Corrupt Army targets and kills innocent civilians for vacation, promotions and perks.

The story tagged to this posting is about an army unit in Columbia, who needed to produce rebel 'kills'. The soldiers needed 'kills' in order to get leave, vacation days off. The officers needed 'kills' for promotions and performance reviews. So they routinely lured civilians
to the base, killed them, and called them 'Rebels'. This was discovered when the brother of a soldier was killed, despite protests.

In the United States an 'army' of workers in the domestic violence and abuse industry does much the same thing, and often fabricates false accusations or 'lures' parents in
custody disputes to make false accusations, in order to bring up the numbers needed to get thier funding, promotions, etc..

There are many studies that address the problems of false abuse and domestic violence accusations in the context of divorce and custody disputes, such as:

http://www.liftingtheveil.org/reports2.htm

Many of these studies fail to include analysis of another very basic motivation
behind false accusations of domestic violence and abuse in the context
of custody: the money. The falsely 'accusing' parent usually profits from false
accusations in the form of more custody, more child support,
vindictive gratification of using the courts like a club to attack the
other parent and 'win' the custody battle. The lawyers also
clearly 'win' lots of money from the extortion racket threatening both
parents thier kids will be taken away unless they pay thru the nose for
more and more legal fees. In reality, there is an entire 'army' of
corrupt conspirators in the 'abuse' industry that simply must generate
abuse and domestic violence numbers in order to survive. Imagine what
would happen to all the shelters, and quacks, and experts and case
workers who's income depends upon domestic violence and abuse, if
no 'real' cases could be found? would they simply sit at thier desks
twidling thier thumbs?

Parents and children are nothing but 'meat' for the butchers in the
corrupt family court racket seeking to maximize thier own best interest
by exploiting children and targeting parents with false domestic
violence and abuse accusations.

The logical solution to this problem would be to end all funding
schemes that are based on quantity of abuse or domestic violence
reports, to reduce the incentive to produce bogus reports. A more
simple neutral funding scheme, such as basing funding for abuse
prevention programs on a simple population headcount would be
preferable. A 'progessive' funding scheme would reward communities with
programs in place successful at preventing abuse and domestic violence.