TV Schedule

Plans for human trial of H.I.V. vaccine canceled

  1. mjsmith11
  2. related topics
Image...
Plans for a large human trial of a vaccine against the AIDS virus in the United States were canceled on Thursday because federal health officials said the vaccine was unlikely to prove effective and might increase the risk of H.I.V. infection among volunteers.
The decision is another major setback in efforts to develop an H.I.V. vaccine, which health officials contend would be their best weapon to control the AIDS pandemic. Several other H.I.V. vaccines are in various stages of testing among people in many countries.

Scientists have been trying for more than 25 years to make an effective H.I.V. vaccine. They say that getting one to market — if one is ever developed — is years off.

After a meeting sponsored by the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases in March, many AIDS experts said researchers needed to go back to the drawing board before they could develop an effective vaccine.

The trial canceled on Thursday was supposed to have begun enrolling 8,500 volunteers last October to receive a vaccine developed by the infectious diseases agency. The study is known as PAVE, for Partnership for AIDS Vaccine Evaluation. PAVE is a consortium of United States government agencies and government-financed organizations involved in developing and evaluating experimental H.I.V. vaccines. Its goal is to develop an effective vaccine that no pharmaceutical company or institution is likely to accomplish on its own.

But the PAVE trial was postponed after a test of a similar, much-heralded vaccine made by Merck failed in its two main objectives: to prevent infection and to lower the amount of H.I.V. in the blood among those who did become infected.

Also, the findings among the 3,000 participants in nine countries in which the Merck vaccine was tested suggested it might have increased the risk of becoming infected with H.I.V.

After a safety monitoring committee detected the problems with the Merck vaccine in September, the company stopped its study immediately.

Scientists have found no obvious explanation for the failure of the Merck vaccine, which had been considered the most promising candidate for an H.I.V. vaccine. The infectious diseases agency helped pay for the vaccine trials
mjsmith11

9 responses // Plans for human trial of H.I.V. vaccine canceled

  •  
    Image...

    I hate to say this but I would be very wary of anything this government approves.
    I know that people with AIDS rely on these developing treatments. I would just research the hell out of anything and see what other countries with good health systems are doing.

    In my book less is more with drugs.

    http://www.motherjones.com/news/feature/2005/05/david_graham.html

    recommended by jubal
    CarolynGillis
  •  

    I agree, especially anything involcing Merck.

    recommended by jubal
    maasanova
  •  

    why not let the test go through?
    anything can happen...

    Dut
    • Dut
    • 4 months ago
  •  

    Imagine the profound changes in the world that a HIV vaccine would bring. Humanitarian workers in Haiti and in Africa, for example, could do so much more to help impoverished people without having to worry about getting infected with the virus. The social behavior of sexually active people would most likely change. What about Needle Exchange Programs? HIV/AIDS research and treatment has come a long ways since "Rock Hudson's Disease". This is a Pandemic that has changed of effected the way everyone lives.

    mjsmith11
  •  
    TyMarshal
  •  

    It's a shame that large medicine companies control our government. This was canceled not because of the lack of effectivness but the fact that big business would lose the billions they get from AIDS victims and of course we value money over human existance!

    jahona42
  •  

    generally they gather this 8500 people, vaccinate them, and send them back out to their usual lives. this unlikely a trial where the researchers are exposing HIV to the participants. after some time, they then compare the HIV infection rates of the general public to their test group, taking into account their ethnicity, social status, sexual habits, etc, to gain a balanced cross-section.

    i really can't believe they would run a trial and intentionally expose people to HIV, so what's the hold up?

    edbr
  •  

    There is already a cure for this and many other diseases, but there is no profit in cures. An what would curing AIDS do for population control and scarring people into not having sex?

    They only treat the symptoms. None of the Pharmaceutical companies will ever truly care about a cure.

    jubal

Add your response

Login/Registration is required to add a response