McCain attacks Obama's Holocaust statement
- added July 23, 2008
- 15 responses
-

-
-
-
- fauxsherrrr
- added this
-
-
- related topics
-
- News and Politics (39397)
- Politics (27757)
- News (21679)
- Barack Obama (3762)
- Election 2008 (3750)
- John McCain (2732)
The McCain campaign implied on Wednesday that Barack Obama's commitment to preventing a future genocide was not sincere, attacking the Democratic candidate during his appearance at the Israeli Holocaust Memorial Yad Vashem.
In an early morning press release, entitled Obama on Genocide, McCain aide Tucker Bounds emailed reporters a quote from Obama's appearance in which the Illinois Democrat reiterated the cry "never again." He followed that quote with one taken a year ago from an interview that the Senator gave with the Associated Press in which he said that genocide or humanitarian crises were not a prerequisite for keeping U.S. troops in Iraq (a statement he has since walked back)
"Well, look, if that's the criteria by which we are making decisions on the deployment of U.S. forces," said Obama, "then by that argument you would have 300,000 troops in the Congo right now."
The message was fairly explicit: Obama's commitment to stopping future Holocausts is in doubt. Asked for clarification, McCain aide Michael Goldfarb responded:
"Today he says 'never again.' A year ago stopping genocide wasn't a good enough reason to keep U.S. forces in Iraq. Doesn't that strike you as inconsistent?"
It's a heavy charge to make, not least because Obama had just wrapped up his visit to the Holocaust memorial. In addition, there are, for better or worse, outstanding implications when discussing genocide when it comes to Jews -- and the insertion of the issue into the presidential campaign will border for some, on the taboo. Moreover, on the topic of Iraq, Obama has said he would leave a residual force to intervene in potential humanitarian crises and that he reserves the right to intervene militarily with international partners in order to "suppress potential genocidal violence within Iraq."
"I'd love to know more about Obama's residual force," said Goldfarb, when asked about it. "How big is it, where is it based, what is its mission, how long will it remain in Iraq? Nobody knows the answers to those questions, and I'd encourage the Huffington Post to inquire further with the Obama campaign."
Obama on Genocide
Obama today at Yad Vashem:
"Let our children come here and know this history so they can add their voices to proclaim 'never again.' And may we remember those who perished, not only as victims but also as individuals who hoped and loved and dreamed like us and who have become symbols of the human spirit."
Obama on July 20, 2007:
Democratic presidential hopeful Barack Obama said Thursday the United States cannot use its military to solve humanitarian problems and that preventing a potential genocide in Iraq isn't a good enough reason to keep U.S. forces there.
"Well, look, if that's the criteria by which we are making decisions on the deployment of U.S. forces, then by that argument you would have 300,000 troops in the Congo right now -- where millions have been slaughtered as a consequence of ethnic strife -- which we haven't done," Obama said in an interview with The Associated Press.
In an early morning press release, entitled Obama on Genocide, McCain aide Tucker Bounds emailed reporters a quote from Obama's appearance in which the Illinois Democrat reiterated the cry "never again." He followed that quote with one taken a year ago from an interview that the Senator gave with the Associated Press in which he said that genocide or humanitarian crises were not a prerequisite for keeping U.S. troops in Iraq (a statement he has since walked back)
"Well, look, if that's the criteria by which we are making decisions on the deployment of U.S. forces," said Obama, "then by that argument you would have 300,000 troops in the Congo right now."
The message was fairly explicit: Obama's commitment to stopping future Holocausts is in doubt. Asked for clarification, McCain aide Michael Goldfarb responded:
"Today he says 'never again.' A year ago stopping genocide wasn't a good enough reason to keep U.S. forces in Iraq. Doesn't that strike you as inconsistent?"
It's a heavy charge to make, not least because Obama had just wrapped up his visit to the Holocaust memorial. In addition, there are, for better or worse, outstanding implications when discussing genocide when it comes to Jews -- and the insertion of the issue into the presidential campaign will border for some, on the taboo. Moreover, on the topic of Iraq, Obama has said he would leave a residual force to intervene in potential humanitarian crises and that he reserves the right to intervene militarily with international partners in order to "suppress potential genocidal violence within Iraq."
"I'd love to know more about Obama's residual force," said Goldfarb, when asked about it. "How big is it, where is it based, what is its mission, how long will it remain in Iraq? Nobody knows the answers to those questions, and I'd encourage the Huffington Post to inquire further with the Obama campaign."
Obama on Genocide
Obama today at Yad Vashem:
"Let our children come here and know this history so they can add their voices to proclaim 'never again.' And may we remember those who perished, not only as victims but also as individuals who hoped and loved and dreamed like us and who have become symbols of the human spirit."
Obama on July 20, 2007:
Democratic presidential hopeful Barack Obama said Thursday the United States cannot use its military to solve humanitarian problems and that preventing a potential genocide in Iraq isn't a good enough reason to keep U.S. forces there.
"Well, look, if that's the criteria by which we are making decisions on the deployment of U.S. forces, then by that argument you would have 300,000 troops in the Congo right now -- where millions have been slaughtered as a consequence of ethnic strife -- which we haven't done," Obama said in an interview with The Associated Press.
-
-
-
-
- fauxsherrrr
- 2 months ago
-
Wow. I guess nothing is beneath the McCain campaign. It's amazing how a person's morals seem to disappear when desperation sets in. Sad.
-
hmmmm... sad it is, but also an insight to tha minds of the candidates.
-
I heard "blah blah blah, blah blah, blah blah blah, blah blah blah, blah blah, blah blah blah blah blah blah, blah blah, blah blah blah, blah blah blah, blah blah, blah blah blah, blah blah blah, blah blah, blah blah blah, frrrnnnnt."
-
I think someone wants to stay in the news because he's not visiting over seas like someone else and it's working. While that someone else is doing the exact same publicity stunt but on a bigger scale...it's not looked as such because apparently visiting a country that's close to war is what someone with heart does.
-
Obama said that Jerusalem will never be divided in front of a jewish audience.
The following day, he said the opposite.
By now, he is beyond flip flopping.
He is like soap that keep slipping out of your hands.
I call this impulsive. -
So does this mean McCain is all for causing future Holocausts and Genocides?
We need to keep both of these asshats out of the White House... both are bought and paid for already. It's gonna be more of the same no matter who we get.-
-
-
-
- Ayahuasca2012
- 2 months ago
-
-
I say Obama makes a much stronger point with his previous statement than McCain is making right now.
-
-
-
-
- Dmitri_Molotov
- 2 months ago
-
-
THIS IS SO STUPID MC CAIN IS A BUSH SUPPORTER AND FAMILY FRIEND THE BUSH FAMILY WERE KNOWN NAZI SUPPORTERS AND THAT'S NEVER IN THE NEWS JUST LIKE CINDY MC CAIN'S DRUG PROBLEM CAN WE START TALKING ABOUT RELEASING THE OIL RESERVES AND BRINGING OUR YOUNG MEN AND WOMEN WHO ARE BEING SLAUGHTERED AND BLOWN INTO TO PIECES HOME AMERICAN NEWS IS SO BIAS WE DON'T HAVE A CLUE WHAT'S GOING ON IN THE WORLD
-
-
-
-
- nortey_2002
- 2 months ago
-
Login/Registration is required to add a response.
