The floating cities that could one day house climate refugees
- added July 4, 2008
- 66 responses
-


-
-
-
- JanforGore
- added this
-
-
- related topics
-
- Not News (25492)
- Random (20988)
- Art and Style (18082)
- Culture (15608)
- Earth and Science (12530)
- Tech (7320)
- Environment (5576)
- Technology (3320)
- Climate Change (1665)
- Global Warming (1624)
- Current News US (1489)
- Current News UK (1461)
- Earth (764)
- Future (318)
- Anthropogenic Climate Change (39)
- CO2 Emissions (30)
- Sea Level Rise (17)
- Climate Refugees (12)
At first glance, they look like a couple of giant inflatable garden chairs that have washed out to sea
But they are, apparently, the ultimate solution to rapidly rising sea levels.
This computer-generated image shows two floating cities, each with enough room for 50,000 inhabitants.
Based on the design of a lilypad, they could be used as a permanent refuge for those whose homes have been covered in water. Major cities including London, New York and Tokyo are seen as being at huge risk from oceans which could rise by as much as 3ft by the end of this century.
This solution, by the award-winning Belgian architect Vincent Callebaut, is designed to be a new place to live for those whose homelands have been wiped out.
The 'Lilypad City' would float around the world as an independent and fully self-sustainable home. With a lake at its centre to collect and purify rainwater, it would be accessed by three separate marinas and feature artificial mountains to offer the inhabitants a change of scenery from the seascape.
Power for the central accommodation hub is provided through a series of renewable energy sources including solar panels on the mountain sides, wind turbines and a power station to harness the energy of the waves.
Mr Callebaut said: 'The design of the city is inspired by the shape of the great Amazonia Victoria Regia lilypad. Some countries spend billions of pounds working on making their beaches and dams bigger and stronger.
'But the lilypad project is actually a long-term solution to the problem of the water rising.'
The architect, who has yet to estimate a cost for his design, added: 'It's an amphibious city without any roads or any cars. The whole city is covered by plants housed in suspended gardens.
'The goal is to create a harmonious coexistence of humans and nature.'
'And it has the other objective of providing housing for refugees from islands that have been submerged.'
~~~~~
Well, it certainly is innovative, but I would have many questions about them if it ever came to be. Firstly, only holding 50,000 people, who would get picked to go on them? Also, what about security and provisions? Let us hope it doesn't get this far, although islands like Kiribati, Tuvalu, Vanuatu, and islands near Bangladesh are already dangerously close to getting there. Would you live on one?
But they are, apparently, the ultimate solution to rapidly rising sea levels.
This computer-generated image shows two floating cities, each with enough room for 50,000 inhabitants.
Based on the design of a lilypad, they could be used as a permanent refuge for those whose homes have been covered in water. Major cities including London, New York and Tokyo are seen as being at huge risk from oceans which could rise by as much as 3ft by the end of this century.
This solution, by the award-winning Belgian architect Vincent Callebaut, is designed to be a new place to live for those whose homelands have been wiped out.
The 'Lilypad City' would float around the world as an independent and fully self-sustainable home. With a lake at its centre to collect and purify rainwater, it would be accessed by three separate marinas and feature artificial mountains to offer the inhabitants a change of scenery from the seascape.
Power for the central accommodation hub is provided through a series of renewable energy sources including solar panels on the mountain sides, wind turbines and a power station to harness the energy of the waves.
Mr Callebaut said: 'The design of the city is inspired by the shape of the great Amazonia Victoria Regia lilypad. Some countries spend billions of pounds working on making their beaches and dams bigger and stronger.
'But the lilypad project is actually a long-term solution to the problem of the water rising.'
The architect, who has yet to estimate a cost for his design, added: 'It's an amphibious city without any roads or any cars. The whole city is covered by plants housed in suspended gardens.
'The goal is to create a harmonious coexistence of humans and nature.'
'And it has the other objective of providing housing for refugees from islands that have been submerged.'
~~~~~
Well, it certainly is innovative, but I would have many questions about them if it ever came to be. Firstly, only holding 50,000 people, who would get picked to go on them? Also, what about security and provisions? Let us hope it doesn't get this far, although islands like Kiribati, Tuvalu, Vanuatu, and islands near Bangladesh are already dangerously close to getting there. Would you live on one?
-
-
-
-
- JanforGore
- 3 months ago
-
This may actually be necessary for those refugees who are refused entry to another country due to landspace, population increases, or lack of resources. But again, there would be many questions about them that would need to be answered.
-
-
-
-
- JanforGore
- 3 months ago
-
-
If sea levels were actually a concern, then please explain why the world's elite are building the most modern city on the planet on the shore of Dubai city in the Middle East?
You can watch the astonishing video of the city underway at this web site: http://www.dubai-video.com/
Certainly, the elite would not be building multi-million dollar homes on man made beaches, islands and various shore if sea levels were as risk.-
-
-
-
- onepersonsopinion
- 3 months ago
-
-
Dubai Islands were built to address any change or rise in water levels . But isn't it funny how the middle eastern countries are investing in all things green and innovating their countries and their economies for an oil less global market. If they didn't have their major unrest in the region the middle east would've been a major financial power house. But if they keep up with their vision and hopefully solve their regional unrest , the world will be talking about Qatar and Bahrain as the top dogs not china or India.
-
These things look really doable, as well as aesthetically pleasing. Can anyone say Waterworld, but far more awesome, and less cheesy, and more feasible?
-
-
-
-
- Adumbration
- 3 months ago
-
-
This is the coolest thing I have seen in a really long time.
