Both of their fix-up plans rely heavily on tax cuts, but in sharply different ways that speak to the historic differences between Democrats and Republicans.
McCain, borrowing a page from Ronald Reagan and President Bush, would keep tax rates low for higher-income taxpayers and slash rates for corporations, arguing that this is the way to jump-start a lethargic economy and create more jobs.
Obama, focusing on a theme of many past Democratic campaigns, seeks to target his help to the squeezed middle class and address the growing income inequality between rich and poor. He would retain all of the Bush tax cuts for families making less than $250,000 a year, but would do away with Bush's cuts for people making more than that.
The money raised from tax increases on the wealthy would be redirected by Obama to tax relief for lower-income Americans.
Unlike a lot of campaign debates where the promises of neither side get enacted into law, this war of words will make a difference because all of Bush's tax cuts are scheduled to expire at the end of 2010.
Since neither party wants to go back to the tax rates in effect before 2001, whoever wins will have to work with Congress to pass legislation shaping how the tax code will look beyond 2010. At stake will be billions of dollars.
Under Obama, the wealthiest 1 percent of taxpayers, those making roughly $600,000 or more, would see their taxes go up on average by $93,709 in 2009, according to an analysis done by the Tax Policy Center, because Obama would begin implementing his tax changes even before the scheduled expiration of the Bush cuts.
Under McCain, those same taxpayers would see an average reduction of $48,860, reflecting in part additional cuts he is proposing.
By contrast, the bottom 20 percent of taxpayers, those with taxable income of roughly $19,000 per year or less, would see their taxes cut by an average of $567 under Obama's program and $21 under McCain's plan, the tax center estimates.
-
-
- ivxx
- added this
- added September 08, 2008
- flag
-
Please correct me if I am wrong, but weren't the Bush tax cuts sold as a way to jump-start the economy and create jobs? If that is the case, I think we may need a different approach than McCain going further down that road.
-
Keep in mind that this tax table was created BEFORE McCain flopped on his "no-new-tax" policy...
Great post! This is the type of information people should be talking about.
-
America cannot afford to stay the course...
Bush's policies failed us...why should we believe the same policies under McCain will produce different results?
-
yeah that doesnt make sense, stay on the same program as bush yet speak of reform. That offers no reform, even to the grumbling richer republicans who aren't satisfied with the current economy.
-
-
- katharinekov
- 4 months ago
-
-
I can't wait to see how the bush-and-mccain-can-do-no-wrong crowd reacts to this.
-
-
- CreditFigaro
- 4 months ago
-
-
Trickle-down economics are notorious crap.
It has been a lame excuse to win favor of the rich for a long time now. Time to end it.
-
-
- MethuselahMouse
- 4 months ago
-
-
I love that campaign ad with the up the ass guy, brilliant
ESKCSG. I'm not sure how to download that so I can show it at work.-
-
- kennymotown
- 4 months ago
-
-
Haven't we all been trickle-downed on enough. If we keep this up there wont be anyone left to trickle on. No more years.

