Iraq may force US withdrawal timetable
- added July 7, 2008
- 55 responses
-
-
-
- bansheewail
- added this
-
-
- related topics
-
- News and Politics (39413)
- Politics (27761)
- War (2718)
- Iraq (2038)
- Current News US (1490)
- 2008 Election (1463)
- Election (1188)
- Afghanistan (615)
- Middle East (564)
- US Military (250)
BAGHDAD (Reuters) - Iraqi Prime Minister Nuri al-Maliki raised the prospect on Monday of setting a timetable for the withdrawal of U.S. troops as part of negotiations over a new security agreement with Washington.
It was the first time the U.S.-backed Shi'ite-led government has floated the idea of a timetable for the removal of American forces from Iraq. The Bush administration has always opposed such a move, saying it would give militant groups an advantage.
In a statement, Maliki's office said the prime minister made the comments about the security pact -- which will replace a U.N. mandate for the presence of U.S. troops that expires on December 31 -- to Arab ambassadors in the United Arab Emirates.
"In all cases, the basis for any agreement will be respect for the full sovereignty of Iraq," the statement quoted Maliki as saying.
"The current trend is to reach an agreement on a memorandum of understanding either for the departure of the forces or a memorandum of understanding to put a timetable on their withdrawal."
It said Maliki, who is on an official visit to the United Arab Emirates, was responding to questions from the ambassadors about the security talks with the United States.
U.S. officials in Baghdad had no immediate comment. Last month Maliki appeared to catch Washington off guard when he said talks on the security deal were at a "dead end". Both sides later said progress was being made.
Maliki, dismissed as weak and ineffective for most of his tenure since taking over as prime minister in May 2006, has been increasingly assertive in recent months.
He has launched crackdowns on Shi'ite militias and also al Qaeda militants, with U.S. forces playing a mainly supporting role.
He has also called on Arab states to re-engage with Iraq.
Sunni Arab countries have long been reluctant to extend full legitimacy to the Iraqi government because of the U.S. presence, as well as Baghdad's close ties to non-Arab, Shi'ite Iran.
But Arab ties have begun to improve
It was the first time the U.S.-backed Shi'ite-led government has floated the idea of a timetable for the removal of American forces from Iraq. The Bush administration has always opposed such a move, saying it would give militant groups an advantage.
In a statement, Maliki's office said the prime minister made the comments about the security pact -- which will replace a U.N. mandate for the presence of U.S. troops that expires on December 31 -- to Arab ambassadors in the United Arab Emirates.
"In all cases, the basis for any agreement will be respect for the full sovereignty of Iraq," the statement quoted Maliki as saying.
"The current trend is to reach an agreement on a memorandum of understanding either for the departure of the forces or a memorandum of understanding to put a timetable on their withdrawal."
It said Maliki, who is on an official visit to the United Arab Emirates, was responding to questions from the ambassadors about the security talks with the United States.
U.S. officials in Baghdad had no immediate comment. Last month Maliki appeared to catch Washington off guard when he said talks on the security deal were at a "dead end". Both sides later said progress was being made.
Maliki, dismissed as weak and ineffective for most of his tenure since taking over as prime minister in May 2006, has been increasingly assertive in recent months.
He has launched crackdowns on Shi'ite militias and also al Qaeda militants, with U.S. forces playing a mainly supporting role.
He has also called on Arab states to re-engage with Iraq.
Sunni Arab countries have long been reluctant to extend full legitimacy to the Iraqi government because of the U.S. presence, as well as Baghdad's close ties to non-Arab, Shi'ite Iran.
But Arab ties have begun to improve
-
-
-
-
- bansheewail
- 3 months ago
-
If they don't value our "help", then we should leave.
-
-
-
-
- bansheewail
- 3 months ago
-
-
Thanks-I needed a good laugh. NEWSFLASH: The U.S. will leave Iraq when it's good & ready to-especially if they still have any oil. Remember, it's good & profitable to the last drop! Do you really think our gov't cares about anyone dying-particularly our troops-when there is so much money to be made off of oil. If they did, they wouldn't be stepping up efforts to keep a foothold in the Middle East & would be focusing on sustainable energy sources closer to home. It ain't happening!
