News and Politics | February 06, 2008 | 5 comments

John Edwards Got Votes On Super Tuesday

source: http://www.cnn.com/ELECTION/2008/primaries/results/candidates/#1803

Image
JanforGore
And considering he had announced that his campaign was "suspended" and he was not campaigning or advertising, I think he did pretty good. He even managed to get 10% in Oklahoma. Of course, many will not know this because the big story is Clinton/Obama just like the media wanted it. However, I was one of those Nj votes and it felt good to vote my conscience and for someone instead of against someone else. Just imagine what John Edwards could have done had he been able to gain the momentum that I believe was begininng, which was why he was pushed out. Can't have anyone dimming the spotlight on the chosen ones.
  1. groups:
    News and Politics,   Politics,   Election 2008,   Election 2008: Super Tuesday
  2. tags:
    News and Politics,  Politics,  Barack Obama,  Election 2008,  7 more
  3.     
    |

5 comments // John Edwards Got Votes On Super Tuesday

  • bjlawrence11
  • CyberCitizen
  • Mafioso
    • 0
      Mafioso  

    • I have no doubt in the next year we will be asking why we didn't elect the candidate that would have made real change. My only hope is that Edwards will be the Vice Presidential nominee for Clinton or Obama. And if the vice president serves as much a role as the current asshole in the current administration, we might be okay after all.

    • 4 years ago
  • JanforGore
    • 0
      JanforGore  

    • And did any of these votes even get covered by the MSM? No, because it would have shown them for the accomplices they are. However, I thought I was seeing things when watching MSNBC last night. I could have sworn they put up Utah on the bottom of the screen and it said 39% for Edwards with only about 1 percent of precincts counted, then it disappeared. I looked over and over again and Utah was not shown after that. Someone else I know saw it too so I know it wasn't just me. It really got me thinking what else this media is hiding and if the results we got were really accurate, because I think John Edwards has a hell of a lot more support out here than the media led people on to believe. http://www.johnedwards.com/whereisjohn/

    • 4 years ago
  • tainerz
    • 0
      tainerz  

    • And that’s just it! I believe that John Edwards did have momentum, but the media has once again done the American people a disservice by participating in the political game instead of focusing on their role as a neutral messenger! The media countered his momentum with their lack of coverage, intended or not could be debated, but pure and simple he had Sh*t for coverage.

      How many picture and clips were we shown nationally, in news segments, newspapers, and other ads that cropped John Edwards out of the coverage, when we KNOW he was sitting at the table during the debate? We know he was there and yet there is little to no coverage except the occasional shot of him in the background or in a pic of the three!

    • 4 years ago
more from News and Politics:
from the community

top videos