Anglican Church divided over women bishops
- added July 05, 2008
- 5 responses
-

-
-
-
- SilenceNoMore
- added this
-
-
- related topics
-
- News and Politics (45987)
- News (28638)
- Religion (2311)
- Women's Rights (189)
- Church of England (9)
The Bishop of Manchester, the Rt Rev Nigel McCulloch, has urged the Church of England Synod to resolve its dispute over how to ordain women as bishops.
Bishop McCulloch said the Synod must not allow a stalemate to develop.
His comments come amid signs of an alliance among traditionalist priests wanting to answer to male bishops only.
The Rev Prebendary Kay Garlick has called on the Synod to be a model of how Christians can "disagree in love" as it debates plans for women bishops.
The Synod has already agreed in principle to ordain women as bishops. Some 1,300 clergy have threatened to leave the Church over the issue.
Unbroken chain
Traditionalists from the Anglo-Catholic wing of the church want the right to opt out of the jurisdiction of a women into special dioceses headed by male bishops, or at least to have guaranteed access to male bishops.
Robert Pigott says the Synod faces an awkward decision about how to treat traditionalists whose religious consciences will not allow them to serve under a women bishop.
He says the Anglo-Catholic Anglicans argue that Jesus chose only men to be his immediate 12 apostles, the men who were given leadership of the early Church.
They point out that an unbroken chain of male bishops has led the Church since then.
Our correspondent says they believe that a man ordained by a woman might not be properly ordained, and might not in reality be a priest.
Such a suggestion is strongly rejected by women priests and many others in the Church.
However, the traditionalists could still get their own way, our correspondent says.
They have formed an alliance with evangelicals who have their own biblical reasons - the belief that men should have authority over women - for demanding the imposition of special conditions before women are ordained as bishops.
Speaking at the opening meeting in York, Ms Garlick, from Much Birch, Herefordshire, acknowledged the outcome of the debate over women bishops would inevitably bring "hurt" to some members.
But she said the Synod should present a model of how Christians who disagree can respect and care for each other.
Meanwhile, a traditionalist Synod member has accused officials of suppressing his call for an explicit policy of converting people of other faiths, including Muslims.
Paul Eddy's motion was backed by about a quarter of the Synod, but officials say the agenda was too crowded.
The Fellowship of Confessing Anglicans - the international alliance of traditionalist Anglicans formed in Jerusalem last week - has made the duty to evangelise other faiths one of its key policies.
The General Synod will also hear a presidential address on Saturday from the Archbishop of York, Dr John Sentamu
-
-
- SilenceNoMore
- 5 months ago
-
First women....then they got distracted by the gays.....now back to women.....ADAPT OR YOUR RELIGION IS DOOMED.
-
-
- SilenceNoMore
- 5 months ago
-
-
A Religion, by the very requirements which make it a religion, cannot adapt.
In other words, if you don't take the whole of your Holy book as god's word, and therefore unchangeable, you're not really following a religion as such, but using your own judgement, and thinking for yourself. This is something religion is understandibly not too keen on, for painfully obvious reasons, namely: the beliefs contained in them are completely ridiculous, and collapse under the slightest scrutiny.
-
rwylie thats bull.......christianity picks and chooses all the time, the same book that they use to bash gays says that anyone who eats shellfish or sleeps in the same bed as a woman who is menstrating should be put to death.
plus the thing about women isnt in the bible, its merely the argument that since the apostles were male women shouldnt preach...which is NOT expressly stated or implied in the bible.
-
-
- SilenceNoMore
- 5 months ago
-
-
All true, but I don't think what I said was bull. If people aren't sticking to their holy texts then they are not being truly religious; they should open their eyes and see that the texts are so ambiguous as to be divisive and damaging.
-
I don't see how their argument stands, who appointed the leaders that chose them so far back, not the twelve disciples they talk about. Then Jesus also had Mary Magdalene (a woman) to remember him and his teachings. I just don't get how the Anglo-Catholic Anglicans find someone who has studied the doctrines and history as much as the other guys is valued lower than the others, its just not right.
