Obama to unveil plan to add troops in Afghanistan
-
-
- xiola
- added this
http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/U/US_US_AFGHANISTAN?SITE=AP&SECT...
War-weary Americans will support more fighting in Afghanistan once they understand the perils of losing, President Barack Obama declared Tuesday, announcing he was ready to spell out war plans virtually sure to include tens of thousands more U.S. troops.He is expected to make his case to the nation in a speech next Tuesday night, even as the military completes plans to begin sending in reinforcements in the spring.
Eight years after the Sept. 11 attacks led the U.S. into Afghanistan, Obama said it is still in America's vital national interest to "dismantle and destroy" al-Qaida terrorists and extremist allies. "I intend to finish the job," he said.
Obama said he would announce after Thanksgiving his decision on additional troops, and military, congressional and other sources said the occasion would be a Tuesday night televised speech laying out his plans for expanding the Afghan conflict - and then ultimately ending America's military role.
Republican critics have been pressing him for months to decide on a next step in Afghanistan, but Obama has said repeatedly he was more concerned with making a decision that was right rather than quick.
Neither he nor his advisers has detailed an exit plan, but the strategy he is expected to describe next week would include specific dates that deployments could be slowed or stopped if necessary, a senior military official said. The official and others spoke on condition of anonymity because the decision was not final.
With U.S. combat deaths climbing on Obama's watch and more than half the American public opposed to escalation, the president seemed to acknowledge Tuesday that he has a lot to explain.
"I feel very confident that when the American people hear a clear rationale for what we're doing there and how we intend to achieve our goals, that they will be supportive," he said, speaking at a White House news conference with Indian Prime Minister Manmohan Singh.
"I can tell you, as I've said before, that it is in our strategic interest, in our national security interest to make sure that al-Qaida and its extremist allies cannot operate effectively" in the area, he said. "We are going to dismantle and degrade their capabilities and ultimately dismantle and destroy their networks. And Afghanistan's stability is important to that process."
Military officials expect an infusion of approximately 32,000 to 35,000 troops to begin in February or March, the largest expansion since the beginning of the war and one that could bring the cost above $75 billion annually.
Returning to a campaign theme, Obama said the Afghan effort had been starved for resources and attention during the Bush administration and he intended to finish the war.
To that end, much of the White House discussion during months of deliberations has centered on how the U.S. would end its military role.
Obama held his 10th war council meeting Monday evening, and officials said it was his last. The Situation Room sessions that began in September were the most visible markers of a strategic and political debate inside the administration about how to address a resurgent Taliban and other insurgents and whether the U.S. was creating its own enemies the longer it remained.
Military officials have said Obama is choosing one of the least risky options he was presented, but one still expected to lead to increased U.S. casualties without guarantee of success.
War commander Gen. Stanley McChrystal has warned that the war risks failure without a large troop infusion. Although he preferred a higher figure - about 40,000 - McChrystal is expected to tell Congress next week that this lesser addition still gives him the tools to better combat insurgents in the south and east of Afghanistan.
The expected increase would include at least three Army brigades and a single, larger Marine Corps contingent, officials said.
Both Democrats and Republicans in Congress has been miffed that the administration blocked McChrystal from testifying during what many Republicans considered an inordinately long decision-making period. His testimony has not been scheduled, but would probably come late next week or early in the week after.
Among others likely to take part in congressional hearings are Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton, Defense Secretary Robert Gates, Joint Chiefs of Staff Chairman Adm. Mike Mullen and U.S. Ambassador to Afghanistan Karl Eikenberry. All were among about 20 officials and advisers participating in the president's final deliberations Monday night - one of the biggest groups gathered for these sessions.
The administration figures will have a tough sell among some congressional Democrats, including Senate Armed Services Committee Chairman Carl Levin, D-Mich., who has questioned the value of adding forces and pointed to the war's rising cost.
The Afghan war bill hit $43 billion annually this summer, with the addition of 21,000 forces Obama has already added to the fight this year. The White House has given Congress this rough yardstick for future troop increases: Approximately $1 billion a year for each 1,000 troops atop the current record figure of 68,000.
