9/11 third tower mystery 'solved'
- added July 4, 2008
- 82 responses
-
-
-
-
- TravG73
- added this
-
-
- related topics
-
- News and Politics (33720)
- News (15777)
- US (2278)
- War on Terror (374)
- 9/11 (242)
- 09/11 (232)
- BBC (196)
- World Trade Center (35)
The final mystery of 9/11 will soon be solved, according to US experts investigating the collapse of the third tower at the World Trade Center.
-
fires give us a break we are not that stupid
-
from the article:
"However, a group of architects, engineers and scientists say the official explanation that fires caused the collapse is impossible. Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth argue there must have been a controlled demolition."-
-
-
-
- stephenthomson
- 2 months ago
-
-
Conspiracy theories can raise interesting points and I'm sure some of them may have a hint of truth. The problem is there is not one Truth. No one will ever know the whole version of it - not even the people in power.
-
This conspiracy just won't die.
FUCKBush a couple weeks ago you were screaming about how tower two was never hit remember that.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2iGYVh7HZo8&feature=... -
U.S experts blew'em up..
so it'll be there answer... ppl still beleave OSAMA did it...
dahh! -
-
maasanova? That's the video I'll never get over.
-
Love that post, maasanova. I hope that is the comment picked, if this makes it to TV.
On a lighter note, why is it always "US Investigators?" Let's get another Country into the mix. One that cannot be compromised by the US government, one that cannot be corrupted by the US government, one that will speak the truth.
Tower's one and two have been debunked a million times, and countered a million times. Fact is, they were hit by a plane. Yes, the collapse COULD HAVE been a controlled demolition, but we will, likely, never know. My only issue with this whole 9/11 thing is Tower 7. It did not collapse by fire, give me a break.-
-
-
-
- Midnight_DevilX
- 2 months ago
-
-
We may never know, but our grandchildren may. I do know I don't trust a word from this administration and sure have my doubts. Bush and Cheny are very evil men who have killed many innocent people for thier own ends and this would mot surprise me even a little bit. There are to many things pointing at thier involvement to disregard this as a coincidence. The jury is still out but I hear the fix is in.
-
Yes Tower 7 is the achilles heal.
-
Engineer Gordon Ross MEng. at the Indian YMCA, London on the 8th June 2007 analyses the destruction of the Twin Towers of the World Trade Center on September 11th 2001. Pretty irrefutable, I reckon.
-
vibration from the twin towers falling wouldnt contribute to tower seven collapsing?
-
jeromecon, it's sad that our government actually has to pay someone to say what you just said.
no shit people, move on!-
-
-
-
- RudyRudell
- 2 months ago
-
-
The BBC reporters had also solved the collapse of the WTC on September 13, 2001, only two days after the attacks and three years before the official 9/11 investigation.
Their diagram says 800 degrees is hot enough to melt steel lol!
"It was the fire that killed the buildings. There's nothing on earth that could survive those temperatures with that amount of fuel burning," said structural engineer Chris Wise.
"The columns would have melted, the floors would have melted and eventually they would have collapsed one on top of each other."
However, you can't just go around changing the laws of physics on the account of 9/11. See:
Name: Iron
Symbol: Fe
Atomic Number: 26
Atomic Mass: 55.845 amu
Melting Point: 1535.0 °C (1808.15 K, 2795.0 °F)
BBC = Zero credibility when it comes to 9/11. -
BOY, how stupid do they think we are? WTC7 is so inexplicable that rather than make an attempt, the official commission left it out of the investigation altogether. There wasn't even going to be an investigation until the families of those killed held a candlelight vigil in front of the White House more than a year after the event itself.
-
We Are Change UK interviews the BBC's Phil Hayton, the newscaster from that day, on why WTC7 was reported to have collapsed when it was still standing.
-
big foot did it
-
Wow, has noone heard of Zeitgeist? So far it, to me, has been the most convincing documentary to blaming the government of 9/11. On zeitgeistmovie.com they show every source and have an FAQ if you dont think a source is legit. 9/11 was an event like the bomb attack on the trade centers in 1993, to instill fear in the public to pass Anti-Terrorist Legislation, strip our rights as Americans, so we can't rise. crazy? I highly recommend you watch it. the full movie is on their website.
