Obama would curtail summer vacation

// added September 27, 2009 // 136 comments //
Image...
current89
WASHINGTON - Students beware: The summer vacation you just enjoyed could be sharply curtailed if President Barack Obama gets his way.

Obama says American kids spend too little time in school, putting them at a disadvantage with other students around the globe.

"Now, I know longer school days and school years are not wildly popular ideas," the president said earlier this year. "Not with Malia and Sasha, not in my family, and probably not in yours. But the challenges of a new century demand more time in the classroom."

The president, who has a sixth-grader and a third-grader, wants schools to add time to classes, to stay open late and to let kids in on weekends so they have a safe place to go.

"Our school calendar is based upon the agrarian economy and not too many of our kids are working the fields today," Education Secretary Arne Duncan said in a recent interview with The Associated Press.

Obama and Duncan say kids in the United States need more school because kids in other nations have more school.

"Young people in other countries are going to school 25, 30 percent longer than our students here," Duncan told the AP. "I want to just level the playing field."

While it is true that kids in many other countries have more school days, it's not true they all spend more time in school.

Kids in the U.S. spend more hours in school (1,146 instructional hours per year) than do kids in the Asian countries that persistently outscore the U.S. on math and science tests — Singapore (903), Taiwan (1,050), Japan (1,005) and Hong Kong (1,013). That is despite the fact that Taiwan, Japan and Hong Kong have longer school years (190 to 201 days) than does the U.S. (180 days).

Regardless, there is a strong case for adding time to the school day.

Researcher Tom Loveless of the Brookings Institution looked at math scores in countries that added math instruction time. Scores rose significantly, especially in countries that added minutes to the day, rather than days to the year.

"Ten minutes sounds trivial to a school day, but don't forget, these math periods in the U.S. average 45 minutes," Loveless said. "Percentage-wise, that's a pretty healthy increase."

end of excerpt

Source: MSNBC
  1. groups:
    News,   Current Tonight,   US Politics,   President Obama
  2. tags:
    bootcamps

136 comments // Obama would curtail summer vacation

  • Birdmanbob4
    • 0
      Birdmanbob4  
    • Image...
    • As Obama is having kids work harder ...the kids will think lie is ok now Obama did ...http://www.cashill.com/ Literary Lion Obama Will Roar No More

      "Dreams From My Father"
      and "Audacity of Hope"
      Authorship Articles

      American Thinker weighs in on breaking "Dreams" authorship story:

      Unmasking Obama
      By Thomas Lifson

      It is now abundantly clear that the image of Barack Obama sold to the American electorate was tightly edited, air-brushed, and exaggerated. He has worn a series of masks -- eloquent orator, brilliant scholar, centrist, and literary sensation. All of these masks are coming off as he copes with a job for which image will not suffice. For instance, hiding behind the eloquent orator mask is a guy who says "uhh" a lot when he is winging it, and who makes lots of factual and grammatical mistakes.

      Now, thanks to Jack Cashill, the literary mask has been removed. Obama is a literary pretender. Case closed. The evidence is overwhelming that Bill Ayers ghost-wrote Dreams from my Father, the book which established Obama's pose as a brilliant writer (and therefore a fine mind, in the estimation of many). The stylistic resemblance between the Dreams and Ayers' work is stunning. Now we know, thanks to Chris Andersen's new book,that Obama hit a brick wall trying to fulfill his contract to produce a book, and shipped off his notes and tapes to Ayers. That is the classic description of a ghost writer's assignment. And it completely fits the theories Cashill had inferentially reasoned from the data of his literary studies.

      The revelation that Chris Andersen had two separate sources means that this fact meets the journalistic standard of reliability, provided by a respected, established bestselling author. Obama's dismissal of Ayers as "just a guy in the neighborhood" has been shown to be an outright lie.

      That will certainly be the verdict of history, regardless of whether or not the issue of Obama's ghost written book ever breaks through into the national discussion. My bet is that the media will not be able to suppress discussion. The image of Obama packing boxes full of tapes and notebooks and hauling them over to Ayers' house a couple of blocks away, is simple and compelling evidence of a ghost writer being put to work. Jack's literary detective work made the case, and Andersen's two neighborhood sources confirm it.

      Anyone who refuses to deal with this issue is willfully avoiding topics that make Obama look bad. The facts are in the public domain.
      The New York Times has just appointed a new editor to monitor online conservative websites and talk radio, to make sure the paper doesn't embarrass itself again, as it did on the Van Jones and ACORN stories. Unlike every other editor, the Times is keeping the name of this editor secret.

      [Jill Abramson, the managing editor for news,] and Bill Keller, the executive editor, said last week that they would now assign an editor to monitor opinion media and brief them frequently on bubbling controversies. Keller declined to identify the editor, saying he wanted to spare that person "a bombardment of e-mails and excoriation in the blogosphere."
      So, whoever you are at the New York Times, you're probably reading American Thinker as an unpleasant duty. If I knew who you were, I'd bombard you with a polite note laying out the trail for you to follow on this important story. The President of The United States lied when he claimed that "I actually wrote them [his books] myself."

      I think that's news that's fit to be printed, even if uncongenial to the incumbent Democrat president. Don't you?

      Thomas Lifson is editor and publisher of American Thinker.

    • 4 months ago
  • morirjedi
    • 0
      morirjedi  
    • We need to give the kids a better education. If it takes a longer year then so be it. The schools are open for summer school anyway.

