Abortion Restrictions In House Bill Show Power Of Organized Religion In Politics

// added November 10, 2009 // 62 comments //
Image...
hpseaton
The Catholic Church successfully helped deliver a crushing blow to the abortion rights movement on Saturday by insisting that abortion restrictions be inserted into the newly passed House health care bill. But this isn't the first time that a religious organization has used its power, money, and influence to merge dogma with public policy.

Last Saturday, Democrats in the House of Representatives celebrated the passage of a health care reform bill that sought to finally provide coverage to millions of uninsured Americans. But the victory was bittersweet for many on the left because of a last-minute amendment offered by Democratic Rep. Bart Stupack that blocks those who receive federal health care subsidies or sign up for the public option from receiving any coverage for elective abortions. Advocates on both sides are calling the amendment the biggest turning point in the abortion debate in decades.

However, a study by the Alan Guttmacher Institute found that in 2003 only 13 percent of abortions in the US were provided under health insurance and, according to the Kaiser Family Foundation, only about half of those who have employer-based insurance have abortion coverage.

Five states, Idaho, Kentucky, Missouri, North Dakota, and Oklahoma, already bar private insurance from coving elective abortions; the federal employees’ health insurance program and most Medicaid programs do the same.

Therefore, the effect of the Stupack amendment on access to abortions would probably be minimal. However, the precedent that the amendment sets could prove disastrous for the pro-choice movement. If abortion rights are seen as a commodity to be traded away to secure the votes of conservative Democrats, abortion-rights activists could see their agenda eroded as a divided legislative body attempts to reach compromise.

Moreover, the success of the Stupack amendment underlines a disturbing trend—the influence powerful religious organizations exert over members of congress and even the President himself.

Advocates on both sides of the issue are largely crediting the Catholic Church with strong-arming the Stupack amendment into the House bill.

Starting in the summer, Catholic bishops began a letter writing campaign threatening to pull support for any health care bill that allowed federal dollars to directly or indirectly be spent on elective abortions.

On Oct. 8 three members of the bishops conference issued the following warning: “If the final legislation does not meet our principles, we will have no choice but to oppose the bill.”

And Cardinal Seán O’Malley, the archbishop of Boston, reportedly delivered a warning directly to President Obama telling him that the Catholic Church would only support the health care bill if it contained restrictions on abortion.

For years the Catholic Church has advocated for universal health care and has been an ally of the Democratic Party on this issue; loss of their support would be a major blow for health care reform.
  1. groups:
    News,   Feminism
  2. tags:
    Religion Health Care Reform Abortion Catholic Church

62 comments // Abortion Restrictions In House Bill Show Power Of Organized Religion In Politics

  • WhiteNoise
    • 0
      WhiteNoise  
    • @ rockhallmemeber

      NO ! The bottom line is thta you've never heard of the separation of church & state !
      & through your ignorance of the facts you want to impose to women your will over theirs... Abortion is a medical act, deal with it just as your underlying religious misogyny... you can console your measly pettiness in the knowledge that you are not alone in being caught in the medieval age ;)

      "The three monotheisms, animated by the same genealogical death instinct, share a series of identical contempt: hatred of reason and intelligence; hatred of freedom; hatred of all books in the name the one & only; hatred of life; hatred of sexuality, of women and pleasure; hatred of feminity; hatred of the body, of desires & impulses. Instead of all that, Judaism, Christianity and Islam defend: faith and belief, obedience and submission, a taste for death and a passion for the beyond, asexual angel and chastity, virginity and monogamic fidelity, the wife and the mother, the soul and spirit. In other words, life crucified and celebrated nothingness" – Michel Onfray

      "Remember there's a big difference between kneeling down and bending over." -Frank Zappa

    • 3 months ago
  • rockhallmemeber
    • 0
      rockhallmemeber  
    • EdJoy, the bottom line is that the president and democrats in congress want "us" to fund abortions. I do not want to. The Catholic church does not want to. I would rather them pay for dental work in the final insurance plan.

