NYC trying to ship out the homeless
-
-
- ebindelglass
- added this
-
- groups:
- News, Current Tonight, News_Featured
-
- tags:
- News, News and Politics, US, US News, 6 more
-
-
RaceBannon
-
i reallly really miss "old" nyc. Now please if you weren't born there stay silent....
- 7 months ago
-
RaceBannon
-
-
Found_Avenue
-
RaceBannon:
Hear hear! Natives, unite!
- 6 months ago
-
Found_Avenue
-
-
pinkerbelle
-
hah!!!! i thought it was odd when i got to new york city and there were less homeless people there than in my native toronto......./gasp! maybe toronto is one of the places nyc is shipping their homeless!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
- 7 months ago
-
pinkerbelle
-
-
occhipij
-
well, they don't add any value right....might as well ship them out like cattle...way to go NYC (sarcasm)
- 7 months ago
-
occhipij
-
-
onemalefla
-
What gives NY the right to send the burdens they created to my city.
- 7 months ago
-
onemalefla
-
-
bluestranger
-
Has anyone read the post about about the Beluga whale saving the diver at the aquarium? Would you call that irony or fate and juxtaposition?
- 7 months ago
-
bluestranger
-
-
MotherForTruth
-
Any one of well to do can become homeless. Life is full of surprises one tragedy and a person may not be able to recover. The human ignorance will help along the way. To those who think it could never happen to you, you are wrong.
- 7 months ago
-
MotherForTruth
-
-
lj111
-
smart move if they can get away with it--every state needs to get involved and keep them moving like a revolving door.
- 7 months ago
-
lj111
-
-
bailey78
-
Hey you can send some down here to south texas I need someone to mow my yard The meskin I had was deported last week. I would prefer a Young Asian family. they are good at yard work right? I meen they are good gardeners they will have a green card right
- 7 months ago
-
bailey78
-
-
bombastinator
-
bailey78:
mmm... a bit too long I think. Liable to get weeds in your propeller at that speed.
- 7 months ago
-
bombastinator
-
-
pleasexplain
-
In my suburban-to-the-max city, Peachtree City (wikipedia us), it is outright illegal to be homeless.
You'll be arrested right away if you attempt to take a bench for a bed at night. Its just "unacceptable" and "unsightly".....
you know, arrest, instead of aid them. yes? - 7 months ago
-
pleasexplain
-
-
bluestranger
-
pleasexplain:
Your not a city you an exclusivity. This place was built by the rich for the rich. It would be hard to live in a place like this if you are not the typical american family with the typical american family values. Say hello to Wally and the Beave for me.
- 6 months ago
-
bluestranger
-
-
medinasoul
-
of course i read it and they are more concerned about the cost of the shelters every year... it says yes they will buy them a ticket to wherever if they have a relative who will take them in... i'm sure a lot dont... so they are stuck in NYC... not only that they now know that because of this program they are not wanted in NYC... its embarrassing enough to be homeless but to be basically not wanted in the city is being treated inhumanely...
- 7 months ago
-
medinasoul
-
-
redvelvet1278
-
medinasoul:
ooorrrr.... you could look at it like this... if i went to new york, got sick, lost my disability due to the fact that this country is a mess and wanted to go back to my family in Puerto Rico or wherever- but no one could afford to fly me there- i would thank god that someone gave me a ticket home.
i still don't believe that every single thing needs to be a rant. when you are homeless there are many more things telling you that you are a problem than someone giving you a ticket home. i think it sucks that every time someone tries to think outside the box they are shot down.
please tell me what you would do to help solve the homeless problem? (i'm totally serious and not being sarcastic)
- 7 months ago
-
redvelvet1278
-
-
addicted
-
medinasoul: This comment has been removed.
-
addicted
-
-
MotherForTruth
-
medinasoul:
redvelvet1278, I do not see one size fits all solution to the homeless problem. I see this as many problems that lead to one result - homelessness.
Some homeless can be reunited with the family who cares about them. Other homeless are in desperate need of long term mental health care. Some may need financial help, home they can afford, a job that can support ALL basic needs and a hopeful path to financial recovery. And we should not forget there are many who need medical treatment or drug addiction treatment. In each case the most important requirement for successful outcome is the support system and a realistic plan to stay on the path to recovery (financial, mental, or addiction). - 7 months ago
-
MotherForTruth
-
-
Incredulous
-
medinasoul:
oddly, redvelvet and Mother...I agree with you both.
