Fire retardant chemical found in children
- added September 12, 2008
- 11 responses
-
-
-
- TravG73
- added this
-
-
- related topics
-
- News (28760)
- Health (5259)
- Children (1495)
- Toys (224)
- Electronics (167)
- Homes (93)
- Furniture (74)
- blood (52)
- Behavior (22)
- Hormones (20)
- Deca (2)
- Polybrominated Diphenyl Ethers (1)
- PBDEs (1)
- Fire Retardants (1)
In a small pilot study of 20 families, the non-profit environmental group tested blood samples from mothers and their young children—ages 18 months to four years—for the presence of polybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDEs), a hormone-disrupting chemical.
In 19 of the 20 families, concentrations of PBDEs were typically three times as high in children as in their mothers, said Sonya Lunder, the study’s author. One child had six times the level of the chemical that was detected in her mother.
“To us, this raises concerns that kids live very differently in the same environment than their parents do and those kid-like behaviors put them at risk for contaminant exposure,” Lunder said in a telephone interview.
Lunder said young children are exposed to more of these substances because they play by putting their hands and other household items in their mouths after touching furniture or appliances that contain PBDEs. They also eat more and drink more, proportionally, than their mothers do, and food and drink can contain these chemicals, she said.
PBDEs build up in the blood and tissues. Two forms of PBDEs are no longer made in the United States but are still present in items in U.S. homes, the study said.
The largest volume of PBDEs is in electronics in a form called Deca, which is banned in European electronics and in some U.S. states, according to the study.
The study cited peer-reviewed tests that showed a single dose of PBDEs given to mice on a single day when their brains were growing rapidly could cause permanent behavior changes, including hyperactivity.
Lunder said there have been numerous studies of the toxic effects of fire retardants on adults, but few on how these substances affect children.
A spokesman for the Bromine Science and Environment Forum, a trade group, took issue with the environment group’s study, saying that even the highest levels of PBDEs detected were relatively low, and that Deca was barely found in the children.
“Flame retardants save actual human lives, and no illness, ailment or harm to any human anywhere has ever been reported as a result of exposure to Deca, even among those who work producing the material,” the spokesman, John Kyte, said in an e-mail.
Kyte said the flame-retardant manufacturers group supported monitoring and analysis of “potential concerns” raised by the environmental group’s study.
Lunder said young children are exposed to more of these substances because they play by putting their hands and other household items in their mouths after touching furniture or appliances that contain PBDEs. They also eat more and drink more, proportionally, than their mothers do, and food and drink can contain these chemicals, she said.
PBDEs build up in the blood and tissues. Two forms of PBDEs are no longer made in the United States but are still present in items in U.S. homes, the study said.
The largest volume of PBDEs is in electronics in a form called Deca, which is banned in European electronics and in some U.S. states, according to the study.
The study cited peer-reviewed tests that showed a single dose of PBDEs given to mice on a single day when their brains were growing rapidly could cause permanent behavior changes, including hyperactivity.
Lunder said there have been numerous studies of the toxic effects of fire retardants on adults, but few on how these substances affect children.
-
HA! At first I thought it was occurring naturally... like kids were fire-proof.
-
The chemicals are only entered orally, what about children that pick their noses?
-
-
- fiat_lux088
- 3 months ago
-
-
they are putting that chemical into everything thats man-made, and it is more cancer causing than second hand smoke.I guess that means that going out side to have a smoke to keep your children safe is a waste of time
-
-
- tracyetheridge
- 3 months ago
-
-
With Bush and other republicans who have sought to have all safety regulations overturned or overlooked this does not surprise me.
I am outraged that our innocent children pay the highest price. Why is it that if someone comes up with an idea, decides it is good, and then foists it upon consumers without enough testing that it is always the consumers who pay? Now I wonder do you think that the NEOCONS are running the world?
-
-
- MeganMcKenzie
- 3 months ago
-
-
Our children have become ticking chemical bombs.
-
-
- MeganMcKenzie
- 3 months ago
-
-
I cannot believe that more people are not voting this up. It is beyond outrageous that are children are being subjected to so much danger!
-
-
- MeganMcKenzie
- 3 months ago
-
-
T-T-T-TRIPLE POST!!!!
Just in case you didn't know, there IS an edit button. It's just to the left of the red delete and reply buttons. -
So shall we start insulating our homes with babies?