      Also remember that any women can pay get an abortion. Sounds fair to me!! There is no restrictions on that. Why, oh why, does the governement want me to pay for that.

    • 3 months ago
  • EdJoyProductions
    • 0
      EdJoyProductions  
    • rockhallmemeber:

      The bottom line is not that the health care bill is going to provide indiscriminate free abortions to anyone that wants them. Regular insurance doesn't do that either. However if an abortion is required to save the life of the mother and is deemed medically necessary for her health, who are you or any other church to say no?

      You religious people kill me. You wouldn't lift a finger to help a low income, single mother raise her family, but you flip out if abortion is even mentioned. Most of the people that are against abortion are people that can never get pregnant: Men and most republican women.

    • 3 months ago
  • EdJoyProductions
    • 0
      EdJoyProductions  
    • The fact that churches don't pay taxes contributes to building them so you are wrong. Hypocritical extortion and unethical lobbying to make church policy part of government policy is also wrong.

    • 3 months ago
  • rockhallmemeber
    • 0
      rockhallmemeber  
    • Wow, some of you are unreal. So far away from God. I pray for you. May God grant you the wisdom to ease your bitter, spiteful heart. We just don't want to pay for abortions. We don't build churches with your tax dollars. It is not a "right" to have an abortion. It is a choice - hence "pro-choice", yes??

    • 3 months ago
  • SleepDirt
  • rockhallmemeber
  • SleepDirt
    • 0
      SleepDirt  
    • rockhallmemeber:

      "I have a fundamental belief that man is at his best when he is good."

      And I have a fundamental policy of not running my world or my life along guidelines of fanciful mythology.
      And neither of 'them' can be in the possession of good nor evil attributes if neither exist, which they don't, from what I've seen.
      Unless you have some startling new evidence that the earth is flat and mounted on pillars with a bubble top like it says in the 'good book'.

    • 3 months ago
  • rockhallmemeber
  • SleepDirt
    • 0
      SleepDirt  
    • rockhallmemeber:

      "Wow! Deep. My philosphy is much simpler - do good and you will feel like a better human being."

      No, it's not simpler. The opposite is true. It's complicated by a disjointed series of incredibly fantastic and impossible-to-quantify myths.
      See, you just described my own philosophy, but without the technical support from an imagined triumvirate of perfect, all-powerful, universe-creating infinitely-old, infallible sky-fairies who are somehow all three of them the one true god all at once, and that second tier female deity, the amazing virgin god-mom. I think my philosophy wins the 'simple' challenge hands down.

    • 3 months ago
  • samthesixth
  • EdJoyProductions
    • 0
      EdJoyProductions  
    • I love how the ads by google on this page are www.safestabortion.com, a NJ abortion clinic and my number one favorite: LAS VEGAS ABORTION. Ditch that fetus and hit the tables, honey. What happens in Vegas can actually be medically removed and stay in Vegas.

      Wow the chick in this link looks relieved.

      I was hoping the Vegas abortion site would be super tacky, maybe with a roulette wheel, but it is no fun.

    • 3 months ago
  • EdJoyProductions
    • 0
      EdJoyProductions  
    • Isn't the pope starting to look more and more like Max Scheck from Nosferatu?

      This is infuriating. If they are going to lobby then take their fucking tax exempt status.... oh thanks Ryan. I was yelling that at my radio at work today.

    • 3 months ago
  • ryan8566
    • 0
      ryan8566  
    • any organized religion that involves itself in politics should have its tax-exempt status revoked. this would put millions of dollars into the Treasury.

