TV Schedule

What's your water footprint?

  1. JanforGore
  2. related topics
Water conservation can begin with your dinner plate. Sure, it looks like merely a hamburger with cheese, a baked potato and a cup of coffee.

But look at it in terms of water: ● It took about 464 gallons of water to produce that quarter pound of beef, ● 108 gallons to produce a potato, ● 37 gallons to make 1 ounce of cheese ● and 37 gallons of water to create your 8-ounce cup of coffee.

This concept of calculating how much water goes into the production of food or other items is called "virtual water." Instead of seeing only the item in front of you — say, a ribeye steak — you look at where it came from, how the cattle was raised, how many gallons of water were used in irrigation to produce the feed the cattle ate, how many gallons of water were used to create the fertilizer and pesticides used in raising the feed corn, how much water was consumed by the actual animal, how many resources went into getting that animal from the ranch to the slaughter house to the packing plant to the store to you.

As food and energy costs continue to rise, and concern about the effects of global warming increases, many consumers are looking at choices differently. Our community consolidates car trips to save gas and plans meals based on coupons and sales instead of convenience.

Water is a prized resource in our part of the world and we face huge policy questions as communities in Arizona continue to grow in size and population. We must come to terms with how we use this priceless and limited commodity.

snip

"I think people at the global level are talking about this with global trading in food, but it's only now becoming a local issue," said Pat Gober, the co-director of the Decision Center for a Desert City at Arizona State University. "If somebody in Phoenix consumes a hamburger it's not consuming much of Phoenix's water, but it's consuming Brazil's water, or wherever the beef was raised. It's the globalization of our food supply.

"Food as a way of conserving water," said Gober. "I think it's an important thing to think about."

