Welcome to Current TV
Woman Calls Off Wedding, Refuses to Return $17,500 Ring
Here is some info from the website:
Colette: So me and Chris [Reinhold] met in the summer of 2007. We broke up in September of last year. Before I received the ring, we had a contract -- an oral contract. Chris said, "You're going to save for the wedding hall, you're going to pay all the bills, pay the rent, pay for all household utilities and food ... and I'm going to pay for this wedding ring. I really want to get you, like, the best wedding ring that I can possibly get you."
She continues explaining:
So we broke up in September, and I said, "Listen I'm going to hold the ring as collateral until you pay me back what you owe me. I said, "I understand that it was a conditional thing that was based upon the condition to get married. And we're not getting married. So I will give it back because it doesn't have any meaning to me." Because all the meaning a ring should have, this has no meaning. So he said, "That's fine, that's fine." And then he never really kept his end of the bargain.
So do you guys think? Does anyone believe her story? I kinda feel her. Next time someone ask you to pay everything please make sure you document all the payments. That is my advice.
Please the whole story to understand what she means.
from the community