NATO and other allies collectively have about 45,000 troops in Afghanistan.
If the full expansion that U.S. military planners anticipate does happen, it would take up to two years to get all the additional U.S. forces into the landlocked country.
The United States is quietly pressing NATO and other allies to increase forces as well, with a goal of between 5,000 and 7,000 additional non-U.S. troops. European and other diplomats have said that number is probably optimistic.
Obama's expected address is timed in part to come before a NATO foreign ministers meeting, taking place in Brussels, Belgium, at the end of next week.
http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/U/US_US_AFGHANISTAN?SITE=AP&SECTION=HOM...
-
- groups:
- News, News and Politics, US Politics, Afghanistan News, 1 more
-
-
Progresshiv
-
Lyrics of "Song for the Dead" by Randy Newman:
Deep in the field
A lone soldier stands
With mud on his boot
And blood on his hands
They left him behind
To bury the dead
And to say a few words on behalf of the leadershipPardon me boys
If I slip off my pack
And sit for awhile with you
I'd like to explain
Why you fine young men had to be blown apart
To defend this mudholeNow our country boys
Though it's quite far away
Found itself jeopardized
Endangered, boys
By these very gooks
Who lie here beside you
Forever near
ForeverWe'd like to express
Our deep admiration
For your courage under fire
And your willingness to die
For your country, boys
We won't forget
We won't forget - 3 months ago
-
Progresshiv
-
-
Guyatthebusstation
-
Different people have very different reactions to President Barack Obama. Those who listen to his rhetoric are often inspired, while those who follow what he actually does are often appalled.
- 3 months ago
-
Guyatthebusstation
-
-
JonRaymond
-
-
http://rethinkafghanistan.com/
Sign the petition to end the war. - 3 months ago
-
JonRaymond
-
-
Cynic2
-
JonRaymond:
I believe I did (sign the petition).
- 3 months ago
-
Cynic2
-
-
Progresshiv
-
JonRaymond:
Signed and shared on Facebook
- 3 months ago
-
Progresshiv
-
-
rodstradamus
-
Protest this!
- 3 months ago
-
rodstradamus
-
-
vans1170
-
the middle east is hopeless.
- 3 months ago
-
vans1170
-
-
DEVORULES
-
Billions and billions on defense, when our schools are broke. America is going down the toilet.
- 3 months ago
-
DEVORULES
-
-
unclecharlie
-
But you see......we need to send more troops over to Afghanistan so they can keep getting blown up......when they get blown up by an IED, that's another Humvee that can be manufactured to replace one that was destroyed by a bomb....that's another helmet that needs to be made to replace the ones lost due to combat casualties.......it's all about keeping those gubmint contractors happy, keeping that funding flowing, keeping the congressmen happy ( if their district includes a factory that makes military vehicles, uniforms, etc.) and the citizens as well. 10,000 or 100,000- it makes no difference. The more we send over, the more troops the Taliban will kill. How long has it been? 8 plus years? And we STILL haven't wiped them all out and declalred victory? History will judge Obama to be an incompetent Chicago "community organizer" who never had the qualifications to be president (Unless blowing hot air out of your ass and making it smell like perfume is the primary qualification needed.)
- 3 months ago
-
unclecharlie
-
-
JohnA
-
Sorry Barack, you can't vote "present" on this one.
- 3 months ago
-
JohnA
-
-
Chique
-
JohnA:
Thou dost repeat thyself frequently with this one liner John - what is it you're trying to contribute?
- 3 months ago
-
Chique
-
-
JohnA
-
JohnA:
Just reminding people who they vote for to lead our nation.
- 3 months ago
-
JohnA
-
-
krag2112
-
JohnA:
That or reminding people how warped and bitter some Clinton supporters can be.
- 2 months ago
-
krag2112
-
-
PirateSauce
-
Stop voting these liars and scumbags into office. Vote 3rd party.
- 3 months ago
-
PirateSauce
-
-
krag2112
-
PirateSauce:
I'm all for a 3rd party. I'd love to see a viable 3rd party in this country. The key word there being "viable". But I'll ask again PirateSauce...where did Obama lie in this case? Simple question.
