Porn 2.0

// video added November 12, 2009 // 85 comments // // Embed video:
Christof
Vanguard correspondent Christof Putzel takes a behind the scenes look at the adult entertainment industry, examining its history and impact on the ever-changing face of new media.
  1. groups:
    Vanguard Journalism,   Tech,   Upstream,   News,   11 more
  2. tags:
    Tech Technology Internet Web 2.0 10 more
  3. credits:
    Christof Producer, JD_Buffalo Editor, Andrew McAllister Editor, more

85 comments // Porn 2.0 // Video

  • Paven
    • 0
      Paven  
    • For better or worse the porn industry is here to stay. Human beings exploit things they enjoy and human beings enjoy sex.

    • 1 month ago
  • PlanetDahmz
    • 0
      PlanetDahmz  
    • Lots of parallels between this and music blog sites that provide us with music, yet claim that since USERS are uploading stuff, that they (the site) shouldn't get in trouble because "no files are hosted on this website"... it's just serving as a holder for all of this content.

    • 1 month ago
  • logicpocket
  • duffman99
    • 0
      duffman99  
    • Image...
    • TRIGGER WARNING: Below is a direct quotation from one of kink.com’s websites called “Public Disgrace,” which is an accurate title indeed. I think employees of this company should consider themselves a public disgrace.

      Kink.com is the hip San Francisco porn company featured, where employees have 401k’s and think nothing of producing hard-core bondage pornography that simulates–and perhaps is–rape and torture of women. Note that there is no simulated (actual?) rape and torture of men, not that this would be an acceptable thing either.

      I think this website copy speaks quite a different message than the irresponsible porn industry infomercial produced by Current TV:

      –QUOTE from http://www.publicdisgrace.com/site/?c=1–

      What is Public Disgrace?

      Public Disgrace is the best public sex and BDSM site on the web. Women are bound, stripped, and punished in public. PublicDisgrace.com features porn with public nudity, public spanking, and public fucking at a new level. This site has hot girls on busy streets displayed tied up, gagged, sucking cock, fucking in public, and ass fucked for everyone to see. Voyeurs, exhibitionists, and anyone else will love seeing European girls being stripped in public, flashing in public, flashing their breasts, bound, gagged, and ass fucked. Girls also get taken to bars and parties and made to suck stranger’s cocks and give them handjobs while bound. The site features lots of European first timers who have never tried bondage before as well as kink veterans like Bobbi Starr and Lorelei Lee. Crowds of people fondle bound naked girls. Hot sluts wear nipple clamps, tight ball gags, and have their shaved pussies exposed. Amateur beauties get vibrated to orgasm while everyone watches. See girls walk around the streets with cum drenched faces. This is no ordinary public sex site, girls are not only exposed to strangers they are fucked in bondage, bound and ass fucked, and tied in inescapable bondage, so once they are exposed they can do nothing to cover themselves up.

      No one has dared to do this public bondage before. Our amazing director takes hot girls into public and humiliates them. They give public blowjob after blowjob and have sex with strangers. The girls are made a public disgrace, public female humiliation at its best. You’ll see tons of high quality pictures, videos, downloads, and streaming media. Publicdisgrace.com is in high definition for your viewing pleasure.

      Other fantastic features on PublicDisgrace.com include nude girls bound, fucked, examined, and put into slave submission. The public humiliation of girls on Public Disgrace is kinky sex at a whole new level!

      –END QUOTE–

      Let’s not lie to ourselves. This is clearly abusive and explicitly degrading sexualized violence for entertainment purposes. People who work for Kink.com are not working at any old job, they are directly contributing to the creation of very disturbing violent imagery that hurts both women and men.

      I find this one-sided "reporting" utterly irresponsible.

    • 1 month ago
  • iamcuriousblue
  • unclepete813
    • 0
      unclepete813  
    • boo hoo boo hoo, im so sad for the porn industry. wow get over it, thats the world we leave in, Hell someone stole my private movies and i saw them on a porn site, and i got a lot of hits. but to sit here and think im going to feel sorry for some one cause he cant make money selling sex. get another job. its sex dammit. and if someone gets it free in a short of time to get OFF. who wants to watch a movie then a lil sex. get straight to the point and maybe you can make more money, call your movies quickies, and watch how many hits you get. ppl dont have 2hours to waist to watch a born out no acting wanna be movie star. Get straight to the point. dammit you waist my time lmao. it is what it is

    • 2 months ago
  • lakepanteraspeed
  • zwan008
    • 0
      zwan008  
    • Looking at all of this really makes me wish that I want a piece of the action as well. Hell I don't care there are a lot of Indian and Pakistani porn stars out there, and most of them started out as escorts working for a leading adult agency.

