The American Family

The Tax payer, pays billions per year to have one side of the child family remove from their life.

Yes, they are sure taking care of the children.....NOT

This is part of the Billions of dollars you are paying for....

search "The American Family" on current to find more of this waste of the tax payers money

The Law and Economics of Child Support Payments By William S. Comanor addresses the phenomenon of the 'Deadbeat Dad' starting with the well known example of the 'baby momma' on welfare scenerio, showing that since dads pay money to the state, and AFDC pays the mother there simply is no incentives for fathers to pay support thru the system, because every $1 paid contributes $0 additional benefit to the child, and only payments 'under the table' directly to the mother or child have any real benefit to the child.
Aall parents should and do have a responsibility to care for thier child, but making these payments thru the state is the least responsible course of action, because doing so funds a corrupt and evil machine that feeds off of the destruction of families, and keeping parents away from thier children. This argument further holds that the only 'real' support a NCP gives a child is the time and money actually spent with, and on a child. In other words, the forced 'child support payment' to the state is viewed as having no benefit to the child, while 'direct' payments such as time and money spent durring 'visits', going on outings, buying the child clothing, schools supplies, etc.. is viewed as the only 'real' means to satisify a parent's moral obligation to support thier child.

. In a marriage, many 'collective' economic decisions are made by parents, which reflect not only the individual preference of each parent, but each parents concern for the 'collective' preferences of the household. Likewise, the amount each parent allocates to spend on the child is likewise dependant upon collective resources. The problem with child support payments is that it raises the income of the custdial parent, thus raising the consumption preference of that parent, so that only a portion of the NCP's child support payment is now allocated to the child. So, like in the welfare 'baby momma' scenerio, each $1 dollar of NCP support payment is no longer $1 going to the child, but rather a fraction gets apportioned to the child, with the remainder enhancing the consumption of the CP due to the increase income caused by the support payment. So the NCP views 'off the books' support payments as a dollar for dollar contribution to the child, while forced state run 'child support payments' are viewed as contributing little or nothing to the child.

Make note on the video, at the time of 3min 10sec into the video this lady slips and states "women can" then she quickly corrects herself and says "custodial Parent". What a bias system.
It also amazes me that when they talk about "help" with child support, they talk about collecting it. How about helping the non custodial parent make enough money to pay for the exorbitant amount... and please don't say "file to have your child support reduced. I filed over a year ago, and have yet to even get a court date. I also do NOT get to see my son & daughter (less than 24hrs in a 4 year time period). But that's not important to the courts.
Forever in contempt

So true "Bra1nk"...not once do they talk about both Parents being in the children life during the time when they "The Children" need us the most.

search "The American Family" on current for more