- 3 months ago
-
krag2112
-
-
JohnA
-
PirateSauce:
I did.
- 3 months ago
-
JohnA
-
-
Guyatthebusstation
-
PirateSauce:
hear, hear
- 3 months ago
-
Guyatthebusstation
-
-
JanforGore
-
And how many of you for this were against the socalled "surge" in Iraq? And are we out of there yet? No, and we won't be. And I will then also say this, should this drag on indefinitely because it expands into Pakistan I hope all the young men for it in this thread sign up to go there to fight for Obama. Any takers on that?
- 3 months ago
-
JanforGore
-
-
krag2112
-
JanforGore:
I was against the surge in Iraq. I'm against one in Afghanistan too. But to suggest that Iraq and Afghanistan are the same thing is asinine and beneath you. They are very different conflicts that were engaged in for very different reasons. And if you bothered to ever give Obama anything more than your scorn, you'd at least listen to his plan before resorting to Limbaughesque fear mongering.
- 3 months ago
-
krag2112
-
-
JohnA
-
There you go Barack, put it off another week so you can be on prime time TV again. It's only our troops lives at stake.
- 3 months ago
-
JohnA
-
-
krag2112
-
JohnA:
And if he had announced this two months ago you would have criticized him for rushing into a decision. If he pulled the troops out, you'd say he's weak and doesn't care about our security. When he commits more troops you'll say he's reckless and no better than Bush.
Yawn.
- 3 months ago
-
krag2112
-
-
JohnA
-
JohnA:
And you would still worship the ground The Great Messiah walks on if he brought Bin Laden to a state dinner and gave him the medal of freedom on the south lawn.
Yawn.
- 3 months ago
-
JohnA
-
-
krag2112
-
JohnA:
Hmmmm...let's see. I've said in this very post that I disagree with his policy. I simply also pointed out to you haters that this is exactly what he said he would do. So much for your worship theory.
But knee jerk complaining and inch deep analysis is about what I've come to expect. Here comes another one...yawn.
- 3 months ago
-
krag2112
-
-
JohnA
-
JohnA:
Yeah, you disagree, sure, while chanting "give him a chance it's only been two months, give him a chance it's only been four months, give him a chance it's only been six months, give him a chance it's only been eight months,...". An inch deep is all you need to see Obama is full of shit. That's about as shallow as his resume is. Right back at you...yawn.
- 3 months ago
-
JohnA
-
-
krag2112
-
JohnA:
Haters hate...it's just what they do. It's my fault for expecting anything different from any of you. Oh well. You've been proven wrong so many times before you must be getting used to it. God knows I am.
- 3 months ago
-
krag2112
-
-
krag2112
-
All you people who are claiming that this is some kind of betrayal, how about posting one quote where candidate Obama said he was going to withdraw our troops from Afghanistan (not Iraq Leonidis)?
Here's an article where he says just the opposite:
"The central front in the war on terror is not Iraq, and it never was," said Obama, who has claimed combat brigades needed to battle the Taliban have been diverted to Iraq and vowed to take the fight to "Al Qaeda in Afghanistan and Pakistan."
So where's the betrayal exactly?
- 3 months ago
-
krag2112
-
-
Leonidis
-
-
Take that to the bank.......http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4LsSppYxSHk
- 3 months ago
-
Leonidis
-
-
Atalanda_Cameron
-
Leonidis:
way to misuse a sound bite I'm almost certain that he was talking about Iraq there but either way rmbr to include a few seconds more of detail in the future please. :P
- 3 months ago
-
Atalanda_Cameron
-
-
Leonidis
-
Leonidis:
war is war whats difference if he takes them out of Iraq then sends them to another country that had nothing to do with 9-11. THE TERRORIST WERE FROM SAUDI ARABIA REMEMBER NOT ONE OF THEM WERE TALIBAN....KEEP DRINKING THE KOOOLAID FRIEND
- 3 months ago
-
Leonidis
-
-
krag2112
-
Leonidis:
"War is war"
Thanks for the in-depth analysis. You could have worked for the Bush Administration.
