Would you help a loved one die?
-
-
- DeliaTheArtist
- added this
http://www.guardian.co.uk/society/2008/oct/29/assisted-suicide-right-...
"Prosecutors fear a high court judgment today will lead to the first criminal cases against people who helped their terminally ill relatives to die.They believe that efforts by Debbie Purdy, a terminally ill MS sufferer who has asked the director of public prosecutions (DPP) to clarify the law, could end the practice of turning a blind eye to the growing number of Britons travelling abroad to clinics where they help their relatives die.
More than 90 UK citizens have travelled abroad with relatives to countries where assisted suicide is legal. Although many of these cases have been investigated by the police, none has been prosecuted.
Sources close to the Crown Prosecutions Service (CPS) say officials are privately reluctant to bring criminal proceedings in such cases. However, campaigners say Purdy's attempts to seek clarification of CPS policy represent a "high risk strategy" which may compel prosecutors to take a tougher line. "If the DPP does publish guidelines it will make it more likely that the decision will be made to prosecute," said David Matthew, a leading barrister who prosecutes criminal cases. "All cases where people die are taken very seriously. It's difficult for a prosecutor to shut off a whole area from prosecuting."
Sir Ken Macdonald, the outgoing DPP, has said he would not be willing to publish guidelines granting immunity from prosecution in assisted suicide cases. "It's for parliament to decide what the law should be and we operate according to the legislation," a spokesperson for the DPP said. "We are awaiting the judgment and if parliament wants to look at the law then that's a matter for parliament."
While the law continues to make assisting suicide a criminal offence, lawyers say the CPS may have no choice but to prosecute.
"Any further guidelines may prove restrictive," said John Cooper, a barrister who has written about the state of the law on suicide. "It may also result in prosecutions, which might not be in the public interest."
The law makes assisting the suicide of another, including a terminally ill friend or relative, a crime carrying a sentence of up to 14 years' imprisonment. It is legal in other jurisdictions, including Switzerland, Belgium, the Netherlands, Luxembourg and the US state of Oregon.
Purdy fears that if her husband travels with her to Switzerland to assist in her suicide, he could be prosecuted on his return. "It is important that the law and the DPP's policy should be clarified," said Saimo Chahal, her lawyer. "There are many other people in the same situation. They should know what the consequences of their actions will be."
The issue came to the fore last month when it was revealed that a 23-year-old, Daniel James, had been helped to travel to Switzerland to end his life. James, paralysed from the chest down since March last year after a rugby scrum collapsed on top of him, ended his life at the Dignitas clinic on September 12, accompanied by his parents. Prosecutors are considering whether they should face criminal charges. Campaigners say the absence of clear guidelines enables prosecutors to take a compassionate stance by deeming it not in the public interest to prosecute. "As things stand, relatives are not being prosecuted for assisting suicide," Nan Maitland, a campaigner for Friends at the End, said. "This might change in future if the CPS are forced to outline a clear policy".
Attempts to legalise assisted suicide in Britain have been rejected. The most recent, in 2006, was defeated in the House of Lords by 148 votes to 100."
-
- groups:
- News, Current News UK, Love
-
- tags:
- News, UK, Current News UK, Love, 9 more
-
-
Neghie
-
My answer, is yes. Because I love them.
- 1 year ago
-
Neghie
-
-
Kanut [removed]
- This comment has been removed.
-
Kanut [removed]
-
-
the_Jack
-
Kanut:
Really? Please cite me the chapter and verse, or at least give me an idea what Biblical personages were involved (Noah? Ruth? Judas?) so I can look it up and read for myself the scriptural prohibition against euthanasia.
- 1 year ago
-
the_Jack
-
-
smice
-
I just read "The Resurrectionist" by Jack O'Connell. It is a novel about a boy in a coma whose father tries to bring him back. Check it out. http://www.enterlimbo.com/
- 1 year ago
-
smice
-
-
SonofLiberty1
-
Dying with dignity and taking someone's life are two very different things.
Yes, seeing a loved one in constant pain is terrible. It's terrible for the loved one and terrible for the immediate family but does it give us the right to terminate that person's life before God does.
No, it doesn't
Maybe God has a reason?
- 1 year ago
-
SonofLiberty1
-
-
DeliaTheArtist
-
SonofLiberty1:
Then why go to the doctor at all if it is not your right to do what you want with your body? Why not just trust god to take care of it, or surrender to "god's will"? What gives you the right to prolong a life through medical intervention but not end it the same way?