    • 4 months ago
  • TadSmooth
    • 0
      TadSmooth  
    • This is a large and complicated idea that I believe would meet much resistance from the teacher's unions for one. The real question is how much will it cost,how do you implement it, where do you do this, and who is in charge of managing this change?

      I like the idea of revamping the education system, it's obvious it needs to be done, but there are many components to consider.

      There is also the matter of the other unresolved issues with two ongoing wars,a broken economy,health care reform, and that little Iran problem.

      The President is great at articulating ideas and suggestions, but I think we should complete some objectives before starting new ones.

    • 4 months ago
  • Reaper26
    • 0
      Reaper26  
    • if he wants these kids to be smarter he need to make sure that this whole standardize test crap isnt what makes you graduate in high school or even in elementary school or middle school pass that grade it just need to gauge where they are at thats one good reason i hated florida's education system. FCAT was a scam and had no purpose but to fill at that time governor bush's friends pocket with money.

    • 4 months ago
  • metalcookiesxy70
    • 0
      metalcookiesxy70  
    • ~Ufufu...

      You can't blame the students, by far it those who teach them, if you measure a majority of those by District of Columbia(which is an easy expieriment), and compare that to the Untied states which is way more, filled with an enitrely different environment...Furthermore, the plan could just collapse, because students are working for education, but they would get terribly discouraged by this and most would dropout...

      But, more importantly for those who think this plan will happen, from the government, it will not becaus it would be illegal, Barrack is only making a statement, he cannot control the States like that, District of Columiba is a different story.....

      Such a shame though, Blasted education system..

    • 4 months ago
  • claybird121
    • 0
      claybird121  
    • nursediesel,
      If we are talking about how things USED to be, then we can obviously bring up the fact that the vast majority of human existence was lived with no agriculture, and humans used to have more leisure time than the average person does now, better diets, and children attended no school, but learned everything they needed to learn to be happy and healthy adults to provide for their communities. Of course, those times are not these times, most of us have been infected and enslaved by civilization. I'm not suggesting "going back" to anything of course. Just saying, that's how things "USED" to be.

      Freedom is freedom, and i don't appreciate you having the gang we all call the U.S. government use their guns to force me and my children to attend your state approved education camps.
      I don't have words to express the sorrow i feel when i see people claiming this is a good idea. Less free time for individuals, more violent monopoly (state) power.
      Happiness in slavery, indeed.

    • 4 months ago
  • nursediesel
    • 0
      nursediesel  
    • claybird121:

      Oh, I agree children should be taught at home a majority of what they need to make it in the world. Unfortunately I and most parents cannot teach at the highest levels of all subjects.
      Home schooling is a often a better alternative. That way groups of children can get together for different parents expertise. My sister home taught and did botany and biology for the groups.
      My kids wanted to go to public school.
      But I still taught them about subjects they wouldn't cover in school and also at higher levels than many of their classes.
      In fact my kids often knew much more about subjects than their teachers.
      And; I agree the truancy system is actually not effective for the kids who are truant.
      Learning should be a wonderful experience, not a forced one.

    • 4 months ago
  • claybird121
    • 0
      claybird121  
    • You're all aware that the amount of school that children are forced (by violence) to undertake by the state is a method by which children and young adults are kept off the job market, right? This is something even the u.s. government admits in history books.

      If it isn't voluntary then it's coercive. All of you who support this are slave masters and yet some how you don't seem to care. You want a bunch of people with guns to use these guns to force other people to put their children into specially sanctioned education camps.
      All regulation is enforced with violence.

      Thanks for the captivity folks.
      More guns solves everything!!

    • 4 months ago
  • nursediesel
    • 0
      nursediesel  
    • I always felt it was wrong to give kids weeks off at Christmas, 6 days at Thanksgiving and then monthes off all summer. (We don't plant and harvest anymore).
      Jobs require you to work 8 hours a day. 51-52 weeks/year.(unless you are a teacher),

      Secondly, if they would go back to the real basics; subjects children need as a foundation and the other classes as electives then maybe they wouldn't need to add more than the 180 school days.

    • 4 months ago
  • Ihatethemall
    • 0
      Ihatethemall  
    • nursediesel:

      (We don't plant and harvest anymore).
      I do and many around me do to.

      On another note..........GO DETROIT. season starts in a couple days. Hope the results are differant than last year. Good luck

    • 4 months ago
  • nursediesel
    • 0
      nursediesel  
    • nursediesel:

      I'm talking about the majority of the countries children used to be needed at the farms to plant and harvest crops by hand.
      That's just not the case anymore.
      Sure there are a lot of farms around but large numbers of hand laborers aren't needed like years ago, and many of the kids that worked before would be breaking child labor laws today.
      No offense was intended toward farmers. We need more of you guys(local farmers). Less of big corp farm businesses.

    • 4 months ago
  • Ihatethemall
    • 0
      Ihatethemall  
    • nursediesel:

      Oh I agree with you for the most part. I live in a rural area surrounded by farms. Most folks don't.

      I couldn't agree more with you on the need for more family farms and less factory farms. Animals are treated better on Family farms and the food is handled better.

      Enjoy the season.

