New US law requires labels on meat-country of origin labels now required

// added September 16, 2008 // 52 comments //
Image...
JanforGore
WASHINGTON - In a few weeks, American shoppers will be able to look at a cut of meat or a pound of hamburger and see something they've never seen before-a label that says where the meat came from.

Starting Sept. 30, food manufacturers and grocery stores have to comply with a new federal law that requires "Country of Origin Labeling," or COOL, on beef, pork, chicken and lamb.

The new labels will tell consumers whether their food came from animals raised in the U.S. or another country. The law also covers perishable items, such as fruits and vegetables and a variety of nuts. Some say this will enable consumers to avoid food that, for example, comes from countries that they have heard have food safety problems. It also will allow consumers to stick to American-grown food, if that is their preference.

Because of the complexities of the livestock industry, some product labels may list multiple countries. That's especially true of ground beef, because some meat processors combine cuts from a number of countries to make ground meat and hamburger patties.

Food safety groups have hailed COOL as a necessary step toward broader consumer education and buying choices. But now they complain that the Department of Agriculture has defined it as narrowly as possible.

For example, they say, the agency has defined a host of foods as "processed," such as mixed frozen vegetables, which exempts them from the new law.

"When they finalized this rule, they bent over backward to make as few things be covered as possible," said Michael Hansen, a senior staff scientist with Consumers Union. "There are giant, giant loopholes in the law."

Many in the meat industry, these advocates say, have fought the new labeling law because they don't want consumers to know that they're buying imported hamburger and beef cuts. The USDA also stood against COOL, according to Lloyd Day, head of the agency's Agricultural Marketing Service, because of its projected impact on consumers and its estimated cost to the food industry: $2.5 billion in the first year.

But Congress has decreed that COOL will take effect on Sept. 30, so the debate over its merits is largely over. Now the industry is bracing for COOL's impact.

"We don't know exactly how it's all going to work," said Colin Woodall, the executive director of legislative affairs for the National Cattlemen's Beef Association. "And we won't know until it's fully up and running."
__________________

I'm sure there are loopholes to this especially where $$$ are concerned, but at least there is a law calling for country of origin labels on meat. I personally don't eat meat any longer, but for those who do, look for it on your labels starting Sept. 30th. Now we have to keep fighting to get the source of the food noted on labels as in genetically modified versus conventional. Then we will be making progress in full disclosure to consumers.
  1. groups:
    News and Politics,   Food,   Current News US
  2. tags:
    News and Politics Food Current News US FDA 7 more

52 comments // New US law requires labels on meat-country of origin labels now required

  • flower09
    • 0
      flower09  
    • I live in the Northeast Bronx and I notice the supermarket in my area started putting these new labels on the meats. However the labels read "product of US, Canada and Mexico - very misleading to say the least. We also have to worry about are these meats being inspected. I Don.t like this method at all.

      Would like your response.

    • 11 months ago
  • third_eye_view
    • 0
      third_eye_view  
    • I am curious as to why this wasn't done sooner.

      Such a better way to pinpoint products to avoid when dangerous diseases break out in different regions. It takes all that guessing away.

    • 1 year ago
  • dontwory_aboutit
    • 0
      dontwory_aboutit  
    • I don't eat meat, but still this is a great law that should be followed by all meat packaging companies. It's pathetic how the USDA stood against COOL though. It's not the country that necessarily depends on the health of the meat it's the facory it originates from.
      I'd like to see them put that on a label and watch the sale of meat drop.

    • 1 year ago
  • JanforGore
    • 0
      JanforGore  
    • jimwiz3416: I agree. Too bad we can't get it the way nature intended it in the first place. I have always found it ironic that Republicans have been known for supporting "less government" but are always the ones imposing it upon us from our bedrooms to our dinner tables.

    • 1 year ago
  • awoempner
    • 0
      awoempner  
    • JanforGore:

      Yeah, for reals. I know a lot of republicans who say they are republicans because they are fiscally conservative. I don't agree with fiscal conservatism (as a socialist) but I can respect that position. However, the GOP's spending is out of control. Look at the mess they've got us in with their crazy spending. How can anyone who says they are for small government and responsible spending possibly support the republican party?

    • 1 year ago
  • awoempner
    • 0
      awoempner  
    • The meat industry is completely f***** everywhere. You will all be much safer as vegetarians or vegans. Labels won't help you -- only compassion can. Go veg.