How much water do you really use?

~~~~~~~~~~
When adding up all of the water you use in just one day to shower, drink, cook, clean, eat, prepare food, and for sanitation, not to mention recreation, pools, sprinklers, watering lawns, washing cars, washing clothes, etc., it is astounding to see the total. And the impacts of that use are felt globally.

http://www.waterfootprint.org can help you calculate your water footprint and give you information about how to bring it down. It is only when we begin to look beyond the dinner plate and the tangible items to see what goes into them that we become more aware and more enpowered in our choices. And that can have a positive global effect, especially now as not only 45 % of our country is in some stage of drought, but much of our world.
JanforGore

50 responses // What's your water footprint?

  • And, nuclear power plants use an enormous amount of water, almost unfathomable. To consider creating more nuclear power plants as a source of energy is a really bad idea (understatement) - not only because of the toxic waste, but the water waste - especially with our drought conditions, and increase in population here in the west and other locations around the world in similar conditions. I've been wondering where pro nuclear people are thinking the water is going to come from as they lobby to build more and more as an alternative energy source.
    SeaJade
  • Can you imagine? One plant using 3 BILLION gallons a day? As you stated, unfathomable.
    JanforGore
  • It is amazing that we do not think about water conservation when we have plenty of it.
    We do try to conserve it in every way we can. I love showers but some days I skip one. We also try to flush our toilet if it is number 2 and skip it couple of times.
    stopnoise
  • watch this comment being used here, here and here
    To really understand the impact of our water consumption requires a big change in thinking. I'm conscious of the water I use directly from the sink/shower/toilet but I've never really considered the amount of water that is consumed by food production. An interesting eye opener. This also makes me think about textile production (such as cotton) and its impact on water use.
    sapere_aude
  • Yes I have never thought of my food in terms of water footprint. This is definitely something to consider.
    jubal
  • I'm so glad we are thinking water! Like I've mentioned before, water seems like such an easy alternative to gasoline-run vehicles... but not in the long run... As a society we have to reduce consumption in all areas. Our materialism is seeped in droughts and deficits!
    jjmaster
  • Spend more money converting more water. Less money on war.

    Problem solved.

    Move on.
    J_Jammer
  • This is a big eye opener. Makes me want to look a little deeper into what really goes into a lot of products.
    VigorousAlloy
  • I'm sure finding a more Green way of going about making things will truly make people of such a mindset feel so much better.
    J_Jammer
  • Why does it matter how much water we use?
    4free
  • We should slow our breathing to save oxygen. SAVE THE OXYGEN!
    willyb
  • watch this comment being used here, here, here and here
    i'm all about helping out the environment as much as we can, but the whole green lexicon is beginning to get on my nerves. the 'footprint' thing is annoying enough -- first carbon, and now water? eco-spare me!
  • I think it is important for all of us to practice a little conservation and that it’s equally important that the government should reform our method of farming and livestock production. None source pollutants from animal feed lots, pastures and farms do a fair amount of damage to our ground and surface water. Without a comprehensive plan to deal with waste water we’re doomed. This is just as important as dealing with global warming.

    As the population continues to grow we need to start implementing the technologies to recycle and reuse the water we pollute. We’re at point now we can’t rely on the earth’s natural processes to replenish our water supply. So we need to learn to conserve and recycle everything.

    We don’t toss our waste onto the street side anymore so it makes no sense that we can allow livestock to use our lands as a toilet. They either have to get out of the field or we need to potty train them. Crops should be grown with hydroponics. Take the plant out of the ground and eliminate pollution from pesticides and organic fertilizers. Plus hydroponics requires less water and nutrients and as an added bonus waste water can easily be collected and treated.
    Ricky84
  • We should become more aware of the water we use daily from our plates to industry because the meat industry uses billions of gallons of water to produce meat, including the growing of corn for feed which is very water intensive to the production of it with factory farms that also seep fertilizers and pesticides into our open waterways.

    Once we become more cognizant of the effects our actions have on the world we can then make choices to modify our diets for the better. I personally do not eat meat anymore but that doesn't mean I would push others into doing the same... at least if they think about modifying their diets to lessen the effect on the environment. With the population reaching 7 billion with projections of it going to 9 billion we cannot continue to destroy rainforest for cattle grazing, and we cannot continue to pollute our waterways with toxins when we need that water for survival.

    There are also vegetables however that are water intensive as well (potatoes, peppers, etc) so researching that can not only lead you to a more sustainable diet to lessen the footprint on the planet, but can also be healthier for you.

    And this isn't as much about being "green" as it is about being a responsible steward of this planet. For those who choose to bow out of that, fine. Those who choose to actually respect that Earth that gives them so much and are informed of where this planet currently stands in terms of its health should then not be mocked. The state of this planet determines our own state, and right now the planet is sick, mostly due to the human behavior of ravaging it for selfish gain. To me that is not our purpose here and water is our most precious resource that we certainly are taking for granted.

    So also to the one who asked why it matters how much water we use, do some research on the drought in California and how they got there, and why the Colorado River no longer flows to the Gulf of Mexico, and why the dead zones there are getting bigger. That didn't happen "naturally." That was us wasting it as if we are so arrogant to think it is just all there for us to take without thinking of tomorrow.
    JanforGore
  • Yes. Soon the water cycle will no longer work. It'll be broken. We'll have to find that dusty spare we have somewhere. Mother Earth hide it.
    J_Jammer
  • I think most people don't realize why this is such a major issue. Of all the water on earth, only 2.5% is fresh water, the rest is salt water.

    Less than 1% of the world's fresh water (~0.007% of all water on earth) is accessible for direct human use. This is the water found in lakes, rivers, reservoirs and those underground sources that are shallow enough to be tapped at an affordable cost. Only this amount is regularly renewed by rain and snowfall, and is therefore available on a sustainable basis.

