Cocktail for killers: Facts not reported in US News supported by pharmaceutical advertising

// added March 29, 2009 // 51 comments //
Image...
CarolynGillis
Scientific studies proving that Prozac encourages psychopathic behavior and suicidal tendencies in young people are voluminous. Red Lake High School killer was on Prozac. "The Uni bomber", Michael McDermott, John Hinckley, Jr., Byran Uyesugi, Mark David Chapman and Charles Carl Roberts IV, the Amish school killer, were all on SSRI Psychotropic Drugs

Our media does not report that killer,Steven Kazmierczak, Northern Illinois University shootings, had been taking Psychotropic Drugs. Columbine shooters Eric Harris and Dylan Klebold, as well as 15-year-old Kip Kinkel, the Oregon killer who gunned down his parents and classmates, and Cho Seung Hui, the Virginia Tech killer, were all on Psychotropic Drugs.

This is an ever-repeating story in America. Everyone seems befuddled each time like it will never happen again and it must have been a failed school system, a bad parent video games or perhaps an odd song. While these may be contributing factors, we should be open to investigating all possible causes. Our US "News" media never whispers any hint of possibility of side effects of these legal drugs being a possible part of the cause.

Imagine a cocktail of these drugs in American "troubled teens" and prisoners. This is common in our vastly over-medicated American society. The problem is often combined with other seemingly harmless drugs that often have serious confusion and violence producing side effects. Many people take 5 or more medications at the same time. This is considered a good thing in the US.

Add this to a population who are missing critical components of their diets. UK Prisons are cutting violent behaviour by a third by simply correcting that deficiency. These are in placebo controlled double blind studies conducted right now with Oxford College. http://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/health-and-wellbeing/health-news/prison-...

If Obama, as our next United States President, is not whipped to his knees by the Powerful Health "Care" Industry, he could clear prisons and youth detentions drastically in the USA within a year, maximum. I think, tragically, he probably is already affected by their millions in contributions. He said he will not be. Only time will tell if he is a true hero for change. I hope so.
  1. groups:
    Upstream,   News,   Green,   News and Politics,   26 more
  2. tags:
    News News and Politics Green Obama 7 more

51 comments // Cocktail for killers: Facts not reported in US News supported by pharmaceutical advertising

  • artemis6
  • tommic
    • 0
      tommic  
    • As someone who grew up in the 1960's & 1970's I can tell you that back then there were not the same number of psyco killers as in percentages of the population. This is not to deny Charles Manson or Ted Bundy but todays society resorts to drugs much quicker than ever before. Back then youth with behavioral issues were treated much more by psychiatrists that did not drug up their patients. I speak from experience as my mother was mentally ill her entire adult life. Social interaction was much more effective in these people gaining control over themselves than drugs are today. Big Pharma wants people to believe there is a magic pill for every aliment, simply not true. Society also refuses to believe that some people belong instituionalized not put in prison. The stigma of instituionalization of a family member forces them into denial of mental illness. Denial is the biggest part of the problem and then acceptance but with these terrible drugs that help some but destroy many.

    • 15 days ago
  • hunzedog
  • lugs
  • lugs
    • 0
      lugs  
    • you shoud watch generation rx that will open your eyes to why we give kids these drugs and its not to help them

    • 28 days ago
  • CarolynGillis
  • CarolynGillis
  • abipolarmind
    • 0
      abipolarmind  
    • CarolynGillis:

      CBT stands for Cognitive Behavioral Therapy. That is not a placebo. The way the graph parallels the two outcomes is the reason these to therapies are used together. Do you have any personal experience with these drugs?

    • 11 months ago
  • abipolarmind
    • 0
      abipolarmind  
    • Image...
    • CarolynGillis:

      Here is the full study from the above chart. Please not that the conclusions are opposite the conclusions of the original article posted here. There was no significant increase in violence or suicidal behavior with the SSRI.

    • 11 months ago
  • CarolynGillis
    • 0
      CarolynGillis  
    • Image...
    • Here is Public Broadcasting with similar questions..

