Did nano-thermite take down the WTC?

No because the vast vast majority of experts agree that it wasn't.

and realistically it would take some sort of unobtainable mega-conspiracy to get all these people to deny the supposed evidence. and i just don't buy that story.

i mean....if you deny the holocaust, AND the moonlanding, AND global warming...

...then ok, go ahead and claim it was a conspiracy.

otherwise, stop checking blogs for facts!

Yes, nanothermite took down the WTC, the moon landing was a hoax and the earth is really flat / sarcasm off

so if it was demo'ed, where are the 3 jet liners and the 100's of people and crew that was on them?

Occum's Razor:
When a new set of facts requires the creation of a new theory the process is far from the orderly picture often presented in books. Many hypothses are proposed, studied, rejected. Researchers discuss their validity (sometimes quite heatedly) proposing experiments which will determine the validity of one or the other, exposing flaws in their least favorite ones, etc. Yet, even when the unfit hypotheses are discarded, several options may remain, in some cases making the exact same predictions, but having very different underlying assumptions. In order to choose among these possible theories a very useful tool is what is called Ockham's razor.

Ockham's Razor is the principle proposed by William of Ockham in the fourteenth century: ``Pluralitas non est ponenda sine neccesitate'', which translates as ``entities should not be multiplied unnecessarily''.

In many cases this is interpreted as ``keep it simple'', but in reality the Razor has a more subtle and interesting meaning. Suppose that you have two competing theories which describe the same system, if these theories have different predictions than it is a relatively simple matter to find which one is better: one does experiments with the required sensitivity and determines which one give the most accurate predictions. For example, in Copernicus' theory of the solar system the planets move in circles around the sun, in Kepler's theory they move in ellipses. By measuring carefully the path of the planets it was determined that they move on ellipses, and Copernicus' theory was then replaced by Kepler's.

basically this mean's,
YOUR WRONG
IT IS WHAT IT APPEARS TO BE
SHUT THE FUCK UP ALREADY !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

i dont think it takes a rocket scientist to tell me what is so undeniably true just from watching the plane crash and think they actually took down the WTC...

good post...whenever i was commuting by the WTC, you can feel the negative bad energy and sorrow vibe...

My recollection from bldg.7 was that it was purposefully brought down on 9/11/01 because it was partially damaged by bldgs. 1&2.

beside all the hoopla...

I must confess that I'm having a little problem in thinking that ALL THOSE PEOPLE ARE terminaly stupid assholes !
http://patriotsquestion911.com/

specially the 190+ Senior Military, Intelligence Service, Law Enforcement, and Government Officials

Current members are definitely not morons but a little self doubt & humility could come in handy ;)

BTW

The official version was declared DOA from the very people that tried to write an accurate account of that tragic day ;)

9/11 COMMISSIONERS

The co-chairs of the 9/11 Commission (Thomas Keane and Lee Hamilton) said that the CIA (and likely the White House) "obstructed our investigation".
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/01/02/opinion/02kean.html?ref=opinion

Indeed, the co-chairs of the Commission now admit that the Commission largely operated based upon political considerations. (CUT & PASTE THIS LINK TO VIEW) http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/n/a/2006/08/04/national/w124141D43.DTL&type=printable

The co-chairs of the 9/11 Commission also said that the 9/11 Commissioners knew that military officials misrepresented the facts to the Commission, and the Commission considered recommending criminal charges for such false statements, yet didn't bother to tell the American people. http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/08/01/AR2006080101300....

Commission report was only "the first draft" of history.
9/11 Commissioner Bob Kerrey said that "There are ample reasons to suspect that there may be some alternative to what we outlined in our version . . . We didn't have access . . . ."http://salon.com/ent/feature/2006/06/27/911_conspiracies/index4.html

9/11 Commissioner Timothy Roemer said "We were extremely frustrated with the false statements we were getting" http://www.cnn.com/2006/POLITICS/08/02/9-11panel.pentagon/index.html

Former 9/11 Commissioner Max Cleland resigned from the Commission, stating: "It is a national scandal"; "This investigation is now compromised"; and "One of these days we will have to get the full story because the 9-11 issue is so important to America. But this White House wants to cover it up" (CUT & PASTE THIS LINK TO VIEW) .
http://www.democracynow.org/article.pl?sid=04/03/23/1546256

9/11 Commissioner John Lehman said that “We purposely put together a staff that had – in a way - conflicts of interest". http://georgewashington.blogspot.com/2008/02/lehman-commission-purposely-set-up-....

