Recent Cases Of Abortion-Related Violence

Amen, I say again, amen!

Can you?

And can't YOU, GodsnLiberals, tell the difference between an embryo, a fetus, and a baby?

and killing a baby is not murder??

btw since when you became religious?

I'm not. I just was checking on the rules.

They seem to shift depending on where you are standing.

Just to be clear.

I stand here.

"and killing a baby is not murder??"

Sure it is - but a fetus is not a baby, no more is it a toddler, a child, a teenager, an adult, or an old-age pensioner.

The Ten Commandments say "Do not kill UNJUSTLY!"

That includes what is found in Judeo-Christian and Islamic Scripture!

Requires all lawful endeavors to preserve our own life, and the life of others.

Forbids taking away of our own life, or the life of our neighbor, *unjustly* (Just taking of life includes self-defense, executions by the magistrate and times of war.); and, anything that tends toward depriving life. By extension it condemns even verbal abuse and anger, as exemplified by Christ's interpretation in the sermon on the mount.

Men can justify anything. That does not mean that they should or that it is right. Anyone justifying this murder is no better than the murderer himself.

Which was quietly dropped from medical schools and is no longer a requirement to practice medicine, because it specifically tells a doctor he may not perform an abortion, or deliberately cause one.

WHo said anything about pro-lifers? The article is about abortion related violence.

Most pro-life advocates are denouncing these actions. So, I agree.

The most important one came out and said he has no concern for the life of the man but weeps for his soul.

So evil is as evil does.

how is domestic terrorism the fruit of Christian Fundamentalism? Maybe Christian exstremist, but not the core beliefs of the Christians. Same as suicide bombing is not the core beief of Islam.

The fruit of Christian Fundamentalism has tasted like mental terrorism toward their own people since the Puritans.

No, it is not hypocritical!

If a madman ran around town randomly shooting people, would it not be just to shoot the shooter?

Yes, it would be just. By stopping the killer, you save more innocent lives that would have otherwise become victims.

In the Bible, it says it is a Sin to kill *unjustly*, but not that to kill is a Sin outright.

@user00

Try commandment 6. Thou shalt not kill.

And what I think you were trying to justify with the "shooter" scenario was self-defense. Obviously setting a bomb is not self-defense, and shooting an unarmed person is not self-defense.

Saddam Hussein was unarmed when he was hung, yet because of his actions most of the world found his execution as justice.

As for the Commandments, In the Bible, it says it is a Sin to kill *unjustly*, but not that to kill is a Sin outright.

The perpetrator need not be armed to be a threat to the lives others, but rather what the perpetrator represents, commissions, condones, orders, or act upon.

The Nazi officers didn't need to shoot every Jew, but they are guilty for making the order nonetheless.

The death penalty is a separate issue with which I also disagree. That being said, it was a court of law that chose the death penalty, not a vigilante. User00, you might want to talk to someone at your church, or maybe a therapist, about your feelings on this topic. Your ease of justification for the murder of people, whether innocent or not, is very disturbing.

"That being said, it was a court of law that chose the death penalty, not a vigilante."

That being said, what is the court but the rule of the people? What is the ruling of the court but that which serves to preserve and secure the good of the people?

By that statement, if there was no court willing the prosecute Saddam Husein or Nazi Officers, should they be allowed to simply walk free?

Or should the people, failed by a court which was established to serve their Justice, take matters into action themselves?

I suppose the lesson I'm to learn from you is that "legal means moral." So, if your going to do something "bad," make sure to get a judge to say it's legal first!

That is the essence of Liberalism -- Moral Relativism!