    • 2 months ago
  • melaniekaye
  • Denica_Cassandra
    • 0
      Denica_Cassandra  
    • There is a demand, here's the supply! I think more women should be involved in Making the er...movies (behind the scenes lol) because I think that it would make it more interesting for female audiences.

    • 3 months ago
  • Juan_Martinez
  • lordsbassman
  • AteTinTin
    • 0
      AteTinTin  
    • I have heard this argument about how the porn industry is always on the cutting edge of marketing to people and I find it really interesting. It makes sense because of what it is it needs to stay on the cutting edge of what the market wants and how to get paid doing it. They have the creative freedom to try different avenues. I just never realized how much of that gets filtered and put into general use. I also find it interesting how they are really trying to combat all of this pirating by offering more 'interactive' features to their products. Really interesting story, thanks Christof.

    • 3 months ago
  • queermo
    • 0
      queermo  
    • I'm really disappointed in this piece. A half-hour documentary on porn and not once is gay/lesbian porn shown or even mentioned?

      A lot of the criticisms of this piece seem to relate that this doc didn't evaluate the social value or ills of pornography, but that wasn't the focus. It was about the current state and future of porn.

      In examining the state of porn, I don't know how you managed to completely neglect gay/lesbian porn, as well those people and perspectives, but congrats.

      Pink & White, No Fauxxx, Trannywood Films, are all doing well financially, as well as breaking porn (and other) social barriers. This documentary would have been so much better if you had interviewed people making gay, lesbian, and queer porn, instead of just heteronormative (and primarily white) films.

    • 3 months ago
  • corndog67
    • 0
      corndog67  
    • queermo:

      Girl on girl is watchable, but have you seen most lesbians? Fuckin' Lumberjacks, plaid shirts, mullets, biker boots, tough chicks.

      I guess most people just don't care about gay porn.

    • 3 months ago
  • Juan_Martinez
  • yans_up
    • 0
      yans_up  
    • I started watching this mess on wed. with my sister and when I heard what that young lady who works in the "product promoting, not supplying" side of the porn industry had to say, I had to turn it off her statement of how this is not an industry people come in because they have no where else to go was obviously not coming from the large percentage of women who were sexually abused/molested as children before they ended up on this side of life...but from her and all the other money swimming people on the other side of this industry.

    • 3 months ago
  • rogerrekus
    • 0
      rogerrekus  
    • I was really hoping for some insights into the sudden influx of porn and how its rise to mainstream has changed our society and how society view sexuality.

      I'll admit it, I am a recovering porn addict. I have seen and felt the devastation, guilt, shame, that porn can have on someone (and their family), in terms of self-esteem, and how one views others. I have been dealing with the tempation that is porn since I was 9. I was kinda looking for some reasurace that I am not alone in this ongoing battle with my "Id" to look at things which I know are not healthy for my mind, and destructive to my marriage, yet am drawn too in my quest to "up the ante", for something more perverse/extrem/niche....

      Maybe something along the lines of the piece on Oxy and pain pills problem, that looked at the situation from someone perspective and that of the loved ones whose lives had been afected, and them at the "industry". I guess the pain that porn created for some ( I do not wish to make a universal assumption about porn, simply reflecting on personal experience. If you enjoy porn and find that it is not damaging your minds, more power to you) is something very real, and I was surprised to say the least, and the "jouranlistic direction" that the episode took.

      There is not enough of a secular/academic voice in the media that can say, "ok porn may be fine for some people but we really need warning on this(similar to cigarettes)", or "how many people know/care about the abuse of women in porn" or "is eas of porn changing/dehumanizing the next generation"....Example: What influence porn may have had on the recent gang rape at the highschool dance? Maybe this is evolution, or maybe its is a regretion to more animal instict and behaviors (except that animals don't feel the need to self-stimulate for the purpose of pleasure. I really could care less about how sucessful well fed porn players are losing market share because they are to busy living in fantastical world to adapt to market trends.

      Vanguard episodes should leave the viewer thinking, interacting, questioning?? Not writing angry replies of how the mark was missed on this one, better luck next time.