    • 4 months ago
  • GoodGodGuy
    • 0
      GoodGodGuy  
    • There would be four 2 week vacations involved in four different seasons. What do young working parents do when their 3rd grader has the summer off?
      School's curriculum is more suspect than the time allotted for school. The "No Child Left Behind" unfunded mandate is not helping either.

    • 4 months ago
  • bansheewail
    • 0
      bansheewail  
    • Image...
    • It's already being done.....SUCCESSFULLY in K.I.P.P schools.

      Most KIPP schools run from 7:30 am to 5:00 pm Monday through Friday and 8:30 am to 1:30 on select Saturdays (usually twice a month), and Middle school students also participate in a two-to-three-week mandatory summer school, which includes extracurricular activities after school and on Saturdays. As a results, KIPP students spend approximately 60% more time in class than their peers.[2]

      There are currently 82 KIPP public schools in 19 states and the District of Columbia enrolling around 20,000 students. More than 95% of KIPP students are African American or Latino / Hispanic.

      Nationally, more than 90 percent of KIPP middle school students have gone on to college-preparatory high schools, and more than 80 percent of KIPP alumni have gone on to college.

    • 4 months ago
  • claybird121
  • claybird121
  • CKAnimations
  • nanac
    • 0
      nanac  
    • This is an excellent idea...We are living in the 21st century, and our children are falling behind the rest of the World in Math and Science.....We are living and competing in a Global Society....Children of today, are the future workforce of tomorrow...Only the well educated have a chance of competing with a Global Job Market....High unemployment in America should be a motivator, and reason to educate our children well.....Obama is a very intelligent and wise President, who is making 21st Century decisions.

    • 4 months ago
  • jaystyx
    • 0
      jaystyx  
    • Making school days longer will only result in more tired and less productive students. I had to go to school at 7:15 AM when I was in high school. Students get pretty grumpy around 4:00 PM when they have to get up that early. Than you have to factor in homework and extra curricular activities.

    • 4 months ago
  • tomatoman13
    • 0
      tomatoman13  
    • i can understand why some people approve of the idea, but i get good grades and feel that i can stack up to students overseas. i think the real problem is that (in my school, anyway) lots of kids just don't care, especially on government standardized tests, which seriously lowers the overall grade of the school.

    • 4 months ago
  • good_stuff
    • 0
      good_stuff  
    • Yeah, I think it would be worthwhile to extend the day slightly. It would also be good to break up summer somewhat.

      I don't think that we should lengthen the days in every subject, but just the ones that really need the help. Parents have to work, so the schedules should be compatable with normal work schedules.

      Also, I think that it shouldn't be mandadory for kids over a certain age (16?) to waste their time in school doing nothing. Kids who have proven themselves responsible enough should be able to make the descisions themselves. I know I hated sitting in class doing nothing when I could have been working and saving money for college. The only reason I had to be there was gov a mandate that said the school only got money if I was there for more than 6 hours regardless of whether I was gettting the best grade in the class or not.

    • 4 months ago
  • J_Jammer
  • thestick
    • 0
      thestick  
    • OOH and also if you want to help educate kids we should start with honesty in advertising. I think that would help. A little morality can go a long way. I mean that's where american kids spend the majority of there time. Am I right? Can I get an Amen or its politically correct equivilant

    • 4 months ago
  • Nephwrack
  • thestick
    • 0
      thestick  
    • WHO'S GOING TO PAY FOR IT? Just think of it from an economic stand point. There have been substantial cuts in schools' funding for years down here in Florida. This public school system still teaches kids that Columbus discovered North America?!?!?! Yes kids, native americans don't count as people who actually lived here for thousands of years.
      What We need is FREE post-high school educaton and vocational training for those who want it. The current system is based on the Industrial era idea of a 9 to 5 serf standard lower class.
      The Obamanator is touching on too many issues at once in a haphazard fashion that leans more on the "Govt. Knows Best" side. I voted for him so that we could get away from BIG GOVT ways of George Bush.

    • 4 months ago
  • montesooma
  • J_Jammer
  • cigarettezack
    • 0
      cigarettezack  
    • Good thing I'm already out of it, I do feel a little sorry for my kids if this actually happens, which...lets be real...it won't. Too many people are against it, and Obama is the president and all, but he's not capable of shooting down all those people.

    • 4 months ago
  • Valence
    • 0
      Valence  
    • This is a stupid idea :/ Shorting summer vacation will only give those who don’t want to learn more time to draw or sleep in class or to consider dropping out, if you don’t want to learn no matter how much time you spend in school, you won’t learn a thing, and it is a shame that all the people who are doing what they need to do in school have to be stuck in school over what is supposed to be their summer vacation just because of some slackers :/ I for one am currently in the 10th grade and I can tell if a child doesn’t want to learn he/she won’t learn. Teachers preach the same thing everyday in class, it is the students responsibility to get what they need to do done.

      All you people that aren’t in school or have recently got out of school and are agreeing with this go talk to your neighborhood school teach, they’ll tell you.

      This will only cause two things, more time wasted in school or more drop outs.

      This is not the solution :/

    • 4 months ago
  • chelseaf89
    • 0
      chelseaf89  
    • I think the difference is the school schedule. Asian countries go to school year round and have breaks during the year, as we have often debated. The three month break basically requires kids to re-learn a lot of material because they forget it during the summer.

    • 4 months ago
  • Maeveeo
    • 0
      Maeveeo  
    • I mean like they always ask what did you do for the summer & they remember it , but if you ask them what did you learn last semester they cannot remember now think about it they seem to have forgotten what they have learned for ten months , why not give them June off
      then back to school the next month only to return in August so they won't forget , I hear we have really dumb kids compared to most all over the world , & you know what lately i have noticed WE DO !

    • 4 months ago
  • stolenapples
    • 0
      stolenapples  
    • What??? Kids in Japan spend less time in school??? That is crazy! Kids in japan spend from 8 in the morning to 11 in the evening in School, they clean they're schools too AND they have homework. The american schools are rotten they have a very fun and interesting system but unfortunately it's not a good one. You can see all the problems if you go in a shop and the 17-year-old employee can't calculate the change by himself. I think that giving students the opportunity to go to class in the afternoon is very important even though it's a bit difficult with insurances and safety... cutting vacation days is a little too much, but the system needs a change!

    • 4 months ago
  • samthesixth
    • 0
      samthesixth  
    • I hope this is only his opinion and not a Dept of Ed plan. Each state has the right to decide these issues for themselves.

      The "traditional school calendar" is based on the US as an agrarian society. We no longer are so changing it to fit our lifestyles should not be a bad thing.

      Perhaps a shorter school day coupled with more school days.

    • 4 months ago
  • ddelazan
  • Muse13
    • 0
      Muse13  
    • Just a few generic opinions

      I agree because keeping kids in school later will help working family s. I know many of the parents i work with have to work there hours around there kids school days. Then have to call of all together if they can not find a sitter.

      On another note the reason kids are still failing despite more class time in my opinion is do to the fact that parents do not stress the importance of school, teachers are not trained to recognize or handle certain learning problems, and class rooms are to full.

    • 5 months ago
  • dabne
    • 0
      dabne  
    • More time in a Government run school and less time at home with the family. That sounds about par with Obama. Maybe we can use that extra time to memorize the new public school Obama song too.

    • 5 months ago
  • bombastinator
    • 0
      bombastinator  
    • dabne:

      What time "at home with the family"? Dude during the day "the family" is working. Ending school long before the standard work day ends just creates pointless child care costs.

    • 5 months ago
  • samthesixth
  • galwayman
    • 0
      galwayman  
    • As I read all the posts coming into my inbox you are all missing the point.Government has decided that the MCAS is the solution to education. Our children are not being given a complete education,but rather just enough for this system of standardized testing! If they pass the MCAS the government is happy.Standardized testing is not the solution people! our kids need a complete education and that will not be solved by standardized testing. no other civilized country uses just standardized testing as a basis for education. this system is ruining our kids.they need to learn math,science,english,history,and all the other basics of a good education but instead they just learn how to pass the MCAS,and its the sole determintion used.we must return to the basics of education and dump the MCAS! Increasing school hours or making our kids go all year long with no summer vacation is not the answer!

    • 5 months ago
  • dc133
    • 0
      dc133  
    • We do need better school systems. Children should be put into advance daycares at a young age, like in China. We have to get children smarter at a young age. This should carry on to their older years. Many students do learn different so this too should be taken into account.

      It is time we raise the steaks and give the younger generations a fighting chance!

    • 5 months ago
  • pandaman2105
    • 0
      pandaman2105  
    • it's a really progressive option, but i doubt it'll work. we really are educationally behind in what we teach and what our kids know, but this will take a lot of convincing if he thinks it will be put into effect.

      plus it's more of a state issue anyway, and it's better if we gave students better options when it came to spending their free time. there is a very obvious issue with technology-induced apathy with the younger generations.

    • 5 months ago
  • Wegg
    • 0
      Wegg  
    • Where exactly in the constitution does it say it is the President's job to dictate how long kids stay in school?

    • 5 months ago
  • mirror
    • 0
      mirror  
    • IF it could be reviewed by teachers, ( who are actually in a position to speak with authority and experience )I would listen to that before I shot off my mouth or made a decision.......

    • 5 months ago
  • FallenMorgan
    • 0
      FallenMorgan  
    • Yes, yes, let's have the federal government arbitrarily decide education standards for the whole nation. The states have no ability to do shit themselves. Yeah.

      "When all government, in little as in great things, shall be drawn to Washington as the Center of all power, it will render powerless the checks provided of one government on another and will become as venal and oppressive as the government from which we separated." -Thomas Jefferson.

    • 5 months ago
  • libertyforall
    • 0
      libertyforall  
    • FallenMorgan:

      FallenMorgan,

      The words of Thomas Jefferson and James Madison fall on deaf ears these days. The Constitution is outdated and passe. Both liberals and so called conservatives use the document when it suits their purpose. Most of the time they disregard the words written in the document.

      Simply read responses on Current and you'll see that the vast majority of people are completely clueless as to what the Constitution contains. It is sad, but the government does this for a reason. When the citizens aren't informed, it is far easier to do what you want.

    • 5 months ago
  • scabbio
    • 0
      scabbio  
    • this article is a pretty little piece of hype meant to stir shit up. Obama can't legally do any of that. He's absolutely right, that kids need more of an education ( and a BETTER education ), but it's not like he can actually DO any of it. Evidence: the healthcare system debacle.

    • 5 months ago
  • bombastinator
  • Alex_French
  • asherp
  • carmalite
    • 0
      carmalite  
    • In Japan, students get a few breaks during the year instead of on long break and they don't forget things they learned during the school year as much as our pathetic students.

