Community | October 30, 2008 | 16 comments

Palin target of new ethics complaint

source: http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2008/10/28/cbsnews_investigates/main4554071.shtml?tag=topHome

Image
sunnyspeaks

http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2008/10/28/cbsnews_investigates/main45...

Alaska Governor and Republican Vice President hopeful Sarah Palin may be facing another round of scrutiny, this time for charging the state for her children to travel with her while conducing official state business.
  1. groups:
  2. tags:
    US,  Election 08,  Palin,  Ethics,  2 more
  3.     
    |

16 comments // Palin target of new ethics complaint

  • andyshooshaw
  • justright
    • 0
      justright  

    • The conservatives have dug up all of the dirt they can on Obama, and the people of the country have found the (alleged) facts lacking. Palin's (alleged) problems on the other hand seem to have hit a chord with the electorate and hurt their ticket. Nuff said

    • 4 years ago
  • Tradiggy
    • 0
      Tradiggy  

    • What closed doors? If McCain would talked more about what he was going to do; instead of trashing what Obama has done, he could be in a better spot. He didn't give what he is going to do, and the things thats he did laid out didn't make sense to me. He don't give he that proud to be American feeling.

      I don't look at him as that's my President, he makes me proud. I thinks he wants to help see me seceed. If something goes wrong he can comfort me. That other countries would want to listen or fear him. And last, that his second can back him up and take over if need be!!!

      That's whay NO McCain!!

    • 4 years ago
  • J_Jammer
  • ninepounds6
    • 0
      ninepounds6  
    • J_Jammer:

      LOL! Good comeback, little man!

      Do me a favor, tell me what this little gem addresses:

      "Some what someone's camp did it to him. It has not been the public so it's nothing in comparison."

      In English, exactly what does this mean? LOL! And you call yourself a writer!

      And I never, ever once said that I support Obama, in all of my hundreds of posts. Not once. But you have not been right in a single one of your hundreds of posts yet, so keep posting little cartoon man! The odds are that you will say, in proper English, something right sooner or later!

    • 4 years ago
  • J_Jammer
    • 0
      J_Jammer [removed]  
    • J_Jammer:

      What does writer have to do with anything?

      Ernest Hemingway couldn't spell and was bad at grammar.

      You don't know what it means to be a writer if you think that something that indicates a poor writer.

      You have never criticized Obama so my statement stands unless you have and you can state what it was.

      You're so wound up. You must shove your foot in your mouth a lot.

    • 4 years ago
  • ninepounds6
    • 0
      ninepounds6  
    • J_Jammer:

      Writers use words to portray an idea, you simply spout garbage that makes no sense at all. You just seem to have the hardest time trying to use words to portray your ideas! Bless your little heart!

      And for the record little man, I am not voting for Obama, I am voting against McCain, Palin, and the Republicans.

      And wound up? This coming from a man who identifies himself with an angry little man in a cartoon? Seriously?

      LOL!

    • 4 years ago
  • J_Jammer
  • ninepounds6
    • 0
      ninepounds6  
    • J_Jammer:

      How incredibly ignorant! You win, little pissed off cartoon man! Your mastery of your Mother tongue has swept you far above us mere mortals!

      LOL!

      You are welcomed, wittle wittle jammie man!

    • 4 years ago
  • ninepounds6
    • 0
      ninepounds6  

    • Correct again little pissed off cartoon man... the Democratic and Republican Primaries are not held in public, nor are the televised, nor are they reported on... they are held entirely in secret behind closed doors.

      And then afterwards, when both parties announce their winners, they are both hidden in a closet and not spoken about until they choose a stupid, arrogant, egotistical criminal as a running mate.

      Good going Sparky.

    • 4 years ago
  • J_Jammer
  • ninepounds6
    • 0
      ninepounds6  

    • Lets see... in this thread we have learned that breaking the law is the same as legally buying air time for ads, and after almost two years of scrutiny, much of it cruel and ugly under Hillarys people, Obama has yet to undergo any public scrutiny at all.

      Right.

      This dingbat is a criminal and an arrogant idiot who voluntarily entered the public arena at its highest level... what does she expect? Stones and glass houses... she has asked for everything she is getting.

    • 4 years ago
  • justright
    • 0
      justright  

    • When you say your sooo good and sooo right of course people are going to investigate you and disagree. She's made some bad decisions and now will be called on them.

    • 4 years ago
  • JohnA
    • 0
      JohnA [removed]  

    • If the press had just given half the scrutiny Palin and Joe the Plumber have gotten to Obama, I wonder how much more we would know about him. No, that would be racist.

    • 4 years ago
  • BillCue
    • 0
      BillCue  

    • We also can expect "House Gate". Someone built her home, but it was most likely not the "dude". Someone who worked on the house will step froward and someone will go to jail just like Stephens.

    • 4 years ago
  • J_Jammer
    • 0
      J_Jammer [removed]  

    • What exactly is wrong?

      Because all this complaining about her is tiresome, because it's getting ridiculious. OMG she's wearing nice clothes OH NOSE.....

      it cost OH so much.

      But let's ignore the millions Obama raises and spends on 30 minutes to hit the repeat button on why HE should win, even though HE states for change.

    • 4 years ago
from the community

top videos