TV Schedule

Are you ready for nuclear war?

  1. News and Politics
  2. Vierotchka
  3. related topics
Image...
Pervez Musharraf, the puppet installed by the US to rule Pakistan in the interest of US hegemony, resigned August 18 to avoid impeachment. Karl Rove and the Diebold electronic voting machines were unable to control the result of the last election in Pakistan, the result of which gave Pakistanis a bigger voice in their government than America's.

It was obvious to anyone with any sense—which excludes the entire Bush Regime and almost all of the "foreign policy community"—that the illegal and gratuitous US invasions of Afghanistan and Iraq, and Israel's 2006 bombing of Lebanon civilians with US blessing, would result in the overthrow of America's Pakistani puppet.

The imbecilic Bush Regime ensured Musharraf's overthrow by pressuring their puppet to conduct military operations against tribesmen in Pakistani border areas, whose loyalties were to fellow Muslims and not to American hegemony. When Musharraf's military operations didn't produce the desired result, the idiotic Americans began conducting their own military operations within Pakistan with bombs and missiles. This finished off Musharraf.

When the Bush Regime began its wars in the Middle East, I predicted, correctly, that Musharraf would be one victim. The American puppets in Egypt and Jordan may be the next to go.

Back during the Nixon years, my Ph.D. dissertation chairman, Warren Nutter, was Assistant Secretary of Defense for International Security Affairs. One day in his Pentagon office I asked him how the US government got foreign governments to do what the US wanted. "Money," he replied.

"You mean foreign aid?" I asked.

"No," he replied, "we just buy the leaders with money."

It wasn't a policy he had implemented. He inherited it and, although the policy rankled with him, he could do nothing about it. Nutter believed in persuasion and that if you could not persuade people, you did not have a policy.

Nutter did not mean merely third world potentates were bought. He meant the leaders of England, France, Germany, Italy, all the allies everywhere were bought and paid for.

They were allies because they were paid. Consider Tony Blair. Blair's own head of British intelligence told him that the Americans were fabricating the evidence to justify their already planned attack on Iraq. This was fine with Blair, and you can see why with his multi- million dollar payoff once he was out of office.

The American-educated thug, Saakashkvili the War Criminal, who is president of Georgia, was installed by the US taxpayer funded National Endowment for Democracy, a neocon operation whose purpose is to ring Russia with US military bases, so that America can exert hegemony over Russia.

Every agreement that President Reagan made with Mikhail Gorbachev has been broken by Reagan's successors. Reagan's was the last American government whose foreign policy was not made by the Israeli-allied neoconservatives. During the Reagan years, the neocons made several runs at it, but each ended in disaster for Reagan, and he eventually drove the modern day French Jacobins from his government.

Even the anti-Soviet Committee on the Present Danger regarded the neocons as dangerous lunatics. I remember the meeting when a member tried to bring the neocons into the committee, and old line American establishment representatives, such as former Treasury Secretary Douglas Dillon, hit the roof.

* * * * *

More at link.
Vierotchka

28 responses // Are you ready for nuclear war?

  •  
    HolyCity2012
  •  

    Russians are crazy, but not to the point of using Nuclear Power. Reality is that Russians have been all along puppets of the Government, but lots of them are Christian, Orthodox and Catholic, they would highly break every single belief if they would tolerate or support this.

    After all, Putin has an end, time shall take care of this.

    petarro
  •  

    Russians are probably among the sanest people in the world. Only a microscopic proportion of them are Catholics - most Russians know better.

    Vierotchka
  •  

    ask me later .

    malathion
  •  

    its not russians anyway. its the same sorry ass politicians as we have here. greedy and power hungry.

    globewatcher
  •  

    For me, the better question is, "Are you ready for death?"
    My answer? Yes. I have no control over why, when, where or how it will happen so, in the meantime, I let my activism against wars of all kinds, care for a diseased planet and endless thirst for knowledge occupy my unknown number of days.
    Should I go, all of the sudden, I'll die knowing that I was in the process of doing worthwhile things.
    That's good enough for me.
    Hope it's good enough for the "Big Kahuna".

    recommended by Vierotchka
    huntre
  •  

    Wise words, huntre.

    Vierotchka
  •  

    Nice comment globewatcher, u cant judge the russians as crazy, for every one of them like us are individuals, Russian culture however, they say what they mean and stand up for what they believe in, where in american culture we dont say what we mean (sarcasm) makes me sick, and these cultures only apply to the people who follow them, and ur right huntre, u cant live if u fear death, so just live life how u want and dont let anything get in the way of it, if u think it is worth the sacfrices that come with it.

    saveplanetearth
  •  

    When the Russian army went into Georgia to rescue the Russians in South Ossetia from the destruction being inflicted upon them by the American puppet Saakashvili, the Russians made it clear that if they were opposed by American troops with smart weapons, they would deal with the threat with tactical nuclear weapons.

    Russia has made no threats against America. The post-Soviet Russian government has sought to cooperate with the US and Europe. Russia has made it clear over and over that it is prepared to obey international law and treaties. It is the Americans who have thrown international law and treaties into the trash can, not the Russians.

    Isn't that contradicting?

    recommended by Vierotchka
    brad62
  •  

    I don't see where this article has much to do with nuclear war

    brad62
  •  

    Until nuclear technologies are banned and destroyed this specter of nuclear war is always with us.

    sublimeuniverse
  •  

    can one ever be ready for Nuclear War.

    teddy14
  •  

    Until nuclear technologies are banned and destroyed this specter of nuclear war is always with us.

    can one ever be ready for Nuclear War.

    That still doesn't answer how this article has anything to do with nuclear war.

    brad62
  •  

    The most dangerous thing to do would be to get rid of Russia's nuclear weapons. The main reason the cold war was 'cold' was because both sides knew they couldn't make a move without a reciprocal attack. As far as nuclear weapons go, it's not the Russians people should be worried about.

    Though have to agree with brad62. Article doesn't have much to do with nuclear war. I guess I'm responding to the title.

    Jaeger
  •  

    Did you click on the link to read the whole article?

    Yes I did.

    brad62
  •  

    this is a very interesting story that caught my eye. good job.

    NickLip

Add your response

Login/Registration is required to add a response