Obama campaign calls New Yorker cover offensive
- added July 14, 2008
- 5 responses
-

-
-
-
- kushan
- added this
-
-
- related topics
-
- News and Politics (39393)
- Politics (27753)
- Election 2008 (3749)
- US (3238)
- Obama (2723)
- Barackstar (66)
- New Yorker (21)
Sen. Barack Obama's campaign has sharply criticized The New Yorker magazine over the publication's latest cover illustration, which appears to portray the presumptive Democratic presidential nominee and his wife as terrorist enemies of the United States.
The New Yorker cover published Sunday shows Barack and Michelle Obama with a flag burning in the fireplace.
The cover, published Sunday, shows Obama in the Oval Office dressed in traditional Muslim attire. His wife, Michelle, wears an Afro hairstyle and has a machine gun slung over her back. An American flag can be seen burning in the fireplace, and a picture of Osama bin Laden hangs on the wall.
"The New Yorker may think, as one of their staff explained to us, that their cover is a satirical lampoon of the caricature Sen. Obama's right-wing critics have tried to create," Obama spokesman Bill Burton said in a statement. "But most readers will see it as tasteless and offensive. And we agree."
Sen. John McCain's campaign spokesman Tucker Bounds said he agreed with Burton's sentiment.
Obama refused to comment on the illustration Sunday.
The cover is linked to a feature article about the senator from Illinois' formative political years in Chicago.
But not everyone finds the illustration over the top.
Chicago Tribune columnist Clarence Page told CNN's "Reliable Sources" on Sunday that the cover "is just lampooning all the crazy ignorance out there."
"I remember a few years ago, when The New Yorker had a cover at a time of great black-Jewish tension in New York. You had a cartoon of an obvious Orthodox Jewish male kissing a black woman, and this created a lot of buzz," Page said. "That's what it is, buzz. It's discussion. It's talk. And that's what covers are supposed to do."
Liberal radio talk-show host Laura Flanders told CNN's "American Morning" on Monday, "I think the Obama campaign made a misstep here. They should have come out strongly endorsing this cover.
She said, "This isn't a jab at them, terrorist or any other kind. This is a jab at the media. ... It should be cause for our conversation to focus on the kind of fear mongering that the media and people on the right have engaged in."
Conservative talk-show host Joe Pagliarulo agreed. "I think this could be a very positive thing for the Obama campaign," Pagliarulo said. "I think they've got to embrace this and say 'Look, there are rumors out there.' I talk to people every day, like Laura does. People really do believe ... that he's a Muslim. They believe he was sworn in on the Quran. They believe that his wife is unpatriotic and so is he."
A Newsweek poll released Friday showed that 12 percent of those polled believed Obama was sworn in as a U.S. senator on a Quran, and 26 percent believed that he was raised as a Muslim. Neither is true.
The New Yorker cover published Sunday shows Barack and Michelle Obama with a flag burning in the fireplace.
The cover, published Sunday, shows Obama in the Oval Office dressed in traditional Muslim attire. His wife, Michelle, wears an Afro hairstyle and has a machine gun slung over her back. An American flag can be seen burning in the fireplace, and a picture of Osama bin Laden hangs on the wall.
"The New Yorker may think, as one of their staff explained to us, that their cover is a satirical lampoon of the caricature Sen. Obama's right-wing critics have tried to create," Obama spokesman Bill Burton said in a statement. "But most readers will see it as tasteless and offensive. And we agree."
Sen. John McCain's campaign spokesman Tucker Bounds said he agreed with Burton's sentiment.
Obama refused to comment on the illustration Sunday.
The cover is linked to a feature article about the senator from Illinois' formative political years in Chicago.
But not everyone finds the illustration over the top.
Chicago Tribune columnist Clarence Page told CNN's "Reliable Sources" on Sunday that the cover "is just lampooning all the crazy ignorance out there."
"I remember a few years ago, when The New Yorker had a cover at a time of great black-Jewish tension in New York. You had a cartoon of an obvious Orthodox Jewish male kissing a black woman, and this created a lot of buzz," Page said. "That's what it is, buzz. It's discussion. It's talk. And that's what covers are supposed to do."
Liberal radio talk-show host Laura Flanders told CNN's "American Morning" on Monday, "I think the Obama campaign made a misstep here. They should have come out strongly endorsing this cover.
She said, "This isn't a jab at them, terrorist or any other kind. This is a jab at the media. ... It should be cause for our conversation to focus on the kind of fear mongering that the media and people on the right have engaged in."
Conservative talk-show host Joe Pagliarulo agreed. "I think this could be a very positive thing for the Obama campaign," Pagliarulo said. "I think they've got to embrace this and say 'Look, there are rumors out there.' I talk to people every day, like Laura does. People really do believe ... that he's a Muslim. They believe he was sworn in on the Quran. They believe that his wife is unpatriotic and so is he."
A Newsweek poll released Friday showed that 12 percent of those polled believed Obama was sworn in as a U.S. senator on a Quran, and 26 percent believed that he was raised as a Muslim. Neither is true.
-
The unfortunate thing about sarcasm and irony is that the people who need to understand it the most, are precisely the people who will not get it. If you take a stroll through the forums where the ridiculous notions about the Obamas circulate, you will see that.
-
-
-
-
- AnaMireles
- 2 months ago
-
-
It takes a great deal to offend this "nothing is holy" 26 year old but this cover is gross. It's not OK to excuse it as satire or commentary when there is nothing satirical about it. It does not earn the label of satire by merit of it simply being a cartoon.
A cartoon of McCain in the oval office, with a lit torch, suited up as a Klansman, Cindy tying a noose, a portrait of Hitler on the wall, and a fire made of small wooden crosses could not be acceptable. A joke must be constructed to have a punchline and there is nothing crafted about a simple depiction of stereotype. It's not a joke to merely state a stereotype: "Jews like money", "Blacks are lazy", "Chinese are smart"...its not funny, theres just no joke there, even if you're dumb enough to believe in the statement. So what is served?
Although the craft of visual art was used to create the cartoon, the craft of satire was not. It's a good picture but it's not complex enough to be a joke and serves no purpose in that respect. It would be a stretch to say that it's artistic value (beyond the basic intrinsic value of art) is in the controversy created by its merely being. However, you could throw that flimsy excuse in front of any "pickininny" or "hooknose" cartoon and most people wouldn't swallow it. It would need to be on a wall in the Met next to "Pisschrist" for that one to go over; Not in a famous US publication.
The cover is and will always be art, of course, which always has a right to BE but it's racist art which serves no net positive purpose.-
-
-
-
- MrInquisitive
- 2 months ago
-
-
But the cover mocks those who believe that it is an accurate picture of the Obamas, not the Obamas. Since nothing has been heard directly from either Mr. or Mrs. Obama, only from the campaign, I think they are laughing about it. Of course, the people whose job is to strategize the campaign must not find it funny at all, and that's why we heard from them.
-
-
-
-
- AnaMireles
- 2 months ago
-
-
Login/Registration is required to add a response.
