Do NOT let the Bu$h administration lift regulations on coal company waste dumping!
-
-
- onechance
- added this
http://www.regulations.gov/fdmspublic/component/main?main=DocumentDet...
Bu$hCo is trying to allow Big Coal to dump their WASTE into your WATER!!!!!!!!!PLEASE go to:
http://www.regulations.gov/fdmspublic/component/main?main=DocumentDetail&d=O...
and leave a comment NOW!
Forward this to everyone please!!!!!!!
-
- groups:
- Green, Big Brother, Criminals
-
- tags:
- Green, Environment, Corruption, Pollution, 3 more
-
- recommended by:
- goldenways
-
-
WisconsinNorm
-
There is no local jurisdiction that cannot override a federal law if a constitutional issue is not in question.
"Eminent domain" might be a stickler, but mountain top removal has nothing to do with highway construction.
"Taking to the street" is not an option for most local residents to confront their "local permit issuing governmental body" for open pit mining, but "taking to the street" does get attention. Please nobody get killed during the injunction period.
Again, what is the economic advantage here from the cost per ton of coal secured from this method versus conventional methods?
If this is a "safety issue" because of mine collapse risks for conventional mining in tremor areas or weak rock, find a different mountain and leave this one alone.
Has anybody ever been to Sudbury, Canada? If the lessons of denuding land has not been learned after visiting there , you are most dense indeed. - 1 year ago
-
WisconsinNorm
-
-
WisconsinNorm
-
There is no local jurisdiction that cannot override a federal law if a constitutional issue is not in question.
"Eminent domain" might be a stickler, but mountain top removal has nothing to do with highway construction.
"Taking to the street" is not an option for most local residents to confront their "local permit issuing governmental body" for open pit mining, but "taking to the street" does get attention. Please nobody get killed during the injunction period.
Again, what is the economic advantage here from the cost per ton of coal secured from this method versus conventional methods?
If this is a "safety issue" because of mine collapse risks for conventional mining in tremor areas or weak rock, find a different mountain and leave this one alone.
- 1 year ago
-
WisconsinNorm
-
-
jjmaster
-
Their motto is to kill and destroy.
- 1 year ago
-
jjmaster
-
-
lukewarmenthusiasm
-
ugh. people never cease to dissapoint. how lame.
- 1 year ago
-
lukewarmenthusiasm
-
-
TightBuns [removed]
- This comment has been removed.
-
TightBuns [removed]
-
-
onechance
-
You can also download our new Advocate's Toolkit. This kit will help you organize house parties and other events in your community. With step-by-step instructions and useful printable handouts, this kit includes everything you need to educate your friends and family about the danger of mountaintop removal mining – and what you and they can do to help stop it.
Please plan an event at your apartment or house. If you are a student, consider an event on campus. Download the toolkit today and get started in your community today.
Help us get out the message that we will not stand for coal companies polluting our water any longer!
Sincerely,
Your friends at Stop Mountaintop Removal
www.stopmountaintopremoval.org - 1 year ago
-
onechance
-
-
onechance
-
If you've been following the news for the last few days, you know that the Department of the Interior's Office of Surface Mining (OSM) is poised to finalize a rule that would allow hundreds of miles of streams and valleys in Appalachia to be permanently buried by waste from mountaintop removal coal mining. OSM's plan directly conflicts with the decades-old Stream Buffer Zone Rule, a Reagan-era rule that prohibits surface coal mining activities from disturbing areas within 100 feet of permanent and seasonal streams.
Just last week, the New York Times published an editorial opposing the move, calling it "one more sad chapter in the long, tortured history of Appalachia's coal-rich hills."
The Bush administration must know from us that this is simply unacceptable.
Please take action now. When it passed the surface mining laws years ago, Congress gave EPA the responsibility to ensure that coal mining regulations do not harm water quality – and this one definitely does! Call EPA Administrator Stephen Johnson and tell him to protect these valuable resources by keeping the Stream Buffer Zone Rule in place.
EPA Main Headquarters: (202) 564-4700
- 1 year ago
-
onechance
-
-
onechance
-
One more thing you can do:
Call EPA Administrator Stephen Johnson and tell him to protect Appalachia by keeping the Stream Buffer Zone Rule in place.
Call:
(202) 564-4700LEAVE A MESSAGE IF THEY DON'T PICK UP!
- 1 year ago
-
onechance
-
-
WisconsinNorm
-
Sometime in the very near future, I will travel about forty miles to an Alliant Energy electrical generating station presently powered by 60 rail car loads/day of coal and ask them to show me first of all what "coal waste" looks and tastes like and secondly what they do with it.
Can't say I ever asked. I can only hope it ends up somewhere in our "evil-twin" Illinois where the coal probably came from in the first place--what a situation!
Man, it must be a lot of stuff, they must rail car it out-- that would be my guess at present. Maybe beyond Illinois?
