London Times Censors Mass Opposition To Mandatory Swine Flu Vaccine

// added July 16, 2009 // 9 comments //
Image...
TheEmpireGuy
The London Times newspaper has apparently censored scores of comments on its own website that expressed vehement opposition to plans by the UK government to implement a mandatory vaccination program for swine flu.

As we reported on Sunday, respondents to a London Times article concerning the fact that the vaccine will be rushed through safety procedures in just five days, increasing the chances of it causing deaths and injuries in the thousands, as happened with the 1977 mass vaccination program in the U.S. which killed more people than the actual swine flu virus, overwhelmingly indicated that they would refuse to take the shot.

At one point, out of the first 50 comments on the article, over 40 expressed opposition to taking the shot and the other handful were merely asking questions about it. Hardly any comments expressed support for the nationwide rollout of the swine flu vaccine.

The overwhelming majority of comments were in the context of the following sample.

“Nobody’s coming anywhere near me or my family with their experimental mass vaccine/poison programme,” wrote one. “We will take our chances of catching their manufactured bird/pig/human virus, that was accidentally on purpose! released onto an unsuspecting public in the first place!”

“Anybody who reads this obviously still has the ability to reason and be guided by their own survival instinct and thus should listen to it. The mass fear mongering is a worldwide, co-ordinated and open conspiracy with massive geo political underpinnings. Don’t be fooled, eat properly and exercise,” adds another.

“A vaccine that is – effectively – being tested on the population, the prime reasons for such being the economy and easing pressure on the NHS? I’ll be another one who passes,” comments another.

“Thanks but no thanks. Rushed through tests in 5 days? What about long term effects? Vioxx and Thalidomide had long testing. How safe did they turn out to be? The side effects of Statins that they want everyone to take are worrying. I’ll take my chances with cholesterol,” writes another.

As of today however, the original London Times article that featured the comments (Swine flu vaccine rushed through safety checks) has been completely wiped clean, and the scores of comments expressing refusal to comply with any potential mandatory vaccination program have been sent down the memory hole.
  1. groups:
    News,   News and Politics
  2. tags:
    News Politics World News Swine Flu 3 more

9 comments // London Times Censors Mass Opposition To Mandatory Swine Flu Vaccine

  • unimatrix0
    • 0
      unimatrix0  
    • It is all a big conspiracy! All the world governments, all the doctors and scientists, and now even the London Times! They are all out to get you!

      Quick, run and hide! Go to the bomb shelter! The end is near! The sky is falling!

    • 7 months ago
  • TheEmpireGuy
    • 0
      TheEmpireGuy  
    • unimatrix0:

      Maybe the sky is falling for you, uni, but some of us are just going to simply say no to this, whether you like it or not.

      What I am getting at is that we should not be forced to take the shot or put anything in our bodies that we don't want there, regardless of whether the thing works or not. As you can see by this article, we are not the only ones who feel this way.
      If you believe it is right to force someone to receive an inoculation then you have some serious problems.

      You would have your fellow man do something against his or her will? So, much for Humanism, eh?

    • 7 months ago
  • evoleon
    • 0
      evoleon  
    • unimatrix0:

      Yeah I'm not going to tell anyone that they can't put something in their body. It's not up to me to decide. I don't use drugs, but others can (in my moral view). If someone doesn't want to take a vaccine it is their RIGHT to choose. Now I wonder would you be up for taking the vaccine if Bush was still president?

    • 7 months ago
  • unimatrix0
    • 0
      unimatrix0  
    • unimatrix0:

      Nobody is forcing you to get the shot! You are paranoid dude.

      I will not force you, Obama will not force you, nobody is going to force you to get the shot.

      Relax, your panties are way up in a bunch for no reason.

    • 7 months ago
  • TheEmpireGuy
    • 0
      TheEmpireGuy  
    • unimatrix0:

      No, if the disease has an outbreak in the fall, which it will, then it is very likely that they will implement a mandatory vaccination program.

      Why did the London Times censor those comments?

      It is an all too real possibility that we may be forced to take a vaccine and we will simply refuse to.

      Vaccines are a neurotoxin at best. Especially when it has been rushed through safety check as this one has. It is unsafe, untested, unreliable, and unbelievable that they are so ready to administer such a thing to the general public.

    • 7 months ago
  • unimatrix0
    • 0
      unimatrix0  
    • unimatrix0:

      As I understand the story they won't have enough made by this fall for everyone who will want the shot.

      I seriously, seriously, in all seriousness can not believe the gov will force you to take a flu shot; if they do I will protest the injustice with my last breath.

      Nevertheless, I still believe the flu shot is a good idea, I don't buy the conspiracy crap, I believe in modern medicine and the power of science.

    • 7 months ago
  • bombastinator
  • evoleon
    • 0
      evoleon  
    • Well go figure, people don't want to be forced to be injected with something that has been out for all of a week. Most drugs take 5 years or more of testing to get through.

    • 7 months ago
  • AmericanStandard

current videos