Top bailed-out banks to pay $30 billion in bonuses

Image...
Three of the largest Wall Street firms -- which together received $45,000,000,000 in taxpayer bailouts -- are on track to hand out $29,700,000,000 in bonuses this year.

That's only the three largest firms. JP Morgan Chase took $25 billion in government aid; Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley, $10 billion each. All three have paid back the government bailout money they've received, but the liquidity and "cheap money" offered by the Fed have kindled record profits at their investment and trading arms.
  1. groups:
    The Real Recovery,   News,   Current Tonight,   The New Great Depression
  2. tags:
    US,  Economy,  US Politics,  Money, 4 more + add
bansheewail
  • added November 09, 2009

46 comments // Top bailed-out banks to pay $30 billion in bonuses

  •  

    SOMEBODY, Please, make this all make sense!!!!

    bansheewail
  •  

    So... the money that we gave them is to go toward bonuses not saving the economy?
    The governments and banks know they can get away with this because the general public at large don't understand or are too concerned with other things such as entertainment or their own miserable existance.
    This is insanity at it's best! and it will never make sense until WE make it make sense!

    recommended by samthesixth
    CarolineS
  •  

    Of course, 0bama and his crew stand to make a load of dough from these deals. These are the people who subsidized 0's campaign to begin with.
    Congratulations on a job well done.

    s0uthc0ast
  •  

    What do the Corporates care? Politicians? As the masses of America work just to pay the Mortgage, electric, heating and Food bills. The rich just keep on getting whatever they want. When was the last time any of these people had to worry about paying a water bill, or for that matter the price of a gallon of gas. They have no concept of the real world and what is even sadder is it seems as if they don't care.
    With Millions of people world wide starving it is all surreal. As A. Greenspan said "If they are to big to fail then they are to big"

    http://current.com/163t24c
    237 Millionaires in Congress

    Nocturnus
  •  

    If every working class American just STOPPED paying taxes, could they arrest us all? Our forefathers did it. Shouldn't we learn from their example? Or is that terrorism?

    ianakaeeen
  •  

    nauseating.

    sugarlilly
  •  

    some day in the not so distant future, a crazy man will not stand for this sort of behavior and 2 shots later.. he will try and end this corruption himself

    CalgarC
  •  

    Well, if the banks already payed back what they borrowed, then until there are stricter regulations put in place there is nothing the government can do about this. However, if these banks end up putting themselves in a dire situation again, I'm hoping the government might just let them twist in the wind rather than help.

    recommended by nkeg87
    Varex_Sythe
  •  

    No end in sight to the corruption in the financial industry.

    You would think people would talk about it more. Once people do start to talk about it, it will be too late.

    No point in talking about it then.

    Chapisbored
  •  

    I see nothing wrong with this since "All three have paid back the government bailout money they've received." They bounced back so they should be able to feel the rewards. I would be more mad if they got our money and failed but since we got it back who cares.

    akassan
  •  

    The good news is that these banks DID pay back the bailouts they received.
    The bad news is that they are not making credit available in a manner that is helping create jobs.
    Solution?
    Regulation. Lots of it.

    recommended by nkeg87
    neocongo
  •  

    none of these bastards should get a dime til unemployment goes back down. but that would be in a fantasy world where every problem was solved with poetic justice. at least we're still able to curse them freely in this one.

    zphoenixdownz
  •  

    Here's perspective:

    The 3, Goldman, JP Morgan Chase and Morgan Stanley - none were banks when they received the $45 billion. They all needed the cash at the time because they were running on empty and it was a matter of time before they were dry. They were on the brink. In my opinion, the world would be a better place now if they had just gone under.

    After getting the lifeline from US taxpayers, they then converted to actual banks under the NY banking charter in record time and came into the FED structure.

    Then the FED, which is allowed to lend money to banks, lent money to these new banks in return for questionable "securities" at basically zero interest with access to the FED's discount window. $2 trillion to date has been lent to who knows to whom - they refuse to say.

    This money from the FED gave the 3 the money to pay back the original $45 billion to taxpayers, making them look like they somehow made all this money, when in fact they borrowed that money from the FED and pushed off the risk onto them. If the FED loses money, it can just print more, since it controls the money supply and can print as much as it sees fit.

    The zero percent interest from the FED on all this money allows the banks to invest that money even in risk free US treasuries, guaranteeing them a profit.