    • 3 months ago
  • WhiteNoise
    • 0
      WhiteNoise  
    • ryan8566:

      The essence of Christianity is told us in the Garden of Eden history. The fruit that was forbidden was on the tree of knowledge. The subtext is; All the suffering you have is because you wanted to find out what was going on. You could be in the Garden of Eden if you had just keep your fucking mouth shut and hadn't asked any questions. Tax the FUCK out of the churches ! - Frank Zappa

    • 3 months ago
  • Still_Falling
  • brianwilson
  • SleepDirt
  • fun_size
    • 0
      fun_size  
    • I dont understand this at all. People are going to have abortions whether they are legal or not, financed by the government or not. So why not finance it so that these people can get sanitary medical conditions instead of going to a shady back alley or using coat hangers?

      If you dont want to have an abortion dont have one. But dont try to restrict people with your bias.

    • 3 months ago
  • Atalanda_Cameron
    • 0
      Atalanda_Cameron  
    • fun_size:

      because there are so many who think abortion is immoral, and dont want thier taxpayer dollars to aid in "killing babies"...
      We need a greater understanding of this issue before any real progress can be made. I think the important message to push is that I dont want the govt. inside my body, and what grows inside of it should be my choice.

    • 3 months ago
  • hpseaton
    • 0
      hpseaton  
    • fun_size:

      lol...But what surprises me about the '...abortion is immoral, and dont want thier taxpayer dollars to aid in "killing babies"...' is that these same people don't give a damn about how much of their tax dollars goes directly to creating machines that kill on a far greater scale then abortion ever could. There is a huge moral disconnect in this country (America) when it comes to the issue of what 'tax dollars' are used for.

    • 3 months ago
  • SleepDirt
    • 0
      SleepDirt  
    • fun_size:

      Also, this same group prays to their god daily to bring to an end the existence of every Muslim on the planet and many, possibly millions, would not even try to conceal their feelings about it.

    • 3 months ago
  • sergantonio
    • 0
      sergantonio  
    • 'judge not less ye be judged" im an atheist and even I agree with that it never ceases to amaze me to what end the religious will go to involve themselves and judge the lives of others the law of the land is made in the best interest of the nation not just the Christians. Freedom of choice is the freedom to make mistakes and pay the consequences breaking the laws of man require punishment by mans law, breaking existential faith based laws are best left to be dealt with by the provider of such rules i.e god "give unto César what is César's give unto the lord what is the lords" if you believe abortion is wrong don't practice it. Im pro choice not pro abortion because abortion is an issue where the options are bad no matter which are chosen are but it is necessary sometimes life is not perfect and neither is humanity no matter what your religion says "your freedom to believe ends at my freedom to not believe" get over your selves if you believe hell awaits them then pray for their souls.

    • 3 months ago
  • Ajil
  • SleepDirt
  • LadybugLady
  • rockhallmemeber
  • aswift1
    • 0
      aswift1  
    • I am pro-choice, but I think that it makes sense to block ANY elective procedures from being covered through government health care- not just abortions. I understand the conflict between church and state here, but they do have a valid point.

    • 3 months ago
  • hpseaton
  • brianwilson
    • 0
      brianwilson  
    • It's important to widen post-natal care and adoption programs in order to aid to help individuals with unwanted pregnancies, as well as mandatory maternity leaves in order to equalize both options and optimize both of their outcomes for people to make a level-headed decision regarding their moral obligations and beliefs on this issue in my own humble opinion.

      I do think it is a personal choice as to whether or not to get one. With that said, this kind of legislation would be more wisely met, if at all, in the confines of the state or even city as far as designating the legality of and in what term abortions should be performed. This should not be a federal issue as it is. It would clearly be Utopian to assume that this issue will not appear at any level as in a democracy in the near future. Even as favorable as that may be, a majority will always carry out the principles of the law by voting and I'm fine with that for the most part.

      Political shifts are always a legislative response to a turning majority, so in a sense this is no one's fault but the fault of the movement itself and their ability to meet their challenges more persuasively than their opponents. This is true of all civil rights movements within democracy, just open up a history book.

    • 3 months ago
  • Josphat_Gachie
  • hpseaton
    • 0
      hpseaton  
    • Josphat_Gachie:

      Oh, you didn't like the abortion clause? I thought that as a woman you wouldn't want people (especially men in power) telling you what you can and can't do in regards to your health or well being....oh wait, you're not a woman are you? Color me surprised.

