Europe offers to cut emissions 95% by 2050

Image...
Europe attempted to reassert its international leadership in the fight against global warming today, offering to slash its greenhouse gas emissions by up to 95% by 2050 and by 30% by 2020 if a climate change pact is sealed in Copenhagen in six weeks' time.

"This should be seen as a clear message to the world," said Andreas Carlgren, the Swedish environment minister who chaired the Luxembourg meeting. "We expect to reach an agreement in Copenhagen," he added, after environment ministers from 27 countries finalised a common EU negotiating position.

But his optimism contrasted with the increasing doubts around the world enough time remains to deliver a binding agreement in Copenhagen. The EU also still has to settle disputes over the EU's carbon trading scheme and how the developing world will be paid to cope with the impacts of global warming.

Yesterday, European finance ministers failed to agree on a funding package for developing countries, with Poland and other poorer eastern European countries unhappy at being asked to subsidise action in countries such as China and India whose economies are growing strongly. Poland is also leading the dissent on the EU emissions trading scheme (ETS).

The EU negotiating position offers to slash greenhouse gas emissions by between 80-95% by 2050 and to deepen cuts from 20 to 30% by 2020 if other world powers sign up for similar action. The ministers said they also reached accord on tough action on deforestation and agreed that aviation would have to cut its emissions by 10% by 2020 compared with 2005 levels and shipping by 20%.

However, reluctance from the big players – the US, China, and India – to unveil targets or specific figures for a climate change pact, the EU was divided over tactics ahead of the UN conference in Copenhagen in December.

Germany and Italy were reluctant to name a figure publicly so early, believing this could weaken the European bargaining position.

"I've heard arguments about tactics," said Stavros Dimas, the European commissioner for the environment. "But by telling the decision now, we encourage other countries to come with their proposals. We don't gain anything by not reaching a decision."

Britain, Denmark, Sweden, and the Netherlands supported this view, believing that Europe had more to gain from playing pioneer and seizing the leadership in the run-up to Copenhagen.

"Environment ministers are determined that the EU maintains its leadership position on climate change in order to promote an ambitious deal at Copenhagen," said Ed Miliband, the UK energy and climate change secretary.

Leaders will meet at a summit in Brussels next week to hammer out the finances package for the developing countries, expected to total €15bn a year from the EU.

Despite today's agreement, environmental campaigners denounced the EU accord as inadequate.

"The level of ambition demonstrated by environment ministers will not deliver a fair and just global climate agreement in Copenhagen," said Sonja Meister, climate campaign coordinator for Friends of the Earth. "Europe must go much further than this and live up to its historical responsibilities by committing to cut emissions by 40% domestically by 2020."

The EU's position is not strong enough to unlock the stalled negotiations," said Greenpeace.
  1. groups:
    News,   Green,   Current Tonight,   Max and Jason: Still Up,   4 more
  2. tags:
    Environment,  Climate Change,  Global Warming,  Copenhagen + add
pjacobs51
  • added October 26, 2009

22 comments // Europe offers to cut emissions 95% by 2050

  •  

    that still might not be fast enough... but its a great start

    CalgarC
  •  

    Great initiative, I just hope that the rest of the world can follow

    chippmunk
  •  

    And I Bet They Will Do It Too !

    Maeveeo
  •  

    On this I say 40-50% by 2020 is actually where it should be, but 30% is MUCH better than our Congress can offer. Unfortunately, with all of these "meetings" taking so much time I wonder if any of it will make a real difference at this point, especially if it too includes a cap and trade carbon scheme mechanism.

    JanforGore
  •  

    could be a problem here somewhere..according to the latest scientific research ..the planet only has until 2050?

    mcwally
  •  

    Being american is frustrating.

    Allorno1
  •  

    what do you mean? AMERICA! the greatest place on earth.. government, of the people, by the people and for the people.. psyche. our corporate masters are really having their way with our collective rear-end.

    vesher
  •  

    This is great, but 2050? I promise to do a lot of things by 2050.

    lilysol
  •  

    Our problem are the developing countries like China or India, they don't care about the environment they just want to grow

    Pedroptz
  •  

    awesome! but they need to speed it up a bit. I was hoping we'd be CO2 free by the time I was sixty lol.

    dsidney
  •  

    Its a big goal. Good for them!
    Now what about the rest of the world?

  •  

    As an individual, I can reach that goal by 2050. Ill be dead. Seriously, the several countries working together set a great example for the rest of us.

    maisry
  •  

    2050... Oh shit, I'm still going to be here! Oh well....

    Manatee_man
  •  

    Shouldn't America be the trend-stter like usual and push for 95% of emissions cut by 2040, or atleast show some commitment to the global warming problem.

    FishaHouse777
  •  

    It's easy to point to somewhere in the distant future because they know that they won't be here or have to pay for it.

    NotFooled
  •  

    The reason America is leading the issue because we still have so many public officials opposing a need for it.

    StopThink
  •  

    but will anything other then the insects on earth still be alive

    Prijedor

Add your comment

keep browsing
News
Green
Current Tonight
most popular

current videos