TV Schedule

Fertilizing ocean may slow climate change

  1. News and Politics
  2. sheamus
  3. related topics
Image...
A seasonal bloom of ocean plankton fertilised by the Amazon river pulls much more carbon dioxide out of the atmosphere than researchers had previously supposed.

The unexpected bloom may, in fact, be enough to turn the tropical Atlantic Ocean from a net source of atmospheric carbon into a net sink.

Ajit Subramaniam, an oceanographer at Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory in Palisades, New York, and his colleagues sampled phytoplankton in the plume of water extending from the mouth of the Amazon into the Atlantic.

To their surprise, they found that for much of the year the offshore waters support a thriving plankton population that converts atmospheric nitrogen into biologically usable forms.

This nitrogen fixation allows the plankton to escape the restrictions of the nitrogen-poor Amazon and thrive on its other nutrients, especially phosphorus and silicon.

The result is a rapid uptake of carbon dioxide by the photosynthetic plankton.
'Major shift'

Moreover, much of this carbon ends up in long-term storage instead of being recycled quickly like most carbon in the ocean. That's because the main photosynthesisers are diatoms, single-celled algae that build a heavy silica shell around their bodies.

This glassy shell makes diatoms sink rapidly after they die, removing 20 million tonnes of carbon from the atmosphere each year, the researchers estimate.

That's not much compared to the amount emitted by human activity each year but it represents a major shift in our knowledge of the oceans' carbon balance, says Subramanian. And although the Amazon is the largest of the world's rivers, other major tropical rivers such as the Congo and the Orinoco may have similar effects, he says – a conjecture he is now aiming to test.

"I think the value of this work is not so much in figuring out how we can use it to humankind's advantage, but in figuring out that the major rivers of the world may be helping to balance the CO2 inventory of the planet in ways we haven't realised before," says David Karl, an oceanographer at the University of Hawaii.

Even so, the Amazon's major contribution suggests that proposals to artificially fertilise the ocean to enhance carbon uptake may pay off surprisingly well in tropical waters, says Subramaniam.

Journal reference: Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0710279105)
sheamus

13 responses // Fertilizing ocean may slow climate change

  •  
    Image...

    Mother Nature had the wheel figured out when the first coconut dropped, rolled down the hill, and sprouted. Chances are the solution to carbon sequestration is yet another trick up her sleeve.

    I'm glad to see the 'biological pump' is starting to get the research it deserves.

    The wheel took us humans oh a few centuries to 'invent'. We'll have to catch on a bit faster this time around if we're going to pull ourselves out of this mess..

    Climos, and their pocket-protector posse, seem to be pioneering this voyage and charting the waters..

    onepeacefullight
  •  

    this is rather uplifting news, considering that every time I turn on Discovery Channel there's another special on how global warming is caused by carbon release and we are all doomed by 2015....

    dgordon
  •  

    Until you get a "red tide." Ocean seeding is risky, but of course no one wants to talk about that. People just want to make excuses for not having to alter their own behavior.

    JanforGore
  •  

    this "solution" like many others would involve dramatically altering an ecosystem...
    not my idea of humans taking responsibility for climate change

    helicopterson
  •  

    all of the dramatic shifts we have witnessed in mother nature has been caused by the massive surge in human population. there is nothing we can do to help the situation except slowing our breeding. i think that the more we try to change things in this literal sense, the more we are damaging natural cycles.
    it's like gardening. the more you mess with your plants, the weaker they are. some things just need to be left alone.
    i still want to see green energy sources, a hydrogen infrastructure, and i love green tech. artificial fertilizations? no.

    scabbio
  •  

    just a note on the last two posts where helicopterson refers to "dramatically altering an ecosystem" and scabbio says, "the more we try to change things...the more we are damaging natural cycles"...
    That is how we got into this climate change problem in the first place. Who knows what oceanic ecosystems would look like had humans not been dumping pollutants into it for the past hundred and fifty years. Restorative practices are worth looking into, and don't deserve broad, sweeping generalizations, such as those above.

    sheamus
  •  

    the road to hell is paved with good intentions.

    scabbio
  •  

    The most important thing to take away from this study is just how little we humans know about the world we live in. Perhaps this should be taken into consideration before doing anything that may dramatically change it (including those things which we feel may be positive).

    chri
  •  

    i'm sure if everyone took the bus or stayed home one day a week we could get the same effect

    donkeyfly69
  •  

    im surprised to hear something so positve about the environment considering it seems everything I hear involves worldly disasters, global warming or the effects of big industries on the environment! Good stuff to know!

    jscrappy

Add your response

Login/Registration is required to add a response