9/11 third tower mystery 'solved' But many Questions Still Unanswered
- added July 5, 2008
- 2 responses
-
-
-
- WorldPeaceTV
- added this
-
-
- related topics
-
- News and Politics (39372)
- News (21646)
- Current TV (9574)
- Current (2745)
- Peace (753)
- September 11 (59)
The 47-story third tower, known as Tower Seven, collapsed seven hours after the twin towers.Investigators are expected to say ordinary fires on several different floors caused the collapse.
Conspiracy theorists have argued that the third tower was brought down in a controlled demolition.Unlike the twin towers, Tower Seven was not hit by a plane.
There are a number of facts that have encouraged conspiracy theories about Tower Seven.
* Although its collapse potentially made architectural history, all of the thousands of tonnes of steel from the skyscraper were taken away to be melted down.
* The third tower was occupied by the Secret Service, the CIA, the Department of Defence and the Office of Emergency Management, which would co-ordinate any response to a disaster or a terrorist attack. (BIG Flag here)
* The destruction of the third tower was never mentioned in the 9/11 Commission Report. The first official inquiry into Tower Seven by the Federal Emergency Management Agency was unable to be definitive about what caused its collapse. (Hmmm!)
* In May 2002 FEMA concluded that the building collapsed because intense fires had burned for hours, fed by thousands of gallons of diesel stored in the building. But it said this had "only a low probability of occurrence" and more work was needed. (Yea, right!)
Read the linked story and come to your own conclusions. There are still many unanswered questions and, in my opinion, suspicious reasons why the building HAD to be brought down.
Conspiracy theorists have argued that the third tower was brought down in a controlled demolition.Unlike the twin towers, Tower Seven was not hit by a plane.
There are a number of facts that have encouraged conspiracy theories about Tower Seven.
* Although its collapse potentially made architectural history, all of the thousands of tonnes of steel from the skyscraper were taken away to be melted down.
* The third tower was occupied by the Secret Service, the CIA, the Department of Defence and the Office of Emergency Management, which would co-ordinate any response to a disaster or a terrorist attack. (BIG Flag here)
* The destruction of the third tower was never mentioned in the 9/11 Commission Report. The first official inquiry into Tower Seven by the Federal Emergency Management Agency was unable to be definitive about what caused its collapse. (Hmmm!)
* In May 2002 FEMA concluded that the building collapsed because intense fires had burned for hours, fed by thousands of gallons of diesel stored in the building. But it said this had "only a low probability of occurrence" and more work was needed. (Yea, right!)
Read the linked story and come to your own conclusions. There are still many unanswered questions and, in my opinion, suspicious reasons why the building HAD to be brought down.
-
-
-
-
- WorldPeaceTV
- 3 months ago
-
Here's the video of the building coming down-
-
-
-
- WorldPeaceTV
- 3 months ago
-
-
It would be interesting to know how the computer modeling was done and what initial assumptions were made. If it was assumed the building collasped due to structural failure cased by collateral damage from the WTT collapses, then the known and assumed data that is input will reflect this assumption. (i.e. the effect of a bomb blast will not be input into the model) However if its assumed that the building came down with the help of a bomb or two, the input into the model will be quite different. To be fair, the model should be run under both scenarios and all the input data fed into the model to arrive at a conclusion made public.
Login/Registration is required to add a response.
