Irradiation Of Food is Frequency Poisoning
-
-
-
-
- Mobius2012
- added this
-
more from News:
http://www.kinginstitute.org/health_news_updates/200604.pdf
The United States enjoys one of thesafest food supplies in the world, but
food borne illnesses remain a constant
concern. Each year, millions of Americans
become ill from food borne infections,
and close to 5,000 die from such
infections.Because of these mounting concerns,
irradiation of food is being considered
to “sterilize” the country’s food supplies
to cut down on food borne illnesses.
Radiation would reduce or eliminate
microorganisms that contaminate food
or cause spoilage. The World Health
Organization (WHO) reviewed a number
of studies and concluded that food
irradiation poses no toxicological, microbiological
or nutritional problems.
But from a physical standpoint
(physics being the Eastern approach to
medical science) supporters of food irradiation
don’t understand that it is just
another way of contaminating our food.
“Frequency poisoning,” says Glenn
King, Ph.D., is becoming seen as a solution
versus a current and increasing
serious problem.
For instance, canned food lowers the
body’s healthy frequencies for approximately
three days. Food cooked in a
microwave oven not only destroys all
the nutritional value but also alters the
molecular structure of the food. By the
time it’s fi nished in the microwave, we
are not really sure what we are eating, much less all the long term
repercussions it has on the body’s
chemistry and energetic foundation
from constant ingestion.
-
- groups:
- News, Max and Jason: Still Up, FOODIES: UNITE, Medicine, 1 more
-
-
couldntfindausername
-
"body’s healthy frequencies"
Whiskey, tango, foxtrot.
"The information on this site is not intended to treat, cure or prevent any condition or disease."
Of course it's not, because it is nonsense. The information is intended, rather, to confuse and bewilder people so that they can be convinced to buy into ineffective rubbish.
- 7 months ago
-
couldntfindausername
-
-
Mobius2012
-
couldntfindausername:
Your argument is ad hominem dude. Disprove the hypothesis.
- 7 months ago
-
Mobius2012
-
-
couldntfindausername
-
couldntfindausername:
I don't need to until someone has supported the notion of "frequencies" or any of the other rubbish on the site [and they haven't, I went and checked].
It's yet another commercial scare site, peddling nonsense you will find refuted on a daily basis in any of the thousands of relevant science journals.
Gems include stopping bleeding with magic rays out of your hands, fixing appendicitis by touching the shoulders, and advising people not to tell their doctors about buying into the twaddle.
The site is nonsense, and it's up to its supporters to show otherwise - not the other way round.
There is a simply awe inspiring volume of *accurate* scientific and medical information available, entirely free of charge or marketing, through a multitude of reputable sources. There is no excuse for this sort of illiterate garbage.
For example, MedScape offer a range of resource databases ranging from general patient information all the way through to specialist-level overviews of various conditions including the relevant anatomy, physiology, pathology and biomedically validated interventional strategies. Compare that to the utter drivel from the "king institute".
- 7 months ago
-
couldntfindausername
-
-
SoundBigfoot
-
I have always wondered weather Irradiation was doing more harm than good.
- 7 months ago
-
SoundBigfoot