    Our growing population using water as if it is an infinite resource means that this level of use is not sustainable.
    recommended by  JanforGore
    jefftego
  • Yes, and with the world's glaciers melting at an accelerated rate the snowpack billions of people rely on for water (the Himalayas as a good example) is disappearing because the hydrologic cycle is being interrupted by evaporation and erratic weather patterns due to climate change. Thanks jefftego. I suppose there will always be knats on these sites who have to fly around to bothers others. I just shew them away.
    JanforGore
  • Jan, I hear you. I like to think that those people just don't know the details. A lot of issues like this are counter-intuitive and it makes them easy to dismiss. It's easy to think that concern over water is going overboard.

    The first time I heard that eating less meat lowers your water and carbon footprint, my immediate reaction was "Come on, that's too far out there for me." Then I did some reading on it and learned that it was true, to my surprise.

    Maybe I am being too optimistic, but hopefully some of the comments are just from gut reactions and lack of knowing. And posts like these will help put people on the path to understanding the details behind the issues.
    jefftego
  • 108 gallons to produce a potato?? That seems a very lot for one potato!!!
    Merge9
  • It also makes sense to remember that water is recycled by the planet, so every gallon used is not gone forever.
    However, pollution by chemical, radiation, mining, and other industrial activities has the potential to poision the water beyond our planet's ability to regenerate it.
    MoonLoon
  • I thought the figures in this article looked conservative. Check this link to vegsource for a different view on how much each uses. These are more in line with what I had previously read.

    An unbelievable difference and a tragic waste of resources just for the taste of some beef.
    Merge9
  • i didn't read all the responses, but that pic makes me want a steak and potato dinner.
    Rjc808
  • Rice
    Water footprint: 3400 litres for 1 kg of rice.

    The rice fields in the world consume about 1350 billion cubic meters of water annually, which is 21 % of the global water use for crop production.
    Paddy rice (the rice as harvested from the field) has consumed 2300 litres of water per kg.

    One kg of paddy rice produces 0.67 kg of milled rice on average.
    In the shop we buy milled rice in the form of white rice or broken rice.
    In this form, rice costs 3400 litres of water per kg.
    This total volume of water refers to a mix of rainwater (‘green water’) and irrigation water (‘blue water’).
    The ratio of blue to green water depends on the production circumstances at the place of growth.
    In China for example, most rice is irrigated, which means a relatively high ratio blue/green, while in India irrigation of rice is much less common.

    International rice trade brings along large international virtual water flows.
    The sum of virtual water flows between countries related to rice trade is about 75 billion cubic meters of virtual water per year.


    That a whole lot of water when rice doesn't even have much taste
    Argon18
  • Our society is so wasteful. People only care when they HAVE TO. "The man never worried until the well went dry..."
    onechance
  • I put a brick in the toilet tank. Does that help?
    http://a-civilife.blogspot.com
    WillBFair
  • onechance
  • This entire topic is great, however, it seems that objectivity is being lost. I asked the question last week as to the number of cattle now vs. the number of Bison around 1800, before their mass slaughter.
    No one answered, so I Googled today. There were up to 60 million Bison roaming the Plains. There are 97.1 million cattle in the U.S. right now. Bison are about 40% larger than cattle so their "footprint" should be about 40% larger. I know that their efficiency was better and more suitable to the environment. Even so, how can you make a logical case against beef production? No one has considered the incremental effect of beef production, you are only broadcasting the total effect of beef production. The reduction in Bison numbers has almost completely offset the increase in cattle numbers. I have no problem with the belief's and philosophy of "Vegans". I do have a problem with facts being distorted, amended, or ignored when presenting a case. Cattle are typically raised on pasture not suitable for crops, their water and grass consumption is returned to nourish the Earth, just as nature intended. Vegetables also require huge amounts of energy, fertilizer, fuel, pesticides, and herbicides, very few return what they take back into the soil, thus the need for crop rotation. For every vegan site I could find numerous agronomy articles that did not support the facts presented by the Vegan sites. So who do I believe?
    MoonLoon
  • MoonLoon:

    Of course you'll find sites to contradict veggie sites... The beef industry is a multi million/billion? dollar industry... You know how much media power that buys?

    -By the way, not everyone's VEGAN (some people are vegetarian, some are pestcatarian etc).

    As far as who to believe, I have a problem believing sources that are monatarialy motivated, and have a much easier time listening to and having more faith in people that actually post things, publish websites, and are generally outspoken due to their passion and CARE for their environment.

    It's just common sense.
    onechance
  • ooooooooooo pleeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeze....

    my water footprint....this nonsense has got to stop - statistics mind games.... the damn planet is virtually MADE of water....and air, and Co2.

    60 gallons of water to produce potatoes. uh oh, I guess we'll have to stop eating to save the planet.

    I wonder how much more water goes into a GM potato?

    How many of you who support this nonsense will be willing to "eliminate" you and your family's footprint when asked to by some unelected politician? Think about where this is all leading? Did you happen to notice the Quietus pills in the movie "Children of Men"?
  • You know what, i think that this conservationist effort is getting out of hand. What do you think will happen when you try and domesticate millions of people into one megalithic civilization, you'll get over crowded streets, over consumption, pollution, toxic emissions because of the over production of resources, congestion, come on!!! The damage is done!!! the earth was here billions of years before we arrived, I'm sure it can last a couple more billion years, damn, just eat sleep and live!!!
    Mobius2012
  • When water shortages reach their peak, people will get that conservation matters...The costs of water will rise far beyond the costs of oil...This "commodity," and lack thereof could bring the eve of total destruction... We had better care about it... I personally have not eaten meat for thirty years after being raised on it at breakfast, lunch, and dinner! It's not that difficult to let go of the old ways... We just need LOUD education, and firm resolves.
    jjmaster
  • Excellent post. If you're looking for ways to reduce usage, save water and clean water at home, please visit www.friendsofwater.com. Lots of information and products to save, filter and celebrate water.
    TimothyH