    • 3 months ago
  • J_Jammer
  • cmgrigg
    • 0
      cmgrigg  
    • Nice commercial... very fluffy...its good to dispel stereotypes but it seems like the "documentarian" knew 2 people at 2 porn companies.. then asked not one single poignant question and offered no conflicting views...very FOXy

    • 3 months ago
  • Juan_Martinez
    • 0
      Juan_Martinez  
    • I don’t feel sympathy for the top dogs of the trade. Nor do I consider their issue a crisis. Exploiting porn (everyone dirty secret) like this does make consumers a bit more comfortable when committing to a monthly payment of $39.99 then finding a way to upload the contents on a Smartphone so blue and white collar workers can find something to do on their 10 min break. Come to think about it..."Was this documentary sponsored by the porn industry?" Honestly, the only way this clip could have been more interesting is if they actually showed some tities.

    • 3 months ago
  • Juan_Martinez
  • Juan_Martinez
  • Juan_Martinez
  • Stentor
    • 0
      Stentor  
    • Shallow reporting. Infomercial for Kink. Is Al on their board too? What about the biggest exporters of porn (and prostitutes) in the world e.g. Romania and the Ukriane, and the damage it does to the women involved? I am pretty sure they dont have "college degrees" and live the nice life of "Princess Donna"

    • 3 months ago
  • iamcuriousblue
    • 0
      iamcuriousblue  
    • Stentor:

      Romania and Ukraine ARE NOT the largest exporters of porn in the world. In fact, the porn industries in those countries are relatively small. The fact is, the country that has by far the largest porn industry, and is the largest exporter, is the San Fernando Valley-based industry in the US. Followed, in a distant second, by the porn industry in Hungary and the Czech Republic, followed even more distantly by local porn industries in countries like France, Italy, Germany, and Japan.

      Somebody needs to get their facts straight.

    • 1 month ago
  • usumacinta
    • 0
      usumacinta  
    • Who cares about where the industry is going to be in ten years! Talk about the real people behind porn? The dangers of porn! That makes a more interesting video than this. Who cares about the business side to it.

    • 3 months ago
  • PepsiJuror
    • 0
      PepsiJuror  
    • ...and the complete and flagrant insouciance for the moron who posted this reminds me even more the degree of minorities who try to convince the majorities that we’re all F’ed – keep your fantasies to yourself! – Children can access to this crap!

    • 3 months ago
  • connected_dots
    • 0
      connected_dots  
    • Complete social de evolution has been achieved. Protocol 1.0, cue food shortage, cue diabetes epidemic, cue media apocalypse protocol 1.0, cue war on terror, cue federal & state court collapse, cue nuclear terror threats, cue economic collapse, cue race war, cue swine flu, cue manic depression epidemic, cue pandemic. Protocol 2.0 divide, divide & conquer, It's the New World Order (Second Roman Empire), the porno industry is a tool which will disappear. God particle, human genome, & artificial intelligence will be remembered as a singular event, Nazi Porno Fascists will be remembered as degenerate heathen profligates. TOOLS.

    • 3 months ago
  • DisownCashValue
    • 0
      DisownCashValue  
    • .Pornography is a great form of entertainment, but has its drawbacks. As with any vice, there are consiquences inherit in the act that should sway people away from overexposure. Porn-goers beware, too much can desensitize you to the type of woman who will actually fuck you, leaving you with more issues than a magazine rack.

    • 3 months ago
  • iamcuriousblue
  • David_Westfall
    • 0
      David_Westfall  
    • I understand this piece is on the business end of the industry, however it's really not right they neglected the social impact of it. It's pretty undebatable the negative repercussions that come from exposure to pornography, especially to pre-teens and teens. If Vanguard covered drilling in Northern Alaska, there's no way they wouldn't cover the environmental impact of their business practices.

      I would recommend to anyone that's interested to check out XXXChurch. It gives a really good perspective on the effect on not only viewers but many of the performers.

    • 3 months ago
  • iamcuriousblue
    • 0
      iamcuriousblue  
    • David_Westfall:

      David Westfall writes:

      "It's pretty undebatable the negative repercussions that come from exposure to pornography"

      Actually, it's HIGHLY debatable, and a case that largely falls apart once one understands how the anti-porn movement cherry-picks research findings to support their case while ignoring a great deal of evidence against it, or relies on "research" by fringe ideologues like Judith Reismann and Diana Russell.

      And the fact that DW then points to XXXChurch, a fundamentalist christian outfit, for proper perspective on porn speaks volumes.

    • 1 month ago
  • scarlettcutie_01
    • 0
      scarlettcutie_01  
    • Gag.............. I can't get over my personal biases enough to finish the clip. I have a 16 year old nephew doing porn in California. Legally! (Emancipated with the help of his sister(a well-known"actress") and his producer. There is sadly still a lot of regulating to do in this industry. Not every gig is as well financed as this giant. There is still some sad back alley stories out there.

    • 3 months ago
  • corndog67
  • Denica_Cassandra
  • iamfree
  • boiscalm
  • GreeneConsulting
    • 0
      GreeneConsulting  
    • I been online before the first wave of internet porn site hit and the web was but a alpha program being tested . We had Usenet news sites they people posted picture adn stories but the content of the what the web has now was just not there. After the house and senate voted to open the internet to commercial want of business the first porn sites in the US came up with the variation of the phone chat type with the first Video chat sites girls hired to talk to you while watched them.. Now you have ton more and its not just the US but all over the world. It not just bootleggers it the Crime world they should be worried about as more of the big crime group in the UK and Eastern Europa put on like site with anything you can think of in porn. the bootleg content or make their own but they are brutal and will do some really sick thing to keep online. the internet and porn has shared a lot of the years but the darker and nastier side was all was under control to after 1994 and the cat was let lose I don't use the web sites i don't need them but i do have to fight the ones that exploit young people that put out the child porn. the profits in internet porn have drop since those early first days. some of those that i know work on the IT of those early sites have retired with lot of money in the bank and I still happy i didn't do that work..
      the money made at the start was much more than just 3 billion but as they said with just any one being able to make a video and get it online and the pirate video sites they will lose more in the end adn will have to give up or find a way to change with out crossing over into the dark to make a profit . as the joke goes Al Gore invented the net.. no he just was the one to take off the leash and let the web run wild and free and changing the intent forever.

    • 3 months ago
  • J_Jammer
    • 0
      J_Jammer [removed]  
    • More interactive like getting a new kind of virus that transmits from computer to human. Oh yeah baby.

      And just because you went to a university or have a degree doesn't mean much. Doesn't mean you're smart. They say it like it makes them legitimate. It doesn't.

    • 3 months ago
  • Nettle
    • 0
      Nettle  
    • J_Jammer:

      Lol, you really do have that fixation on catching STDs, dontcha. First me, then Lady Gaga, now this, all in less than two days. Hmm, I'm sensing a pattern here...

      HEY EVERYONE! JAY IS TOTALLY PETRIFIED OF CATCHING STDS, TAUNT HIM!

      XD

    • 3 months ago
  • J_Jammer
  • Nettle
  • JanforGore
  • manuschnirkt
    • 0
      manuschnirkt  
    • It was interesting to see how this industry is developing but:
      I am also a little disapointed by this. I would have liked to get more insight from the actual actors and actresses. I would have been interested in how they feel about doing this kind of job. And if they don't want to or maybe feel used sometimes.
      But the only opinions there were on that seemed to be those two people who were working for "Wicked". And what they talked about sounded just very surface scratching...

    • 3 months ago
  • Tardragonfly
  • Atalanda_Cameron
    • 0
      Atalanda_Cameron  
    • meh. That one wasnt as great as i thought it would be.. We heard from all the people behind the scenes but what about the actual models?? Did we hear from any of them?? feels kinda odd so have a whole episode about porn but leave out the stars. :P

      Ah well, can't win em all. I still love you Vanguard!!! :)

    • 3 months ago
  • Tardragonfly
  • ashgallagher
  • dan_ucko
  • Bekanator
    • 0
      Bekanator  
    • Image...
    • Atalanda_Cameron:

      Kink.com actually has a "news" branch of their website called Behind Kink (http://behindkink.com). They have clips of many interesting dynamics from the day to day of Kink, including model interviews. All of them are free, I might add. There is nudity, but the clips are mostly provided in order to show the day to day runnings of the company. Granted, Kink doesn't represent the dynamics of every porn company out there, but I do find that Kink.com is run with a large amount of respect for its employees, models included.

    • 3 months ago
  • aitch
    • aitch  
    • This comment has been removed.
  • ny_nj_soulchild
    • 0
      ny_nj_soulchild  
    • Im not really surprised that vanguard went this far to do a story about porn. I think vanguard should be an hour long instead of a half hour. There is alot of information and like he said "This is going to be a very new expierience for him."

