Beck Wins..... Anita Dunn...... Done!

Is your America a place called lunacy, or did you forget to take your anti-psychotics this morning? If you don't mind, may I ask who in the white house is a communist? More importantly, why are you so angry about them being communists? What is it about communism, or the Obama Administration for that matter, that makes you this angry?

By all means, speak your mind if you hate everyone in the White house, but at least come up with something tangible to be upset about. Just so you are aware, repeating the fanatical rants made up by television personalities to get ratings makes you seem crazy, no offense. By your tone, it sounds like you want to send a lynch mob to the White House and yet, I still have no idea what the motivation is behind it.

Care to explain, or do you hate that as well?

Expalin what??? That obama appoints people who have a way of thinking that completely goes against everything that is American? Explain to me why obama would appoint John Holdren as science czar even though his book reveals what he is really about. Forced abortions, sterilants in drinking waters. I didnt get that from a news show. Its in his book. Try reading it. Do you even know the name of it?

Tell me why you would defend the appointm,ent of someone who writes this in a book:

Direct quotes from John Holdren's Ecoscience------------
Page 837
Indeed, it has been concluded that compulsory population-control laws, even including laws requiring compulsory abortion, could be sustained under the existing Constitution if the population crisis became sufficiently severe to endanger the society.
Page 786:
Single mothers should have their babies taken away by the government; or they could be forced to have abortions--------------One way to carry out this disapproval might be to insist that all illegitimate babies be put up for adoption—especially those born to minors, who generally are not capable of caring properly for a child alone. If a single mother really wished to keep her baby, she might be obliged to go through adoption proceedings and demonstrate her ability to support and care for it. Adoption proceedings probably should remain more difficult for single people than for married couples, in recognition of the relative difficulty of raising children alone. It would even be possible to require pregnant single women to marry or have abortions, perhaps as an alternative to placement for adoption, depending on the society.
Page 787-8:
Mass sterilization of humans though drugs in the water supply is OK as long as it doesn't harm livestock---------- Adding a sterilant to drinking water or staple foods is a suggestion that seems to horrify people more than most proposals for involuntary fertility control. Indeed, this would pose some very difficult political, legal, and social questions, to say nothing of the technical problems. No such sterilant exists today, nor does one appear to be under development. To be acceptable, such a substance would have to meet some rather stiff requirements: it must be uniformly effective, despite widely varying doses received by individuals, and despite varying degrees of fertility and sensitivity among individuals; it must be free of dangerous or unpleasant side effects; and it must have no effect on members of the opposite sex, children, old people, pets, or livestock

Page 838
The kind of people who cause "social deterioration" can be compelled to not have children--------If some individuals contribute to general social deterioration by overproducing children, and if the need is compelling, they can be required by law to exercise reproductive responsibility—just as they can be required to exercise responsibility in their resource-consumption patterns—providing they are not denied equal protection
Page 838:
Nothing is wrong or illegal about the government dictating family size------
In today's world, however, the number of children in a family is a matter of profound public concern. The law regulates other highly personal matters. For example, no one may lawfully have more than one spouse at a time. Why should the law not be able to prevent a person from having more than two children?
Page 942-3:
A "Planetary Regime" should control the global economy and dictate by force the number of children allowed to be born------Perhaps those agencies, combined with UNEP and the United Nations population agencies, might eventually be developed into a Planetary Regime—sort of an international superagency for population, resources, and environment. Such a comprehensive Planetary Regime could control the development, administration, conservation, and distribution of all natural resources, renewable or nonrenewable, at least insofar as international implications exis

This commie bitch in the story. Do you know who her "people to look up to" are? I saw the video of the speech she gave where she says she looks to Mao for advice.

I got a problem with that. If you dont, I dont understand how you can call youself an american

OK, fair enough. The science Czar wants to force abortions on everybody and Anita Dunn looks up to Mao. Both are rational things to be upset about. Still, why are you convinced that Obama is a communist? Furthermore, I am not defending any appointments made by the President, I simply wanted to know why you are so livid over Obama's presidency.

Actually, I am not very offended by this information at all. There are all a lot of perspectives in this country that I consider to be dubious and vile. The blessing (and mostly a curse) of the Bill of Rights provides protection for these people to think and feel anyway they choose, so I am bit jaded when it comes to other's opinion. Besides, being upset about something doesn't make me any more of an American than if I was completely apathetic to politics. Unfortunately for the activist-voter, the only requirement of citizenship in this country is birth, or a lot of paper work. Still, I respect that you feel passionate about this matter and I thank you for explaining your side to me. My only suggestion is that you tone down the hatred in your complaints so they can be objectively heard by those who you wish to consign to your cause.