    • 5 months ago
  • J_Jammer
  • Releaser31
    • 0
      Releaser31  
    • he wants the american students to be on top of the line. i dont think its such a bad idea. its how use those extra school time can be good.

    • 5 months ago
  • alyssak
    • 0
      alyssak  
    • Also, I thinkt he title of this post is a little inappropriate... Obama doesn't want to just shorten summer vacation for the hell of it (and really, the only reason you should only give a shit about short summer vacations is if you're in seventh grade). Obama wants to improve education in America. That is what this article is about, not summer vacation.

    • 5 months ago
  • alyssak
    • 0
      alyssak  
    • This is a good thing. I'm a student and I wouldn't mind going to school year-round, with longer holiday breaks. Some people say we need to increase the quality as opposed to the quantity, but why not just increase both? We aren't losing anything by investing time and money in education.

    • 5 months ago
  • kivol
    • 0
      kivol  
    • I want to see how the obama administration explores other solutions to our hurt education system. I am of the belief that more time in the class room will benefit but classroom size and supplies play a larger role in success. With the economic downturn, classroom sizes are no doubt increasing and supplies are becoming scarce.

    • 5 months ago
  • brit50
    • 0
      brit50  
    • In my opinion, terrible idea. You cannot just consider the actual school hrs. What about the High School students (especially upperclassmen including Juniors because of SAT/ACT, exit lvl state standardized testing, general large amounts of work) that put in 2 or 3 more hrs of homework time outside of school.

    • 5 months ago
  • Nettle
    • 0
      Nettle  
    • brit50:

      Not unless you severely reduce the amount of homework by taking that time into the elongated school day. I'd personally love to do extra work in class rather than during the few hours I get at home.

    • 5 months ago
  • brit50
  • Ihatethemall
    • 0
      Ihatethemall  
    • Las Vegas has had year round schools for a long time now. The kids get 3 week breaks throught the year instead of one summer vacation. That is only for the grades up to 6th I believe. What he is proposing is nothing new.

    • 5 months ago
  • libertyforall
    • 0
      libertyforall  
    • Ihatethemall:

      Vegas can do that because it is a legitimate enumerated function of the state. Obama cannot propose or force this because it is not an enumerated power of the Federal Government.

      Obama doesn't seem to be letting that pesky little document stand in the way of many of his decision though.

    • 5 months ago
  • bombastinator
  • samthesixth
  • J_Jammer
    • 0
      J_Jammer [removed]  
    • Summer was originally just for kids to work on the farm and help out. Now years later we have lazy kids that become self involved and what has it been good for?

      Kidding.

      People need vacation time.

      Even little people. I think that going two months off one month works for me or three months off one month.

    • 5 months ago
  • cafiredancer
    • 0
      cafiredancer  
    • This would be good for students and teachers...because of how much they have already cut back. When I was a kid, school was from 8am-3:15pm and summer break was 2 1/2 months long, my kids currently go to school from 7:50-2pm and out at noon on Wednesdays and have over 3 months of summer vacation.I see lots of kids wondering the street at 2 in the afternoon, tell me why it wouldn't be better to have them in school longer? My son is in 3 grade and is the ONLY kid out of all the 3rd graders that is an advanced reader?? How does this happen? It's because parents are at work all day and kids are picking up the controllers instead of books! As a parent wanting to raise little Einsteins, this looks great, but unfortunatly there are also parents that do need the child care...I say it's better than having these kids roaming the streets...

    • 5 months ago
  • libertyforall
    • 0
      libertyforall  
    • I thought Obama was a Constitutional scholar? His degree is severely devalued because one again, he is proposing another unconstitutional measure. The Federal government has absolutely no role in dictating anything about state ran education systems.

      Beyond that, this is probably the dumbest proposal he has had yet. So how do we fixed our failing education system? We make those kids spend more time and spend more money on that same failed education system. This is beyond logic and Obama need to be reigned in.

      You want to fix the education system? Abolish the DOE and privatize education and see how quickly we catch up to other countries.

    • 5 months ago
  • kivol
    • 0
      kivol  
    • libertyforall:

      You prove to me that your smarter than a constitutional scholar. You eluded that the pot smoking got to him.
      hahahaha privatize the education system. again with the 'rights' jokes. Prove to me that private schools will do a better job. I'll try not to laugh in your face.

    • 5 months ago
  • Ihatethemall
    • 0
      Ihatethemall  
    • libertyforall:

      @KIVOL:

      You really believ that public schools are as good or better than private ones?

      Sorry I couldn't help but to laugh at that. Where the hell did you come up with that idea....oh yeah..PUBLIC SCHOOLS

    • 5 months ago
  • kivol
    • 0
      kivol  
    • libertyforall:

      first there are no caps in my name. Thank you very much. I totally believe that the public education system is just as a good if not better than the private. no thanks i don't want private funders supporting our schools. It is a community investment. Not in all cases do public schools succeed, and when they fail there needs to be an assessment on why they did.

    • 5 months ago
  • Ihatethemall
  • libertyforall
    • 0
      libertyforall  
    • libertyforall:

      Kivol,

      I am not alluding to any "rights." The Constitution does that by specifically enumerating the powers of the federal government. Dictating the education system was not one of them.