      Besides that....

      There is a lot of things missed. - the small companies plus the in depth coverage of how the porn stars really act...However he did touch on one point which leads to technology & media - innovation & creativity.

      Everyone can complain about how moral or immoral porn is...that is not the entire issue. What christof is reporting ... it is the fact that porn is this 3 billion dollar industry that is creating new technologies that media is trying to get their hands on for patents plus how piracy effects production. This is good info no doubt, porn is a very broad subject and so is sex all together.

      (Superveining social necessity vs. Supression of Radical Potential (Internet, I-pods, Dvd, blue ray):: written all over this pod. Look up Brian Winston - How Are Media Born and Developed...relate that to porn...there.)

      I'm just a person who is taking a class & is learning about Media, industries, and how things are financed (Communications TV & RADIO Major).

      Christof - I hope this shines some light to your vanguard pod. You did well with the resources that you have gathered. Again, This is a very broad topic.

    • 3 months ago
  • ThresholdBroken
  • lordsbassman
  • UrbanGypsy
  • Mzark87
    • 0
      Mzark87  
    • I am somewhat disappointed with this Vanguard piece. I have grown use to this series presenting new and fresh perspectives on whatever topics they choose and tackling it head on but in an intelligent manner. There was some good research done but I don't feel as if I learned anything new. I would have truly enjoyed it if there was a debate created about the morality of the porn industry. Not a pointed stern finger pointing saying 'thou art filthy' but an open and intelligent conversation with both parties being vocal. I am in a way wondering if maybe this is just a part of a larger piece and that I am just misinformed. Maybe there's a Porn 1.0 or something. Also, what happened to the little guys. You interview all these big named industry giants and accomplished companies but you never took a look at the men and women starting out in this business and the struggling to make it. So many questions I have:

      How does one go about taking part in the porn industry?

      What are the varying degrees of interaction in the business and how does it affect
      your lifestyle.

      Do some industry and production people find themselves desensitized to sex, how does it affect heir own sexuality or expressions of intimacy?

      Women actresses in the business, are they treated humane and respectfully? Who are these women and men? What makes them do what they do, what drives them?

      Socio-economics, Race, Ethnicity?

      Why is it that i don't know of any ethnic Wick'd models and actresses?
      What is it like for some of these women to be subject to such intense work that is at most times delegated by a man for the pleasure of men? What companies are the exception to this?

      I am left at the end of this doc very unfulfilled and with more questions than gained knowledge. Wanna make my own doc know just to close the deficit.

    • 3 months ago
  • twodragonswithguns
  • PSLPWNS
  • jarrod86
    • 0
      jarrod86  
    • I am disappointed in current for practically glorifying the "poor" porn industry. For portraying it as barely hanging on in these hard times -even though it maybe. Porn is trash. This documentary would have been better if it had shown another side of it. It took a strictly economic perspective and didn't even begin to touch on the fact that these people are living shallow, exploitative lifestyles, and perpetuating the notion that women are sex machines and guys are only here to "fuck bitches"..at least throw another perspective into the mix current, even if you do feel bad for porn.

      Did anyone else think that by viewing this, it made Christoff or at least the vanguard team, or hell, Al Gore completely sympathetic and "OK," or even fanatical about the porn industry.

    • 3 months ago
  • SactownJD
    • 0
      SactownJD  
    • Sometimes I wonder what this easy access, and availability of pornography is going to do for our society? When I was a teenager, you were lucky to find pornography. I remember finding an old horribly produced video in the back of my fathers closet, and thinking holy cow I found the Golden Fleece! Who doesn't remember seeing their first Playboy? I would think that most young men would laugh at the idea of looking at magazine in this day and age. I think about those two guys from Superbad (Vagtastic Voyage) and wonder if its really like that now. It's so available currently, that you can just wank it whenever you want. Why leave the house? Why even date? Times are a changing.

    • 3 months ago
  • flyingkick
  • 2helenahandbasket
    • 0
      2helenahandbasket  
    • Of COURSE folks make money making porn. More power to them, I guess. The problem with porn is, it can be addictive and guys who view porn come to believe that women should all be porn stars and they want to be treated as such. They expect women to behave like porn stars, willing to go through the most degrading and humilating acts to please their men. I've always thought that if a woman had a hole that was big enough, a man would think it was a good idea to screw it.

