Cindy McCain's $300,000 outfit for the RNC!

// added September 04, 2008 // 81 comments //
Image...
talicatz
It caught Vanity Fair's attention when First Lady Laura Bush and would-be First Lady Cindy McCain took the stage Tuesday night wearing some rather fancy designer clothes. So they asked their fashion department to price out the outfits.

here's the breakdown:

Laura Bush
Oscar de la Renta suit: $2,500
Stuart Weitzman heels: $325
Pearl stud earrings: $600–$1,500
Total: Between $3,425 and $4,325

Cindy McCain
Oscar de la Renta dress: $3,000
Chanel J12 White Ceramic Watch: $4,500
Three-carat diamond earrings: $280,000
Four-strand pearl necklace: $11,000–$25,000
Shoes, designer unknown: $600
Total: Between $299,100 and $313,100

Wow! No wonder McCain has so many houses: his wife has the price of a Scottsdale split-level hanging from her ears.

(All prices except Laura’s shoes and Cindy’s watch are estimates, and the jewelry prices are based on the assumption that the pieces are real.)
  1. groups:
    News and Politics,   Fashion
  2. tags:
    News and Politics Fashion Elections RNC 11 more

81 comments // Cindy McCain's $300,000 outfit for the RNC!

  • ctrl_alt_del
    • 0
      ctrl_alt_del  
    • Seriously, guys I thought Current was more mature than the major news networks, but I guess I'm wrong. Who the hell cares if she wears an expensive dress. Politicians=rich people, 70% of them probably are, I bet none of them live in the barrio or even lower-middle class houses.

    • 1 year ago
  • KatM
    • 0
      KatM  
    • Since when is being rich a crime??? Everytime someone posts an asinine, stupid, POINTLESS story like this on Current we move further and further away from the real issues and the pov's of the candidates. Don't add fuel to the fire by responding to these "news items" with comments like "let the rich get richer" blah blah! We all feed into the media exploitation and worship of mindless filthy rich celebritys, and say nothing about the extravagant ridiculous way they spend their underserved money, yet we're all willing to rip cindy mccain and michelle obama apart the first chance we get! these are both intelligent, professional women who WORKED for their money, so who gives a damn how they spend it!!

    • 1 year ago
  • bansheewail
    • 0
      bansheewail  
    • They are not even trying to identify with the middle class.

      Just keep footing that tab, pay your taxes and send your childern to serve in the military. The rich will get richer and everybody else can go fuck themselves.

    • 1 year ago
  • jawnybnsc
    • 0
      jawnybnsc  
    • You idiot liberals do know the FDR was rich . . . RIGHT? Oh . . . and the Kennedys. The McCain family was a military family. I guarantee they weren't rich. So basically what McCain is guilty of is marrying well. I don't seem to recall a whole bunch of you being worried about that when John Kerry was running. I certainly don't remember any of you saying that it should disqualify him from being President. For the love . . . do any of you people ever think about what you write before you post?

    • 1 year ago
  • bansheewail
    • 0
      bansheewail  
    • jawnybnsc:

      Do you think about what you write?? Or should we all consider it fiction. McCain's father and grandfather were both ADMIRALS in the Navy. Check the retirement pay for an Admiral or two and get back to me.

    • 1 year ago
  • jawnybnsc
    • 0
      jawnybnsc  
    • jawnybnsc:

      Oh you're kidding me . . . right? Even if your post wasn't a complete dodge, nobody is getting rich off of retirement pay from the military . . . at any level. Maybe in a lifetime the McCains would pull half a million. I guarantee you that they didn't buy Cindy's earrings off of an admiral's retirement. Don't be a goof.

    • 1 year ago
  • dabne
    • 0
      dabne  
    • McCain even said it last night that the dems are trying to increase our Government to take more of our money from our pockets. The Repubs want less Government so that we can spend our hard earned money on anything we please - including dresses. That's American. That's capitalist.

      If you would rather the Government tell Cindy where shes needs to spend her money then yes you better vote blue this year.

    • 1 year ago
  • Moopak
  • bansheewail
  • Moopak
  • jawnybnsc
  • MissAmanda
    • 0
      MissAmanda  
    • oh. my god. who cares.

      personally, i don't care who you are, spending that much money on any article of clothing is just silly to me...but thats me personally...me who doesn't spend more than $15 on a pair of jeans...

      it's just nitpicking...im sure the boys have suits that are rather pricey...because they know that image is everything in elections...

      you know it's true...and maybe these things were on loan and they don't pay a dime for them...or maybe they were given to these people for free...that happens in fashion alllllll of the time...

      think before you care about trivial crap...

    • 1 year ago
  • arcticspirit
  • abbym0308
  • petarro
    • 0
      petarro  
    • I'm full Anti-Republican but Three-carat diamond earrings: $280,000 this is the most stupid Number for Sensationalizing and creating a stupid story. It's more like $28,000.

    • 1 year ago
  • merasyad
    • 0
      merasyad  
    • She spends more on one dress than what the average American family needs to purchase a home, while her husband talks about economic relief for Americans! Pathetic, hypocrite, pricks.

    • 1 year ago
  • Moopak
    • 0
      Moopak  
    • Image...
    • To put this into perspective,

      Michelle Obama recently appeared on The View outfitted in a stylish ‘Black & White’ dress any one of us could buy for $148.

      “One of the persistent memes in the Republican line of attack against Barack Obama is the notion that he is an elitist, whereas the G.O.P. represent real working Americans like Levi “F-in’ Redneck Johnston,” says Vanity Fair.

    • 1 year ago
  • Moopak
  • MissAmanda
    • 0
      MissAmanda  
    • Moopak:

      "any one of us"....could not afford to piss away $148 on one dress...

      maybe for a woman like michelle, but she is not in an "average/any one of us" position.

    • 1 year ago
  • arcticspirit
  • SDLN
    • 0
      SDLN  
    • I posted a few jokes throughout this page, but I don't really care. Just having fun with it, as I suspect most others are. The only thing I find interesting, or, rather, politically relevant, is that the Republican Party and those who represent it are constantly use words like "elite" in a negative manner (look it up; 'elite' is a good thing), or they try to portray Democrats as "latte drinkin'" so-and-so's, when they're just as rich (if not more so), enjoy the same privileges, and live the same extravagant lifestyles. They're just as out of touch as the Democrats.

      Language and lattes: those are the real victims here, other than the political process, that is.

    • 1 year ago
  • synclaire
  • CalgarC
    • 0
      CalgarC  
    • can't she donate the money instead :D

      i mean natasha bedingfield and her entire family run a childrens charity, you dont see them wearing 5000 dollar watches

    • 1 year ago
  • justright
  • KateLove
    • 0
      KateLove  
    • It seems like we're tearing down every little thing on the presidential candidates, especially the Republicans. I mean, resorting to these means, ridiculing OUTFITS? Really? That in itself is ridiculous and low! Those poor elephants... I'm a big fat dem and my heart belongs to Barack, but it seems that everywhere I look, it's either "Palin and the McCains are morons that don't get America" or "Obama is the Savior!".

      Maybe I'm just focused on the wrong media centers, but Republicans are people, too. :]

    • 1 year ago
  • FallenMorgan
    • 0
      FallenMorgan  
    • Anybody who wears a $300,000 outfit shouldn't even be near the capital of a largely middle and lower class nation. All you need is money to get into the inner circle of the Republican Party.

    • 1 year ago
  • J_Jammer
  • jdalston
  • FallenMorgan
  • J_Jammer
  • jh64487
  • FallenMorgan
    • 0
      FallenMorgan  
    • FallenMorgan:

      I don't mean a homeless person as president, jj, I mean a REAL American. What I mean by a REAL American is someone who has to work 2 jobs or something to support his/her family and the like, the type who deserve something like that, the type that knows what the average working class American might be going through. Sadly everyone who gets nominated is rich.

