Two officials speaking on condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to discuss the case on the record said the Washington-based joint terrorism task force overseen by the FBI was notified of communications between Hasan and a radical imam overseas, and the information was turned over to a Defense Criminal Investigative Service employee assigned to the task force.
That worker wrote up an assessment of Hasan after reviewing the Army major's personnel file and the communications. The assessment concluded Hasan did not merit further investigation, in large part because his communications with the imam were centered on a research paper he was writing at the time, and the investigator had concluded Hasan was in fact working on such a paper, the officials said.
The disclosure came as questions swirled about whether opportunities were missed to head off the massacre — 13 dead and 29 wounded — and the FBI launched its own internal review of how it handled the early information about Hasan. Military, law enforcement and intelligence agencies are all defending themselves against tough questions about what each of them knew about Hasan before he allegedly opened fire in a crowded room at the huge military base in Texas.
Within hours after the role of the defense investigator on the task force was disclosed, a senior defense official said "based on what we know now, neither the U.S. Army nor any other organization within the Department of Defense knew of Maj. Hasan's contacts with any Muslim extremists."
read more at link below:
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20091110/ap_on_go_ca_st_pe/us_fort_hood_shooting
latest video:
http://cosmos.bcst.yahoo.com/up/player/popup/?rn=3906861&cl=16558272&ch=...
-
- groups:
- News, Current Tonight, US Politics, Progressive America, 2 more
-
- tags:
- + add
-
-
-
-
- JulianCommongold
- added this
-
Hey JulianCommongold,
Thanks for updating this developing story!
What does this mean? Where do you go from here? Read all about it on the Current.com blog:
http://blogs.current.com/currentdotcom/congratulations-your-story-has-been-featu...
What's a developing story? Read all about it on our blog:
http://blogs.current.com/currentdotcom/2009/11/04/introducing-developing-stories...
If you're interested in scooping this story, submit your investigation to Current.com and tag it with "Current Developing Stories" -- [NOTE: Tags are different than groups]
Let me know if you have any questions, or need in assistance developing your story on Current.com.
BTW -- You can read how the Fort Hood story has been developing so far on the Fort Hood developing story page:
-
well, that settles it. we can blame uncle sam.
-
Another screw up by our government
-
This is absolutely amazing. We have the most well equipped military and intelligence agencies in the world and yet they can't stop known terror suspects with simple box cutters who even trained in U.S. flight schools - they can't stop those guys from hijacking five planes and crashing into the Pentagon and the twin towers; and they can't stop this guy Hasan, who they have known evidence on as well with his relations with a known terrorist sympathizer and they even employ him on a military base.
Someone clue me in here. Are these people in our intelligence agencies complete idiots?
OR
There are those who question the whole legitimacy of 9/11 as a purely terrorist act. There were no aircraft engine parts found at the Pentagon on 9/11. Instead they found what appeared to be a hole in the building made by a missile. Some demolition experts believe the twin towers were destroyed with explosives by demolition experts - like our highly trained military who specialize in such things perhaps?
Now we have this highly suspicious terrorist act by Hasan, where we know he was thwarted and harassed to the breaking point, and we know he had an internal conflict between his ethnicity and people versus his military service, while working for a military that slaughters innocent Muslims with extreme ethnic prejudice (if you were a white guy working for an Arab army that did this to Americans, do you think you'd have a few internal conflicts too?).
Yet our military with its vast resources can't figure this stuff out until after a great American tragedy happens, coinciding with Veterans day and on our American soil - all the talking points of making a case for war against a foreign enemy. What a great photo op for Obama at Ft. Hood the day before Veterans Day. Can you think of a better commercial for going to all out war?
Naomi Kline's book The Shock Doctrine: The Rise of Disaster Capitalism, points out ever so clearly the history of the United states government in using disasters to make a case for war, not only in our country but first in South American countries which were the proving ground for this policy. And we see this happening over and over again. Here we are with Obama on the brink of sending ten's of thousands more troops off to fight and die in vain fro a war without end, without purpose, without strategy. A war that targets innocent civilians because our crack cutting edge military can't figure out the difference between civilians and terrorists, and in the process of killing the innocent, proliferates more terrorism.
It is very highly likely, in light of historical fact, that our intelligence agencies employed persons from the Muslim connections that Hasan had his neighbors that harassed him to his wit's end with the sole purpose of perpetuating and coercing him to commit these crimes, so that they would have an awesome ongoing news story (one that will now last for months since they went to extreme measures to keep him alive) to make a case for perpetual war in Afghanistan and to sway public opinion away from it's current sentiment against staying in Afghanistan.
-
-
-
-
- JonRaymond
- 10 days ago
-
-
Hi JulianCommongold,
current89 has updated this developing story!
For those who are asking, "What's a developing story?" read all about it on our blog:
http://blogs.current.com/currentdotcom/2009/11/04/introducing-developing-stories...
If you're interested in scooping this story, submit your investigation to Current.com and tag it with "Current Developing Stories" -- [NOTE: Tags are different than groups]
Let me know if you have any questions, or need in assistance developing your story on Current.com.
BTW -- You can read how the Fort Hood story has been developing so far on the Fort Hood developing story page:
