Alaska seeks to reverse US polar bear decision

Image...
The state of Alaska has sued the U.S. government, arguing that listing polar bears as a threatened species will hurt Alaskan oil and gas exploration, fisheries and tourism.

The lawsuit, filed on Monday in federal court in Washington, seeks the withdrawal of a May 14 decision to list the big Arctic bears as threatened under the Endangered Species Act because climate change is melting their sea ice habitat.

Polar bears live only in the Arctic and depend on sea ice as a platform for hunting seals. The U.S. Geological Survey reported last year that two-thirds of the world's polar bears, some 16,000, could be gone by 2050 if predictions about melting sea ice hold true.

Alaska's suit contends that the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, part of the Interior Department and the agency that helped make the polar bear decision, failed to consider that polar bears have survived through previous warming periods.
  • added August 05, 2008
  • flag
 

News and Politics

31 responses // Alaska seeks to reverse US polar bear decision

  •  

    thanks for posting this. How disgusting. One can only guess which elected official is behind this one.

    Polar bears cannot vote that means that pressure has to come from two leggeds.

    MeganMcKenzie
  •  

    Those that seek to 'explore for oil and gas' are kinda like the neanderthals that refused to accept the wheel, and continued to drag their cargo around by hand. Open those pretty little eyes!

    recommended by Vierotchka, Neghie
    benjaminV
  •  

    We need polar bears. All of our state economies are hurting. Let's think of other ways to boost our economy than by making a species extinct.

    karnathis
  •  

    This kind of greed is just tragic. The thought of nominally trying to 'reverse' or 'undo' the fact that a species is endangered without being willing to actually do something to protect the animals is absurd.

    JanaPokana
  •  

    I think the Alaskan people should decide what they want. In Oregon, we still have the Spotted owl for a bit longer. Even after protecting the endangered species from logging in the 90s, it will still be wiped out from a competing species of owl. Best intentions etc.

    rightbrain
  •  

    Hey, the polar bears deserve the land more than we do. They survive out there. All we do is live and poison the earth.

    recommended by merasyad
    sk84life
  •  

    um, they ARE threatened. Taking their name off the list won't make that fact go away.

    azalea
  •  

    Aren't polar bears the only reason anyone goes to alaska in the first place?

    BenDorries
  •  

    1, 2, 3. Ha! Scissors cut paper! Fish and oil trumps extinction.

    Neghie
  •  

    I'm sure all those people who live in Alaska are pissed their land is not being exploited as much as it could be.

    Bldng4Jstc
  •  

    alaska sucks...

    polar bears need to be recognized as being threatened...not ignored in favor of big oil like every other animal and natual habitat on this planet...

    The U.S. government, for once, is right for putting those animals on the threatened list.

    MissAmanda
  •  

    i wonder wat the polar bears are doing to become a threatened species? let me guess... nothing! it's not there fault they are being pushed south because of the melting sea ice. ridiculous! the U.S gov makes me wanna gag.

    firu
  •  

    Just because they have survived previous warming periods doesn't make them any less threatened.

    I've survived car accidents, doesn't make driving in Florida any less dangerous!

    recommended by merasyad
    Kynmore
  •  

    Global warming IS an issue and the polar bears ARE threatened. A lawsuit isn't going to solve anything.

    ryllisse
  •  

    "...polar bears have survived through previous warming periods."

    The Alaskans conveniently forget or omit the fact that previous warming periods came along very gradually and took a very long time, giving Polar bears ample time to adapt.

    Vierotchka
  •  

    To be fair, if keeping the polar bears on the threatened list would cause grievous harm to the state's economy, then they should consider removing it from the list. Now they have to prove that the bears are actually that ridiculously threatening.

    CCashman
  •  

    Another sad but typical story about how the Bush administration only values the all mighty dollar and not the planet they live on!

    singrrr
  •  

    Canada doesn't like Polar Bears?!?! tsk tsk!
    What's so bad about Polar Bears!!

    alaskans.. clubbers of seals and un-threateners of bears

    SarahAna
  •  

    Where did you see that Canada doesn't like Polar bears? Alaska is part of the USA, not part of Canada.