- 7 months ago
-
Incredulous
-
-
medinasoul
-
are you serious?! this sounds like that south park episode.... but really... "oh well lets ship em out... they wont be our problem anymore!" (way to show compassion NYC!)
- 7 months ago
-
medinasoul
-
-
redvelvet1278
-
medinasoul:
did anyone actually READ this story? or are you just ranting. that is way off the mark medina...
i don't get it, people just love to yell and scream and ... not read? - 7 months ago
-
redvelvet1278
-
-
HomoGenous101
-
The same "business model" band aid placed on all of capitalism quick fixes. If we are to see real solutions the underlying problem of what causes homelessness needs to be confronted. How bout taking the profit incentive out of peoples lives and where they live? Sounds like a plan! Socialize all housing, no real estate market = no homelessness
- 7 months ago
-
HomoGenous101
-
-
s0uthc0ast
-
Of course they are.
Every liberal haven after having invited the people it makes homeless, asks "holy crap, where did these homeless people come from ?!", then decides it is not responsible for the problem it took responsibility for.Typical...
- 7 months ago
-
s0uthc0ast
-
-
Found_Avenue
-
To all the people who took the title of this post at face value, please READ the article before posting your disapproval.
There are a zillion homeless people in NYC, and most have already been offered things like meals and shelters by the city. There are teams of people combing the streets & subways daily, offering food/clothing/shelter to anyone who needs it. Many homeless take them up on these offers, but many are too proud to do so, and continue to starve or freeze.
Now, for some of these people (especially new yorkers whose families are now homeless because the main breadwinner lost his or her job, and the average one bedroom apartment in manhattan now rents for over $2000/month) there is only one thing keeping them on the streets - the fact that they cannot afford a plane ticket to go live with family elsewhere.
So.... if the city has started a program to RELOCATE PEOPLE WHO WISH TO BE RELOCATED.... so they can LIVE A BETTER LIFE... um... why is that such a bad thing...?
The homeless people who are alone, who have no one to turn to, will still be offered the services of their local soup kitchen. But the homeless new yorkers who WANT to pick up and start a life somewhere else (preferably somewhere much easier to live in than NYC - where it's easier to make a living wage and afford rent) are being offered a subsidy to do so. And in turn, the city spends less on feeding and housing the homeless. So yes, it is a win-win.
Many people posting here are showing their utter disdain for "the homeless," and it's quite ugly. People who are fortunate tend to forget that homelessness is a temporary situation. If Bloomberg pays someone's ticket to go live in Toledo, where they can live with family until they get a job (because it is easier to make a living wage ANYWHERE compared to NYC) and can start renting a new home, then that person has officially gone from "Homeless with No Prospects in NYC" to "Gainfully Employed With a Home and a Life in Toledo."
Again... how is this a bad thing?
No one is being rejected by the statue of liberty! No one is being "shipped out" against their will! The city is helping homeless people get their lives back on track and start new beginnings for their families. And if more homeless people leave NYC this summer for better life opportunities in locations far more affordable than manhattan, then less people will freeze to death on the streets of NYC this winter.
That's a good thing, people.
- 7 months ago
-
Found_Avenue
-
-
occhipij
-
Found_Avenue:
transport isn't that expensive. Just hop on a greyhound.
And WHY can't they live there? We're establishing an economic caste system. We all know that officially are most concered with $$$$. They are probably thinking: "Well, they are an eyesore, and they are hurting our budgets" so 1000.00 could save us 30+k by pawning them off on other cities...I mean, God forbid we have to help them."
LOL...recently San Fransisco ranked 7th worst in treatment of the homeless...in fact, earlier this year they installed "homeless meters" http://www.nbcbayarea.com/around-town/real-estate/San-Francisco-is-Mean-to-the-H...
- 7 months ago
-
occhipij
-
-
bombastinator
-
Found_Avenue:
its not social it's economic. Homeless pople cost money. it's cheaper to send them away and make other people spend money on them than to do it themselves.
it reminds me of that time in the 80s when Castro in response to demands from the US allow people to emigrate obligingly opened his prisons and sent over all his murderers and rapists.
- 7 months ago
-
bombastinator
-
-
Found_Avenue
-
Found_Avenue:
Occhipij, the economic "caste system" of New York City started YEARS AGO.