- 1 year ago
-
DeliaTheArtist
-
-
alicynx
-
I am SOO glad I live in Oregon; we had a suicide rate that was through the roof before the Death with Dignity law, and now people who are faced with their last resort can do so safely and without endangering others. Go Oregon! ^_^
- 1 year ago
-
alicynx
-
-
ninepounds6
-
We have a choice in death, and there is a choice out there. Doctor and relative assisted suicide is very, very common, simply not talked about openly. I am pretty sure it is done all the time, I know my family has discussed it and made plans, I know friends of mine have discussed it and have made plans. Though it would be nice to make it legal within certain well established perameters, it is already common, accepted, but discreet.
- 1 year ago
-
ninepounds6
-
-
purplefox
-
I think it'd be an incredibly hard decision to make, and I don't know what I'd do if a loved one asked me to help kill them. I don't know if I could even ask another person to do that for me. I guess that's partly why it's such tricky legislation, since there's no way of really knowing how you'd feel unless it happens to you.
- 1 year ago
-
purplefox
-
-
ScratchyPants
-
J_Jammer, I respect and understand your point of view. I'm with the masses, though, and would not want to see my brother or mother suffer through something that can't be cured.
- 1 year ago
-
ScratchyPants
-
-
J_Jammer [removed]
-
No I would not help someone die. Life is a gift and that is not a gift that I have any right, nor does anyone else, to take away...even if it's themselves.
This world is full of disrespect and I will not add to it by disrespecting life itself.
- 1 year ago
-
J_Jammer [removed]
-
-
alicynx
-
J_Jammer:
What about your family pet? If they were in pain, suffering from something that would eventually kill them, would you consider euthanasia for them?
I'm gonna go out on a limb here and assume you're not a vegetarian either, right? I mean, life is so damn precious, are you putting it in your gut every day?
There's an amazing double standard in our society, and so many people don't even realize it. Really think about it - what constitutes life in your book? How much do you really value life, in all its forms? - 1 year ago
-
alicynx
-
-
J_Jammer [removed]
-
J_Jammer:
With that same narrow minded mentality you don't swat flies or mosquitoes.
Do not equate human life with animal life. No amount of research or PeTA propaganda will ever make them the same.
As for my dog...she got hit by a car on Monday. Or so we think...because she whined and hobbled back to the door. She doesn't whine often. We take her to the vet they won't do anything for her and if they do try to fix her they might make a mistake and then ask if we went to put her down. She still wags her tale and she still tries to move her back legs.
Telling me that I have the choice over another life to take it via animal against human is not the same.
Animals do not have a voice nor do they have a gift. They do not have morals nor do they have empathy for humanity as humans have for them. They are not on the same playing field. They do not deserve any mistreatment but they don't deserve human rights. Deciding their death is far different than deciding the death of a human. It's less complex. The things that can be done for them medically are no where near what can be done for humans.
As for deciding if I would end my dog's life if she were in pain that is far too complicated for me to even to comprehend and the guilt I know I would feel would be much. I would not be making that call and leave that up to the vet to decide.
I don't even hunt.
I do eat meat.
- 1 year ago
-
J_Jammer [removed]
-
-
sarahlou79
-
J_Jammer:
I agree with you about the animal comparison, (not because I don't believe animals aren't worthy however). But can you honestly say - faced with the choice - that you would rather watch the person you love most on this planet end their lives in pain and misery rather than 'help them' just because you have no right to 'disrespect life'. Surely life has disrespected you and the person dying by putting you in that situation in the first place.
- 1 year ago
-
sarahlou79
-
-
Gtarfr3ak
-
J_Jammer:
J_Jammer... I gotta ask you... do you just like to play devil's advocate? You tend to just disagree with the popular opinion and then argue it with at least some degree of intelligence.. and I've heard you defend yourself by saying people have lost their 'sense of humor'.. so whats your deal?
- 1 year ago
-
Gtarfr3ak
-
-
J_Jammer [removed]
-
J_Jammer:
I know people that are paralyzed like that one boy mentioned and they are full of life.
Pain is also mental and created by the person. Someone could be in a horrible situation and it's made that much worse by how they think about it.
This is a situation that is up to the person to decide. What they decide is what they decide. I do not think less of the boy for deciding that what he had now compared to what he had then is worse and not worth living. I understand that sort of mentality based on his situation.
But to state that that's how another would feel if they were in that situation is silly. There is no rule book on who would feel what during what situation. You can't control situations. You can only control how you perceive them. And that is power in itself to create great change that leads to coping.
--------
What exactly do you mean what is my deal?
I will see if I can answer it with this:
People don't argue the point made in news articles. They arguing feelings and attachments to groups they love. People who defend Obama argue for him and because he's part of this group and ignore his faults. When someone says something about him those people claim they are lying or don't understand or they justify it. That's a problem because it's about the situation and they just make it about him and how lovable he is. Who cares? He's to be the President. Lovable isn't presidential nor is part of what a leader needs to be. Teddy Bears are good for one thing...hugging and calming...not for this world and it's tainted view of right and wrong.