In the years leading up to 9/11, the Taliban was giving safe haven to Osama bin Laden and had a very close connection to al-Qaeda (including hosting many al-Qaeda training camps and bases). I agree that Iraq had nothing to do with 9/11 and we should never have invaded that country. But to suggest the same is true of the Taliban government in Afghanistan reveals a shocking disconnection with reality. As does a statement like "war is war".
If you want to argue the fact that we should no longer be in Afghanistan and that our military objectives there are unrealistic. Okay. I think you could make a convincing case there. But your argument here holds no water at all. Nor does the video you posted...since Obama was clearly talking about Iraq...NOT Afghanistan.
I'd say nice try...but sadly it wasn't.
- 3 months ago
-
krag2112
-
-
Leonidis
-
Leonidis:
hey krag2112 yeah Osama Bin Laden is hiding out in Afganistan ......Where do you get your information from the CIA? Remember weapons of mass destruction? Bush and Obama are sellouts to the MULTI NATIONAL CORPORATIONS THAT RUN THE WORLD.
- 2 months ago
-
Leonidis
-
-
krag2112
-
Leonidis:
@Leonidis
I guess you didn't understand the phrase "In the years leading up to 9/11". That means past tense. Try reading a little closer...might help you prevent looking so foolish in the future.
Might.
- 2 months ago
-
krag2112
-
-
krag2112
-
Leonidis:
@Leonidis
Proof that Bin Laden was in Afghanistan around the time of the attacks of 9/11.
Of course If Bush had actually accomplished that mission we might not find ourselves in the no win position we are today. Ugh.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/11/29/senate-report-bin-laden-w_n_372960.html
- 2 months ago
-
krag2112
-
-
rickm8
-
4 more years of bush w00t w00t. He didn't just inherit the problems, he's making them worse. **cues SNL clip.**
How about he brings the troops home? didn't he say he wants them home?
Our residing over there has allowed the once limited opiate production (limited by the taliban) to flourish because of improper limiting techniques. Taliban 1, US 0.
Impeach obama! - 3 months ago
-
rickm8
-
-
krag2112
-
I'm not happy about a troop increase in Afghanistan either. But I didn't expect anything different. Obama said time and time again during the campaign that Afghanistan was vital to our national security and that it had been neglected because of Iraq. You can agree or disagree with that conclusion if you want, but to suggest that he's pulling some kind of bait and switch here is disingenuous. Anyone who expected some kind of blanket withdraw from Afghanistan simply wasn't paying attention during the election. And here's an idea, why not hear the man out? While I'd prefer no increase in the number of troops, I think an increase that comes with a clear plan to end the war is better than endless occupation under deteriorating conditions.
- 3 months ago
-
krag2112
-
-
JohnA
-
krag2112:
If they were paying attention, they wouldn't have voted for Obama.
- 3 months ago
-
JohnA
-
-
krag2112
-
krag2112:
Funny. I haven't seen Hillary suggest any other course of action. Like Obama, she also ran on refocusing on Afghanistan...do you imagine she would have broken her campaign promise and withdrawn the troops? Somehow I don't think so.
- 3 months ago
-
krag2112
-
-
JohnA
-
krag2112:
At least she wouldn't have been too bus jetting around the world to bow down to foreign leaders and throwing dinner parties to make a life or death decision for our troops in harm's way.
- 3 months ago
-
JohnA
-
-
krag2112
-
krag2112:
Uh-huh. So Bill and Hilary never had a state dinner or took a trip or went on vacation while American troops were in Bosnia or Somalia? Come on John...get a grip.
- 3 months ago
-
krag2112
-
-
Chique
-
krag2112:
John, your arguments are non sequitur, false attributions. Obama bowed because he was respecting another country's customs and it was appropriate. He was in someone else's home! And these dinners he's attending - - let's use the most recent for an example - do you get the connection with Pakistan and India and the correlation to our troops? I can only assume that after 8 years, your logic just got rusty from lack of use.
