Nearly 200,000 sq miles declared National Marine Monuments by Bush
Dina Cappiello in Washington, D.C.
Associated Press
January 6, 2009
The home of a giant land crab, a sunken island ringed by pink-colored coral, and equatorial waters teeming with sharks and other predators have been designated national marine monuments by U.S. President George W. Bush in the largest marine conservation effort in history. (See photos.)
The three areas—totaling some 195,274 square miles (505,757 square kilometers)—include the Mariana Trench and the waters and corals surrounding three uninhabited islands in the Northern Mariana Islands, Rose Atoll in American Samoa, and seven islands strung along the equator in the central Pacific Ocean.
"We should be very happy because it's the largest marine area ever protected," said Enric Sala, a marine ecologist and National Geographic fellow and emerging explorer. (National Geographic News is owned by the National Geographic Society.)
"We don't need more research to know that more of these remote intact places need to be protected," said Sala, who has helped conduct some of the few scientific surveys in the remote central Pacific islands, particularly in the pristine Kingman Reef.
"This is the only chance we have left to protect parts of the ocean that are still natural."
Palmyra Atoll, a region included in the monument, and Kingman Reef are among the most biodiverse marine ecosystems on earth, according to Suzanne Case, Hawaii director of the nonprofit the Nature Conservancy.
"At a time when positive news about our seas is rare, the designation of three new marine national monuments in the Pacific is a landmark to be celebrated," she added.
The areas harbor the highest fish biomass in the Pacific and are one of the few places still dominated by sharks and other predators, Case said in an email.
Rare Treasures
Each location harbors unique species—such as a bird that incubates its eggs in the heat of underwater volcanoes—and some of the rarest geological formations on Earth, including a sulfur pool. The only other known pool exists on Jupiter's moon Io.
All will be protected as national monuments—the same status afforded to statues and cultural sites—under the 1906 Antiquities Act. The law allows the government to immediately phase out commercial fishing and other extractive uses.
It will be the second time Bush has used the law to protect marine resources.
Two years ago, the president made a huge swath of the Northwestern Hawaiian Islands a national monument, barring fishing, oil and gas extraction, and tourism from its waters and coral reefs. At the time, that area was the largest conservation area in the world.
Savings Accounts
The three areas to be designated Tuesday are larger, though the decisions came with some opposition.
Northern Mariana Islands government officials and indigenous communities, for instance, initially objected to the monument designation, citing concerns about sovereignty, fishing, and mineral exploration.
Recreational fishing, tourism, and scientific research with a federal permit could still occur inside the three areas under the new law. The designations will not conflict with U.S. military activities or freedom of navigation, White House officials said.
The decisions also fell short in size and scope of what conservationists, including Sala, had hoped for.
"The bottom line is that less than a tenth of one percent of the ocean is protected," Sala said, versus 12 percent of land area locked up in reserves.
Reserves are important conservation strategies, Sala said, in that pristine environments can be thought of "savings accounts."
That's because protecting large areas allows marine life to flourish and eventually spill over into neighboring ecosystems, constantly replenishing the seas.
Christine Dell'Amore of National Geographic News contributed to this report.
-
-
Jweezy
-
Nice... not bad.
- 1 year ago
-
Jweezy
-
-
plusaf [removed]
- This comment has been removed.
-
plusaf [removed]
-
-
neocongo
-
I'm interested to see the jurisdiction issue cleared up. It would be like, the imperialist frosting on the hubris cake if Bush declared international waters to be a national monument.
- 1 year ago
-
neocongo
-
-
glabadabadoo
-
Ok, Bush is probably the worst president in recent history, but the folks on this site even bash him when he does something good for the environment, or AIDS in Africa. I am begining to think the people site may be a little slanted and somewhat intolerant.
- 1 year ago
-
glabadabadoo
-
-
MRprez
-
glabadabadoo:
i know what u mean but everything that he does that is good always ends up spiraling downward, crashing and then igniting in a giant ball of flame
- 1 year ago
-
MRprez
-
-
cyman01
-
glabadabadoo:
it seems that the "pack mentality" rises to the surface in human nature. what else can I say?
- 1 year ago
-
cyman01
-
-
ejasun
-

-
Bush set aside the areas as national monuments under authority granted him by the Antiquities Act that President Theodore Roosevelt signed in 1906. The designations bar resource destruction or extraction, waste dumping and commercial fishing.
http://www.upi.com/Science_News/2009/01/06/Bush_names_three_marine_national_monu................................................... Vs. .............
When it comes to learning management and leadership skills, professional planners say "I'm OK, but my boss and my colleagues could sure use some help."
How Bad Leadership Spoils Good Planning | Planetizen
Under the watch of poor leaders and managers, staff morale declines and workers ... How bad - 1 year ago
-
ejasun
-
-
Scarabus
-
Yeah. Good people can do bad things, and bad people can do good things.
But I betcha there are no oil reserves beneath those waters!
- 1 year ago
-
Scarabus
-
-
csmonut
-
Scarabus:
Ahhh...is that why he did it?! :))
- 1 year ago
-
csmonut
-
-
csmonut
-
The fact that Bush did anything positive for the environment is surprising!
Of course he probably didn't even consider whether or not he could. He is the "Decider", ya know:) - 1 year ago
-
csmonut
-
-
Nancyf
-
csmonut:
You'll notice he it did it to SOMEONE ELSE'S property, not ours.
- 1 year ago
-
Nancyf
-
-
AveryMoore
-
pjacobs51 writes,
"..does our government have any jurisdiction at the Mariana site? That would seem to fall under the Japanese governments jurisdiction,"
Exactly my thought. It's open territory.
Why not unilaterally declare Tibet, Sudan, the entire middle east, and lots of other dicey locales, National Neutral Land Reserves?
Sure. We have no authority to do so, no ability to pay for supervision, or maintenance, or armies to impose our will, no legal international right to impose ourselves, but let's do it anyway.
It's so, I dunno - BUSH.
- 1 year ago
-
AveryMoore
-
-
pjacobs51
-
I'm just curious, but does our government have any jurisdiction at the Mariana site? That would seem to fall under the Japanese governments jurisdiction,
- 1 year ago
-
pjacobs51
-
-
JCunliffe
-
pjacobs51:
I'm from Guam and we are the closest land mass to the Marianas Trench...Guam itself is a territory of the United States transferred from Spain to the U.S. after the Spanish-American War in 1898. Guam is the largest of the chain of Marianas Islands. The Northern Marianas Islands are a Commonwealth of the U.S. The indigenous people of the islands are called Chamorros or Chamorus (it's up for debate because some believe the Spanish changed the spelling to Chamorros). Hope that helps.
- 1 year ago
-
JCunliffe