-
-
-
-
- darkhorsejim
- 3 months ago
-
-
I don't think it works this way. Yes, there is a moment where the US should leave and this time table SHOULD be told from the America's mouth and not from Iraq itself. This will also avoid being.. Kicked out?
-
Maliki better be careful the repugs are in charge for about 7 more months.That's more than enough time to force another sham election and install someone with their "priorities in order."
-
We are liberaters right? Operation Iraqi FREEDOM ring a bell? But now that they want us out it is operation occupation (aka the never ending story)
-
so let me get this straight. the majority of american's want to withdraw, the iraqi's want us out, our "allies" are withdrawing.
...why are we still there?
OIL!! they're already making underhanded no bid deals folks. everyone called it years ago...and then they went ahead and did it anyways and half of america bought the lies and let'em. sigh. do you think the superbases and the mega-embassy are sign's that the neo-cons are going to accept withdraw any time in the conceivable future? no folks, we're in there, like korea, japan and germany, for good. -
It's time. Where is the UN? Why don't they tell us to get the Hell out?
-
-
-
-
- Marilynn_Murray
- 3 months ago
-
-
Alright, see this proves that they are READY for us to leave. They want us out, the American public wants us out, WHY AREN'T WE OUT!
-
-
-
-
- huffamoose2k
- 3 months ago
-
-
They want us out so we need to leave!
-
-
-
-
- shroomfairy
- 3 months ago
-
-
Well let's add that to the "to do" list.
Impeach Bush/Cheney
Get out of Iraq
that should keep Congress busy for a while, right? -
I was kind of hoping that the Bushs, the Cheney's(minus the lesbo, she can stay), the Libby's, the Rove's and all the other american oil "royalty" ......r"OIL"ty, if you will, will just move in when Obama withdraws our troops. They can all live in the mega-embassy together! They can enjoy Americas newest oil colony themselves. They made it. They can have it. I wonder what their mortgage payment would be??
-
-
-
-
- bansheewail
- 3 months ago
-
-
This is delicious. And I always thought it was best served cold. Someone tell Sen. McCain 100 years is looking like less of a possibility.
-
-
-
-
- bluestranger
- 3 months ago
-
-
bansheewail, Even as a gift that sounds like a good idea. None of the neighbors would like them. Better than protected in a prison. I wonder how long they would last?
-
-
-
-
- Marilynn_Murray
- 3 months ago
-
-
They want us out, we want us out. So we stay and more from both sides die.
-
-
-
-
- cleansouth
- 3 months ago
-
-
The administration started the war for the wrong reason and they had to come up with a new reason... So, We went in for liberation, and ended up in occupation. I'm glad the Iraqi government is starting to take back control from it's un-welcomed guests.
-
-
-
-
- TEC_Photos18
- 3 months ago
-
-
The United States is occupying this country against the will of the majority of Americans, as well as the Iraqi people and now its government. For a long time now the US has been asking Iraq to take responsibility for its own country, give Iraq a chance to do this. Yet it is not something the US is considering. Its belly is not filled to capacity with oil I guess.
-
Sounds like Iraq dosen't want our troops there so I hope Bushie will get us out now. But Iraq dosen't want Bushie there either and we don't want him here in America maybe we will get lucky and he will dissappear or just crawl back under his rock, hopefully a rock on Mars and he takes all his family and cronies with him. America should be so blessed. I hope Iraq can enforce thier desires.
-
Heard this one before. Bush heralds "mission accomplished" 5 years ago and yet we're still at war. Until troops are coming home like moth to a flame then I can believe a withdrawal is near.
-
Iraq should be a issue addressed by the current candidates for the 2008 Elections for president because the Bush administration knows it doesn't have enough time left.
-
Don't worry ladies and gents, Bushie will veto that appropriations supplemental as soon as al-Maliki puts it on his big desk. Those darn Dawas never do what the Republican leadership wants.
-
thats because the republican leadership lacks one key thing... LEADERSHIP!!! they have done nothing but run our country into the ground since their inception. and thats the reason oil sucks too because the exchange rate for the dollar blows... and who's at fault?
-
-
-
-
- TEC_Photos18
- 3 months ago
-
-
This is almost as bad as Vietnam.
-
-
-
-
- flyingkick
- 3 months ago
-
-
watch this comment being used hereHow will it look to the rest of the world when they ask us to leave and we say no? We were to be in and out in six months, remember?