- 3 months ago
-
Chique
-
-
peterzylstramoore
-
csmonut,
I recognize that you are a minority opinion (on this site and judging by polls across the states) and therefore are brave in posting your opinion.
I think we do need to talk about some of the good things that are happening in afganistan.
However, we need also to recognize how far we have to go and whether it's possible to accomplish it's almost unstated goals in afganistan.
We need to recognize that the elections were fraudulent and so we don't have democracy. We need to recognize that the Taliban didn't appear out of knowhere but were created by us in getting the Soviet's out. We need to be sensitive to the way we are arming war lords to keep some sort of peace, and to ask ourselves what kind of new Taliban are we creating that we can liberate Afghan's from tomorrow. We need to ask ourselves how bombing campaigns are affecting moderates, and about the subsequent rise in terrorism. We also need to recognize if their is no economy, and therefor no government budget how we can ever leave without the government being overrun by the war lords involved in the drug trade (or Karzai's brother who was on the CIA's payroll). We have created an inevitable war unless poppies can somehow become less profitable then other forms of business .
We also need to ask ourselves if our intentions historically have been benevelent and if they haven't been what reasons have we fought wars. Karzai's was involved in an oil pipleline project supported by the US prior to being elected. The US wants to reduce it's dependence on Russian pipelines.
I recognize that leaving is an ugly decision, but I think we have created a situation where there is no right answers, and the longer we are there the more enemies we are making.
- 3 months ago
-
peterzylstramoore
-
-
csmonut
-
peterzylstramoore:
I will grant that the US involvement in Afghanistan gave rise to the Taliban. Our historical involvement in Afghanistan has not been pretty. And yes, there is a lot of corruption within the government. And yes, there are many things that need to be carefully scrutinized. And there appears to be no other economy than poppies.
However, to only focus on what is wrong, gives no solutions to how it can be righted.The US needs to make sure it does not repeat it's history in Afghanistan, and I can only hope that someone in Washington has read the "book".
I do not know how long it will/would take to help stabilize the country. I do know it can't be done in two years, but it will take several generations.
Should the US stay involved, no. At some point we need to leave the country to be run by the people. - 3 months ago
-
csmonut
-
-
krag2112
-
peterzylstramoore:
Excellent post peterzylstramoore...your last point is my greatest fear. If our goals are ultimately unachievable, then it's far better to recognize that now and withdraw as quickly as is possible to do safely. Sadly that will never happen in an electoral democracy.
- 3 months ago
-
krag2112
-
-
shoegazer
-
peterzylstramoore:
..the two of you have very good points which in general proves the "damned if you do..." kind of situation of u.s. foreign policy....but the truth of the matter is, we are are treading on extremely thin economic ice right now, and without fully taking appropriate measures to end this, we are not going to be in a position to help ourselves, let alone even a thought of helping anyone else in the future...
- 3 months ago
-
shoegazer
-
-
current89
-
Important note: An EXIT STRATEGY is included. Obama sent his advisers back to the drawing board multiple times so they could create benchmarks and a competent exit strategy. In addition, President Obama made clear to some of his advisers that the commitment is not open-ended. But of course we focus on troop #s, not the nitty gritty details. For instance, infrastructure building, humanitarian aid, a focus on protecting cities, and other tactics are included in the plan.
Alas, many will look at the tree, and not the forest.
- 3 months ago
-
current89
-
-
fun_size
-
current89:
Thank you! Its amazing that people are complaining about his coming up with a plan of action before committing troops. Personally im glad hes taking his time since that means hes learning from the mistakes of his predecessor whose lack of planning got us stuck in Iraq for 6 years and counting.
- 3 months ago
-
fun_size
-
-
current89
- This comment has been removed.
-
current89
-
-
My_America
-
PREZBHO take your time no rush troops are just dying because of your lack of experience.
- 3 months ago
-
My_America
-
-
Atalanda_Cameron
-
My_America:
troops are dying because Bush rushed them into a war built on lies. what the hell is wrong with you?
- 3 months ago
-
Atalanda_Cameron
-
-
My_America
-
My_America:
Whatever helps you sleep at night.