      In my experience, porn turns men into animals.

      And if you guys who view porn think those women are really ENJOYING the stuff that's depicted, I have a bridge to sell ya.

    • 3 months ago
  • corndog67
    • 0
      corndog67  
    • 2helenahandbasket:

      Sure, some people get completely hooked on porn, so much so that they forego any social contact with members of the opposite sex. Same with video games. Same with the internet.

      But porn is big money. Money is the driving force in this country, hell, the world. It's not ethics, it's not about exploitation, it's about money. People want porn, people will make it for them, people will sell it, people will put it on the internet.

      I'm not sure what Tar means by "possibly" the porn industry "might have potential" in this world. It makes $3 billion/year, which is probably a low estimate. I think it's making it's potential.

      The world is not about treating people fair. It's not about religion. It's not about doing the right thing. It's about money, Do you think that is going to change, anytime soon? Or ever?

      As for exploiting the women and men in the videos, nobody is forcing anyone to do anything. You also don't have to watch it either.

    • 3 months ago
  • Nettle
    • 0
      Nettle  
    • 2helenahandbasket:

      Wow, that's a horribly sexist remark you made. Just because men seem to be more oriented towards sex doesn't mean that ALL of them are going to get addicted to watching porn. Guys mostly watch it to jack off because they're more visual than women are.

      And porn isn't just for men, plenty of women watch it too. What makes you think that women are objects that men want to perform acts on? We are passionate, willing creatures of our own and we have desires and fetishes as well.

      I like riding, dominating, being dominated, oral, anal, roleplaying, toys, and whatever else I find interesting. I really ENJOY it. Bridge sold.

    • 3 months ago
  • QuestionGeek
  • eta
    • 0
      eta  
    • the one thing I enjoy about well-made amateur porn is that it's unabashed, its sincere. it transcends "porn" and just becomes sex. and as a viewer, it's enjoyable b/c there's more chemistry b/w the actors and less sense of contrivance. it fits and reflects a simple bidirectional function in our current culture: exhibitionism and voyeurism.

      and within the ideals of these 2 sociological movements, i think there's a lot of potential for reconciliation with our sexual and sensual nature. that's why this democratization of the industry is a positive. first of all, wicked pictures is the old guard. and that kinda narrativization and veiled exploitation of sex is passe. we don't need that poorly-made junk. Porn should be straightforward. Leave it to artists and talented folks to make cinema. there's no more place for conventional storylines, stiff acting, ineptitude with color, space and composition, mediocre lighting and production vales... we get enough of that in mainstream cinema. it boils down to: people wanna see people having sex. and if we consummate this truth, then porn & its ripple effects don't become such a detriment to our culture.

      so maybe addressing these things will lead to porn stars and amateur porn being more consistently a door into people having sex. and that will lead to less disingenuous sucks and slobbers and annoying oh-my-gods. and maybe that will lead to our society being more sincere as a whole in our communication and expression with and of one another.

      lastly, jessica drake is not very attractive, and although her perspective about interaction and community is true enough... her actions are thoroughly the epitome of the downside of a twitter culture.

    • 3 months ago
  • eta
    • 0
      eta  
    • "tech-sex". "new" "better". sex is a driving force of creation, but so is the undefinable, unquantifiable blanket called love. and what porn epitomizes is the common misconception our culture has with progress. technology is the direct derivative of sex, and that's got us into a lot of shit, hypercapitalism, fragmentation in mental well-being, the decline of american educational systems. all i'm saying is sex and tech are snakes in the grass... necessary to betterment and creativity, but things that we need to learn to compose and tame, not let loose bc they have the ability to hedonistically spiral out of control.

    • 3 months ago
  • technic
    • 0
      technic  
    • I understand, but don't follow the logic of Wicked's CEO. You don't keep making high budget porns with plots and such if the market is disappearing or demand has shifted to other content like Gonzo. A smart leader of an organization adapts its company to the current or even the possible future market and continues to thrive. If they want to continue to stay rooted in the past, then they will quickly go under. It doesn't matter what business it is, you have to continue to strive to have an edge over your competitors.

    • 3 months ago
  • derk
  • biggranny
  • Varex_Sythe
  • SactownJD
    • 0
      SactownJD  
    • Image...
    • One of the companies that is featured in this documentary is kink.com and I've had a chance to view some of the material that they produce. I've got to say that their material is "different" to say the least. However, kink.com has been extremely successful financially. This fact is clearly demonstrated in the Porn 2.0

      Internet pornography is a 3 billion dollar a year industry, and however you slice it up. That's one big pie.