If you don't believe me, try to legally rent an apartment in manhattan. Better yet... try to buy one. Can't do it with less than $1 MILLION in your bank account. And as for renting, you need to have a SERIOUS cushion of dough (or some well-off family members living within the five boroughs who are willing to "co-sign") simply to put your name on a lease.
I don't care WHY the city is doing this, or whether they give people plane tickets or bus tickets. This is helping human beings stay alive. Yes, of course the city's main motive is to reduce the budget for feeding & housing the huge homeless population in NYC. Obviously! That's City Hall doing their job. And if, in the process, someone is given a chance to live a better life, with better opportunities, in a safer environment (where they're not likely to be knifed by another homeless person for a $20 bill, or sent to jail for panhandling to feed their family), I still say that is a good thing.
No one is being told to leave NYC - they are just being handed an opportunity to start a better life for themselves by the city that (ironically) probably killed their dreams in the first place. Stop acting as if this is some sort of forced mass exodus. Please READ THE ARTICLE. No one is being kicked out or driven away against their consent. This is an OPTION that people can take advantage of. No one is taking away a human being's right to live wherever they choose.
- 6 months ago
-
Found_Avenue
-
-
bluestranger
-
Is this a money saving effort or a way of removing them from view? If the jobless index keeps rising N.Y. City could save the airline industry.
- 7 months ago
-
bluestranger
-
-
occhipij
-
bluestranger:
I'd say...a way to get them out of their sights....that just happens to save the city some money (a little of column A. a little of column B.)
- 7 months ago
-
occhipij
-
-
RaceBannon
-
the way people talk about fellow human beings on this post is awful. You've lost your humanity and become what every friedman capitalist wanted a selfish mindless consumer who only cares about theirs and the next update to the iphone (people are f-ing stupid). Trust me one of these days those people will regret such thinking.
I used to like new york because it was genuine people didn't hide from the cities problems. It was my home and I loved it without strabucks, time square and tourist on 5th moving like rodents to buy sh*t. I mean expect things like that from LA because people are segregated here, but nyc is becoming a bourgoise cesspool. I thought radicals still lived there...
- 7 months ago
-
RaceBannon
-
-
Found_Avenue
-
RaceBannon:
You're describing the reasons I left my hometown...
Never thought I'd move out of NYC, but I couldn't take the hipster mentality anymore. My parents grew up in a very, very different NYC, and it is so sad to see how things have changed....
- 6 months ago
-
Found_Avenue
-
-
Denica_Cassandra
-
"Not like the brazen giant of Greek fame,
With conquering limbs astride from land to land;
Here at our sea-washed, sunset gates shall stand
A mighty woman with a torch, whose flame
Is the imprisoned lightning, and her name
Mother of Exiles. From her beacon-hand
Glows world-wide welcome; her mild eyes command
The air-bridged harbor that twin cities frame.
"Keep, ancient lands, your storied pomp!" cries she
With silent lips. "Give me your tired, your poor,
Your huddled masses yearning to breathe free,
The wretched refuse of your teeming shore.
Send these, the homeless, tempest-tossed to me,
I lift my lamp beside the golden door!"~Emma Lazarus ;)
LMAO
- 7 months ago
-
Denica_Cassandra
-
-
RaceBannon
-
Denica_Cassandra:
yes we're a nation of double-speakers its a uniquely american tradition.
- 7 months ago
-
RaceBannon
-
-
Spoon2013
-
Screw sending them to CA we'll eventually have to pay for them... Its about time Canada had a use send them all there
- 7 months ago
-
Spoon2013
-
-
Incredulous
-
--but of course no mention of the banking and housing fiasco that has upped the numbers of homeless. No mention of the legitimized raid on pension funds that has stripped so many of their hard earned savings and retirement investments.
I think we need to address the underlying causes of homelessness, and yes, Reagan's policies greatly contributed, but then so did Bush's...albeit the Bush administration was much more covert with their agenda of deregulation in achieving that end, whereas Reagan was pretty up front about his agenda.
The end results have been frighteningly similar. Remove funding form social programs and take that taxpayer money and funnel it to defense contractors under the guise of confronting the latest threat to freedom and the American way of life.