    • 3 months ago
  • desertcat
    • 0
      desertcat  
    • all the pro lifers are doing is making it unsafe for abortions. Woman will have to go to back door doctors again. But then I believe with them life starts at conception and ends at birth.

    • 3 months ago
  • aswift1
    • 0
      aswift1  
    • desertcat:

      If you read the article you'd know that most women receiving abortions today do not have health insurance that covers the procedure anyway- it does not make it unsafe, just expensive. That's all- it does not make abortions illegal so they have to be sneaky about getting one, they just either have to pay or they have to get on a state provided low income family planning health plan that will allow them to get one at a discounted price. In California it's called FamilyPact- I haven't had an abortion but my sister has and I was there with her holding her hand. I know how it works, and it's not unsafe.

    • 3 months ago
  • tommic
    • 0
      tommic  
    • Any woman who votes for conservative republicans or conservative democrats needs to have their heads examined. These are old white men decieding on womens reproductive rights. While I do not endorse abortion as a birth control method it is criminal to deny abortions to any woman. We are a country that clearly seperates church and state yet we allow religious dogma a place in our national discourse regarding healthcare for women. My wife and I both have some regrets from when we were young and she had two abortions over a seven year stretch but we understand things are not always what they seem and sometimes its in the best interest of society to allow abortions. Unwanted, unloved children end up in jail by the time they are teenagers when no person gives a shit about them. Women on welfare who repeatedly become pregnant for no other reason than to extract more welfare monies should be sterilized. Harsh but a real solution to that part of the problem. Second and third generation welfare queens should suffer the same.Welfare was never meant to be a generation to generation free ride on the taxpayer and it should not be. The vast majority of people who choose to have children do so when they can afford them, not so society can pay for them. There is no exuse for the self perpetuation of poverty stricken children to have to suffer the lives they are forced to because of societies social situation that almost
      condones that behavior. There are some fundemental problems we as a nation and society must come to grips with. Unwed, unemployed mothers are one of them.

    • 3 months ago
  • Ajil
    • 0
      Ajil  
    • tommic:

      I have a new profound respect for you. we may differ in terms of understanding Islam, but on the topic of population control, I feel it might be eye to eye.

      I see humor in how religious groups (conservatives) refuse to allow people they differ with, the right to practice population control.

    • 3 months ago
  • SleepDirt
  • My_America
    • 0
      My_America  
    • The baby killing radicals have no need to worry it will be put back in. It was a temporary means to a greater end. KILL BABIES ON THE GOVERNMENT DIME.

    • 3 months ago
  • hpseaton
  • SleepDirt
  • My_America
  • WhiteNoise
    • 0
      WhiteNoise  
    • "The three monotheisms, animated by the same genealogical death instinct, share a series of identical contempt: hatred of reason and intelligence; hatred of freedom; hatred of all books in the name the one & only; hatred of life; hatred of sexuality, of women and pleasure; hatred of feminity; hatred of the body, of desires & impulses. Instead of all that, Judaism, Christianity and Islam defend: faith and belief, obedience and submission, a taste for death and a passion for the beyond, asexual angel and chastity, virginity and monogamic fidelity, the wife and the mother, the soul and spirit. In other words, life crucified and celebrated nothingness" – Michel Onfray

      "Remember there's a big difference between kneeling down and bending over." -Frank Zappa

    • 3 months ago
  • s0uthc0ast
    • 0
      s0uthc0ast  
    • You can't have it all ways.
      I don't NOW, NARAL or Moveon involved in my family's health care choice.
      If the government insists on pushing in this way, the Catholics have a right to invoke their rights.
      We have to accept that the 0bama voters are just going to have to get off their asses, shut off Oprah and go see a doctor and pay their own way.