Maybe I could get some insight as to what agencies govern THIS waste issue for a plant operating since WW II--if I could, I would leave right now to throw out a "point to ponder."
- 1 year ago
-
WisconsinNorm
-
-
rasting [removed]
-
WisconsinNorm: This comment has been removed.
-
rasting [removed]
-
-
rasting [removed]
- This comment has been removed.
-
rasting [removed]
-
-
pokesmot
-
My tracking # 8078181e
- 1 year ago
-
pokesmot
-
-
SeaJade
-
Thank you for this post onechance!
- 1 year ago
-
SeaJade
-
-
pakazak
-
i think it would be okay to dump the wast in crawford texas. on the bush ranch would be juft fine.
- 1 year ago
-
pakazak
-
-
Virtual_Will_Rogers
-
...put George Bush underground....and Dick Cheney....
force them to be coal miners.....Golden Ruler...Will....... - 1 year ago
-
Virtual_Will_Rogers
-
-
Grinhooks
-
I want tougher environmental regulations, and I want all such regulations enforced, but I ask again to please point out the relevant parts of this document that we're supposed to protest. I don't want to protest blindly.
- 1 year ago
-
Grinhooks
-
-
onechance
-
This piece of garbage is to REVERSE that 100 foot regulation...
If you read the whole thing, you still might not understand. It's written that way to confuse you into NOT CARING.
This is the Bu$h Admins last handout to big Coal.
Its a LIFT of dumping regulations. Do want Coal waste in your drinking water? Do you want it in ANY water?If not, comment, and tell them NOT TO LEFT CURRENT REGULATIONS (and hopefully to make them tougher).
Thanks.
- 1 year ago
-
onechance
-
-
Beatrix_Kiddo
-
thnaks onechance!!!! :D
comment left and forwarded
- 1 year ago
-
Beatrix_Kiddo
-
-
current89
-
Good post Onechance. I'll leave a comment, and send it to some friends.
- 1 year ago
-
current89
-
-
Patio_Patty
-
Good night! Is this like the last ditch piece of shit Bu$h & his Butt Buddies want to do to destroy our planet? WTF? This guy must really want to go down in flames!! Please visit the link, sign the petition and pass it on!
Peace!
Patio Patty © - 1 year ago
-
Patio_Patty
-
-
Grinhooks
-
OK, I'm not sure I get this. I assume that OneChance has read the 249 page document, could you please save the rest of us some time by telling us where the scary parts are?
On the surface, it appears that page 6 says stay back at least 100 feet from water or stream beds. If that is not possible, they must explain why not to the satisfaction of the "regulatory authority". In addition, the miners would have to come up with a better idea.
If we happily assume that America will wake up and get responsible authorities into the OSM/DoI, then the miners would only have a maximum of 3 months from now to get their plans shoved through government under the current worthless administration.
Or should we assume that this follows the government's tradition of naming their actions the exact opposite of what they actually do, like "Patriot Act", "Homeland Security", "Fair Tax" or "Help America Vote"?
OneChance, which pages and paragraphs are of interest?
- 1 year ago
-
Grinhooks
-
-
onechance
-
Grinhooks:
This piece of garbage is to REVERSE that 100 foot regulation...
If you read the whole thing, you still might not understand. It's written that way to confuse you into NOT CARING.
This is the Bu$h Admin's last handout to big Coal.
It's LIFT of dumping regulations. Do want Coal waste in your drinking water? Do you want it in ANY water?If not, comment, and tell them NOT TO LEFT CURRENT REGULATIONS (and hopefully to make them tougher).
Thanks.
- 1 year ago
-
onechance
-
-
dankitti
-
We must do everything we can to save the environment.
- 1 year ago
-
dankitti
-
-
Eternal_Wind
-
dankitti:
If everything meant killing people, I'd say no. Let's not get too extreme, but we should definately be doing more, especially petitioning (maybe some demonstrations/protests.) Oh, and arguing by countering what people have said to support the dumping might help as well, though it'd probably really piss the person off... Just know when to stop, and make sure you argue intelligently while you're at it, it'll help a lot. That probably has a higher chance of getting people to "convert" as well.
- 1 year ago
-
Eternal_Wind
-
-
deeblackangel
-
I say we just burn the damn planet down to the core.
Then leave it like that bastard child we never met. - 1 year ago
-
deeblackangel
-
-
Eternal_Wind
-
deeblackangel:
... Is that sarcasm? >_>l|
I don't think we could just leave anyways, we'd have to find another place to stay first.
- 1 year ago
-
Eternal_Wind
-
-
desertcat
-
I already sent to friends and signed petition.Everyone should
- 1 year ago
-
desertcat
-
-
onechance
-
Send this to everyone you know. Please.
- 1 year ago
-
onechance
