Oh Sarah, scuba weddings, geo engineering & talking to whales

This guy sounds like he's helping someone run for office, I also believe that these people got this way; because they choose not to use condoms due to their belief in the christian belief. They want to become well off even if this means they are willing to exploit their means of living.........

I believe this is just a way for the owners to make some money, ...unless the happy couple is willing to be completely nude; then it seems logical.........

Ha! Yes: taken out of context that would be a bit odd! Here's the section of the article that explains more :)

1998 was the hottest year on record because of an extraordinarily powerful el Nino that heated up the entire planet dramatically. But because it was so hot, climate disruption deniers have been using it as the starting point from which they claim, wrongly, that “the global temperature has been cooling for a decade now.” This false claim was strengthened by the lucky coincidence that 2008 turned out to be a la Nina year, when the global temperature dropped significantly. Climate disruption deniers then took advantage of an unfortunate fact of least-squares linear trend estimates - they’re VERY sensitive to endpoint variation, especially in short, noisy datasets. And not only is global temperature noisy on a monthly and yearly basis, but ten years is a woefully short amount of data. And don’t even get me started on Joe D’Aleo’s, Lord Monckton’s, and Ross McKitrick’s 5-year “trend” from 2003 to 2008 which, conveniently enough, has another el Nino to la Nina transition.

So now, with a new el Nino heating up the summer and autumn global temperatures by some as-yet-unknown amount, climate disruption scientists and activists have their own convenient endpoints to the data. 1999 was a la Nina year, after all, and 2009 is an el Nino year, so any trend calculated from 1999 to 2009 will be huge, given that global temperatures for July through December are significantly warmer on average than January through June. It’s not outside the realm of possibility that 2009 could be warm enough to turn the supposed “cooling trend” into a “warming trend” all by itself. And that’s the first reason I’m happy about a new el Nino.

Jan, I prefer an import fee on imported oil. Simple, straight forward, good for the economy, good for national security and oil independence(targets the specific problem in that area, foreign oil)----and since there is no way that domestic production can make up the increased price on the 70% we import---it will make biofuels much more competitive.

I think we should have an excise tax on coal to cover environmental losses to mining. I think we need to double the price of coal for damage to the land, the waters, and the air.

Sarah Palin should go bury her head in the sand...........