Obama needs a warrior to bring the smackdown
- added June 11, 2008
- 9 responses
-


-
-
-
- smorrisey
- added this
-
-
-
-
- barackobama
- drinks McCain's milkshake - he drinks it up
-
-
- related topics
-
- News and Politics (32487)
- Politics (20451)
- Barack Obama (2647)
- Election 2008 (2291)
- Foreign Policy (127)
- GObama (90)
- Joe Biden (76)
- Good Ideas (45)
- Vice President (39)
- Op Ed (27)
- Washington insiders (1)
With economic distress so high, and with John McCain claiming national security as his trump card, Democrats may again be tempted to play down foreign affairs so they can turn the election into a fight over domestic questions about which McCain has had little to say.
Evading national security, says Sen. Joe Biden (D-Del.), would be a disastrous mistake. "The only way we lose this election is not to engage this issue head-on," Biden said during an interview in his Capitol office the day after Obama clinched the nomination. Democrats, Biden said, should be "proactive" and not "play defense on foreign affairs" because "the case against McCain and Bush on national security is so overwhelming. . . . It should be an essential part of the case for the Democratic nominee."
He should be at the top of any list of vice presidential picks for Obama. Why Biden? Few Democrats know more about foreign policy, and few would so relish the fight against McCain on international affairs. Few are better placed to argue that withdrawal from Iraq will strengthen rather than weaken the United States.
The worst thing in a running mate is the fear of muddying his or her image in political combat. Biden would be a happy warrior.
He was born in Scranton, Pa., an essential state for Democrats, and has been a regular in the Philadelphia media market. Pennsylvania Gov. Ed Rendell, himself a plausible No. 2, has called Biden "a perfect fit." The senator has been through two of his own presidential campaigns, in which he experienced what an acquaintance of his called the "white-hot heat" of scrutiny.
Biden is Catholic and hails from a blue-collar world, two constituencies with which Obama needs help. The chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee and former chairman of the Judiciary Committee, Biden speaks with real learning on international affairs and the judiciary -- the next vacancies on the Supreme Court should be a big issue in this campaign -- while never sounding like an elitist.
But the central reason to pick Biden is the message the choice would send about Obama's readiness to contest national security issues and his understanding that fixing American foreign policy must be one of the next president's highest priorities.
Biden has been critical of Bush's approach to Iraq and the world for the right reasons, and from the beginning. Even before the war began, Biden was warning of the costs of a lengthy occupation and predicting a decade-long intervention.
To restore its strength and influence, the United States needs to return to the realistic internationalism of FDR, Truman and, yes, the first President Bush. Whether or not Obama picks Biden, he should listen to what Biden is saying. Obama can't sidestep the foreign policy debate. He has to win it.
Evading national security, says Sen. Joe Biden (D-Del.), would be a disastrous mistake. "The only way we lose this election is not to engage this issue head-on," Biden said during an interview in his Capitol office the day after Obama clinched the nomination. Democrats, Biden said, should be "proactive" and not "play defense on foreign affairs" because "the case against McCain and Bush on national security is so overwhelming. . . . It should be an essential part of the case for the Democratic nominee."
He should be at the top of any list of vice presidential picks for Obama. Why Biden? Few Democrats know more about foreign policy, and few would so relish the fight against McCain on international affairs. Few are better placed to argue that withdrawal from Iraq will strengthen rather than weaken the United States.
The worst thing in a running mate is the fear of muddying his or her image in political combat. Biden would be a happy warrior.
He was born in Scranton, Pa., an essential state for Democrats, and has been a regular in the Philadelphia media market. Pennsylvania Gov. Ed Rendell, himself a plausible No. 2, has called Biden "a perfect fit." The senator has been through two of his own presidential campaigns, in which he experienced what an acquaintance of his called the "white-hot heat" of scrutiny.
Biden is Catholic and hails from a blue-collar world, two constituencies with which Obama needs help. The chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee and former chairman of the Judiciary Committee, Biden speaks with real learning on international affairs and the judiciary -- the next vacancies on the Supreme Court should be a big issue in this campaign -- while never sounding like an elitist.
But the central reason to pick Biden is the message the choice would send about Obama's readiness to contest national security issues and his understanding that fixing American foreign policy must be one of the next president's highest priorities.