    • 1 year ago
  • woffler
    • 0
      woffler  
    • it is a good idea for a start further regulation is coming ie: there are ideas in the works to chip the the animal to track to a indavidual owner or ranch to further track any problems to assist in fast location of any problems .Live along the mexico border you would not believe what your eating in those veggies!!

    • 1 year ago
  • darkhorsejim
    • 0
      darkhorsejim  
    • This is fantastic news & can only get better over time as the process works itself out. Companies should be taking this opportunity to voluntarily provide product info to the growing numbers of savvy consumers. It's a win-win situation.

    • 1 year ago
  • Jaaaaaaaaaade
  • missmydog
    • 0
      missmydog  
    • We have never had enough information about where our food comes from. When I was little, my suburbanite cousin decided to become a vegitarian at age 15 because she just found out that the meat she was eating came from animals.

    • 1 year ago
  • Robroy1
    • 0
      Robroy1  
    • All this tells the consumer is what country or countries it comes from, it does not really protect against anything. In America we have the USDA which is supposedly an inspection process. If the countries of origin have such organizations and they are reliable, then this would be a help but most countries don't have such controls. If you know what countries have inspections that can be trusted and stay with those countries, then this is a good thing. If the consumer does his or her homework then this will help the consumer avoid unsafe countries.

    • 1 year ago
  • jimwiz3416
    • 0
      jimwiz3416  
    • Labeling meat with the country of origin is a worthy legal step!

      To be honest, we should also label food that is GMO, Irradiated, gassed, chemically or artificially enhanced or, in any way, different from the way nature intended.

      Hmmm, what's left - grass and dandelions...

    • 1 year ago
  • kennyJ
    • 0
      kennyJ  
    • Image...
    • Well at least it will be EASY to know which meats are practically NEVER tested for MADCOW: The ones with an AMERICAN Flag.

      I love America and I am NOT proud to post this...

    • 1 year ago
  • j2kila
  • awoempner
  • blood77
  • Alfie35
    • 0
      Alfie35  
    • I feel really sorry for the food retail. Its hard enough to run a grocery store, now this had to come up and will be more stressful.

      Its also going to be very interesting for people. There's going to be a mixture of different countries within a section of fruit. But it will be nice to see where the food is coming from.

    • 1 year ago
  • awoempner
  • daylightsunsets
    • 0
      daylightsunsets  
    • I've always thought that people's insistence on buying American products was sort of pretentious.
      Is it really the country of origin that affects the health of the meat? A contaminated factory is a contaminated factory, and they exist all over, regardless of what country they're in.

    • 1 year ago
  • outtheinside
    • 0
      outtheinside  
    • daylightsunsets:

      true, except for buying american products keeps american money in our hands and jobs in our country.. kind of like why we need alternative fuel as opposed to importing oil.. call me a quack, but unless there is some weird outbreak of viruses, i'd rather keep my money here.

    • 1 year ago
  • awoempner
    • 0
      awoempner  
    • daylightsunsets:

      FYI, U.S. meat is among the worst. Know why they don't find any cases of mad cow in the U.S.... cuz they simply don't test for it. Also, they pump the cows full of antibiotics and all sorts of unnatural nastiness. I'll take the tofu, thanks.

    • 1 year ago
  • outtheinside
    • 0
      outtheinside  
    • this really will transpire into an extra economic sanction by the american people against any countries' goods that are found to be harmful or substandard by our government's standards. it will also allow those of us who support the american farmer to follow through with our bucks. nice.

    • 1 year ago
  • asinine_cloud
  • agitator
  • bigloutech
  • ocanada
    • 0
      ocanada  
    • Whats funny is how long it took this law to go into affect. First steps were taken for this law as early as 2004 and such actions might have had an impact on spending habits and promoted spending on U.S. foods but may have saved lives in the food tampering scandals of the last two years wherin China sold us a bad bill of goods. Frankly this law helps responsible American industry and that's the only type that ought to be supported. If its a german company selling me american beef I'll take it over an American company selling prepackaged beef from China any day.

