Palin, McCain add up to a continuation of Bush policies

Image...
Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin has awesome self-confidence. Chosen by fellow Republicans to be Sen. John McCain's running mate, she told an interviewer: "I'm ready."That confidence reflects her naivete about her role that puts her one heartbeat away from the presidency.

In accepting the nomination as veep, she invoked the greatness of President Truman, based on their small-town origins. But anyone who was around during Truman's era knows there is a world of difference between Palin and Truman. Take, for example, humility.

Truman was vice president for only a short time when on April 12, 1945, he was summoned to the White House and told the stunning news that President Franklin Roosevelt was dead. Truman and FDR were not close and Truman was not deeply familiar with the U.S. military plans for World War II. He also did not know about the atomic bomb.

As the nation's new leader, Truman wanted a few days to move into the White House. He understood the magnitude of his new job. The morning after being sworn in Truman emerged from his Washington apartment to go to work on his first day as president. He took one look at the three wire service reporters who standing in front of his building.

"Boys," he said to the familiar faces, "the moon and the stars fell on me. If you ever prayed before, pray for me."

So when Palin says she is "ready," one thinks of the two U.S. wars under way in Iraq and Afghanistan -- and the devastating market crash on Wall Street.

There is no question that Palin has given a big lift to McCain and helped boost his ratings so that he's now virtually tied with Barack Obama, the Democratic nominee. As a team McCain and Palin are on the same page. Both are pro-guns, and anti-abortion. She is literally a rifle-toting mama, against sex education, and has attempted to ban books she considers immoral from her hometown library.

But Palin's evangelical rigidity on social issues puts her out of step with the modern woman. She is said to be more reactionary than McCain -- if that's possible. Is it any wonder that the activist feminist organizations have come out in support of Obama?

The new Republican ticket seems like the current White House tenant. Neither McCain nor Palin appear to have any significant doubts about President Bush's disastrous policies. Palin's gubernatorial tenure in Alaska is personified by massive firings when she took office. She does not tolerate dissent and shuns the press.

It seems clear to me that we would have another imperial presidency if McCain and Palin win the hearts and minds of the American people in the November balloting. Bob Woodward of the Washington Post has been privy to the workings of the Bush White House and has written four books to prove it. In his latest Book, "The War Within," Woodward depicts Bush as a "man of few doubts" who is "still following his gut, convinced that the path he has chosen is right."

Bush, who has switched from using the word "win" in speaking of Iraq to "succeed," has the gung ho McCain-Palin team behind him. The question is "why?" Woodward also wrote that Bush was intolerant of confrontations and in-depth debate. He said Bush maintained an "odd detachment" in the management of the war in Iraq ... "and too often failed to lead."

Bush has never explained why he invaded Iraq -- a country that had no doomsday weapons and did us no harm. It's doubtful that McCain or Palin could explain Bush's mindless mission in the Middle East if they gained the White House.
  • added September 19, 2008
  • flag
 

4 responses // Palin, McCain add up to a continuation of Bush policies

  •  
    goldenways
  •  

    Only the Repubs could present more of the same as -

    New!

    Different!

    Real Change! [but not from what we already did to you]

    Stay The Course! [it works for us!]

    Hurry [before everything is foreclosed!]

    AveryMoore
  •  

    Just because you are listed as a "Republican" does not mean you agree with everything that is said by your candidate. I agree with some of the issues the the repubican party are presenting, but on the other side I also see where the democrats have made good points (referring to Hillary). Sometimes it comes down to what is the less of the two evils.
    McCain and Palin do not have to have the same views as President Bush and agree with all of his decisions.
    I think Sarah Palin is awesome. She would be a definite asset to this country.
    Point being.....forget the political parties and look at what each person stands for individually, not what the person before them has done.
    Just because I'm registered as republican doesn't mean that I will not or have not voted for a democrat.
    That's just my two cents. Thank you.

    ElandenRN
  •  

    ElandenRH,

    Up to a point you're right on the money. Then you lose it.

    If George Bush was the only person who made all those catastrophic errors - the real Decider - that would be different. But it doesn't work that way and you know it doesn't work that way.

    You can't claim that all these mistakes for 8 years [with McCain in office for 26 years] were made against the advice and consent of the entire Republican Party and McCain was unaware of his responsibility as a Senator..

    Had the Party been unified and opposed Mr. Bush he could do nothing. But the Party did not oppose him at his worst and McCain voted more than 90% for him - at his worst.

    Yet you want to reduce a very complex process - the voting franchise - into tidy chunks of choosing between perceived evils and think Sarah Palin would be "awesome." Having established what about Sarah other than she is afraid of the press but thinks that is just part of being qualified to lead? Lead who?

    As each day goes forward it becomes more apparent that Senator McCain is too enfeebled ever to entrust with an air traffic controller's position. He gets lost far too easily in detail.

    He can't remember what countries are in Europe! Or where borders end and begin in the middle east, who the Iranians are or aren't arming, to name a few. His best aide is on Georgia's payroll, he wants a tussle with nuclear armed Russia - but you want him to control the entire US military?

    Your two cents are worth two cents - but for your own sake stop and think about the larger picture of where we are and where we can go under different management.

    I'm conservative. I want better than the shit I've seen the last 8 years - it's not that scary to get out of the neo-con sandbox and see things the way they really are.

    Start by reading as many big city financial pages as possible. No one is going to ask you to do anything more than use your brain independent of anything but the facts - to make your decision - other wise you've just signed on as a sheep.

    AveryMoore

Add your response

Login/Registration is required to add a response