      Shooting fuels debate over safety of Prozac for teens
      by Marisa Helms, Minnesota Public Radio
      March 25, 2005

      Jeff Weise, the assailant in the Red Lake shootings, was reportedly taking Prozac, a popular antidepressant. Some research seems to indicates a link between the medication and suicide attempts and violence. (Photo by Stephen Chernin/Getty Images)
      Family members of Jeff Weise say they have questions about the medication he was taking up until the day of the shootings in Red Lake. Authorities say Weise shot and killed nine people before turning the gun on himself. Weise was taking the antidepressant Prozac. The shootings are likely to renew the controversy over the use of antidepressants in children and adolescents.

    • 11 months ago
  • abipolarmind
  • CarolynGillis
  • abipolarmind
    • 0
      abipolarmind  
    • CarolynGillis:

      It is off label prescribing. The drugs are safe for the general public so they are approved but with a restriction on who they are prescribed to. The doctors and family are taking a risk when these medications are used with teenagers.

    • 11 months ago
  • CarolynGillis
  • abipolarmind
    • 0
      abipolarmind  
    • First, don't blame the meds, don't blame the condition the meds were prescribed for. People must take responsibility for their actions and not use an excuse of the drugs they were taking or the mental illness they have. When excuses like these are used it harms those of use who have successfully battled our illness for so many years. It is not the illness or drugs doing the killing people, it is the person carrying out the act.

      Second, I would like to know how many of these people were also taking illegal drugs. Marijuana is very dangerous for those who already suffer from mental illness and when combined with SSRI anti-depressenants can cause psychosis. I know from experience these drugs work miracles, but there is a reason they are used under the close observation of a medical proffessional.

      I have fought long and hard to remove the stigma of mental illness and when the media uses stories like this it may make most people feel better but it only worsens the stigma of mental health. If you would like to learn more about the stigma of mental health I invite you to visit http://www.abipolarmind.com/MentalHealth.html

    • 11 months ago
  • chunche
    • 0
      chunche  
    • How convenient that they left these little tidbits out of the available facts pertaining to these drugs. True, these instances may be rare, but one person sustaining psychopathic behavior under the influece of these medications is one person too many. I just wish the pharmaceutical companies were more honest and open about all possible side ects that transcend slight headaches or vomiting.

    • 11 months ago
  • CarolynGillis
  • AlexBush
  • renbyrd
    • 0
      renbyrd  
    • How quick we are to point the finger.

      Yes, it is true that some people are misdiagnosed and/or overmedicated, but we cannot lead some fear-mongering tirade against SSRI drugs, especially when there are numerous cases where they are helping, not damaging. Mental illness is a physical illness, not some problem that can be cured with yet-to-be proven homeopathic methods.

      Citizens taking doctor-prescribed SSRI drugs are hurt by such discrimination. I'm glad to see that many of the responses to this article were able to see through the discriminating opinions. It certainly shows that this forum encourages media literacy.

    • 11 months ago
  • cybexg
  • Vikingblood
    • 0
      Vikingblood  
    • This is crap. Just another way to scapegoat the real killer, which is society. These young people --and people in general-- got their heads screwed up by society and that's why they are/were on medication. Their actions had to do with being screwed up, not the medication.

      I'm really sick of this always looking for something and someone else to blame crap. Oh no, it can't be OUR fault. In the case I'm talking about, mainly school shootings, it CAN'T be something about how American society behaves toward each other.

      It's medication now, or it's music, drugs, video games. We all have to find the cause of this, everyone says. Or, there's some stupid component in our brains that makes humans believe things just 'happen', magically and from no where, 'just because' that causes us to fail to see that there's a root cause. We go after the effects and not the causes. We don't act we react... it's a taught discipline to do otherwise, taught or self-taught.

      Keep shifting the blame, it can't be something WE are doing. So, what are we doing?

      Edit:"Many people take 5 or more medications at the same time." This is true and needs to end. People should be advised to take as little as is needed. 3 medications should be pushing it. 5 would zombify people, make their thinking incredibly fuzzy etc (drug them rather than treat them, there's a difference), but it wouldn't be the cause of any violence. This article tries to drum up fear and hysteria by adding facts amongst the 'opinion'.