    Problem solved and the banks (now they really are banks), can now continue as before until they make huge losses again, in which case the FED will be there to "buy" the bad securities from them and cover up the losses by printing money to itself.

    We need to re-instate the Glass-Steagal Act (separation of banks from Wall Street securities firms)
    We need to establish a settlement system to the stock market (there is none now)
    We need to bring transparency to the FED (private entity)
    We need to bring the US currency under the control of the government and away from the private FED
    We can not allow private entities control the printing of money nor regulate the banking sector - that's the government's job.

    tommytoyz
  •  

    at times like this, I am proud to be an American...

    DreSandoval
  •  
    Rashpal
  •  

    I'm confused as to why the Fed did not apply an interest rate to these bozos like they do to everyone else for credit cards and the like...I guess my hard-earned tax money comes without compounding interest...

    KBinGA
  •  

    WTF

    patrickpants
  •  

    ...I will forever have an uneasy feeling in surrendering my fate to people who will never feel the cold steel of an empty shopping trolley, the despair of opening an actual letterbox, and the sadness of children's faces without hope...

    eden49
  •  

    OUTRAGE!

    OGRE
  •  

    we should bury these people with our cash and watch them suffocate to death under their wrong doings. any chance we can put it on payperview too?

    thewarnerla
  •  

    Congress is catching on. And for all the "innovation", the US financial system is losing ground to the rest of the world and being left behind. International and domestic issuers and investors are having enough of Wall Street games that only benefit them. Here are the stats:

    www.capmktsreg.org/competitiveness/2009Q2update/Q2 2009 Press Release.pdf

    Excerpt:
    Hal S. Scott, President and Director of the Committee and Professor at Harvard Law School, said that “while the global recession continues to distort some measures of competitiveness, almost all of the 13 competitiveness measures tracked by the Committee for Q2 2009 reflected negatively on the attractiveness of U.S. public equity markets.”
    For example, the U.S. share of global IPOs dropped to just 3.8% in Q2 2009. Historically, the U.S. share of global IPOs by value averaged 28.7% for the period 1996-2006, but dropped to 6.9% in 2007, and fell further to 1.9% in 2008. While the U.S. share of equity globally raised in public markets grew to 26.9% for the first half of 2009, up slightly from the U.S.’s 23.6% share in 2008, it nevertheless remains below the historic average of 32.2% for 1996-2006.
    Even among the global IPOs captured by the U.S., most of the activity was in the private Rule 144A rather than the public market. For the period 1996-2006, this figure averaged just 64.1%. In Q2 2009, this figure reached 94.7%, just below the high of 95.5% in 2008.
    The percentage of IPOs that U.S. issuers have chosen to list only abroad grew to 4.5% in Q2 2009, up from 0% in Q1 2009. This figure had climbed from an average of 0.3% for 1996-2006 to 8.6% in 2007 and 20.0% in 2008.
    The U.S. share of global market capitalization was down to 33% in Q2 2009, continuing an overall steady decline from an average of 43.3% for 1990-2006.
    Also on the decline is the U.S. share of total global M&A advisory and equity/debt underwriting revenue, falling from an average of 49% for 1996-2006 to 42% in 2007, 41% in 2008, and 39% for the first half of 2009.
    ____________________________________

    So much for needed Wall Street talent and innovation. All this innovation and activity has only driven away investors and issuers alike. Letting Wall Street have it's way has only imploded the competitive position of the USA. Next time anyone talks to a politician or regulator, bring these stats up. The other side of the coin is that the money is flowing into markets that are far tighter and fairly regulated. It's not about throwing money and manpower at the problem either. The USA spends more money and manpower on "enforcement" than other market centers, but gets much less in return. Time to instill self regulating mechanisms and ask the politicians to put their thinking caps on.

    tommytoyz
  •  

    Chase bank jacked up my credit card interest rate to 30% (I have no balance thank god) and they did this to pay out multi-billion dollar bonuses? WTF!

  •  

    WhatEVER!!!! Geeeesh!!! This is nutz!

    Glock_Gurl
  •  

    Not This Again !

    Maeveeo
  •  

    I hope they get a billion paper cuts

    MGCandles
1 - 25 of 32

Add your comment

keep browsing
The Real Recovery
News
Current Tonight
most popular

current videos