Interview with Dr. Woodrow Clark II

Image...
In this awesome first edition of “Science is Speaking!”, I interview the ambitious and inspirational Dr. Woodrow Clark II about sustainable energy, politics and what we need to do to put America back on the right track.

Dr. Clark earned three separate masters degrees from different universities and his Ph.D. at University of California, Berkeley. He was Senior Advisor on Renewable Energy, Emerging Technologies, and Finance to California Governor Gray Davis from 2000 to 2003. In 2007, Clark was a co-recipient of the Nobel Peace Prize due to his co-authorship and co-editorship for the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) from 1995-2000 in which he is still active today.

Q: There are so many types of renewable energy sources; solar, wind, biomass- it seems we could easily run America on sustainable energy! What’s the biggest obstacle to this goal right now?

A: Primarily public policy -- it is far too limited and "afraid" of change. See what the Europeans and Japanese are doing. I am and some scholars refer to this difference as The Third Industrial Revolution (renewable energy, storage and new technologies, smart girds and cities etc). That is the USA is still in The Second Industrial Revolution that is influenced and "controlled" by lobbyists for the oil & gas industry as well as auto (although that might change now, finally!)

Q: What steps does America need to take to emerge as a leader in what you describe as the 3rd Industrial Revolution of sustainable energy?

A: We need to get elected officials in office. The Obama Admin is a good example of that. In many ways the young voters today (under 40 who get the issues and DEMAND change) get what he is all about. It reminded me of the Anti - Vietnam War era. And makes sense as the National Election "skipped a generation". Some scholars refer to them as the New Millennium.

Q: In your UCLA lecture you discuss how politicians can be corrupted and even “bought off” by businesses like those involved in so called “Clean Coal” and Nuclear energy. Are you concerned that the scientific voice in America is overshadowed by corporate interests?

A: Absolutely. And there are signs in the Obama Admin that this is true even now. People who argue for "clean coal" are only delaying the need for society (globally) to get off the dependency on fossil fuels. They pollute and are the key cause to climate change. What we need are these government funds focused instead on renewable energy and making The Third Industrial Revolution real: in short it is "The Sequel to An Inconvenient Truth" We are doing just that here in LA at the Community Colleges.

Q: Let’s talk local- what’s the number one thing your average citizen can do to that will make a difference as we strive towards a sustainable future?

A: Aside from everyone being aware of the environment (turning off lights, computers and TVs etc) we all need to recycle and DEMAND that local programs are there to do it. That means participating in the local government and committees. Above all we need to vote, as they did in LA, for new programs that ensure our future as being off the dependency on fossil fuels. Here in LA, over 71% of the voters passed in the Nov 08 elections, 2 bond measures for making the the K-14 schools and colleges less dependent on fossil fuels by putting renewable power generation, LEED level buildings and infrastructures on campuses along with education, training and job creation. IT IS A POLITICAL MYTH that voters do NOT want to pay higher taxes. What they need now is correct and positive information about what the taxes are for --- climate change is front and center on ALL the surveys today.

Q: You’re a doctor, author, teacher, Nobel Prize Winner and more! What’s next for you?

A: An Academy Award for dramatic film that I am making on this topic along with Emmys for a TV/Cable series that will spring off of that. Another long story!
  1. groups:
    Tech,   News,   Green,   Max and Jason: Still Up,   3 more
  2. tags:
    News,  Politics,  Green,  Tech, 11 more + add
  3. credits:
    Mike_Johnston hooked this up
  4. recommended by:
    ras_menelik,
    Vierotchka,
    pjacobs51
DeliaTheArtist
  • added May 15, 2009

12 comments // Interview with Dr. Woodrow Clark II

  •  
    Image...

    You can find Dr. Clark at this conference coming up May 21st!

    You can also find out more about him, what he does and sustainable energy solutions at his website, http://www.clarkstrategicpartners.net/

    recommended by huntre
    DeliaTheArtist
  •  

    nice interview Delia :-)

    Mike_Johnston
  •  

    Nice Post Thanks!

    slarabee
  •  

    I really find what he's been saying about the 3rd Industrial Revolution interesting- obviously we are at a crossroads in America and the world in a lot of ways and our energy problems (and solutions) will shape America's place in the world- will we stand up to the plate and regain our role as a leader in science, energy and innovation? Or will we let big business and corporate interests corrupt our future?

    DeliaTheArtist
  •  

    Based on his passions regarding Science, the Arts, Politics, Ecology and how we fit into all of it, his chances of scoring that Academy Award, someday, are nearly assured.
    Thanks, Delia.

    huntre
  •  
    Image...

    That's a Tata Air Car. One of many models.

    It runs on compressed air in underseat titanium cylinders and is pollution free.

    Note the date on the license plate?

    Have we done anything even close to this?

    Its engine was engineered, built and tested by a French Gran Prix race car designer. Realizing that he had a solution to so many of today's problems he shopped it around. Who took it?

    India. That's where Tata Motors is located. The idea that with such vehicles India would be far less oil dependent than we are made sense nationally. They saw an obvious competitive advantage and went for it.

    Seen anything here that comes close? Of course not. We subsidize companies that want to construct American cars everywhere else, but America.

    http://dvice.com/archives/2008/02/zero_pollution.php

    http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/7243247.stm

  •  

    “Science is Speaking!” Yes, and it's about time people listened.

    The Second Industrial Revolution was greed at the cost of the environment. The Third Industrial Revolution should be quite the opposite putting the environment first and foremost ahead of all else.

    Great post Delia!

    pjacobs51
  •  

    Great interview Delia!

    The guy is right, as citizens we can't afford to be complacent. We very much need to be carefully voting in people at every level of government that will do the job we expect from them (and not just voting party lines). Paying attention to presidential elections and then ignoring local and state politics just doesn't work.

    lucidstone
  •  
    Image...

    Lucidstone,

    http://www.xerraireart.com/blog/2008/06/18/the-air-car/

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Air_car

    About that first image? See anything the wind would catch on? Your average Detroit designer would never sacrifice profits for improved gas mileage if you waterboarded him. His boss would fire him long before that. Only Detroit could be stupid enough to demand that lower gas economy be mandated by the government.

    That 'ugliness' you describe is twofold.

    1/ The first image was of a 'city car.' Like a Smart Car. It was distorted by whatever routines Current uses to position images on their page. The actual image looks better. Like a new Beetle.

    2/ Aerodynamics.

    Too many North Americans want cars to approximate the macho image of Hummers but with better interiors. Such cars have horrific problems with wind-resistance. My first car - a 1954 Ford - had a 99 horsepower 8 cylinder powerplant. A 2009 Honda Accord, (Dinky by comparison. Luggage space? What's that?) with far less weight and wind-resistance ranges from 190-248 horsepower. I can see no reason why.

    Gran Prix and Formula 1 designers, especially those who set up cars for endurance races take everything into consideration.

    That said, I laughed when I first saw the image above because the rear wheels look like an afterthought. I pictured the designer writing - "Note to self: draw wheels first." But everything is there to reduce drag.

    Why? For decades Euros have had ridiculously high gas prices to cope with so to they had every incentive to link "ugliness" with saving lots of money.

    BTW you might find this article interesting..

    http://reviews.cnet.com/8301-13746_7-9876428-48.html

    "106 mpg Air Car to come to U.S. by 2010"

    That's at 75\HP

    AveryMoore
  •  

    Hey Avery,

    I love the links you provided and I love the technology. Like I said, I would definitely be down for a car that has 1,000 mile range, 96mph top speed, and 100mpg . . . I just wish they took their design cues more from Tesla Motors.

    Whether or not the Tata design is more aerodynamically efficient or not is irrelevant if the general public in the States thinks it's ugly and won't buy it for aesthetic reasons.

    People want an energy efficient car that saves on gas, but they also want a car that they think looks good (according to their personal taste).

    This is kind of the inverse criticism I have of Tesla Motors, I like their style . . . but I don't like the technology enough to want to buy (they still need better batteries that charge faster and have a longer range for me to be interested in buying).

    If they put this air-powered technology in something that looked like a Peugot 207 CC . . . I would be sold.
    http://www.webwombat.com.au/motoring/news_reports/peugeot-207-cc-convertible.htm

    lucidstone
  •  

    I know we need to have people who are this passionate about renewable energy to get things to happen, but this guy loses an awful lot of credibility when he says it's a myth that people don't want to pay higher taxes. That's one of the biggest hurdles out there for renewable energy.

    I think most people realize that things need to change and we need to move towards renewable energy, but they don't want to pay for it or change their lifestyle. Dr. Clark should be selling us on why we should pay higher taxes, not telling us we want to pay higher taxes. He's got a captive audience in this political environment, but he comes off as a guy who's not in touch with reality.

    foogs
  •  

    Talk is cheap...
    Today millions of cars are on the road...
    Coal fired power plants are dumping tons of carbon into the atmosphere...
    The reefs are dying...
    The rainforests are burning...
    etc...
    Have we reached the tipping point yet?

    charfman

Add your comment

keep browsing
Tech
News
Green

current videos