Why Women Choose to Divorce.
source: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PCVg1q-BpW8&feature=related
-
-
- FRED4JUSTICE
- added this
Marriage represents uncertainty for women "for better or worse", while government programs (from CS collection to EITC, etc) are a sure thing. In uncertain economic times, particlarly among people near the bottom of the economic spectrum, the security of these government programs is more attractive than the uncertainty of getting or staying married - they become a government divorce incentive system.
For men, Marriage represents a substantial risk of losing savings or investment into a marriage. Investing in a family is likely the most substantial investment of time and effort a man can make. Knowing that women typically 'win' no fault divorces, and walk away with
virutally everything including the house, the marital savings, the car, the children, and even his future earnings... men prudently view marriage as a sort of unilateral debt obligation that women may 'cash in' at any time, and leave them financially destitute and in emotional distress over the loss of thier children.
The divorce incentive system works for women because the expectation of winning most or sole custody. In other words, it must be known that the no-fault divorce petition will probably be interpreted as a demand to exclude the other (defendant) parent from the family. This is 100% opposite to a request upon the judge for permission to leave the family, as divorces are often portrayed.
Margaret F. Brinig, in "These Boots Are Made For Walking: Why Most Divorce Filers Are Women", describes "expectation of sole custody" and its effect on divorce filing decisions. This report has been criticized as biased, for example it presumes all reports of 'cruelty' made in a divorce are true, and that all courts are 'fair' or just in terms of allocating custody. It does provide some fairly reasonable conclusions:
"Our results are consistent with our hypothesis that filing behavior is driven by self-interest at the time of divorce..... We have found that who gets the children is by far the most important component in deciding who files for divorce, particularly when there is little quarrel about property, as when the separation is long. .... Because the custody coefficients were the largest by far, family law reformers may want to concentrate on formulating custody rules that will alter the spouses’ relative gains from marriage."
In some jurisdictions, 80% or more of divorces are filed by women. Women aren't choosing to deliberately sabotage their economic health, they are securing benefits for themselves and their children. The U.S.C.B. reports (Pub. P60-230) that 83.1% of sole custodial parents are female, and this knowedge is the assurance to a female plaintiff that she can file with almost 85% confidence in the outcome.
-
- tags:
- Child Custody, equal custody, parent rights
-
-
justadad
-
Great string.
Nor should we respect "states" that play the pieces of endearing child-parent rapports like mere commodity for plunder.
Extortion,
Racketeering, and
Embezzlement;Should never be couched upon best interests of children;
Nor upon the endearing facets of any child of the Almighty. - 3 years ago
-
justadad
-
-
Leisha
-
When my ex-husband had an affair he made his decision. It was my decision to end our relationship as I was not willing to "stand by your ( my ) man". During our seperation I told him he needed to file for divorce. After our divorce we shared parenting albeit our son's primary residence was my home. I did what was best for my son putting my feelings aside for what was best for my son - a loving relationship with both of his parents. Don't get me wrong I felt if I had boots I would walk all over him ( a sign of my weakness ) my son never knew, nor did my ex. I wish more women would realize that divorce is painful but it does not serve their child's best interest to cause them more pain just to get even. I do not respect women / men who use their children as a pawn to pay back their partner for all the wrongs they may have done.
- 3 years ago
-
Leisha
-
-
FRED4JUSTICE
-
States are beneficiaries of a federal program (42 U.S.C. 658a) that pays them money in proportion to the size of their CS programs, which is dependent on the number of divorces. More divorces or more single parent households with child support payments = more money for states. So the states have an incentive to preserve the preference for mothers in sole custody awards, in order to enhance the numbers of divorce, which enhances income to the states.
The need to strike down 42 U.S.C. 658a is a no-brainer. There should never be a financial incentive for states to destroy families, period. If the federal government wants to do something to help families, it should simply provide funding on a straight and simple
per capita basis of the numbers of children residing in a state. If any 'incentives' are offered, they should be in the form of reduced administrative and legal costs, and rewarding states that allocate the most money directly to children and families that need it the most.Rather than viewing child support as a sort of competetion between states on who can generate the most support payments, we should view child support payments as the measure of last resort, and a very poor substitute for direct parental care. In this regard, we should view it as an example of a failure in our society, and one of those necessary evils that we should try to minimize, rather than encourage.
- 3 years ago
-
FRED4JUSTICE