    • 1 year ago
  • SDLN
  • jdalston
    • 0
      jdalston  
    • What is interesting to me is that I myself wear 4ct. Diamond studs... I worked my ass off so that I can afford to pay for nice things and I wear all of my designer clothes PROUDLY!!!! Why dont you get off your lazy ass and make a good living and then we'll see who judges who!!!! FYI... My studs are E color and are flawless and did not cost near as much as you are estimating!!!!!

    • 1 year ago
  • Moopak
    • 0
      Moopak  
    • Maybe those designers sent them the clothes and accessories for free to be seen by millions of people and make a fashion statement. Designers compete to have people of high status wear their designs.

      Celebrities pay nothing for their Red Carpet gowns.

      Just a thought, but if Cindy and Laura actually paid for their outfits, we have a fashion emergency.

    • 1 year ago
  • walski
    • 0
      walski  
    • Wow some of you people are a bunch of morons.

      Do these fools that are picking apart her dress realize that she came from a rich family that makes large yearly donations, she has been a business savvy woman and has founded nonprofit organizations that send medical supplies to other countries?

      Why don't you do some research on her and her job with Anheuser-Busch before you go bashing her.

      Btw. I know some aren't economists but when rich people spend their $, which means take it out of a bank, then it gets circulated throughout our economy. I know it sounds crazy but the working class needs the rich to spend $.

    • 1 year ago
  • jh64487
    • 0
      jh64487  
    • walski:

      what percentage of their income to they donate, how much are they left with. more than enough for a dozen families to live on and be considered wealthy is the answer, so I'm not exactly proud of them for giving something

      also, if trickle down theory worked we wouldn't have a growing economy but a shrinking workforce and growing housing foreclosures and all the other stuff. the only thing trickledown theory accomplishes is concentration of wealth.

      that's not a debate, that's historical fact as proven by the last 8 years of bushes "tax free" tenure in office

    • 1 year ago
  • clayjj05
  • J_Jammer
    • 0
      J_Jammer [removed]  
    • Some people spend their money on drugs, by the thousands. Some spend it on their hobbies. Some spend it on their car. Some spend it on donations.

      However one spends their money is their choice. Looking good isn't at all a bad thing to spend money on. Better than being rundown. Of course no one would even look at a homeless person speaking because they'd be too keen on how nasty they looked.

    • 1 year ago
  • jh64487
    • 0
      jh64487  
    • J_Jammer:

      again, this is the same party that smeared kerry for his haircuts being 400 and has called obama elitist and out of touch.

      thats why this is news, because they are (again) being hypocrites

      ....and just...really, really, stupid

    • 1 year ago
  • J_Jammer
  • khromadjo
    • 0
      khromadjo  
    • J_Jammer:

      "Some people spend their money on drugs, by the thousands." --J_Jammer

      For a while there, Cindy McCain didn't. She got them for the Five-Finger discount. But I digress.

      I will say, though, as much as I revile her, it's her money.

    • 1 year ago
  • Prijedor
  • SDLN
  • antiyou
    • 0
      antiyou  
    • haha, i love how everyone here is sitting on their high horse telling everyone else what they should do with their money. i'm assuming that all you donate half of your paychecks to charity right? cause that's what anyone who makes money should do...why should they keep their money? that's just ridiculous...

      but that aside lets look at how this issue was addressed earlier today when nobody cared about people voting based on the first ladies wardrobe.

      lets compare apples with apples...i like how you compare cindy mccains RNC dress to a dress obama wore on a stupid daytime talk show, a dress that is 1/10th the price of the dress she actually wore during the DNC at that.

      in Michelle's DNC appearance she was sporting some custom designer dress(which was reported here)
      http://current.com/items/89251569_michelle_obama_s_dnc_...

      oh did you guys forget about that? ...but hey $1300 dress, that's "smart" looking right? that's not concerned with "image" is it? 1300 is completely reasonable for a dress, why as a matter of fact i just so happen to be wearing my $1000 boxers today at my blue collar job...good ol michelle, everyday person just like you and me.......