Then those same people will attack Palin or McCain viciously with the exact same comments they were defending Obama against.
It's annoying and they deserve opposition to such atrocious thinking.
That's one reason why I do that.
- 1 year ago
-
J_Jammer [removed]
-
-
ninepounds6
-
J_Jammer:
Jammer, you are so wrong and so arrogant. You assume to know what everyone on the planet that is backing Obama feels! How utterly arrogant!
I voted independant every election except this one for over 25 years. I am not voting for Obama, I am voting AGAINST McCain and the Republican party! Yet you talk like I am voting for Obama because I need cuddles from a teddy bear! How stupid!
And I cannot stand Palin for the same reason over 80% of America cant stand her.. she is stupid, arrogant, a religous nut, a crappy parent, a crooked politician, and has an ego bigger than Alaska!
Only a fool presumes to know what millions of people think, but only an ass makes his feelings known so often.
You know what YOU think Jammer, not what every one of the millions upon millions of voters think.
- 1 year ago
-
ninepounds6
-
-
J_Jammer [removed]
-
J_Jammer:
You can't state an opinion without being insulting. Must be a talent.
- 1 year ago
-
J_Jammer [removed]
-
-
ninepounds6
-
J_Jammer:
You are damned right I am insulting you! You are a fool!
You state that NONE of us on here can state an opinion without responding to our feelings alone... an insult!
You state that eveyone voting for Obama is doing so because we are in love with him and not voting on issues... an insult!
You say that when we state an opinion that disagrees with yours, we are lying... an insult!
You insult everyone constantly, and I AM insulting you! You are a fool, and idiot, and an egomaniac!
But you did pick your icon properly... a cartoon of a little pissed off man... THAT is YOU!
Deal with yourself honestly dingbat, we all see you for exactly what you are.
- 1 year ago
-
ninepounds6
-
-
DeliaTheArtist
-
J_Jammer:
J_Jammer, who's right is life if not yours? Why would you not have the right to do what you want with your body? To whom do you grant that authority?
- 1 year ago
-
DeliaTheArtist
-
-
sarahlou79
-
My grandfather also died this year - He was so adamant that he wanted to survive and beat what was hurting him that he asked us to do all we could to help him, BUT the doctors decided to stop giving him his medication because “there was no point”. My grandfather had no choice in that, that was their decision, and he died. But if it was his decision to die, and he asked them to stop giving him medication, because he knew it wasn't working and he was in too much pain to cope, then it's a whole new story. Surely if the doctors and hospital have the right to stop medication then the patient and the terminally ill person should have the right to say -'NO MORE'.
- 1 year ago
-
sarahlou79
-
-
bedeboop
-
sarahlou79:
I agree.
- 1 year ago
-
bedeboop
-
-
samonster34
-
why is suicide a crime? these bitches need to back off!
- 1 year ago
-
samonster34
-
-
jperson
-
I like the Futurama "Suicide Booth" idea, especially if there's a discount around the holidays.
- 1 year ago
-
jperson
-
-
rainbowryan420
-
jperson:
would you like quick and painless or long and and horrible
- 1 year ago
-
rainbowryan420
-
-
jperson
- This comment has been removed.
-
jperson
-
-
abbym0308
-
UPDATE: It's being reported that Debbie Purdy lost her case to clarify the law on assisted suicide.
- 1 year ago
-
abbym0308
-
-
bedeboop
-
I'm not sure if I coul'd or not. "Murphy's Law" has followed me all of my life....if you will. A cure would be found the next day with my luck. :( I would not want to live, if faced with being a vegetable, myself....but in that I have made clear that I would not want my life sustained by machines. Not sure about having my brain faculties (hehehe, such as they are) and not my muscle functions.
- 1 year ago
-
bedeboop
-
-
Horntho [removed]
- This comment has been removed.
-
Horntho [removed]
-
-
bmltv
-
I have been in the position many times where I wanted to assist.
- 1 year ago
-
bmltv
-
-
abbym0308
-
People should absolutely be allowed to choose to live or die. It's no one's business but their own. The fact that the state has any influence in decisions like this makes me mad.
- 1 year ago
-
abbym0308
-
-
jjeziorski
-
Certainly. I think honoring someone's wishes regarding their final hours goes without question.
After all - what one person sees as extending life, another may just see as prolonging death.
- 1 year ago
-
jjeziorski
-
-
krush_productions
-
Yes,
I would only hope someone would do the same to me if i was a fucking comatose vegi. I would be useless just taking up time, and medicine that could help someone else who was going to be a competent, "complete" human.
- 1 year ago
-
krush_productions
-
-
mako2424
-
Absolutely.
And anyone who has watched a relative or a close friend suffer through the pain of a terminal illness would probably agree.