-
-
-
-
- flamegarden
- 3 months ago
-
-
Where would the human waste go.I hope it is not dumped in the sea,but I doubt this invention will come to reality.
-
Very very cool!
can't wait to look at this more closely...
looks very green.-
-
-
-
- CarolynGillis
- 3 months ago
-
-
This is not a solution to global warming...which of the 50,000 inhabitants will be allowed to float and live on these lilypads? And who decides?
Let's try saving the earth first...let's really do something about global warming and pollution... -
Yes, let's try saving the Earth first.... where then is the action?
-
-
-
-
- JanforGore
- 3 months ago
-
-
Pretty impressive indeed.A bit on the surreal side. No wonder the designer has yet to estimate a cost for his design...Gov'ment Funding I think not...Must be a daring venture Capitalist to pony up !!!!!
-
-
-
-
- silverex87
- 3 months ago
-
-
This just looks ridiculous, I don't mean aesthetically. The idea is stupid, do you really wanna live on a cruise for your whole life? Seasick? Where would the food come from? Will every one be permanently stuck on the island? Do they have to go by helicopter? How will people work? Where would they get their goods?
-
Such propaganda. The elites would love it if they could force us into floating cities. While there free to go about the earth.
-
-
-
-
- PatrioticAstronaut
- 3 months ago
-
-
Use everything you have to ease the stress on the planet. We should treat this crisis like our hair is on fire. We must use all avalible reasources but be carefull not to cut our own heads off in the process.
WE (all 6 billion of us) can do this. -
Wasn't this called Waterworld? Where is Kevin Costner?
-
-
-
-
- marco_polo86
- 3 months ago
-
-
If there's climate change, and the ice caps melt enough to raise sea level that much, then wouldn't there also be other weather concerns? You wouldn't want another Katrina hitting a boat with 50,000 people on it.
-
-
-
-
- ultravphunter
- 3 months ago
-
-
And that is the point to my posting this. We need to then do something about the climate crisis to prevent this from being needed. There is still time to keep this planet from getting to the sixth degree, but we are running out of time to get our act together. And that is not a scare tactic that is reality. As I stated in the original post, islands in the pacific are already near being submerged and some already have been. This is not some fantasy novel scenario we are talking about. I for one would not like to live on one of these pads. However, where will those people on these islands go if countries refuse to take them in if we have not prepared for what is to come and what is already here?
-
-
-
-
- JanforGore
- 3 months ago
-
-
how do you divide up the waters? how do you fight wars? how do you industrialize? water-based cities are far from perfect.... 50000? competition for that would just be crazy.... nevermind the death of all the organisms living below because of no sunlight.... industrial waste go directly into seas along with nuclear by-products... its a hell-hole
-
I bet itas going to be 60% rich & 40% poor, they will need people to pick their fruite & cut their grass & cook their food...
-
i would live on one absolutely it seems fun
-
i like this picture better by the way it shows how the city truly functions -
this is really cool but they're calling it 'the solution to rising sea levels'? abandonment? is this 'Water World' nightmare inevitable now? have we given up?
-
-
-
-
- oneofthree
- 3 months ago
-
-
isn't dubai already doing something similar to this?
-
-
-
-
- Alex_Rowland
- 3 months ago
-
-
Anything beats a FEMA trailer.
-
these islands look cool
-
it won't work. the problem with this is simple, humans have forgotten about a little thing called altruism.
-
Nice idea, but the situation persists and this is not a solution. the Earth is still getting hotter.We still have to deal with the sun and its growing strength.
-
Check out Neal Stephenson's disturbingly prophetic _Snow Crash_. This is The Raft.
-
Waterworld here we come!
-
That's super interesting, but how sustainable are they (how long will they last with 50,000 people living on them?) And... who is going to pay for these huge floating cities?
-
-
-
-
- huffamoose2k
- 3 months ago
-
-
This could very well be the way of the future, with the sea levels rising and urban centers becoming overpopulated, any ideas to create more space are needed
-
looks like a carvaval cruise ship...
-
-
-
-
- sufferahsmusic
- 3 months ago
-
-
These could be a solution..but what ever happened to atlantis....but still might be very nice idea!
-
-
-
-
- metalcookiesxy70
- 3 months ago
-
-
yea! take that kevin costner and water world! we'll find a solution even to destroying the planet and continue to survive. cockroaches and humans, the only creatures of the future.
-
If there's any deceny the people who should get first pick are the people who live over in Somoa and Indonesia. If their islands go underwater alot of people are going to drown.
-
-
-
-
- Frier_peppino
- 3 months ago
-
-
Too bad not in our time.
-
-
-
-
- cerealforeal
- 3 months ago
-
-
I think they should build these cities whether or not the ocean levels rise, they are so cool.
-
from what i can gather this is going to be in our future and im glad there are plans for this.. with the polar caps melting, no ice in the north pole this going to happen for sure. sad but true.
-
I think for all the efforts being put into rebuilding Southern Louisiana and the Gulf Coast...there needs to be a dose of reality brought into the problem with our ever changing world. If there truly is no stopping the changes going on, then mankind needs to accept the fact that some places on our planet will no longer be inhabitable. You can say as much as you want about the history and love for cities like New Orleans, New York City, London, Hong Kong etc...but that is not gonna stop planet earth from stopping massive changes to it's environment that have gone on since it's birth. There is a reason why certain creatures on earth have survived for so long while others haven't. They learned to adapt to their environment and RELOCATED. We must change the way we plant our "roots" here on earth. It's the nomadic way of life that got mankind this far...if we ignore this fact...we may all become cavemen again.