Happy Thanksgiving!
- 3 months ago
-
My_America
-
-
krag2112
-
My_America:
I know having a President who demands an actual plan before he sends more troops into harms way is confusing to you after 8 years of Bush's blunders. It's called leadership...you'll get used to it in time.
But Happy Thanksgiving to you too. Have a great holiday.
- 3 months ago
-
krag2112
-
-
csmonut
-
At the risk of getting torn apart here, and I am not saying I am for war in any context, but .......
Afghanistan and the people are different from Iraq.
And while I am sure there are many that would wish us gone....schools have reopened, and women and children are now attending those schools. Music is once again allowed to be played, where it had not been heard for many seasons.
Markets are once again opened.
The army is being trained...and without the fear of secular terrorist bombings that Iraq has had so much trouble with.
It is not perfect, but we are there, whether those of us here like it or not.
I don't recall Obama saying he would recall all the troops and leave the Afghani people to fend for themselves now that their fragile infrastructure was torn to bits.
As for change, the US is experiencing some of that change. Health care is now being debated. More politicians are being prosecuted for wrong doings. People on both sides of all fences are speaking out. The racism that is so prevalent in this country, but hidden within political correctness, is being revealed for just what it is. So called Christians are also showing their true colors.
Change is taking place....but maybe not as fast as people need it to, or want it to. And maybe we won't like some of those changes, but...Change is the only constant. Nothing stays the same. - 3 months ago
-
csmonut
-
-
current89
-
csmonut:
Thank you, saved me a few minutes of typing.
- 3 months ago
-
current89
-
-
skatherine
-
csmonut:
nicely put.
- 3 months ago
-
skatherine
-
-
Atalanda_Cameron
-
csmonut:
I'm glad someone said it, because honestly I dont think my post would have been as effective :). WHERE is my recommoned button?!!
- 3 months ago
-
Atalanda_Cameron
-
-
dabne
-
csmonut:
Why is it different than Iraq. Iraq is in far better shape than Afghanistan. I was in Iraq. Schools, hotels, business's are being built. The success of what we did in Iraq is largely being ignored by left wing media. I was there, I saw it. The people held free elections, and were by and large thankful for our support.
Afghanistan on the other hand is controlled by the Taliban in 75 percent of the country.
Obama waited far too long to send more troops. But thank God he finally made a decision.
- 3 months ago
-
dabne
-
-
krag2112
-
csmonut:
Yeah. What was Obama thinking, demanding an actual plan from the military before he committed any more troops. What an asshole.
- 3 months ago
-
krag2112
-
-
csmonut
-
csmonut:
dabne,
Yes, we have done a lot for Iraq, since we tore down their infrastructure. But Iraq is still experiencing a lot of secular violence. So many different agendas, and too many people willing to turn to violence to further their agenda.
Afghanistan is different in the fact that the people are pretty much on the same page, and that is a huge difference. - 2 months ago
-
csmonut
-
-
cmgrigg
-
you don't go into a country and then just leave the people that stood up to assist you holding the bag unless your name is G Bush the first. Afghanistan is un-winnable for our Hollywood and Aircraft carrier sensibilities. said, a push in manpower and assistance for a 2 year period is honorable. The focus should be on assistance.
- 3 months ago
-
cmgrigg
-
-
JanforGore
-
Oh yes, he did win the Nobel PEACE prize didn't he. For what again?
- 3 months ago
-
JanforGore
-
-
JohnA
-
JanforGore:
For not being George Bush.
- 3 months ago
-
JohnA
-
-
peterzylstramoore
-
It was clear from the campaign that he supported an increased offensive in Afghanistan/Pakistan. If we seperate the language of change and hope from his centrist policy which he has always advocated, we would not be surprised about another increase in troops, while similarly not finding enough money in the budget for a second stimulus.
I know we hoped for change, but as long as we have a system that's funded by the rich and their corporate sponsors, our government will represent them and not the people. This should not be surprising. 9 out 10 persons elected in the states are the top fundraisers in their campaign. If we want a representative government we need full public financing of not only presidential campaigns, but campaigns for every government office. Elections are currently paid for by the rich, but if we tax it out of them rather then have them lobby with it, we may move towards a system of government that might someday be recognizably representative.