    Vierotchka
  •  

    Canada clubs seals.

    Polar Bears eat seals.

    Polar Bears are blocking progress of oil because they have an agenda or because those that profess love for the Polar Bears have an agenda?

    Humans who love animals tend to bend over backwards to keep them alive but refuse to make the animals bend over backwards to keep us alive. It works both ways. OMG they can't speak up for themselves, but they sure can attack a human without being provoked....people think they can become one with an animal and understand them so well that they can speak for them because no one else can. Well guess what no one can speak for the animals unless they can actually talk to them and I don't think this world has a Dr. Doolittle.

    So don't start to presume that animals, such as the Polar Bear, are ready to block humans from getting what they want. Maybe they don't mind us drilling for oil but that wouldn't really work to the benefit of the EnvironMENTAL-psychopaths now would it?

    J_Jammer
  •  

    What difference does it make weather or not one species lives or dies? People only care about polar bears because they're big, fuzzy, cute looking animals.

    evervsfinity
  •  

    The fact that species are becoming endangered whether or not we are the cause of such things is tragic. It has potential to throw ecosystems off-balance causing changes that we, with our great technology and higher-level thinking can't seem to correct. Once a species is gone, it's gone forever, just in case you hadn't realized that. We can't fix that.
    And it's not necessarily that they have an agenda so to speak, it's that us being there and drilling and boosting our economy, though I agree - is important, disrupts their natural habitat. It f#@!s things up for them, but some people don't seem to care that it could be potentially hazardous for other living things.

    Though some people may think they're cute, with or without thinking about the fact that they could basically rip your friggen face off if they felt so inclined, it's not about what makes us say "aaaaw" or about what makes us feel warm and fuzzy inside. It's about respecting the animal and their living environment. I'll admit. I'd do everything that I possibly could to keep an animal alive, even if right after, the damn thing ate me. Since we have the gift of quick adaptation, choice and realizing what is right/ wrong or un/necessary, we should use it to our fullest potential. Polar bears, or any other species of animal for that matter, don't see things as right/wrong. They just see survival and how to achieve it. Animals don't bend over backwards to help us because #1 they can't comprehend that. and #2 they shouldn't have to

    If people REALLY want to drill and make money, having a couple words on a list isn't going to change a thing.

    maka_wave
  •  

    oh and one more thing...

    "What difference does it make weather or not one species lives or dies?"

    I pity your ignorance.

    maka_wave
  •  

    At the most recent meeting of the IUCN Polar Bear Specialist Group (held in Seattle in 2005), the world's leading polar bear scientists reported that of the 19 subpopulations of polar bears, five were declining, five were stable, two were increasing, and seven had insufficient data to make a determination. The group reclassified the polar bear as vulnerable, noting that the species could become extinct due to sea ice changes. Individual countries with polar bears have reclassified the species as well. Citing to concerns about shrinking sea ice habitat, the U.S. Department of the Interior announced on May 14, 2008, that it is listing the polar bear as a Threatened Species under the Endangered Species Act. Canada and Russia both list the polar bear as "a species of concern." The major threat to the polar bear is shrinking sea ice habitat due to climate change. Other threats include pollution, poaching, and industrial disturbances.

    Scientists estimate that there are between 20,000 to 25,000 polar bears.

    In the wild, polar bears live an average of 15 to 18 years. Climate change is the biggest threat that the bears face. Estimated in 42 years the population numbers will decrease some 13,000 to 16,000, leaving roughly 10,000

    Greenpeace, the Natural Resources Defense Council and the Center for Biological Diversity are seeking to intervene in the case of Alaska vs U.S. government

    krystahardin
  •  

    Even if they can survive, we should still protect them because they are big fuzzy and cute.

1 - 25 of 29

Add your response

Login/Registration is required to add a response