-
-
-
-
- VSiskos
- added this
- video added November 18, 2008
- flag
-
A Day Without A Gay Nationwide (and World Wide) Protest
-
-
-
-
- donkeyfly69
- 8 months ago
-
-
There is no need for a compromise as the initial ruling by the California State Supreme Court was not radical and extreme to begin with. All it did was recognize the right of gays and lesbians to marry their partners and to give their families the full legal and social recognition that they deserve. It did not in any way infringe on the rights of any religious group at all. The ruling applied only to civil marriage and did not apply to religious marriage as performed by churches. Any church could set its own rules as to who it wished to marry and to how it wished to conduct the ceremony. The court ruling gave rights to one group deprived of them without taking any rights away from anyone else in any manner whatsoever.
-
This is so wrong.
There is no way this should be legally binding.
The state and religion should be seperate.
Homosexuality does not prohibit religious activity.
Gambling is a 'sin', is that banned?
Smoking cigarettes is technically a 'sin' as your brain is affected by the drugs.
There are a lot worse thing than homosexuality.
How would the religious order react if homosexual voted to ban religion?