    • 3 months ago
  • hpseaton
  • futuregen
    • 0
      futuregen  
    • Image...
    • Video on youtube here:

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vX_0MVOUytU&feature=PlayList&p=FB78610FE0...
      ____________________________________________________________________
      http://www.democracynow.org/2008/6/24/george_carlin_1937_2008_legendary_comedian

      George Carlin hit it on the nail during his HBO special, Back In Town. Partial transcript here:

      AMY GOODMAN: George Carlin. Well, this is a clip from his HBO special Back in Town, taped here in New York. In this bit, he deals with the anti-abortion movement.

      GEORGE CARLIN: Boy, these conservatives are really something, aren’t they? They’re all in favor of the unborn. They will do anything for the unborn. But once you’re born, you’re on your own. Pro-life conservatives are obsessed with the fetus, from conception to nine months. After that, they don’t want to know about you. They don’t want to hear from you. No nothing. No neo-natal care, no day care, no Head Start, no school lunch, no food stamps, no welfare, no nothing. If you’re pre-born, you’re fine. If your pre-school, your [bleep].
      Conservatives don’t give a [bleep] about you until you reach military age. Then they think you are just fine, just what they’ve been looking for. Conservatives want live babies so they can raise them to be dead soldiers. Pro-life. Pro-life. These people aren’t pro-life. They’re killing doctors. What kind of pro-life is that? What, they’ll do anything they can to save a fetus, but if it grows up to be a doctor, they just might have to kill it?
      They’re not pro-life. You know what they are? They’re anti-women. Simple as it gets. Anti-women. They don’t like them. They don’t like women. They believe a woman’s primary role is to function as a brood mare for the state. Pro-life? You don’t see any of these white, anti-abortion women volunteering to have any black fetuses transplanted into their uteruses, do you? No. You don’t see them adopting a whole lot of crack babies, do you? No, that might be something Christ would do. And you won’t see a lot of these pro-life people dousing themselves in kerosene and lighting themselves on fire. You know, morally committed religious people in South Vietnam knew how to stage a [bleep] demonstration, didn’t they? They knew how to put on a [bleep] protest. Light yourself on fire! Come on, you moral crusaders, let’s see a little smoke.

    • 3 months ago
  • hell0everything
  • crashbangnoises
  • fun_size
  • jcamille
    • 0
      jcamille  
    • "And Jesus said to them, "Render to Caesar the things that are Caesar's, and to God the things that are God's." And they were amazed at Him."
      -Mark 12:17

      I think even Jesus was saying the government and the church should be separate.

      When church and state are intertwined, the government will always end up corrupting the church and the church will always corrupt the government. They can't help but corrupt each other. History has proven it. Just look back at the different theocracies in Europe and the middle east.

    • 3 months ago
  • aswift1
  • Atalanda_Cameron
  • sidewaysclyde
  • Still_Falling
    • 0
      Still_Falling  
    • Where is King Henry viii when we need him, he would know exactly what to do with the religious morons that get in the way .... a little beheading would go a long way at this point.

    • 3 months ago
  • CalPal
  • WhiteNoise
  • hpseaton
  • SleepDirt
    • 0
      SleepDirt  
    • WhiteNoise:

      I have read several of this guy's articles.
      He is doing some of the very best investigative journalism in this category like Jesus Killed Mohammed and Through a glass, darkly: How the Christian right is reimagining U.S. history.

    • 3 months ago
  • Progresshiv
  • futuregen
  • hpseaton
    • 0
      hpseaton  
    • Holy shit...if the Catholic Church, with all its horrible warts and mutations, is considered a powerful political force in this day and age we are well and truly screwed.

    • 3 months ago
  • futuregen
  • carmalite
    • 0
      carmalite  
    • hpseaton:

      Not just the Catholics!!!!!!!!!!!Remember those gleeful fundamentalists celebrating the murder of the abortion doctor.
      Its the Catholics + Fundamentalist+ some non Christian fundamentalist groups and they are all a serious threat to separation of church and state.

    • 3 months ago

Add your comment

current videos