      I also find it saddening that you haven't taken the time to educate yourself on the numerous advantages of a privatized education system. Which include much better quality, less hassle for teachers, better teachers, and an overall better education.

      Interestingly enough, perhaps one of the best proposed models comes from Sweden where they have semi-privatized education and it is flourishing.

      http://www.economist.com/displayStory.cfm?Story_ID=E1_TTVPVGQV

      Sadly, not surprising. Your post demonstrates the success of a government run education system.

    • 5 months ago
  • metalcookiesxy70
  • bombastinator
  • jesuswho
    • 0
      jesuswho  
    • I think this is a state wide issue. I think more funding state wide is the only way to get the kiddos heads swelling with knowledge. And another thing schools teach the same old fake ass stories. The spice trade from world history was really the first drug ring. You get to learn all this dumb ass shit no one cares about anymore. Teach a kid how to swindle money and fuck people out of 401ks and we could go places!

    • 5 months ago
  • thestick
  • bansheewail
  • arcticspirit
  • arcticspirit
    • 0
      arcticspirit  
    • In japan I didn't get home until like 7pm but I had activities after about 3 pm and research projects, and group stuff. Some organized, some we just were responsible to have done.

      People could leave the school after classes, and some did. If I was sick I did.
      But I walked and took a bus that ran later, just like most other did.

      Only good thing, when I got back to the USA, college was really easy. I enjoyed it. Because I needed the break. Everything else was crazy & difficult.

    • 5 months ago
  • ocanada
    • 0
      ocanada  
    • Well I think it's more important we give our students goals. Something like going to the moon was for the baby boomers. I think we need a new challenge for a new century rather than just more hours in school.

      However allowing schools to operate more like civic centers in terms of giving kids a safe place to go to on weekends is a great idea, and if a kid want's some extra credit hours to graduate early and is willing to sacrifice a few hours on saturday than we know there are teachers willing to give that time along with the children. I can only vouch for my experience of true boredom will living in a rural community and my parents fears when we lived in the inner city in indy, and most extracurricular activities tended to not be so wholesome and not involve education. I think this is the type of solution that helps both of those situations.

    • 5 months ago
  • J_Jammer
  • yvesisaki
  • J_Jammer
    • 0
      J_Jammer [removed]  
    • J_Jammer:

      I see you did. =p

      I also think that they should, from day one, prepare kids for the "real world" in a way the children understand...different each year. Preparing them for a job that they want or help them think of what it is they want to do.

    • 5 months ago
  • Quiggles
    • 0
      Quiggles  
    • J_Jammer:

      I wanted to be a pro basketball player, could they teach that to our kids? Kids in kindergarten want to be zoo keepers, firemen, and astronauts; but I agree I'm sure 5 year olds have pretty good ideas of what they want to be. Give me a break

    • 5 months ago
  • Ihatethemall
  • Quiggles
  • yvesisaki
    • 0
      yvesisaki  
    • J_Jammer:

      I agree with J_Jammer that they should give kids a sense of the real world with responsibility and what career they want to do when they grow up. They do this in Japan, so there's your proof that this isn't asking too much.

      If they teach this to 5 year olds, at least they'll have a sense of different jobs to decide which one is perfect for them instead of doing that when you're older and never finding a niche and instead work at a supermarket forever. Plus who says they have to full on make them firemen and put them on the scene. He said little each year.

    • 5 months ago
  • Quiggles
    • 0
      Quiggles  
    • J_Jammer:

      I agree we should tailor our kids throughout their schooling but let kids be kids. You have your whole life to do what you want and you only have a 1 short childhood

    • 5 months ago
  • J_Jammer
    • 0
      J_Jammer [removed]  
    • J_Jammer:

      Every single thing a child wants to be you can use that to help them learn.

      Truck driver.

      They can help them talk about the trucks and how they work and how much weight they can handle.....

      Anything that a child wants to be can be linked to all studies and help them. Read about truck drivers. Do math that involves truck drivers. Do all science about what truck drivers carry...whatever....it can all work.

      Yes this is more work for the teachers....but whatever it's the students that matter.

      And children switch their minds the school work switches.

      Schools can do so much and yet they do so little.

    • 5 months ago
  • clownpuncher
  • bombastinator
  • revolutioninamerica
  • J_Jammer
  • Kari_Heaberlin
    • 0
      Kari_Heaberlin  
    • J_Jammer:

      I agree with you J., and with Bombastinator. Perhaps if we did both, revise the public curriculum and increased availability and access to teachers and educational materials, and not just for students but also for parents, we could see an increase in children's test scores.

      Personalizing education is a good the way to create economic progress in the job market as well. By increasing the amount of personalized instruction a student can get from their teacher, i.e. more class time, smaller class sizes, revamping the curriculum, etc., American students can not only compete within the domestic and foreign job markets, they can become more specialized, more productive and more innovative in their work.

      Plus, how can you call it work if you enjoy it? It is about time people did what made them happy instead of just pay their bills. How many people would quit or lose their jobs if they were trained, specialized, and motivated to go to work. Perhaps, poverty and crime rates would fall and society's morale would get a boost in the right direction. With a better educated citizens, fundamental changes to improve the quality of life at local level, like crime prevention, homelessness, and social decay, could take place on an individual basis and not through government intervention, i.e. police action, economic development programs and prisons, which has not worked thus far.

