U.K. Nursery Worker, 2 Others Admit Horrific Child Sex Abuse

Cameras are for paranoid people and then people who do no wrong will get into trouble for stupid little things like living the child alone for five seconds.

But the alternative is terrible that things would go unnoticed by what they were doing with the child and that is bad and so it's hard to argue against allowing it for that reason alone. The children that that would protect would be countless and it would deter a lot of bad behavior from even starting because of knowing their are cameras and I'm not just talking about bad behavior towards children but other types of bad behavior that could be done around children....things said and such.

Cameras would be a bad turn of events but a necessary evil to keep children safe. That's what it should be used for more than to get people into trouble.

You are down right wrong J. Cameras in certain situations are a good thing. Yes, some people can take it to the extreme and misuse it, but let's be real here. You seem not to have kids so of course, you're not understanding the point here.

I don't have kids and i see the trouble in this country when someone down the block from me, decides to have a "nursery" just so that they don't have to work their regular 9-5 job. They do it because they charge cheaper and they see it as a way out in paying tons of taxes. But how about when they are mistreating the child? how would a parent know without a camera being in place? if you had a child and your child was being molested, you wouldn't know it because there are no signs, unless you are checking your son and daughters privates every single day and hour!

The people that have been arrested figured they could get away with shit like this because they weren't being watched.... plain and simple. The cameras shouldn't be there to judge someone's ability in watching a child every second! the camera is there for the mishandling and abuse a child can go through without supervision.

GET IT?

Where did I disagree with the use of cameras in this situation?

with your first statement bro!

"Cameras are for paranoid people and then people who do no wrong will get into trouble for stupid little things like living the child alone for five seconds. "

I read the rest, but the first statement wasn't needed.... we are not looking for the extreme here, we are looking for what is needed to get this stopped!!

No one looks for extreme. But that is what eventually happens.

Like taking photos of your children naked in the bath and then posting them online for family to see....instead getting into trouble for posting child porn.

That's what happens when people think they are doing the RIGHT and good thing. They get innocent people in trouble because they're on a justice high.

In any situation people can misuse measures that were designed to protect others...but that doesn't mean that people should do nothing because the potential for abuse is there. If these babysitters have nothing to hide, they shouldn't have a problem installing cameras. Besides, there are already cameras in lots of other places of employment (and not just to safeguard against stealing).

That is all good and fine, but there will be a case where someone didn't do anything that no one hasn't done before and they'll get in big trouble and it'll be a stupid case that people mock....like the 3rd degree burn of coffee in lap by old woman at a McDonald's.