What is stupefying in all of it, is the rhetoric used and reused to convice people that it is the right thing to do. Too few of us make the connection and follow the path of our tax dollars into the pockets of multi-national corporations and defense contractors as we step over the homeless people cluttering the city streets, but the prescription hasn't changed, it is always the same, and we predictably fall in line with whatever lies are being perpetrated by the turncoat media.
The homeless are not the real problem, the people who helped put them there are. It's just easier to accept a pompous ass in a tuxedo padding the pockets of his "base" than it is to deal with the churlish behavior of a homeless person attempting to extort you, but extortion is extortion. Is that the American way we are so eager to defend?
Let's stop treating the symptoms and deal with the disease.
- 7 months ago
-
Incredulous
-
-
HomoGenous101
-
Incredulous:
I totally agree. Shipping homeless out is a total reactionary approach to fixing the problem. The same "business model" band aid placed on all of capitalism quick fixes. If we are to see real solutions the underlying problem of what causes homelessness needs to be confronted. How bout taking the profit incentive out of peoples lives and where they live? Sounds like a plan! Socialize all housing, no real estate market = no homelessness
- 7 months ago
-
HomoGenous101
-
-
Incredulous
-
Incredulous:
not sure I'm ready to jump on the socialization band wagon...I prefer to see the checks and balances that were originally written into our system of government doing their job, and actually implementing and applying those measures that the forefathers intended to keep greed, avarice and power in check.
But you cannot implement checks and balances if you are a spineless self centered politician...and therein lies the biggest part of the problem. Our representatives have sold their souls to the corporate elite, and so, our entire system of governing has gone the way of the aristocracy this country was established to reject.
- 7 months ago
-
Incredulous
-
-
GodsnLiberals
-
ship them them to california..
we will feed them..we will make sure that they are in good health..and we will make sure that they have more rights than the people feeding them...
WELCOME TO CALIFORNIA
- 7 months ago
-
GodsnLiberals
-
-
islek
-
GodsnLiberals:
Except Los Angeles.
- 7 months ago
-
islek
-
-
GodsnLiberals
-
GodsnLiberals:
you should adopt one
- 7 months ago
-
GodsnLiberals
-
-
BenDorries
-
Didn't they already do this?
I feel like NYC has the smallest homeless population out of any city in America (per capita).
The should really ship the homeless out of Denver. Now that place has a homeless problem.
- 7 months ago
-
BenDorries
-
-
GodsnLiberals
-
BenDorries:
maybe valenzuela??
- 7 months ago
-
GodsnLiberals
-
-
krush_productions
-
BenDorries:
Its Hawaii actually, mad homeless people from N.Y were given one way tickets to Hawaii a few years back. The Locals got pissed so I'm sure it's stopped.
Free showers, Warm all the time, hawaii...
- 7 months ago
-
krush_productions
-
-
good_stuff
-
Makes perfect sense to me, but now we just need to figure out how to make a business out of homeless shelters. The article makes it sound like they have the option to do whatever they like, but it is all footed by the taxpayer.
Maybe we should make homeless shelters where you have to do mindless labor (stamp liscence plates and stuff), if you want to stay there.
- 7 months ago
-
good_stuff
-
-
bombastinator
-
good_stuff:
they were called "work houses".
- 7 months ago
-
bombastinator
-
-
MilchMann
-
good_stuff:
There was a proposition to do something similar at one point... paying minimum wage to clean trains, buses, subways and the like for minimum wage and then if they stayed in the shelters, they would be charged rent, it was something like 15 a night... so essentially they could work three hours a day and have a bed shower and a hot dinner and breakfast... but it was deemed it would cost to much... how is that for fiscal conservancy for you...
- 7 months ago
-
MilchMann
-
-
blknight
-
good_stuff:
I agree. I think that not only should the bums get a chance to do mindless labor, but that we should make prisoners work for free--ALL prisoners. It would save the economy no doubt. Slavery practically built this country anyways, may as well not let them just sit in a cage all day- put those people to work and let them gain a skill.
- 7 months ago
-
blknight
-
-
bombastinator
-
good_stuff:
I suspect it was deemed to be illegal. Work houses are famous. Ever read or watch Oliver Twist?
- 7 months ago
-
bombastinator
-
-
MilchMann
-
good_stuff:
Yeah, I did, did you? He is not in an orphanage for very long in that book... and there was no slave labor...
