Community | January 30, 2009 | 15 comments

Banned! These ads are too racy for the Super Bowl

Image
KevinFederline
Remember the bevy of scantily clad Victoria’s Secret models sashaying about in the “Lingerie Bowl”? Or the two women tearing each other’s clothes off in a battle over whether Miller Lite was “great tasting” or “less filling”?
  1. groups:
  2. tags:
    US America Super Bowl American Football 1 more
  3.     
    |

15 comments // Banned! These ads are too racy for the Super Bowl

  • numinant
    • 0
      numinant  
    • something tells me that these ads are produced with the intention of getting banned, and then being distributed on the strength of their publicity.

    • 3 years ago
  • eldamon
    • 0
      eldamon  
    • OK the veggie one may be a bit too "entertaining" for mixed company I have to admit but what the hell, it's just skin.

    • 3 years ago
  • MissG
    • 0
      MissG  
    • it all has to do with audience segment and time. this is prime time television and a mixed gender, all-age audience.

      normally, these ads would be saved for late night so that advertisers would presumptively get a better return on their investments by targeting messages to appropriate viewers.

      however, the super bowl breaks this in that it is a HUGE random sampling and a chance to run brand ads that are provocative and generate buzz. apparently, this means no holds barred for content.

      i am not in favor of censorship, but do question the business relevance. there is a way to generate buzz that doesn't involve sex.

    • 3 years ago
  • petarro
  • pjacobs51
  • aswift1
    • 0
      aswift1  
    • Those Ashley Madison ads advertise "An Affair to Remember." They state that people use them to have extramarital affairs... Now I don't care who does what and whether or not they are married, but the superbowl is kind of family programming, and I think most parents do not want to have to explain that one to their kids... It's still dumb that you can parade tits on a stick in the form of Victoria's Secret models all over the tv, but this is worth censoring...

    • 3 years ago
  • Jenkins
    • 0
      Jenkins  
    • I guess this debunks the claims that the PETA ad was was not allowed not because of the content, but because it was, in fact, too sexual.

    • 3 years ago
  • charfman
  • Mark701
    • 0
      Mark701  
    • When I read something like this I have to laugh. We can watch people getting blown away by guns, sliced by knives and axes, eaten by dinosaurs etc. in graphic detail on nightly prime time television but GOD FORBID if anyone tries to put something with a little sex (or cursing) on TV . Americans have some seriously twisted values.

    • 3 years ago
  • twodee
  • charfman
    • 0
      charfman  
    • Mark701:

      It's not the Americans but those who are protecting us from such vile outpourings...
      And they define what is vile...
      I think most Americans would laugh at this stuff...

    • 3 years ago
  • power_packed_ro
  • charfman
  • KevinFederline
  • Iulian
    • 0
      Iulian  
    • The commercials are still being shown, aren't they--I mean here and other sites. So what's the dif? It's just that they're today and not on the Big Day.

    • 3 years ago

top videos