- 3 months ago
-
peterzylstramoore
-
-
thewarnerla
-
Obama is a _____________, (since current censors my comments now--I'll let you fill in the blank. But I will remember that next time I win a Nobel Peace Prize, the smartest thing to do is to double the number of troops that I sent before I won the Nobel Peace Prize.
Hopefully the "Thought Police" won't be chasing me after that comment.
- 3 months ago
-
thewarnerla
-
-
thewarnerla
-
looks like a pic from a video game like "Call of Duty" or "Modern Warfare."
- 3 months ago
-
thewarnerla
-
-
indecisiveh
-
How depressing. So much for change. I voted for that guy.
- 3 months ago
-
indecisiveh
-
-
shoegazer
-
.. damn!...just another corporate puppet. what was i thinking. i guess all that talk about "change" got the best of me. now i just feel used.
- 3 months ago
-
shoegazer
-
-
indecisiveh
-
shoegazer:
I know right?
- 3 months ago
-
indecisiveh
-
-
bushama
-
shoegazer:
dont feel bad man, i thought things were going to change also, but its good to see not everyone is blinded like the bush supporters
- 3 months ago
-
bushama
-
-
isnamthere
-
He's so full of shit ! Obama's rhetoric is no different than Bush's. He's more eloquent, but he's saying the same damn things. Why do these MF'ers even bother to tell us what they're doing anymore, they just do whatever the hell they please without regard to what the populace wants or feels.
- 3 months ago
-
isnamthere
-
-
artemis6
-
Win ? War is THE no win situation . This will bankrupt us , just like it did russia .
- 3 months ago
-
artemis6
-
-
JanforGore
-
WIN? Are they delusional? And win what? Just another Bush. EIGHT YEARS they had to "win" and all they have done is kill innocent civilians, inflame them to hate us more, and of course instituted their corproate agenda which is the REAL reason why they aren't pulling out. What a betrayal.
- 3 months ago
-
JanforGore
-
-
shoegazer
-
JanforGore:
...word. obama has proven himself to be the smooth talking half minority extension of bush. another corporate patsy...what was i thinking when i voted for him?
- 3 months ago
-
shoegazer
-
-
Cynic2
-
JanforGore:
That's why I said it'll never be won.
- 3 months ago
-
Cynic2
-
-
Cynic2
-
Afghanistan will never be won. But I suppose the Afghan Navy has its fleet coming to Boston Harbor or San Francisco Bay. Yep, we gotta fight 'em over there or over here, right? Riiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiggggghhhhhhhhhht!!! And WHO armed the Taliban to fight Russia?
- 3 months ago
-
Cynic2
-
-
darinK
-
Obama can't please the left or right. He just made a lot of promises he never intended on keeping, but wow doesn't he speak well!! I get jitters and this little tingle up the back of my leg everytime I hear him(lol). The annointed one better enjoy his 3 more yrs as pres. I just hope the democrats try to re-elect him. Nobody would show his senate record before the election but most now know he has no core principles to speak of other than to say whatever it takes to get power.
- 3 months ago
-
darinK
-
-
bushama
-
how does it feel to murder innocent women and children, democrats?
- 3 months ago
-
bushama
-
-
lvk104
-
I voted for Obama, and I thoroughly oppose the wars, but I do have several friends in the military who've been to Iraq and Afghanistan and say that the only way to safely and responsibly leave is to have more troops.
- 3 months ago
-
lvk104
-
-
xiola
-
I must say: This is surprising. From past speeches, I didn't think he'd go in this direction. I suppose we'll see...
- 3 months ago
-
xiola
-
-
kennymotown
-
So it seems as if the bogus war in Afghanistan gets paid and we get nothing in healthcare. Our priority's are so screwed up and it's obvious too me we are no longer in charge.
- 3 months ago
-
kennymotown
-
-
courage
-
we elected a comunity organizer as president because he was pretty
- 3 months ago
-
courage