      Porn 2.0 is not an investigative case study into the moral ramifications of the porn industry. It is rather it is a look at the metamorphic nature of the industry and it's attempt to merge with cyberspace as we become more dependent upon the internet.

      The current battle within this niche industry is similar to that of the mainstream television landscape. In which once dominant players (NBC, ABC, CBS) now have to contend with smaller more aggressive companies that are clearly more able to figure out which way the wind is blowing withing their own demographic.

      Porn 2.0 shows how these small upstart companies like kink.com are able to the beat the big production porn studios such as Wicked Pictures. This is due to the fact that they are able to merge with current technologies.

      Now that anyone with a camcorder and a high speed internet connection can produce porn, it has become a game of one oneupmanship.

      As technology becomes more intertwined within our social landscape. It is no surprise that it has permeated to other aspects of our lives including entertainment and sex.

      I found Porn 2.0 an interesting look into the current landscape of the porn industry. However, it only scratches the surface of what is to come.

    • 3 months ago
  • ninos
  • ashgallagher
    • 0
      ashgallagher  
    • obviously porn's content is not something i get excited about.

      but i have to say, christof, i think your coverage on it is well done, because the reality is ...that in order to pull off such multi-billion dollar industry, it takes intelligent, techy, geeky people who can run the biz and flood the web.

      as to the second segment: it's true, the porn industry is losing money, but it's not just b/c of pirated copies: even that is stemmed from the fact that it's one less expense people feel they need to spend money on, when the rest of the economy is at stake, ....family values or survival take over and thus, such an industry becomes almost nil.

      ironically, though, as you pointed out in the 3rd segment, like any other business in the world, when sales are down, the companies, the industries are going to find creative ways to get their product back out there.

      2.0 is the future of media communication....it's taking movies, television, written form, everything w/ it.

    • 3 months ago
  • ankab
    • 0
      ankab  
    • i say yes....... It is the American way....Get it all out...........In a dimly lit back ally in the middle of the night.......I didn't even have to press it to play........tooo early for me
      his morning this sort of thing...........

    • 3 months ago
  • backpacker1
    • 0
      backpacker1  
    • I think that the positive, legitimate business image that the porn industry is given in this documentary really stems from the companies that they interviewed. However, once you leave these large legitimate companies, the picture changes. Outside of this legitimate porn world, pornstars are not feminists expressing themselves sexually with agency in what they are doing. Many of these women are exploited by a male dominated system which uses them quickly and kicks them out of the industry. They don't have the same degree of agency. Drugs are used to keep the women trapped in the system.

      I was kind of surprised that this didn't come up in the documentary. I think it is important to give the porn industry a fair shake, but it seems to me that the companies represented are the minority. There is another side of porn that remains to be revealed to the world.

    • 3 months ago
  • T5vZZ
    • 0
      T5vZZ  
    • backpacker1:

      thats a strong point. i think the primetime news shows parade it out every few years and point all the vices at who might be considered the industry folks, when they should distinctly be identified apart from the market managers. the top industry folks are the industry in my book, and the other 90% are content producers and un-contracted performers. theyre the market. often unseen and unchampioned/interviewed. so listening to the industry talk about disseminating materials - they may be talking about shared product, but theres always further endorsement for them either way. i dont think the 'porn region' needs to be forcibly stabilized or anything. but profit models could stand to turret around the market before/or with better advancement than pocket genitalia. love that everyones pushing adaptation to new technical outposts. but theres also that sustainability aspect that proliferating in so many other markets, that deserves some research.

    • 3 months ago
  • loupetho
    • 0
      loupetho  
    • backpacker1:

      Absolutely backpacker1. I thought it was more a promotional video for the porn industry than a documentary. And to use words like 'build a community' and transferring the idea that technology has given us the tools to be more intimate to having a sexual relationship with them ... didn't quite get that one.

      I offended, not by the subject, but by the one sided angle of a story.

    • 3 months ago
  • PlanetDahmz
    • 0
      PlanetDahmz  
    • backpacker1:

      Good point, but the main purpose, at least how I saw it, wasn't to talk about it in a positive light, but was to show the connection between advances in technology, communication, and porn, hence Porn 2.0.