      Honestly, improving our education seems like the best way of solving all of our nation's problems, isn't it? At least it is the cheapest way.

    • 4 months ago
  • J_Jammer
  • FallenMorgan
    • 0
      FallenMorgan  
    • Deciding on how long the school year should be is not the job of the federal government. Who gives a fuck about how much time children in other countries spend at school? We're not other countries.

      America shouldn't have to "compete" and "keep up" with the rest of the world. I wish people would get over their love affair with internationalism and the Imperial Presidency.

      Education is supposed to be an issue for the states, not the federal government.

    • 5 months ago
  • Quiggles
  • alyssak
  • TheJerryMadden
  • Kari_Heaberlin
    • 0
      Kari_Heaberlin  
    • FallenMorgan:

      There reason why we care about being competitive is because the United States of America is not the only country with money. If more of our citizens are gainfully employed, we have more money as a country, regardless of where that money comes from.

      Now, the US has laws requiring American workers be paid an amount for their labor that is much higher than other countries charge for the same work. Due to the nature of market capitalism and the law of supply and demand, most businesses, even American ones, will go else where to hire their employees.

      If you don't educate your citizens to do jobs which require more skill than manual labor, sooner or later they will have no jobs to go to. That is what happened during the last recession and it will continue to happen as long as third world countries provide cheap labor at the expense of its citizens. It is as simple as that.

      If you want the United States of America to become a third world country, and we are getting there, keep it up with the sense of international non-competition and fears of a growing global community. The global economy is moving forward with or without the help of the American worker.The height of which we find ourselves on the global power ladder will depend on how well we educate our citizens to keep up, ON THE GLOBAL LEVEL.

    • 4 months ago
  • yvesisaki
    • 0
      yvesisaki  
    • This is a great idea; IN THE CORRECT CONTEXT. I like the idea of kids learning more, and school being a safe place for kids to go, but it depends. Some schools are crappy and may be bad or insocial. Also it heavily depends on the quality of the schools. Our education system is pretty low compared to France, Japan, and a few other overseas places. What I learned in grade school was not that much; I feel like I was deprived of a true quality education. Instead I read things and sought higher learning in my own time, of course, which I shouldn't have had to.

      Overall, I don't quite like the U.S school system to make kids stay in there longer. Improve the quality of U.S schools first then think about extending time. We can't all put our kids through private school like he does.

      Also organize kids' vacation time better not take it away from them. Maybe 3 months in school: Take 1 month off.

    • 5 months ago
  • ReganMann
    • 0
      ReganMann  
    • They (non-US schools) are in school more days but less hours!! If we were to get more days and same hours the economy would also shift due to kids not being out spending their parents money...

      Also no one would work weekends ihatethemall it just says it would cut into the summer break.

    • 5 months ago
  • Ihatethemall
    • 0
      Ihatethemall  
    • ReganMann:

      From the story above, fourth paragraph down

      "The president, who has a sixth-grader and a third-grader, wants schools to add time to classes, to stay open late and to let kids in on weekends so they have a safe place to go."

      I would hate to think they were just going to let these kids play in the schools with no supervision. Someone is going to have to work the weekends.

    • 5 months ago
  • SparkShark16
  • brit50
  • bombastinator
  • My_America
  • HaloedGriot
  • ddelazan
    • 0
      ddelazan  
    • My_America:

      "Our school calendar is based upon the agrarian economy..." It's not logical for one to change and not the other. If you bought a new car that required electricity would you continue to put regular gasoline?

    • 5 months ago
  • bombastinator
  • Ihatethemall
    • 0
      Ihatethemall  
    • So he wants to keep the schools open after hours and on the weekends so they have somewhere safe to go. Who is going to be working after hours and on the weekends. Better question is whos going to be paying for it. Another social service that the government will provide the citizens with. Free day care 7 days a week, 52 weeks a year.

      Isn't there own back yard safe? there homes? maybe if they weren't wandering the streets looking for trouble, they would be safe. Maybe the parents of these kids should take a little bit of responsibility for their own kids safety instead of the government doing it. Oh hell, the parents most likely aren't very resposible adults themselves. But of course thats not there fault. the government never taught them how to be responsible.

    • 5 months ago
  • ddelazan
  • logicpocket
  • galwayman
    • 0
      galwayman  
    • While I agree with longer hours,I do not agree with denying school kids a summer vacation! How much pressure do you think a kid can take.The problem in education is the MCAS. Instead of teaching our kids to learn we teach them only to pass the stupid tests and this is so wrong! Dump MCAS and instead teach our kids to learn so that they can compete in the world. no other nation bases an educational system on standardized testing,and they are all ahead of us! Fix this problem and allow our kids to take summers off!

    • 5 months ago
  • brit50
    • 0
      brit50  
    • galwayman:

      I completely agree. Here in Texas it is all about the TAKS (Texas Assesment of Knowlege and Skills) Test. A basic end of yr. test that runs from 3rd grade to 11th grade. The entire curriculum of the year (excluding AP/advanced classes) is based on passing that test. Makes the curriculum lame and frankly quite dull.

    • 5 months ago
  • bombastinator
  • Manuel_Trujillo
  • metalcookiesxy70
    • 0
      metalcookiesxy70  
    • Learning and understanding, Some creative ways for students to get interested within the critique of the lesson, add a few demonstration and hands=on learning, and then to summarize it all up in a simplified way...