The Senior Counsel to the 9/11 Commission (John Farmer) who led the 9/11 staff's inquiry, said "I was shocked at how different the truth was from the way it was described .... The tapes told a radically different story from what had been told to us and the public for two years.... This is not spin. This is not true." http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/08/01/AR2006080101300....

Opening 9/11 Pandora's Box / Sibel Edmonds Video
http://current.com/items/89842969/opening_9_11_pandora_s_box_sibel_edmonds_video....

So, yeah, I think its fair to say we haven't been to the bottom of this & since we are relentlessly being told that "9-11 CHANGED EVERYTHING" shouldn't we investigate this in a proper manner once 7 for all ?

...or maybe its no time for questions & dissent cause we have a war to win ;)

the building was coated on the WTC to help prevent fires but the builders took shortcuts and thats why it lit up

Yes, Tower 7 was professionally demolished. Look up "tower 7" on youtube and watch the videos.

Sadly, our government *at the very least* allowed Sept 11 to happen, just as they allowed Pearl Harbor to happen. I personally think some branches (such as the CIA) had direct involvement.

And that's very sad.

Also: Tower 7 was a stable building not hit by falling debris, with only a few isolated floor fires in its middle (fires so tame that sprinklers should've handled).

They let the fires burn for a while and then suddenly.... BOOM the whole thing falls into itself.

Right......

Did nano-thermite take down the WTC?
NOPE ! TOTAL BULLSHIT !

It is was not an event that was created by by our government as a reason to convince us it is ok to increase government and defense from our money. Neither was Oklahoma city.....the government says so. WTF! Terrorism from within creates wealth for those in control. Zeitgeist is not a theory....but an intelligent observation.

NO I CAN'T HANDLE THE TRUTH STOP TELLING ME THE TRUTH!!!!!! AHHHHHHHH MY FRAGILE PARADIGM IS CRUMBLING, ARE YOU TELLING ME ALL THE ENERGY I'VE INVESTED INTO THE THE RIGHT/LEFT PARADIGM IS WASTED AND THAT THE GOVERNMENT HAS BEEN OVERTAKEN BY POWERFUL GLOBALIST INTEREST AND I'M JUST A SLAVE?? AHHHHH I CAN'T HANDLE THE TRUTH TALK TO ME MORE ABOUT MICHAEL JACKSON, AHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH I'M MELTING.

Gotta love conspiracy theory's, cause after all they are just theory's...

Like the Domination Theory of mine....
1 nuke, in each major city, planted by a secret society planning to take over and start new with their own agenda...

But anywho, who would believe that?

The truth is rarely as much fun, interesting, or sensational as the possibilities created by imaginative individuals. There were too many witnesses to the attacks (and footage) to write them off. I even heard rumors that Hunter S. Thompson died after finding the smoking gun indicating that 9/11 was an inside job.

I just need to see some more proof before I believe that it wasn't just smelly Islamic extremists. Actually, religion as justification for mass murder is a lot more believable if one takes history into account.

These conspiracy theory posts definitely capture ad revenue through viewership, though, so good job contributing to those globalist interests so adamantly opposed.

Oh and don't forget that the WTC was bombed once before in the 90's which may account for the traces of explosives "discovered". It is amazing how bomb residue can infiltrate the most isolated of places.

In Oklahoma City they closed it off claiming there were more explosives......at the towers the rubble was tougher to sort through and cover up.....

Nano-Thermite didn't destroy the towers. Terrorists did. With box cutters and airplanes. That's why we're at war with Iraq, right? Because that's what my Government told me and they never lie. Well, not to me anyway.

Ignorance is bliss, isn't it?

[Sarcasm Off.]

Current really needs a conspiracy theory section. This is hardly news.

Everyone remember this and take it to heart: country first, physics second.

Now get back in line, and get back to work. Remember, anyone who questions the reality you've been told is a nutcase conspiracy theorist. Make fun of them because they do a lot of research, and feel better about yourself because you don't.