    • 1 year ago
  • satanskidney
    • 0
      satanskidney  
    • Man, I hope those $280k diamond earrings are actually cubic zirconium. I wonder how much money the African who found those diamonds has? It makes me sick...

    • 1 year ago
  • asherp
  • justright
  • fernandez_is_go
  • cheeseAndCrackers
    • 0
      cheeseAndCrackers  
    • Yes lets appoint a family that knows nothing about the turmoil going on to the average american much less the world. What could possibly be wrong with that........................wait a minute.

    • 1 year ago
  • justright
  • Robroy1
    • 0
      Robroy1  
    • With that much spent on themselves I must say Laura Bush is still a dumpy looking porker but McCane is not bad or I should say not Dumpy anyway. She is not bad looking anyway but I always say "like attracts like" and "birds of a feather flock together". I guess that is what makes Democrats, Republicans, Liberterains, Socialists, Commies and other political groups as well. People like to be with people of the same mindset, it's normal. The evil and greedy as well as the honest and peaceful etc.

    • 1 year ago
  • Yaemea
    • 0
      Yaemea  
    • Why do they even have so much money?
      Can't they donate it to someone who would use it to put food on the table and get school supplies for their kids?

      'Donate to the campaign, they will buy yellow jackets!!!'

    • 1 year ago
  • bruceabeal
  • talicatz
  • bruceabeal
  • carpy
  • benjamingon
  • justright
  • SDLN
    • 0
      SDLN  
    • Image...
    • $300,000? The average middle-class family should be able to afford 16 of those a year, with money to spare.
      ;)

    • 1 year ago
  • CreditFigaro
  • SDLN
    • SDLN  
    • This comment has been removed.
  • VegaNerDiva
    • 0
      VegaNerDiva  
    • Damn why so much?!
      Was it made with some special sort of fabric that will time release Vicodin & Percocet?

      Her dress matches my urine after I ingest vitamins.

    • 1 year ago
  • vixen0078
  • sperritt
  • jdalston
  • jh64487
    • 0
      jh64487  
    • sperritt:

      they are, however, the ones claiming that obama is an elitist and out of touch with america. they are also the ones that pounced on kerry's haircuts.

      they are, in essence hypocrites, and basically what this article (and most supposed "attack" articles) is doing is simply pointing out that hypocrisy.

    • 1 year ago
  • Ricky84
  • LarzNero
    • 0
      LarzNero  
    • Yeh with all this Palin crap, don't forget the seven houses. $300,000? That's like 50 cents for every single person in Alaska.

    • 1 year ago
  • VSiskos
    • 0
      VSiskos  
    • Eh, I don't care if someone's rich and they spend their money. Just don't spend completely on yourself and others more fortunate and then say you're a patriot trying to help the people.

    • 1 year ago
  • aschneider
    • 0
      aschneider  
    • VSiskos:

      Well, she is the chair of the largest beer distributing company in the US or something like that so I don't think she's spending John's patrioteer money on her clothes. I think she has her own. Laura on the other hand likely had a federal budget for clothes that goes with her office of first lady.

    • 1 year ago
  • CreditFigaro
  • justright
  • jawnybnsc
  • justright
  • aschneider
  • talicatz
  • iloveravi
    • 0
      iloveravi  
    • aschneider:

      Get over it. The fact is these millionaires should not be representatives of the public.

      Anyone who spends 300, 000 on an outfit when 1.5 hours away by plane people are eating dirt (literally, in Haiti) is a fucking asshole.

    • 1 year ago
  • aschneider
  • iloveravi
    • 0
      iloveravi  
    • aschneider:

      Sorry. I'll re-phrase:

      Get over it. The fact is these millionaires should not be representatives of the public.

      Anyone who spends $300,000 on an outfit when 1.5 hours away by plane people are eating dirt (literally, in Haiti) is a "Fluking bing-skillet".

    • 1 year ago
  • antiyou

Add your comment

current videos