    • 1 month ago
  • Tardragonfly
    • 0
      Tardragonfly  
    • I can't believe this 'industry'. The people in it- from the stars, to the directors, to the people whose job it is to 'promote' the websites on the internet- they ONLY think about the money that it brings them. Not how it is affecting other people.

      I think that *possibly* the porn industry might have potential in this world. It's just that the way it is today...it isn't healthy for people. It is exposing people to all kinds of extreme behaviour that isn't normal, it is creating and reinforcing gender and age stereotypes- and it is affecting millions of people's sexualities, not to mention the relationships that go with them.

      Until I see a major change in this industry, I won't be able to agree with it or support it in any way. It's not only about the 'quick, easy, money'...we need to consider how people are affected by what they are being exposed to.

    • 3 months ago
  • Tao_D
    • 0
      Tao_D  
    • Tardragonfly:

      So... you feel we need to consider how people are affected by the porn they are (quite willingly) exposed to? LMAO Doesn't take much imagination to answer that.

      Of course it's all about money, the porn industry can't supply enough porn in all its variations to meet the demand in today's society. People know what they like, and by god, they like porn. And lots of it. All through history, from paintings on cave walls to the internet. Even panda's like porn.

      Legislation of morality is oppression and a sign of the police state. Resist it at every turn.

    • 3 months ago
  • tome_erau
    • 0
      tome_erau  
    • Tardragonfly:

      Sexually based crimes such as rape, sexual assault, etc. have actually been steadily declining as pornography becomes more readily available. I know you have a very strong opinoin, but unless you can show me at least one study to support it it doesn't really matter how you feel.

    • 3 months ago
  • yipyep
    • 0
      yipyep  
    • Tardragonfly:

      Reply to Tao_D

      Agree with what you say, except that:::

      "Legislation of morality is oppression and a sign of the police state. Resist it at every turn."

      Not all legislation of morality is "oppression". Murderer's are incarcerated by the justice system. That is legislation of morality I embrace.

    • 3 months ago
  • backpacker1
    • 0
      backpacker1  
    • Tardragonfly:

      to Tome Erau: do not confuse correlation with causation. I could accept part of your argument but the decline in sex crimes could not be so simply linked to increased access to pornography. Porn has always been around and has always been fairly easy to access. Why would this make the difference?

    • 3 months ago
  • Tardragonfly
    • 0
      Tardragonfly  
    • Tardragonfly:

      I agree with backpacker1 that correlation does not equal causation. Maybe you could show ME at least one study that supports YOUR strong opinion, tome_erau

      And I also agree with yipyep that this industry could probably benefit from stronger legislation...

    • 3 months ago
  • wellhunggimp
    • 0
      wellhunggimp  
    • Tardragonfly:

      backpacker1: "Porn has always been around and has always been fairly easy to access."
      That porn has always been fairly easy to access is very far from true, to the extent that I think you're either flat out lying or stupid.

      Tardragonfly: "And I also agree with yipyep that this industry could probably benefit from stronger legislation..."
      Yipyep didn't said that. What benefits do you think the porn industry would experience fro stronger legislation? What kind of stronger legislation?

    • 3 months ago
  • backpacker1
    • 0
      backpacker1  
    • Tardragonfly:

      I admit that access wasn't always as easy as getting online, but ever since the creation of Playboy, anyone of the proper age could buy it at a store. This is not even to mention the various forms of erotica present since at least the mid-nineteenth century. I still don't see how this proves that increased access to porn has led to a decrease in violent sex crimes, especially since no one has produced any figures to show that violent sex crimes are declining.

      Let's also not forget that the internet has made the creation and dissemination of child pornography much more easy, so the internet, in itself, may have increased the market for child pornography. I guess my point is that access to pornography through advances in technology is not a simple way of decreasing violent sexual crimes.

    • 3 months ago
  • cynker
  • QuestionGeek
    • 0
      QuestionGeek  
    • Tardragonfly:

      Tardragonfly when I see people who post blog paragraphs such as yours, the first things that come to mind are, "Gee, so I guess watching people's heads get cut off, abusive scenes of violent rape, and other extreme gratuitous violence is just fine and healthy. By the way, I'm talking about free national broadcast USA television, not pay TV

      What is so wrong with watching people have sex? It's one of the most basic desires of human nature. And unlike you've been taught, it isn't something to be ashamed of, or disparaged, etc.

    • 2 months ago

Add your comment

current videos