-
-
-
-
- piperpicked
- 3 months ago
-
-
It's about time someone forces a withdrawal
-
If the Sunnis and Shias can play nice( from one country to the next )it will make Dems and Repubs look like fools.
The Iraqis need the help of their neighbors not the Americans. We've done enough damage!
Preemptive war was a tool of the Nazis! McCain says, "100 more years"( maybe ). Some of our troops stationed in other countries have committed hideous crimes long after the war ended( Japan ). The people of Iraq and IT'S government should have the last word. We crammed our word down their throat.-
-
-
-
- macdontcare
- 3 months ago
-
-
I guess sometimes its good to have installed a puppet government in a country. Then when they say something that we all really want, we can just say, "Hey, we disagree (wink, wink)".
Our only purpose there is to hire useless contractors to rebuild nothing but oil infrastructure and stand in the middle with arms outstretched holding back two groups of people ready to go to war with each other. -
I suspect the Bush admin is trying to finalize some kind of deal ASAP, before they leave office and can't control the provisions of the agreement. And perhaps al-Maliki is dragging his heels a bit, waiting us out, so he can deal with an Obama admin instead...???
-
Does anyone think that if we leave that Iraq will not sell us oil? I really don't understand what passes for thinking here. Our troops are in Iraq for no other reason than to provide support for the Iraqi Army and Police who now seem to be firmly in control of the security situation. Bush and Maliki are almost certainly talking about troop withdrawal on a daily basis and I'm sure none of this comes as a shock. Try to step out of fantasy/conspiracy world every once in a while and take stock of the reality around you.
-
Well its about time its been said. The Iraqi governmetn had already said they were ready to control Iraq on their own. But i guess the great "Bush" wants to weight it out and drain every drop of oil and money poured into this war.
-
-
-
-
- Arsenal4Life
- 3 months ago
-
-
I'd say this could be a huge turning point.
-
-
-
-
- compositsketch
- 3 months ago
-
-
Do any of you have one document proving that our country is siphoning oil out of Iraq for profit? I don't agree with being there either but I can't sit by and read unsubstantiated claims being made just because you dislike "dub-yuh" (and I emphasize "dub")...Doesn't Iraq need to pay us for their security in some way?
-
can anyone say,, DING DING Round 3 !!!
meaning,,, we have deployed to iraq 2x since desert storm. if we pull out, the possibility of going back would make that 3x. -
NExt time it's gonna be TKO. If we have to go back that shit hole itts gonna be catastrophic.
-
Let's be excited about this! Regardless of anyone's political position on how our country uses its military, we should all be thankful that we are bringing Americans back home to their own country and families. They have risked their lives, and now we should extend our gratitude.
-
-
-
-
- CicatrizJCP
- 3 months ago
-
-
The title of this post does not reflect the content of this story but the bias of the author
I thought many on current wanted to take care of Mugabe. The terrible man
So now that our soldiers will leave IRAQ, it is your chance.
He has been left alone for 28 years
Talk is cheap -
Why is this a problem? With all of the changing reasons for being there in the first place, that last reason given was to help the Iraqi people until they are ready to 'take care of themselves. So, they are ready to take care of themselves now. This is a good thing. What makes anyone actually believe we won't leave now that we've been asked to leave. I have certainly NEVER heard anyone state an intention to stay regardless of the desires of the Iraqi people. I'm just grateful they are ready to do their own security and soon we won't have to lose any more Americans on their behalf. Now we can send troops to Afganihstan.
We need a draft. There are some that have actually been sent to a war zone >2x...that's BS. Activate the draft now...what's that? the sound of people sucking air? -
Last of the bohicans.
-
-
-
-
- ReluctantD
- 3 months ago
-
-
My son is in the Army and is getting ready for a 2nd tour of duty in Iraq. He says that more and more duties are being taken over by the Iraqi people. They have started doing guard duty at the bases in Baghdad and other places, along with many duties that were once done by US Soldiers. So maybe we will get out of there eventually.
Also, many soldiers are leaving the Army and then going over there to work as a civilian for $100+ grand a year. No wonder our soldiers think they are underpaid.-
-
-
-
- LectrkLady
- 3 months ago
-
-
Now that's a story there....soldiers leaving the Army to work as civillians in Iraq. I absolutely do not blame them for doing so....unless they're working for Blackwater...