    • 11 months ago
  • mykuh
  • samhebert1
    • 0
      samhebert1  
    • I think your wrong. I think that the reason that all these killers were on these drugs was because they were already unstable. Ever think that maybe mental illness and murder are the issues related and not the medicines? I think the coincidence between all these killers are that they were all mentally unstable and apparently their doctor (who went to college for 10 years) prescribed them medications that can lessen the instability. There are people in my circle that depend on these important medications to live life the same way we do. I think it is a little hasty to try to propagate them as a proponent of mass murder.

    • 11 months ago
  • VoyagerFilms
    • 0
      VoyagerFilms  
    • samhebert1:

      So, you think these terrible shootings are evidence of "increased stability"?

      A doctor who went to school for ten years isn't "all-knowing and omnipotent". Largely, the drugs many of them prescribe weren't even available let alone invented yet when many doctors were in school. With tens of thousands of drugs on the market, how could the doctor know about them all, assuming the doc even cared to learn? And if the doc cared, why would the doc prescribe a mind altering substance with side effects for psychological problems?

      The cases we are talking about are psychological in nature.

    • 11 months ago
  • samhebert1
    • 0
      samhebert1  
    • samhebert1:

      I don't think that these killings are evidence of increased stability, I think of them as failed stability.

      I do see your point. Not all doctors are completely aware of the medications they are prescribing. That is where the FDA comes in. Of course the FDA can't find all the mistakes or problems with SSRI's. I also see that SSRI medications do not permanently solve the problem of mental illness. However, Neither of these are grounds for making blanket statements that SSRI's are asssociated with homicide. I personally know people who are completely dependent on these medications. It does not "cure" them, but helps them become functional.

      I do agree that all medications should be heavily scrutinized by the FDA. In fact, SSRI's carry psychological warnings for younger patients. I see the point of this article, but it is misleading to assume that major media is ignoring the issue because pharmaceutal companies buy ads on their stations.

    • 11 months ago
  • kennymotown
  • VoyagerFilms
    • 0
      VoyagerFilms  
    • kennymotown:

      Absolutely RIGHT!

      Hey, but then they would be considered potential "Terrorists" by the ol' Busheney Gang of thieves and placed on the FBI's "subversives" list. But, that's more fun than poking yourself in the eye, isn't it?

      And, by being labeled by the FBI as such, guess what, the Constitution and laws don't apply to you - according to Alfarto Gonzales and the rest of the Busheney Gang.

    • 11 months ago
  • CarolynGillis
  • abipolarmind
  • brunsbuilt
    • 0
      brunsbuilt  
    • ...is it possible to not eat a pickle once every three days?

      Furthermore, let's be rational. It's obvious pickles are safe and are not a legal narcotic.
      I agree that we need to be open minded on the subject. The fact that all these people were already taking drugs for psychiatric problems is the correlation in my opinion. These people obviously had issues before the drug was introduced to them. Just because these people were prescribed the mediation didn't mean they were taking it either. Unless there is a substantial amount of lab testing to indicate otherwise.
      But, my stand on these drugs are not positive, as these people should be treated by other means instead of chemically. They have a chemical imbalance for a reason, so, treat the problem, not the symptom.

    • 11 months ago
  • mykuh
  • brunsbuilt
    • 0
      brunsbuilt  
    • brunsbuilt:

      My mistake, I was just using the word as a negative synonym for "drug". "Narcotic" is frequently loosely used to describe all illegal drugs but of course the technical definition would be something like "a substance used to cause loss of feeling or paralysis".

    • 11 months ago
  • brunsbuilt
  • abipolarmind
  • artemis6
    • 0
      artemis6  
    • This is worth investigating . My sis and I debate it a lot because she is a pharmacist and I a nutritionist . I knew about prozac increasing the risk of successful suicide , the rest would not surprise me considering the value big pharma places of life .