<object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value=" http://www.youtube.com/v/7_E4N5YIycI&hl=en&fs=1... name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><embed src=" http://www.youtube.com/v/7_E4N5YIycI&hl=en&fs=1... type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object> -
-
It's another BS report by a group of Theorizing scientists. The article states clearly that they had no evidence to analyze so their guess is as good as the 9/11 truth scientists. Neither one can analyze anything. Science is developing experiments that can be reproduced and peer reviewed.
-
-
-
-
- Psychedelic
- 2 months ago
-
-
Most conspiracy ideas hinge on one fact, steel doesn't melt in 800* fire.
This is just an ignorance of science and a confirmation bias at its best. True, steel doesnt turn into a LIQUID until heated to over 1500*, but it does surely melt and weaken at 800* to the point where it becomes more brittle, and under pressure snaps.
It is hard for the mind to comprehend that a few dozen men in Afghanistan with $400k planned and executed these attacks; but it is truth. It is our fault as citizens that we allowed our government to use fear to lead us to war and infringe on our rights. Own up to it. -
I don't buy alot of conspiracies but how did the BBC get that story before it happened??? It wasnt hit how did it fall...sceptics cant answer that one (tower 7).
-
-
-
-
- gemenilaidback
- 2 months ago
-
-
Larry Silverstein had stated on PBS in 2002 that he "pulled" ( demolished ) WTC7. He later tried to cover up that by saying pulled meant getting fireman out of the building. Whatever Larry. We know you just wanted your money. Oh, and kinda strange that you put an insurance policy for 7 billion two weeks prior to 9/11.
And now they wanna investigate this to end up telling us the same nonsense from before? -
Um.....call me unamerican....or just really bad memory cuz i was in 8th grade when this happened but....i didn't even know there was a third building until just now...
-
-
-
-
- SilenceNoMore
- 2 months ago
-
-
Why don't the Feds take credit for a fabulous and infallible plan to protect the nations secrets.
Even if it were really unlikely coincidence the feds would want our enemies to think they were so smart and all powerful.
1: They thought the secrets were in danger.
2: They couldn't leave anyone to protect the secrets because they don't believe in suicide missions.
3: It worked perfectly and nobody else got hurt.
I would have hated to be the one to push the button, but the concept is one I would approve of.-
-
-
-
- CaptSutter
- 2 months ago
-
-
there was an explosion
-
-
-
-
- resin_lungs420
- 2 months ago
-
-
Building 7 (The Solomon) must have been the most strongly re-inforced structure of all the WTC buildings when one considers what all it housed.
Amazing. -
i would just like to say that i believe it was an inside job and i hate the fact that i believe our gov. would do something like this, but i have looked at all the evidence and it is the only conclusion i could come to. so if any of you so called debunkers have any evidence that someone other than the gov. did this , could you please share it with me. also calling me a conspiracy nut or a tin hat wearing koolaid drinker doesn't convince me.
-
If the collapse is easily explained, why isn't the justice department looking for the architects of this great accomplishment of destroying three buildings. Where are the accountability? Who is the culprit? Was there really a demolition company in New York that week? Did they clear 3 entire floors in each building for a week? Who was NOT in the buildings when they should have been? Just a few I would like to know.
-
-
-
-
- GoodGodGuy
- 2 months ago
-
-
I believe it was a Corporate tactic to make money. Save on an investment and turn it into earnings. While at the same time make money of the disaster, the cleanup, and the rebuilding. Not to mention all the corporate lawsuits that were interrupted cause of all the case files against them being in WTC7......
-
-
-
-
- Magnus_Kain
- 2 months ago
-
-
I think everyone who is saying 9/11 was an inside job is vastly overestimating our governments competence.
-
-
-
-
- marco_polo86
- 2 months ago
-
-
how does it take them this long to figure it out? i think they already know....
-
-
-
-
- currentkid
- 2 months ago
-
-
i'm so confused...if tower 7 was a controlled demo - and the government had the same amount of competence as a supposed terrorist network (marco_polo quotes south park) - then what does that mean? how do we react as a people if we can decidedly say that the bush administration killed all those people?
-
-
-
-
- oneofthree
- 2 months ago
-
-
I can't believe people choose to ignore the impact tower seven has on the events that took place on 9/11 It is a clear demolition which should raise a lot of questions for the citizens of this country.
-
-
-
-
- VynalFrontier
- 2 months ago
-
-
i honestly don't care
-
Things that make you go hmmm...