      Time goes only to expand the learning and understanding that basically is the same thing when you don't have extended time--There is only more of the same thing...Not actually touching out to those students...Extending the time is only wasting the time..

    • 5 months ago
  • seeker561
    • 0
      seeker561  
    • We have a cuuriculum designed for the manufacturing economy of 100 years ago run by a calendar rooted in the agrarian economy of 200 years ago. No wonder it is working to well for today's needs.

      I hesitate to endorse a longer school year. I learned an awful lot of good stuff at summer camp, summer day camp and vacation trips with my family.

      I could go for a longer day though. There are a lot of latch key kids getting into trouble who would benefit from the supervision.

    • 5 months ago
  • metalcookiesxy70
    • 0
      metalcookiesxy70  
    • For September, since there are a lot of other kids who really need to review, because they usually forget over time..Although they have been to those afterschool sessions they just need basic reviewing in the classroom...Err NCLB needs to be dropped however..

      October, testing begins which follows up on everything which was in August...And some new things...

      Yes, yes the ways that teachers teaching and the techniques upon the curriculum definitely needs to be changed...

      Certainly because it wasn't like this back before Bush was elected, everyone wasn't failing as much, hence there were no days subtracted from the school year...

      Its the teachers/administrators on one hand that needs to do their teaching method a entirely different way, and as for the students, well you have to try hard, because ya just cannot fix stupid...

    • 5 months ago
  • clownpuncher
  • mcjk
  • libertyforall
  • mcjk
    • 0
      mcjk  
    • clownpuncher:

      Ah, libertyforall, once again getting in the way of someones answer.

      Well, libertyforall, I was actually just asking clownpuncher here if he believed encouraging more and better education was a strike against the President. I never made any implication that more funding or class time would equate to better education, it appears you assume I did.

      Now I have a question for you specifically, libertyforall. How will less funding and less time in school educate children better?

    • 5 months ago
  • libertyforall
    • 0
      libertyforall  
    • clownpuncher:

      mcjk,

      Actually your statement implied exactly what I stated. You said:

      "Are you saying encouraging more and better education is a strike against him?"

      This statement implies that Obama's proposal will provide better education. No need to twist your words as they were clear from your post.

      Quantity of education is not the problem. Our school years should be shortened to about 9 or 10 years and we could get everything we need. Most of high school learning is done past 9th grade and you are really just there to waste time half the year.

      It is about the quality of education that matters. This also starts at home, but providing better quality of education should be the focus. Which will never happen with government provided education.

    • 5 months ago
  • mcjk
    • 0
      mcjk  
    • clownpuncher:

      libertyforall,
      I never said that I agreed with Obama at all. Just asking clownpuncher how this is a strike against Obama.

      I agree quality of education is very important, but wouldn't more of higher quality education be nice as well.

      Can you explain this, and back it up?
      "Our school years should be shortened to about 9 or 10 years and we could get everything we need. Most of high school learning is done past 9th grade and you are really just there to waste time half the year."

      Problem is, public schools are funded by property taxes. So wealthy communities have wealthy schools. Poor communities have poor schools. Unfortunately, study after study shows there is a correlation between the success of school, and the funding behind it. http://bit.ly/103HXm

      More funding for poor schools would help their students.

    • 5 months ago
  • chelseaf89
    • 0
      chelseaf89  
    • clownpuncher:

      At least Obama is making an attempt to better education, which is something that hasn't happened in a long time. And more money would definitely help, better pay for teachers is better motivation, better textbooks, more supplies such as laptops for students and other technology for the classroom.

    • 4 months ago
  • crashbangnoises
    • 0
      crashbangnoises  
    • clownpuncher:

      my wife is a special education administrator. She travels around to 10 different schools in our area here in Nashville TN. I know first hand that more time in class and in school is a better thing. Half of her students (non special ed.) and almost all of her special ed. students don't have proper learning at home. A vast majority don't even live with there mother and father and are living with grandparents our aunts etc. Our country is already falling behind the rest of the world and we will be the ones who are soon immigrating to find work if we don't educate ourselves more.

    • 4 months ago
  • J_Jammer
  • current89
    • 0
      current89  
    • I think this is a great idea; Sept. and October are generally wasted reviewing what you did the previous school year. In addition, Obama's plan of getting rid of tenure and re-vamping NCLB should help the education system as well.

    • 5 months ago
  • FishaHouse777
  • ScorpioGee
    • 0
      ScorpioGee  
    • FishaHouse777:

      Exactly. The time frame a kid spends in school is not the one shot problem we have. It's the content and the way school is structured. Not everyone's going to become a mathematician and not everyone's going to become an artist. School has to become more flexible.

    • 5 months ago
  • Reaper26
  • metalcookiesxy70
  • brit50
  • TheJerryMadden
  • metalcookiesxy70
    • 0
      metalcookiesxy70  
    • You can't fix stupid...What do they really say, when the students are still failing in school, regardless of time?
      Becuase that is the least of how to better students for education...

    • 5 months ago
  • Nettle
    • 0
      Nettle  
    • Good! I hope we also get to move the time schools start so that we don't have to be in school until 9am, make school days longer and have less homework. There's nothing more depressing than coming home from a 7-hour unproductive day in school to do 4-5 more hours of homework and studying.

    • 5 months ago
  • antifence_sitter

Add your comment

current videos