    • 11 months ago
  • SPECIALIST
    • 0
      SPECIALIST  
    • if you want to oust a really bad, violence "inducing" drug, why don't you investigate alcohol related violence. it might be more fruitful.

    • 11 months ago
  • VoyagerFilms
    • 0
      VoyagerFilms  
    • SPECIALIST:

      Perhaps the issue of "alcohol" would be better left to you as "alcohol" has never had that effect on me, not have I ever used it nor had a reason to use "alcohol" as an excuse for anything.

      A weak mind which has been taught / mislead it is not responsible for itself, or that it's responsibility has been denied it by abusive / dysfunctional parents / society will use "alcohol" as an excuse.

      Again, guns don't rob convenience stores and they don't kill people. And if a convenience store was so convenient, robbers wouldn't need to rob it. Think about it.

    • 11 months ago
  • SPECIALIST
    • 0
      SPECIALIST  
    • in 99% of all airline crashes, the pilot had eaten a PICKLE within three days of the incident.

      You show No Causality in your post. You are making the logical error of equating temporality with causality. You neglect to even mention if the incidents of violence had perhaps been delayed or reduced by the use of the drugs listed, which is an unfair assumption to overlook, implying that you have a biased agenda.

      I do not generally support the widespread use of psycotropic drugs - they are probably over prescribed, but I do NOT claim to have all the information; to deduct causality takes long term widely sampled statistical analysis, which you do not reference, and is usually an immoral type of research in humans. Don't oversimplify this issue. Could it even be possible that many more incidents have been averted by these same drugs? Yes, it could be, but No Body has that information either.

      Be fair and more open minded.

    • 11 months ago
  • VoyagerFilms
    • 0
      VoyagerFilms  
    • SPECIALIST:

      Quoting myself, I said in response to lucidstone:

      "Your argument leaves out the fact that like drug addicts self medicating, giving people mind altering substances for psychological problems is not treatment at all. It does not "fix" the problem. It doesn't even address the problem. Like attempting to kill ones perceived (actually you've been mislead on this issue) undefined and undeclared enemy, the idiots version of doing something constructive, it attempts to suppress the REAL problem so the "suppressor" doctor [a victimizer] may maintain the appearance of relative omnipotence and credibility - in effect keep stealing from your wallet and maintain denial of ones own arrested development issues.

      So, if the risk is that you, me or my children may be cut down by someone on a prescription of deception and denial resulting in ever escalating anger feed by the awareness of being taken advantage of by the medical profession, pharmaceuticals, the FDA and continued psychological indifference and abuse by their parents, I'd guess that there are better alternatives - lest you are a psychopath getting off on other people's misery."

    • 11 months ago
  • neocongo
  • VoyagerFilms
    • 0
      VoyagerFilms  
    • Thank you CarolynGillis for posting this for our benefit.

      It's hard to believe that highly educated people, our medical doctors would prescribe and continue prescribing mind altering substances which are so clearly harmful to their patients.

      Consider that some of those patients which receive psychotropic drugs also have a mouth and have expressed to their doctor undesirable side effects - which could have or should have warned those many doctors treating them.

      I see the potential for HUGE class action law suits against "FAT CAT" pharmaceutical companies, the AMA and those doctors who through gross ignorance, incompetence or malicious negligence push drugs known to be dangerous to the taker as well as society - on the part of victims of these shootings, families of patients and people in the general population which have been subjected to a person's hostile or otherwise anti-social behavior while on such medication.

      This could dwarf the tobacco industry class action lawsuits, and should. There are many, many other drugs which only serve to enrich the greedy at the expense of those who seek help.

    • 11 months ago
  • lucidstone
    • 0
      lucidstone  
    • VoyagerFilms:

      The side effects are known to occur in X% amount of patients. Vaccines are known to actually cause diseases in X% of patients. This is modern medicine.

      A family member of mine fractured a vertebrate some years back, very painful. She's a nurse and asked a doctor friend for a recommendation. He prescribed a painkiller that normally works well. However, there was a 1.5% chance the painkiller would cause hallucinations. She was in that 1.5% and had what was described as an extremely unpleasant acid trip. She stopped taking the drug and all was fine.

