Attempts to defend Obama's shift on Iraq lack logic, seriousness, chronology

Attempts to come to terms with, and to defend, Barack Obama's sudden attempt to walk back the centerpiece of his presidential campaign -- unwavering opposition to the effort in Iraq, regardless of facts on the ground or of new information -- have abounded over the last few days, with each falling well short of anything even remotely resembling intellectual honesty or seriousness.By Jeff Emanuel Posted in 2008 | Barack Obama | New Yorker | Obamafiles

I only copied this one paragraph because the point I want to make is contained within.The repugs keep harping on the point that the situation in Iraq is improving/getting better.The point of our argument should be that the war is illegal to start with.There were no WMD's,Saddam was not involved in 9/11.Therefore we were lied to to start with.Invading a sovereign nation under false pretense is a war crime.(Wikipedia:Any devastation not justified by military necessity)Want for oil is not a military necessity.Political control of an entire region is not military necessity.(Unless you are a repug)

Rep.Dennis Kucunich's 35 articles of impeachment should be brought up by congress immediately.