Hiroshima marks bomb anniversary with hope for US change

Image...
The mayor of Hiroshima on Wednesday urged the next US president to work to abolish atomic weapons as the city marked the 63rd anniversary of the world's first nuclear attack.

Some 45,000 people, including Prime Minister Yasuo Fukuda, gathered at a memorial to the dead within sight of the A-bomb dome, a former exhibition hall burned to a skeleton by the bomb's incinerating heat.

They stood up and offered silent prayers at 8:15 am, the exact moment in 1945 when a single US bomb instantly killed more than 140,000 people and fatally injured tens of thousands of others with radiation or horrific burns.

Delivering a speech at the memorial, Hiroshima mayor Tadatoshi Akiba noted the United States was one of only three countries which oppose a UN resolution submitted by Japan calling for the abolition of nuclear arms.

"We can only hope that the president of the United States elected this November will listen conscientiously to the majority, for whom the top priority is human survival," he said.

Akiba said the effects of the atomic bombing on the minds of survivors had been underestimated for decades, adding that "the voices, faces and forms that vanished in the hell" had never left the hearts of survivors.

With the average age of survivors now over 75, he said the city would launch a two-year scientific study of the psychological impact of the experience.

"This study should teach us the grave import of the truth, born of tragedy and suffering, that the only role for nuclear weapons is to be abolished," the mayor told the service.

On the eve of the anniversary, children gathered in front of the Atomic Bomb Dome for a lantern march. Survivors burned incense before dawn broke.

An altar at the Peace Memorial Park quickly filled up with a mountain of flowers. A group of South Koreans performed a traditional dance to honour the dead, who included a number of Koreans.

"Children who evacuated buildings or went to work at factories on that day have not returned 63 years on... the atomic bomb deprived them of normal life," 11-year-old school girl Honoka Imai told the service.

A Chinese representative, a diplomat, attended the annual ceremony for the first time in a move welcomed by the city, which each year invites representatives of the world's eight declared nuclear powers to the event.

Previously India, Pakistan and Russia were the only nuclear powers that had sent representatives to the ceremony. The other declared nuclear states - Britain, France, North Korea and the United States - have never come.

Three days after the Hiroshima bombing, the United States dropped a second nuclear bomb on Nagasaki, which killed another 70,000 people in the southern port city.

Japan surrendered in World War II on August 15. The nation has since been officially pacifist and turned into one of the closest US allies, hosting more than 40,000 US troops.

Dozens of atomic survivors and activists protested in Nagasaki this week as a US nuclear-powered submarine arrived in Japan, just days after it emerged another sub may have suffered a small radiation leak earlier this year.
  • added August 06, 2008
  • flag
 

13 responses // Hiroshima marks bomb anniversary with hope for US change

  •  

    We really do need to remember this. I hope that it never ever happens again. No one person should have that much power. No president, dictator or country should have the power to wipe out over 200,000 people in a matter of 3 days.

    kbclef
  •  

    There are no rules in love and war. Tragic as it is, don't think the other side wouldn't have used one if they had it first. These days the entire world is only structured the way it is because some countries have the "boom stick" while others don't. I wonder how throwing away that advantage and putting everyone back on a level playing field would affect things?

    A bomb is no good in less you plan to use it. That said, a renegade country with one nuclear weapon is probably more dangerous than the stockpiles we have.

    It ain't pretty, but that's just the world we live in.

    What happens if we give up all the nuclear weapons while smaller countries secretly build an arsenal then decide to use them? We'd be screwed. The only thing we have protecting us from Armageddon is the promise of mutually assured destruction right?

    God, people are stupid.

    The world would be a better place without nuclear weapons, but the world would be a much better place without the evil people that are willing to use them under religious (oh the irony) pretense.

    damnneargenius
  •  

    It's weird I was just thinking about this issue. But anyway, Personally just take all of the nuclear weapons and send them to the sun. If we can consciously destroy the world I think we can agree to not destroy the world as well.

    ChrisWT
  •  

    What a move of utter disrespect and complete lack of sympathy that the US would choose to be absent from this event.

    Disgusting.

    SpookyFish
  •  

    the "US" has been present at many through the years . this is the 63rd . Bush is pretty busy at the moment .

    malathion
  •  

    While I'm not trying to 'save face' for the U.S., I hope the Japanese government also pay homage to the Koreans and Chinese they raped, murdered, and made slaves of during their occupation of the Asian mainland before WWII.

    bishopobispo
  •  

    That was the Japanese government at the time that ordered troops to do that under the guise of nationalism.

    Now, I think we should launch all the nukes into space. Launching the several thousand nukes into the sun might do something negative, but perhaps we could launch them into Jupiter, which is already bathed in radiation, or we could just launch them into deep space and detonate them.

    FallenMorgan
  •  

    I don't think it is possible for the powers of the world to give up nukes now. There would always be some idiot building one in his basement and trying to control the world by fear. Once man had achieved the power to produce a nuke I don't think they will turn back, sad but true. And in the end it just may be this knowledge that destroy's humankind. Also sad but true. I would like to think that all nukes will some day be destroyed but I don't see it happening anytime soon. It is just wishful thinking. We can't even get rid of handguns let alone nukes. What would all the war mongers like Bush and Co. and the Penatgon do without thier nukes to threaten the rest of the world with? Also very, very SAD but TRUE.

    Robroy1
  •  

    No President of the United States would ever nix the entire Nuclear program.

    J_Jammer

Add your response

Login/Registration is required to add a response