Palin's Attack On Obama's Patriotism Raise Questions About Palins' Association With Secessionist

People in California and Texas want to secede too. Hell, after all but one of my states delegation voted against the Wall Street bailout bill, I'm ready to secede myself.

The McCain camp keeps saying "If Obama would just do town hall meetings then everything would be fine." Utter horsehockey. The McCain camp had low numbers going into this game. They've been behind in electoral college numbers since the beginning. They can't take the "high road" because their policies are like Bush.

Therefore, smears. And Obama's large grassroots Internet following will bat it all down. Then, finally on the Fifth of November, the whole Internet will return to lolcats and all will be well.

...um, not to be nosy or anything but isn't trying to separate a state from within a democracy covered by laws against SEDITION? Isn't it a form of undeclared civil war? Isn't sedition the peacetime version of Treason?

Any Constitutional lawyers out there?

So let's see, Obama is "seen" with a radical but "does" nothing.

Palin "joins" with and "supports" a group that is seditious.

And he's the badguy?

Not clever, this girl..

Losers will do anything to create a "news" story about their opponent.

McShame is a loser in every way. He lacks integrity. He is a crybaby. He uses his war hero status as a martyr and to me that is the most disgusting.

He is losing therefore he is fabricating stories. Palin is equally as ugly.

You people don't seem to see how petty you sound. The Democratic party nominated for President a known associate of an unrepentent domestic terrorist who has said he wishes he had done more to bring down the United States. A man who claimed as his mentor for 20 years someone who accuses the United States of creating Aids in order to kill it's own citizens. Do you really believe anyone in America is going to pay attention to this story after that?

i don't think any intelligent person would listen to either story as they are both mostly bull shit.

obama isn't a terrorist or a terrorist supporter, and palin simply wants the feds to let her drill whereever she likes, alaska wouldn't be able to survive without government handouts.

i wish both sides would just shut up but the argument here is that if one side is going to play dirty the other side has the right to do so as well. that's fair...get over it

JohnA returns to standing on his head and insists he sees the world as it really is,

"You people don't seem to see how petty you sound. The Democratic party nominated for President a known associate of an unrepentent domestic terrorist who has said he wishes he had done more to bring down the United States."

A nice aggregate of assumptions signifying - nothing.

Let's paraphrase it for him.

1/ "You don't seem to see how one-sided, biased and paranoid you sound. Why not?

2/ "a known associate" is a meaningless term. There is no criminal or even legal content to the term. Governor Palin is a "a known associate" of Senator McCain. Which is the guilty party? You have proved nothing. Not even guilt.

3/ "an unrepentent domestic terrorist" may or may not know or be known to many people. How many are equally guilty of whatever that person may have done? Are you seriously dumb enough to believe that a Harvard Law graduate would conspire with "an unrepentent domestic terrorist" to actually do anything rash or illegal to damage his own career? There is no evidence that the Democratic Party did not vet Senator Obama before he ran for the White House. There is every evidence that Senator McCain still remains clueless about the past history of his "known associate."

4/ "who has said he wishes he had done more" than what he actually did. So if I say I wish I had done something I didn't do, after I didn't do it that means that -

a/ I actually am as guilty as if did it?
b/ I actually intended to do what I didn't do?

c/ you are grasping at straws because your candidates are steadily tanking in the polls and you are in a panic?

nobamajon - nobrain-a-joe?- continues the smear campaign,

"Everything in one past is fair game. For instance, I'd like Barry to account for the two years in NEW YORK which he cant remember. Word is he lived with a CRACK dealer. So....how do you suppose he paid the RENT!!! Do you suppose this could be one of our OCTOBER surprise's?? Sounds like FUN."

Two can play this game.

You'd better explain why word is you are a paranoid schizophrenic child molester who lived with a known terrorist and paid the rent by making kiddie porn..

Prove you didn't. Hurry up.

See?

It's easy to make the smear, isn't it?

well it's not anti-American to "hate" (or disagree) with your government now is it? I've heard lots of people say they'd like to escape to Canada or Mexico even. Many have.

Are we at a crossroads in our mentality where we have to "prove" our patriotism to one another because of mere suspsicions or some whack allegation/smear tactic? Aren't we smarter than that? If not, how sad...and how increasingly vulnerable we'll ALL become, eventually, for those taking that "higher" ground will use it against us like it was some badge of courage or some merit of service. Those prix rather need to be burned at the stake imho...