- 1 year ago
-
mako2424
-
-
Gtarfr3ak
-
-
But think of what you could be missing out on!!!!!
but in all seriousness I support death with dignity and would not want to stand by while a family member slowly died in pain.
- 1 year ago
-
Gtarfr3ak
-
-
devo64
-
This is being voted on next week in Washington State. I will vote yes for I-1000, Death with Dignity. It is modeled after Oregon's law and gives these rights back to the Individual.
If you are dying and do not have hope of recovery why should the law dictate that you do not have the right to ask your doctor for the medication to end the suffering and the extreme waste of family resources to continue to go on at any cost.
We are more humane to animals and to killers than medically afflicted individuals. Get religion and the legal system out of such decisions- If you have watched someone die then you can relate that it is a very sad sight and event.
- 1 year ago
-
devo64
-
-
DeliaTheArtist
-
devo64:
Thanks for that info!
- 1 year ago
-
DeliaTheArtist
-
-
CarolynGillis
-
I have been through the loss of my father a few years ago and I learned that they use Morphine to speed death as well as a way to stop the pain. Someone in Hospice told me if they gave me a healthy person morphine that their body would start shutting down soon.
They use this when it is convenient for them...sometimes with compassion but often with the bottom line as a motive...get them through the gauntlet and out....pay on your way out.
- 1 year ago
-
CarolynGillis
-
-
smice
-
Talking about death helps us stop worrying about it.
- 1 year ago
-
smice
-
-
PoisonTheMonkey
-
What a blatant slap in the face to freedom when you can't even take your own life.
- 1 year ago
-
PoisonTheMonkey
-
-
isnamthere
-
PoisonTheMonkey:
Total agreement!
- 1 year ago
-
isnamthere
-
-
daledrops
-
i support euthenesia. it would be alot less painful for all parties involved if the practice were regulated.
- 1 year ago
-
daledrops
-
-
Lil_Pete
-
daledrops:
I think the wording here is equal important, Euthanasia sounds (and don't get me wrong is a) genuine medical solution, when life is unliveable.
The problem with 'Assisted-Suicide' is the connotations with crudely written, notes by depressed teenagers who've listened to the wrong music growing up - Suicide isn't thought of as the most socially acceptable practice, I think we need to make use a medical definition like, Euthanasia to differentiate.
And yes I am 100% behind it.
- 1 year ago
-
Lil_Pete
-
-
JohnA
-
My Grandfather always told me, keep me plugged in as long as you can. The day that they unplug me, the next day might be the day they find the cure for me.
- 1 year ago
-
JohnA
-
-
DeliaTheArtist
-
JohnA:
Interesting, my mom always told me she doesn't want to be plugged in at all. She's a brain aneurysm survivor, so there's a decent chance I may have to stand by that one day.
- 1 year ago
-
DeliaTheArtist
-
-
DeliaTheArtist
-
"I think it is ironic governments kill thousands and yet a single individual who wants to end his suffering gets their attention." - I totally agree!
- 1 year ago
-
DeliaTheArtist
-
-
rainbowryan420
-
I agree with Dr. Kevorkian on this one
people should have the right to end their own life - 1 year ago
-
rainbowryan420
-
-
Ragan
-
Governments have no qualms about killing hundreds or thousands in senseless wars, I should think it is none of their business if people want to end their life for any reason. Like abortion it is the persons own body to do as he sees fit. Government should stay out of peoples private life and business. Men and women in government since barbarian government has been invented caint seem to find something to keep them busy so they meddle into peoples making them miserable. The truth is civilization does not need politicians to tell then what to do, Civilizations needs schools with a civil and intelligent curriculum and educational facilities to ensure that children and young people get a proper education. In my years of living Government and politicians have not confined their duties to government matters, rather they have spread their greedy interests to every nation that will let them in. They have been in the business of killing for so long what difference does it make if someone desires to end his own pain and suffering. I think it is ironic governments kill thousands and yet a single individual who wants to end his suffering gets their attention.
- 1 year ago
-
Ragan
-
-
mata_dindi
-
The right to end one's life because of certain circumstances and the right to ask someone to help should not be denied. I applaud Oregon for often being ahead of the rest of America.
This year, the state of Washington is putting an assisted suicide initiative on the ballot and hopefully they can be another example for the remaining states and countries that have yet to understand the need for such a right.
- 1 year ago
-
mata_dindi
-
-
neocongo
-
Agreed. Be smart about it. If you aren't you will likely spend a significant portion of your life in prison.
- 1 year ago
-
neocongo
-
-
DeliaTheArtist
-
I would too. I think the right to die is an important one, we need to face this issue especially in America without it being so taboo.
- 1 year ago
-
DeliaTheArtist
-
-
cantucwearebrothers
-
Yes I would absolutely help a friend or relative that was terminally ill end their life with dignity.
- 1 year ago
-
cantucwearebrothers