- 7 months ago
-
MilchMann
-
-
jaystyx
-
Send them all to California, it worked in South Park
- 7 months ago
-
jaystyx
-
-
Denica_Cassandra
-
jaystyx: This comment has been removed.
-
Denica_Cassandra
-
-
TheBrownKid
-
jaystyx:
Do that and they'll all flock to San Francisco, Golden Gate Park specifically.
- 7 months ago
-
TheBrownKid
-
-
chasingame
-
Besides the title being somewhat misleading on this post, I do not see anything wrong with it. If these homeless people have family they can stay with NYC will flip the bill to get them there. It is kind of a win-win IMO.
- 7 months ago
-
chasingame
-
-
bombastinator
-
chasingame:
until other cities start sending them back. "I'll see your 5 homeless and raise you 2 gang bangers ad a sex offender."
- 7 months ago
-
bombastinator
-
-
redvelvet1278
-
chasingame:
"City officials say none of the relocated families have returned to city shelters"
did you read this? it appears to be working.
- 7 months ago
-
redvelvet1278
-
-
Found_Avenue
-
chasingame:
I don't think bombastinator read the article...
- 7 months ago
-
Found_Avenue
-
-
chasingame
-
chasingame:
Yeah... I don't think that bombastinator read the article either. It's that or he is just fishing. That's why I didn't respond to his comment.
- 7 months ago
-
chasingame
-
-
bombastinator
-
chasingame:
I read it. I wouldn't necessarily send the same homeless people back. But I'm sure I could find some homeless person to go. If I was a leader in another city and I caught nyc doing this to me I would do it right back.
- 7 months ago
-
bombastinator
-
-
chasingame
-
chasingame:
@bombastinator... If you read it then you would realize that they are not just sending random homeless people to random cities. One requirement is that the homeless people that they are buying the tickets for must have family to stay with at their destination. If there are families living in NYC that are willing to take in a family member that has fallen on hared times and another city was willing to pay for their travel, I do not think anyone in NY should have a problem with it. I guess I just don't get your point.
- 7 months ago
-
chasingame
-
-
unclecharlie
- This comment has been removed.
-
unclecharlie
-
-
noxidereus
-
unclecharlie:
Brrrrr that's cold man
- 7 months ago
-
noxidereus
-
-
Mark701
-
unclecharlie: This comment has been removed.
-
Mark701
-
-
Mark701
-
unclecharlie:
There is a saying you should always try to remember before posting about people less fortunate than yourself:
"There but for the grace of God go I"
The only thing that separates you from the homeless are a couple of unpaid electric bills. Think about that before you judge.
- 7 months ago
-
Mark701
-
-
jaystyx
-
unclecharlie:
Liberals aren’t to blame for NYCs homeless problem. Remember that Ronald Reagan sent thousands of mentally ill patients out on the streets when he took office.
I’m not blaming conservatives or Republicans for the homeless. I’m pointing out that this is an American problem, not a conservative or liberal problem.
- 7 months ago
-
jaystyx
-
-
bombastinator
-
unclecharlie:
well there used to be institutions for them but Reagan pushed them out onto the street. (where a lot of them almost immediately died but not all of 'em) I guess tossing them onto someone else's doorstep is one way to do it. They'll get tossed back of course.
If I was a mayor and found out the NYC mayor was Dumping their homeless on me I'd send two back for every one they gave me, announce it in NYC, and possibly FedEx the man one of my recent bowel movements to boot.
As for "back in the 50s" don't you mean back before black people could legally use a public restroom, and therefore venture out of their own neighborhoods.
- 7 months ago
-
bombastinator
-
-
MotherForTruth
-
unclecharlie:
bombastinator, bold truth and well stated ... :)
- 7 months ago
-
MotherForTruth
-
-
mik661
-
unclecharlie:
Thats our charlie. Another old white man pining for the days when women and negros knew their place in the world.
- 7 months ago
-
mik661
-
-
onemalefla
-
unclecharlie: This comment has been removed.
-
onemalefla
-
-
unclecharlie
-
unclecharlie:
You need to read my other posts before you put your foot in your mouth, mik. I guess because I support Black conservatives who speak out against racial quotas and affirmitive action (thereby supporting genuine equality) that drives you nuts. Just too bad MLK, Jr. was a Republican, eh?
- 6 months ago
-
unclecharlie
