Our tax dollars at work; SS Title IV-D
-
-
-
-
- regjoeschmo
- added this
-
more from WTF:
http://www.ssa.gov/OP_Home/ssact/title04/0458.htm
Have any of you ever wondered why it is so hard to have family courts follow their own rules if you involuntarily lost your job, wound up on disability/unemployment. parenting time changes, or even having the custodial parents income applied acoordingly?Here is a basic overview of how the states annual budget is determined by the amount of support that is paid through the system:
In general.—In paragraph (1), the term “incentive payment pool” means—
(i) $422,000,000 for fiscal year 2000;
(ii) $429,000,000 for fiscal year 2001;
(iii) $450,000,000 for fiscal year 2002;
(iv) $461,000,000 for fiscal year 2003;
(v) $454,000,000 for fiscal year 2004;
(vi) $446,000,000 for fiscal year 2005;
(vii) $458,000,000 for fiscal year 2006;
(viii) $471,000,000 for fiscal year 2007;
(ix) $483,000,000 for fiscal year 2008;
The applicable percentage with respect to a State's support order performance level is as follows:
If the support order performance level is: The applicable percentage is:
At least: But less than:
At least - But less than = The applicable percentage is:
80% = 100
79% - 80% = 98
78% - 79% = 96
77% - 78% = 94
76% - 77% = 92
75% - 76% = 90
74% - 75% = 88
73% - 74% = 86
72% - 73% = 84
71% - 72% = 82
70% - 71% = 80
69% - 70% = 79
68% - 69% = 78
67% - 68% = 77
66% - 67% = 76
65% - 66% = 75
64% - 65% = 74
63% - 64% = 73
62% - 63% = 72
61% - 62% = 71
60% - 61% = 70
59% - 60% = 69
58% - 59% = 68
57% - 58% = 67
56% - 57% = 66
55% - 56% = 65
54% - 55% = 64
53% - 54% = 63
52% - 53% = 62
51% - 52% = 61
50% - 51% = 60
0% - 50% = 0.
-
-
justadad
-
Amounts are of the "incentive payment pool"
Not even of mention relative the total distributions.
The use and misuse to abuse of children must cease.
For sure, the thickest of smoke and shiniest of mirrors by which to cover the Grandest of Duping of Americans and Families.
IV-A, IV-B, all the way to IV-E,
The co-dependents cleverly supplant,
Needs of the Needy and prospective Needy,
With Greed of the Greedy of eyes Beady.Bank of American banks on it,
JP Morgan counts on it,
Lockheed Martin locks on it,
Northrop Grumman grooms it,
Policy Studies Inc. politicizes it,
System and Methods Inc. systematizes it,
Maximus maximizes it.
International Business Machines internationalizes it,
. . .
Even our lower courts Judicially sanctify it.Come on baby, who ya gonna call?
The FBI even has bloodied their hands green within the bled hearts, parted tears and voiceless screams cleverly kept within the abusive cookie jar of creed-less greed.
Heaven help us and the many of no voice or ability to speak for themselves.
Again,
Jurisdiction to tree;; as crime to sound.It really is a dark, decrepit and disgusting epidemic.
IV-mainliners need be brought to light, not further rewarded.
Good grief!
With sincerity of expression, good-will and concern,
- just adad - 1 year ago
-
justadad
-
-
Steward2
-
Right On,
shall be deemed to be 65 per centum,
TITLE 15 > CHAPTER 41 > SUBCHAPTER II > 1673(a) Maximum allowable garnishment
Except as provided in subsection (b) of this section and in section 1675 of this title, the maximum part
of the aggregate disposable earnings of an individual for any workweek which is subjected to garnishment may not exceed(1) 25 per centum of his disposable earnings for that week, or(2) the amount by which his disposable earnings for that week exceed thirty times the Federal minimum hourly wage prescribed by section 206 (a)(1) of title 29 in effect at the time the earnings are payable,whichever is less. In the case of earnings for any pay period other than a week, the Secretary of Labor shall by regulation prescribe a multiple of the Federal minimum hourly wage equivalent in effect to that set forth in paragraph (2).(b) Exceptions(1) The restrictions of subsection (a) of this section do not apply in the case of(A) any order for the support of any person issued by a court of competent jurisdiction or in accordance with an administrative procedure, which is established by State law, which affords substantial due process, and which is subject to judicial review.(B) any order of any court of the United States having jurisdiction over cases under chapter 13 of title 11.
(C) any debt due for any State or Federal tax.(2) The maximum part of the aggregate disposable earnings of an individual for any workweek which is subject to garnishment to enforce any order for the support of any person shall not exceed—(A) where such individual is supporting his spouse or dependent child (other than a spouse or child with respect to whose support such order is used), 50 per centum of such individual’s disposable earnings for that week; and(B) where such individual is not supporting such a spouse or dependent child described in clause (A), 60 per centum of such individual’s disposable earnings for that week;except that, with respect to the disposable earnings of any individual for any workweek, the 50 per centum specified in clause (A) shall be deemed to be 55 per centum and the 60 per centum specified in clause (B)
shall be deemed to be 65 per centum, if and to the extent that such earnings are subject to garnishment to enforce a support order with respect to a period which is prior to the twelve-week period which ends with the beginning of such workweek.(c) Execution or enforcement of garnishment order or process prohibitedNo court of the United States or any State, and no State (or officer or agency thereof), may make, execute, or enforce any order or process in violation of this section.---- - 1 year ago
-
Steward2
-
-
regjoeschmo
-
the lower representation might be hard to follow since the whole graph would not paste, but the information is directly from the link and the graph is easier read there......
- 1 year ago
-
regjoeschmo
-
-
justadad
-
regjoeschmo:
Great post.
Needs of the Needy and prospective Needy,
Supplanted by Greed of the Greedy of eyes Beady.Many an entrusted actively/passively serves,
In the bleeding of hearts,
The tearing of pockets, and
The dowsing of dreams,
Of children,
In the name of children.IV-mainliners need be brought to light.
- 1 year ago
-
justadad