    • 1 year ago
  • Virtual_Will_Rogers
    • 0
      Virtual_Will_Rogers  
    • ...if you are going to eat meat....then why not eat all meat....it is all the same....why waste all the meat that you pump full of chemicals and place in the ground....when your loved ones die....the ones from where you came.....eat them....let them be even more of you.....many cultures have done this.....at least they knew what they were eating.....better still...be a Golden Ruler...if you do not want to be eaten...dont eat another.....what about vegetables ....fruits.....you must eat something.....clean them just like you were a raccoon....say a silent thank you that they will become part of you.....like many cultures do....eat it......live long and prosper...Golden Ruler...Will.....

    • 1 year ago
  • lcdoll920
  • awoempner
  • JanforGore
    • 0
      JanforGore  
    • Image...
    • CRS report for Congress. This gives more specifics about what is covered and perceptions behind why this was now made law when it was scheduled to be made law four years ago. Critics claim it is the FDA's way of perpetuating a false assumption that US food is safer than food imported from other countries and is a trade barrier. So again, I say, do your own research and be aware because regarding meat, the US is really no better. Matter of fact, since this law supposedly also covers vegetables, I will then use it to look for vegetables that I know are specifically GM here and not in other countries to buy from other countries of origin that I know do not grow GM crops.

    • 1 year ago
  • queenofit
  • mariposablanca
    • 0
      mariposablanca  
    • We should know a lot more then counrty of origin. We should know what farm, what grower, what type of feed these animals are eating and how they are being treated.

      Just like many of the U.S government quick fix skeems, this isn't going to solve anything. It will not make our food any healthier or safer for the cunsumors, the animals or the processer's employees in any way.

      If anything it will just reiterate any prejudices that U.S. cunsumers already have about other countries.

    • 1 year ago
  • heaven3000
    • 0
      heaven3000  
    • The more aware we are of what happens to food before it hits our table the better. Everyone should do their research before buying anything. I'll bet if everyone did this, more people would grow their own food.

    • 1 year ago
  • queenofit
    • 0
      queenofit  
    • I just noticed this in the article.....

      "The law also covers perishable items, such as fruits and vegetables and a variety of nuts. Some say this will enable consumers to avoid food that, for example, comes from countries that they have heard have food safety problems. It also will allow consumers to stick to American-grown food, if that is their preference."

      hmmm? ok now, we may be getting somewhere, now where is GMO forbidden? they have my money!

    • 1 year ago
  • JanforGore
    • 0
      JanforGore  
    • queenofit... my thoughts exactly. I wouldn't buy meat from any country now. Besides, I stopped eating it to be more environmentally conscious. That's even better if you can do it.

    • 1 year ago
  • outtheinside
    • 0
      outtheinside  
    • JanforGore:

      how does not eating meat make you more environmentally conscious?? lol... talk about crazy jan.. if you want to be environmentally conscious, buy meat from struggling countries where their meager exports allow them to cultivate land instead of it laying waste. the money to those farmers goes back into development and helping the poorest subside.. small farmers hoorah! not eating meat blah!

    • 1 year ago
  • mariposablanca
  • JanforGore
  • Wreyeter
  • JanforGore
  • ii386
    • 0
      ii386  
    • If I ate meat still, I would even go a step further than this and just buy fresh from local livestock farms. This way, I would be able to see where the animal was raised and meet who butchered it. Although it holds no real importance, I think it would just give me piece of mind that it was given a good, healthy life.

    • 1 year ago
  • awoempner
    • 0
      awoempner  
    • ii386:

      wouldn't it give you more piece of mind just to be vegetarian or vegan and know for sure you weren't contributing to the torture and suffering of billions of animals. I for one am quite happy with my good vegan karma.

    • 1 year ago
  • ii386
  • schobiz
  • queenofit
  • schobiz
  • JanforGore
    • 0
      JanforGore  
    • Yes, Will, and I also know labels can be false too... but it's a start and hopefully people will ask questions and become more informed about what their hard earned dollars are buying. I'm wondering if this will also raise the price of meat. Hope not. It's already outrageous along with everything else.

    • 1 year ago
  • jubal
  • Virtual_Will_Rogers
    • 0
      Virtual_Will_Rogers  
    • .....Caution....some labels are misleading..........
      I bought a Guchi handbag....the G fell off........
      it was actually a Huchi handbag........
      Lies have taken over this world....it does not have to be a spoken word.....you can print it on a label.....
      such as......organic..........Golden Ruler...Will.......

    • 1 year ago
  • dontipo
  • MeganMcKenzie
  • synclaire

Add your comment

current videos