      Doctors are supposed to inform the patient of the possible side effects so both are aware and prepared for possible complications. No drug is ever perfect for everybody.

    • 11 months ago
  • VoyagerFilms
    • 0
      VoyagerFilms  
    • VoyagerFilms:

      lucidstone said "No drug is ever perfect for everybody."

      Your argument leaves out the fact that like drug addicts self medicating, giving people mind altering substances for psychological problems is not treatment at all. It does not "fix" the problem. It doesn't even address the problem. Like attempting to kill ones perceived (actually you've been mislead on this issue) undefined and undeclared enemy, the idiots version of doing something constructive, it attempts to suppress the REAL problem so the "suppressor" doctor [a victimizer] may maintain the appearance of relative omnipotence and credibility - in effect keep stealing from your wallet and maintain denial of ones own arrested development issues.

      So, if the risk is that you, me or my children may be cut down by someone on a prescription of deception and denial resulting in ever escalating anger feed by the awareness of being taken advantage of by the medical profession, pharmaceuticals, the FDA and continued psychological indifference and abuse by their parents, I'd guess that there are better alternatives - lest you are a psychopath getting off on other people's misery.

    • 11 months ago
  • lucidstone
    • 0
      lucidstone  
    • VoyagerFilms:

      No one is EVER supposed to be "self medicating" . . . that is why they are prescription.

      If there is a problem with the drug in regards to a particular patient, then it should be revealed by the monitoring doctor and the patient should immediately be advised to discontinue the medication.

      The problem is with the lack of oversite by bad psychiatrists and bad doctors (doctors shouldn't be giving out anti-depressants in the first place). The problem isn't necessarily with the drugs themselves.

      And that's correct: no drug IS ever right for everybody . . . that's why professional medical oversite is required.

    • 11 months ago
  • kennymotown
    • 0
      kennymotown  
    • At one time a few years ago I had heard that 23 of the 25 school shooting incidents, the shooters were taking such medicine. It was a study that got hushed very quickly because Columbine had just happened. The authority's know the consequences of these drugs but with millions of people on them there is too much money to be made.

    • 11 months ago
  • Jiji_Kero
  • neocongo
  • CarolynGillis
    • 0
      CarolynGillis  
    • neocongo:

      Neocon i can see why you question it but I don't have time to look into all posts i make..i wish i were a paid investigative journalist.and i would research everything .but my job here is to put the question on the table in any way i can so people will listen...
      becasue if i don't, i don't see it happening much and i definitely am seeing people dying around me from this bad medical system..trying to do what i can with the limited time and resources i have.

    • 11 months ago
  • neocongo
  • CarolynGillis
  • neocongo
  • krush_productions
  • CarolynGillis
    • 0
      CarolynGillis  
    • If you have time please try to look at the data base http://www.askapatient.com/viewtopratings.asp for information on how these drugs are affecting real people who are reporting these troubles with violence and other problems. Then you can multiply the sometimes horrific effect of one of these by 2 or 3 or 5 or more medications at the same time. This is common in America. People think the more drugs they are taking with their doctor, the better they will be. This sounds like an exageration but it is true once you add in various medications that sound harmless. http://www.askapatient.com/viewtopratings.asp

    • 11 months ago
  • lucidstone
    • 0
      lucidstone  
    • CarolynGillis:

      Some of the extreme responses to some of the drugs on this site should be treated with skepticism.

      I found this under the Prozac heading:

      "Do yourself a huge favor. Google the connection with Nazi's and fluoride. Now do a google on what Prozac is made of. That's right. Prozac is 94% FLUORIDE. A POISON. The way it works, is it dumbs people down, and they no longer care. This is the same for all SSRI's. Pfizer is nothing more than modern nazis. Get off this drug."

      *sigh*, more fluoride conspiracy theory . . . so yeah, these responses aren't moderated to weed out the nutjobs and whatever people that may be making shit up. So look for trends, and not individual extreme cases on this site.

    • 11 months ago
  • Conniepae

Add your comment

current videos