Biden has been critical of Bush's approach to Iraq and the world for the right reasons, and from the beginning. Even before the war began, Biden was warning of the costs of a lengthy occupation and predicting a decade-long intervention.
To restore its strength and influence, the United States needs to return to the realistic internationalism of FDR, Truman and, yes, the first President Bush. Whether or not Obama picks Biden, he should listen to what Biden is saying. Obama can't sidestep the foreign policy debate. He has to win it.
-
House Judiciary Committee, Senate Foreign Relations Committee is a pretty impressive slate. I fully agree and when there were still eight or nine debaters on the platform on the Democratic side, Biden was THE man in foreign policy. Mike Gravel ended the draft with his historical filibuster but only Biden could address a strong foreign policy message with intense facts. That's his background and he was under rated and also told that he talked too much by a few idiot pundits. That was when they asked him in an embarrassingly moronic fashion if he was long winded all the time and he answered "NO!." As Obama's VP he could go to bat in a big way and win the constituencies mentioned in the Post article. It seems to be a good fit and it would add a little gray hair to the ticket and that's a good thing. Biden has the credentials and will not trip on his words when it comes to our nation's security and rating on the world's stage. In fact, when I too the politmeter test on line two years ago, kind of like the religion meter test, Biden came out as pne of the two candidates that held my views.on domestic and foreign policy.
I think he would be an excellent choice. Certainly not a neophyte and that's a good thing. Definitely food for thought and I agree the Democrats MUST act fast here as they are being touted as the party that's soft on defense. A neocon can even take the legacy of FDR and distort it. The party must act and now and Obama has to address this before there is any hijinks from you know who. There needs to be a strong focus From June through September so there is no October surprise. Private Ibber-
-
-
-
- privateibber
- 2 months ago
-
-
Sounds promising. I wonder what spokespeople for Sen. Obama's campaign had to say??
-
-
-
-
- arturogarza
- 2 months ago
-
-
Sounds promising.
-
Check Biden's voting record on the war before you get too excited about him liberals. He doesn't seem like a bad choice if you are looking for an experienced candidate, but I think he's more to the 'right' on foreign policy.
Plus historically I think VP's candidates for Democrats are usually bible belt southerners (think Edwards) and that's the voting block that Obama needs. -
I'm sure that Obama can beat McCain in a debate over any topic; just make sure neither candidate has ear pieces and McCain won't be able to handle Obama.
-
-
-
-
- cerealforeal
- 2 months ago
-
-
Biden is a much, much, MUCH better fit than Rendell. Biden is a good choice, with Edwards as AG and Richardson as Secretary of State.
-
-
-
-
- 96thdayofrage
- 2 months ago
-
-
The Atlantic article "spoke" to me as it called for immediate action. Taking a real stand in this area. A smackdown I think they called it. This is the one area where the current bunch seems to be able to turn people's heads. It is with fear that they do it. Wouldn't it be great if the Democrats could do it with REAL statistics. As far as Biden being "too right" well it's a balancing act. I envision Edwards, Dodd and a few others as well. It's an American Idol world, unfortunately, and that has to be taken into account.
Who is best for the country and who makes the winning team. It's pretty simple.
Whatever duo can mount the trapeze or high wire and display balance has the best chance. I would love nothing more than to see a world of pure dove thinking. I believe that full transparency (which Obama is already asking for) would decide the justification for any action or presence in any area.
The matter is to start now with this very important point. The two greatest reasons I have heard for people not voting for Obama is that he is too far to the left and that he is soft or not too savvy in world affairs. The post 9-11 world has left many people in great fear. Fear which has never really been addressed. Fear that remains silent for more fear of being called "unpatriotic." That has to be taken on and not lightly.
I just don't want the nitpicking-I say that lovingly as a quarreling family might do- of the different factions of the Democratic party to inadvertently make way for a GOP victory. Private Ibber-
-
-
-
- privateibber
- 2 months ago
-
-
i think he should pick Michelle as his VP.
-
-
-
-
- DefenderOfPants
- 2 months ago
-
-
96thday of rage: I totally agree with your choices. Obama's choices are critical. Private Ibber
-
-
-
-
- privateibber
- 2 months ago
-
Login/Registration is required to add a response.
